Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Refinement and Psychometric Properties of the Eight-Item Brazilian Positive and Negative Affective Schedule for Children (PANAS-C8)

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Happiness Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to refine the Brazilian Positive and Negative Affect Scale for Children (PANAS-C34). A total of 1,160 children, between seven and 16 years of age (M = 11.2; SD = 1.92), from public elementary schools in eight Brazilian southern cities participated in the study. Four studies were conducted for this project. Study I (n = 370) evaluated the factorial structure of the PANAS-C34 (the original 34-item version). Ten potential items were selected for the instrument’s refined version. Employing an independent sample (n = 340), Study II assessed the utility of this ten-item version. Exploratory factor analysis, parallel analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis supported a bi-factorial solution. However, significant modification indices emerged for two items (happy and sad) regarding their respective factors and thus they were excluded. In Study III, using another independent sample (n = 450), it was demonstrated that the eight-item version (PANAS-C8) had better fit indices than the ten-item version. In Study IV (N = 1,160) a multigroup confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to evaluate the measurement invariance of the factorial solution across gender. Moreover, convergent validity was also evaluated using the Child Depression Inventory (CDI) and the General Life Satisfaction Scale for Children (GLSS-C). Measurement invariance was obtained for the PANAS-C8 across all the investigated model parameters. The correlations between the PANAS-C8 and both the CDI and the GLSS-C were of similar magnitude to those obtained using the PANAS-C34. The PANAS-C8 had adequate validity indices, demonstrating its usefulness in evaluating positive and negative affect in children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baumann, N., & Kuhl, J. (2005). Positive affect and flexibility: Overcoming the precedence of global over local processing of visual information. Motivation and Emotion, 29(2), 123–134. doi:10.1007/s11031-005-7957-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. (2010). Structural equation modeling with Amos: Basic concepts, applications and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, J. R., & Henry, J. D. (2004). The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): Construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 245–265. doi:10.1348/0144665031752934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, P. R. E. (1997). A confirmatory factor analysis of the Positive Affect Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) with a youth sport sample. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 19, 91–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(1), 297–334. doi:10.1007/BF02310555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Sandvik, E., & Pavot, W. (2009). Happiness is the frequency, not the intensity, of positive versus negative affect. Social Indicators Research, 39(1), 213–231. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4_10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebesutani, C., Okamura, K., Higa-McMillan, C., & Chorpita, B. F. (2011). A psychometric analysis of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule for Children-Parent Version in a school sample. Psychological Assessment, 23(2), 406–416. doi:10.1037/a0022057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekkekakis, P., & Petruzzello, S. J. (2000). Analysis of the affect measurement conundrum in exercise psychology: I. Fundamental issues. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 1(1), 71–88. doi:10.1016/S1469-0292(00)00010-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7(1), 286–299. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folkman, S., & Moskowitz, J. T. (2000). Positive affect and the other side of coping. American Psychologist, 55(6), 647–654. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.6.647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L., & Branigan, C. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought–action repertoires. Cognition and Emotion, 19(3), 313–332. doi:10.1080/02699930441000238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giacomoni, C. H., & Hutz, C. S. (2006). Escala de Afeto Positivo e Negativo para crianças: Estudo de construção e validação (Positive and Negative Affect Scale for Children: Construction and validation study). Revista Semestral da Associação Brasileira de Psicologia Escolar e Educacional (ABRAPEE), 10(2), 235–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swan, W. B., Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(1), 504–528. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7(2), 191–207. doi:10.1177/1094428104263675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for estimating the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(1), 179–185. doi:10.1007/BF02289447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M. (2005). A role for neuropsychology in understanding the facilitating influence of positive affect on social behavior and cognitive processes. In C. R. Snyder & S. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 528–540). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 141–151. doi:10.1177/001316446002000116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kammann, R., & Flett, R. (1983). Affectometer 2: A scale to measure current level of general happiness. Australian Psychologist, 35(1), 259–265. doi:10.1080/00049538308255070.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovacs, M. (1983). The Children’s Depression Inventory: A self-rated depression scale for school age youngsters. Pittsburg, PA: School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovacs, M. (2003). Children’s Depression Inventory (CDI): Technical manual update. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (2001). Relational meaning and discrete emotions. In K. R. Scherer, A. Schorr, & T. Johnstone (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research (pp. 37–67). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leue, A., & Beauducel, A. (2011). The PANAS structure revisited: On the validity of a bifactor model in community and forensic samples. Psychological Assessment, 23(1), 215–225. doi:10.1037/a0021400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonigan, C. J., Philips, B. M., & Hooe, E. S. (2003). Relations of positive and negative affectivity to anxiety and depression in children: Evidence from a latent variable longitudinal study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(3), 465–481. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.71.3.465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46(1), 137–155. doi:10.1023/A:1006824100041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackinnon, A., Jorm, A. F., Christensen, H., Korten, A. E., Jacomb, P. A., & Rodgers, B. (1999). A short form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule: Evaluation of factorial validity and invariance across demographic variables in a community sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 27(1), 405–416. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00251-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masters, J. C., Barden, C., & Ford, M. E. (1979). Affective states, expressive behavior, and learning in children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(3), 380–390. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.3.380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. A. (2000). A meta-analysis of variance accounted for and factor loadings in exploratory factor analysis. Marketing Letters, 11(3), 261–275. doi:10.1023/A:1008191211004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reise, S. P., Waller, N. G., & Comrey, A. L. (2000). Factor analysis and scale revision. Psychological Assessment, 12(3), 287–297. doi:10.1037//1040-3590.12.3.287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins, R. W., Trzesniewski, K. H., Tracy, J. L., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2002). Global self-esteem across the lifespan. Psychology and Aging, 17(3), 423–434. doi:10.1037//0882-7974.17.3.423423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenhan, D. L., Underwood, B., & Moore, B. (1974). Affect moderates self-gratification and altruism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(1), 546–552. doi:10.1037/h0037038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference Chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66(4), 507–514. doi:10.1007/BF02296192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, J. B., Stage, F. K., King, J., Nora, A., & Barlow, E. A. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 324–337. doi:10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligson, J. L., Huebner, E. S., & Valois, R. F. (2002). Preliminary validation of the brief multidimensional student’s life satisfaction scale (BMSLSS). Social Indicators Research, 61(2), 121–145. doi:10.1023/A:1021326822957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. T., & McCarthy, D. M. (1995). Methodological considerations in the refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7(1), 300–308. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D., Edwards, C. D., Lushene, R. E., Montuori, J., & Platzek, D. (1973). Preliminary manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strayer, J. (1980). A naturalistic study of empathic behaviors and their relation to affective states and perspective-taking skills in preschool children. Child Development, 51(1), 815–822. doi:10.2307/1129469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. R. (2007). Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(2), 227–242. doi:10.1177/0022022106297301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuccitto, D. E., Giacobbi, P. R., Jr., & Leite, W. L. (2010). The internal structure of positive and negative affect: A confirmatory factor analysis of the PANAS. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(1), 125–141. doi:10.1177/0013164409344522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tugade, M. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 320–333. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullman, J. B., & Bentler, P. M. (2003). Structural equation modeling. In J. A. Schinka & W. F. Velicer (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Research methods in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 607–634). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Linden, D., Nijenhuisb, J., & Bakkera, A. B. (2010). The general factor of personality: A meta-analysis of Big Five intercorrelations and a criterion-related validity study. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(3), 315–327. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2010.03.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(4), 1–68. doi:10.1177/109442810031002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veronese, G., Castiglioni, M., Barola, G., & Said, M. (2012). Living in the shadow of occupation: Life satisfaction and positive emotion as protective factors in a group of Palestinian school children. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(1), 225–233. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.10.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villodas, F., Villodas, M. T., & Roesch, S. (2011). Examining the factor structure of the positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS) in a multiethnic sample of adolescents. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 44(4), 193–203. doi:10.1177/0748175611414721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., & Clark, A. L. (1994). The PANAS-X. Manual for the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Expanded Form. Iowa City: University of Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1), 1063–1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98(1), 219–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wills, T. A., Sandy, J. M., Shinar, O., & Yaeger, A. (1999). Contributions of positive and negative affect to adolescent substance use: Test of a bidimensional model in a longitudinal study. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 13(4), 327–338. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.13.4.327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zevon, M. A., & Tellegen, A. (1982). The structure of mood change: An idiographic/nomothetic analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(1), 111–122. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.43.1.111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Ramiros Barcelos Street, 2600/104, Porto Alegre, RS, 90035-003, Brazil

    Bruno Figueiredo Damásio, Juliana Cerentini Pacico & Sílvia Helena Koller

  2. Brazilian Institute of Business Management, IBGEN, Barão do Amazonas Street, 46, Porto Alegre, RS, 90670-000, Brazil

    Michele Poletto

Authors
  1. Bruno Figueiredo Damásio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Juliana Cerentini Pacico
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michele Poletto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sílvia Helena Koller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno Figueiredo Damásio.

Additional information

All authors have agreed to authorship in the indicated order.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Damásio, B.F., Pacico, J.C., Poletto, M. et al. Refinement and Psychometric Properties of the Eight-Item Brazilian Positive and Negative Affective Schedule for Children (PANAS-C8). J Happiness Stud 14, 1363–1378 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9383-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9383-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation