Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Subjective Wellbeing and Homeostatically Protected Mood: Theory Validation With Adolescents

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Happiness Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Researchers generally agree that Subjective Wellbeing (SWB) comprises both cognitive and affective components. However, the proportioning of their contributions, and the relationship between these constructs and personality, remain equivocal. This study investigated the relationship between these constructs, representing affect by Homeostatically Protected Mood (HPMood). Using a sample of 205 Victorian high-school students aged between 13 and 20 years, structural equation modeling determined that an HPMood-driven model of SWB was better fitting than either a personality-driven model of SWB or a cognition-driven model of SWB, explaining 80% of variance. These results support HPMood as the major component of SWB. They also reinforce the proposition that HPMood may be the driving force behind individual SWB set-points and the variable that SWB homeostasis seeks to defend.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AMOS 7.0. (2006). Smallwaters Corp: Chicago, Il.

  • Blore, J.D., Stokes, M.A., Mellor, D., Firth, L., & Cummins, R.A. (2010). Comparing multiple discrepancies theory and affective models of subjective wellbeing. Social Indicators Research. doi: 10.1007/s11205-010-9599-2.

  • Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (1995). On the trail of the gold standard for subjective wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 35, 179–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (2010). Subjective wellbeing, homeostatically protected mood and depression: A synthesis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A., Collard, J., Woerner, J., Weinberg, M., Lorbergs, M., & Charini, P. (2010). Australian unity wellbeing index, survey 22: The wellbeing of Australians—who makes the decisions, health/wealth control, financial advice, and handedness. Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Deakin University. Retrieved May 12, 2010, from http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/auwbi/survey-reports/survey-022-report-part-a.pdf.

  • Cummins, R.A., Lau, A.D.L. (2005). Personal Wellbeing Index—School Children (PWI-SC) (3rd ed.). Melbourne: Deakin University. Retrieved January 17, 2010, from http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/instruments/wellbeing_index.htm.

  • Cummins, R. A., & Nistico, H. (2002). Maintaining life satisfaction: The role of positive bias. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 37–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davern, M., Cummins, R. A., & Stokes, M. (2007). Subjective wellbeing as an affective—cognitive construct. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8, 429–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective wellbeing. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 197–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Diener, M. (1996). Most people are happy. Psychological Science, 7(3), 181–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective wellbeing: three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmons, R. A., & Diener, E. (1985). Personality correlates of subjective wellbeing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11(1), 89–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Headey, B., & Wearing, A. (1989). Personality, life events, and subjective wellbeing: toward a dynamic equilibrium model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 731–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Headey, B., & Wearing, A. (1992). Understanding happiness: A theory of subjective wellbeing. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Wellbeing Group. (2006). Personal Wellbeing Index—Adult (PWI-A). Retrieved January 12, 2010, from http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/instruments/wellbeing_index.htm.

  • Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loehlin, J. C. (1987, 1992). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Michalos, A. C. (1985). Multiple discrepancies theory (MDT). Social Indicators Research, 16, 347–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pallant, J. (2001). SPSS Survival Manual. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C. (2000). The future of optimism. American Psychologist, 55(1), 44–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 1, 145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. A. (2009). Emotion, core affect, and psychological construction. Cognition & Emotion, 23(7), 1259–1283.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPSS for Windows: Release 17.0. (2008). Chicago: SPSS Inc.

  • Steel, P., & Ones, D. S. (2002). Personality and Happiness: A national level analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(3), 767–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S. C., Thomas, C., Rickabaraugh, C. A., Tantamjarik, P., Otsuki, T., Pan, D., et al. (1998). Primary and secondary control over age-related changes in physical appearance. Journal of Personality, 66(4), 583–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomyn, A. J., & Cummins, R. A. (2010). The Subjective Wellbeing of High-school Students: Validating the Personal Wellbeing Index – School Children. Social Indicators Research. doi:10.1007/s11205-010-9668-6.

  • Veenhoven, R. (1994). Is happiness a trait’? Test of the theory that a better society does not make people any happier. Social Indicators Research, 32, 101–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitterso, J. (2001). Personality traits and subjective wellbeing: Emotional stability, not extraversion, is probably the important predictor. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(6), 903–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitterso, J., & Nilsen, F. (2002). The conceptual and relational structure of subjective wellbeing, neuroticism, and extraversion: once again, neuroticism is the important predictor of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 57, 89–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Health Sciences, Discipline of Psychology, RMIT University, PO Box 71, Bundoora, VIC, Australia

    Adrian J. Tomyn

  2. School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia

    Robert A. Cummins

Authors
  1. Adrian J. Tomyn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert A. Cummins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrian J. Tomyn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tomyn, A.J., Cummins, R.A. Subjective Wellbeing and Homeostatically Protected Mood: Theory Validation With Adolescents. J Happiness Stud 12, 897–914 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-010-9235-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-010-9235-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation