Skip to main content
Log in

Social implications of housing diversification in urban renewal: A review of recent literature

  • Published:
Journal of Housing and the Built Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

British and Dutch urban policies have advocated housing diversification and social mix in neighbourhoods subject to urban renewal. Question marks have been placed against the evidence base for the assumed social effects of diversification. This paper provides a review of research into the actual consequences of diversification in Great Britain and the Netherlands. After a brief policy discussion, the paper identifies five issues for which evidence is reviewed: housing quality and area reputation, neighbourhood-based social interactions, residential attitudes towards social mix, the role-model effect, and problem dilution. The review shows ambivalent results that necessitate modest expectations, especially with regard to area reputation, cross-tenure social interaction and residential attitudes. This ambivalence is partly due to unclear policy goals and policy terms as well as vagueness about the relevant spatial level. Moreover, the influence of tenure mix is often superseded by other, more important factors in residential satisfaction, such as lifestyle. The paper also argues that positive role-model effects in neighbourhoods have not yet been adequately studied and therefore remain based on conviction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson, R. and Kintrea, K. (1998) Reconnecting Excluded Communities. Neighbourhood Impacts of Owner Occupation, Scottish Homes, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, R. and Kintrea, K. (2000) Owner-occupation, Social Mix and Neighbourhood impacts, Policy and Politics, 28(1), 93–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, R. and Kintrea, K. (2001) Disentangling Area Effects: Evidence from Deprived and Non-deprived Neighbourhoods, Urban Studies, 38(12), 2277–2298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balkenende Administration (2003) Regeerakkoord: meedoen, meer werk, minder regels (Coalition Agreement: Participation, More Jobs, Fewer Rules). Available at: www.regering.nl.

  • Beckhoven, E. van and Kempen, R. van (2003) Social Effects of Urban Restructuring: A Case Study in Amsterdam and Utrecht, The Netherlands, Housing Studies, 18(6), 853–875.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beekman, T., Lyons, F. and Scott, J. (2001) Improving the Understanding of the Influence of Owner Occupiers in Mixed Tenure Neighbourhoods, Report 89, ODS Limited for Scottish Homes, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blokland, T. (2001) —Middenklassers als middel: het Grotestedenbeleid en de betekenis van midden-en hogere inkomensgroepen voor grootstedelijk sociaal kapitaal (Middle-class People as Means), Beleid en Maatschappij, 28(1), 42–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blokland-Potters, T. (1998) —Wat stadsbewoners bindt. Sociale relaties in een achterstandswijk (Social Relations in a Deprived Neighbourhood), Kok Agora, Kampen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boelhouwer, P. and Van der Heijden, H. (1992) Housing Systems in Europe: A Comparative Study of Housing Policy, Housing and Urban Policy Studies, Part 1, Delft University Press, Delft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolt, G.S., Kempen, R. Van and Burgers, J. (1998) On the Social Significance of Spatial Location; Spatial Segregation and Social Exclusion, Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 13, 83–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramley, G. and Morgan, J. (1998) Low Cost Home Ownership Initiatives in the UK, Housing Studies, 13(4), 567–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramley, G. and Morgan, J. (2003) Building Competitiveness and Cohesion: The Role of New Housebuilding in Central Scotland's Cities, Housing Studies 18(4), 447–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridge, G. (2002) The Neighbourhood and Social Networks (Centre for Neighbourhood Research Paper 4, http://www.neighbourhoodcentre.org.uk).

  • Brophy, P.C. and Smith, R.N. (1997) Mixed-Income Housing: Factors for Success, Cityscape, 3(2), 3–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • B & A Group (2001a) —De effecten van de verkoop van sociale huurwoningen. Een onderzoek onder kopers in Emmen en de Achterhoek (The Effects of the Sale of Social Rented Dwellings. An Evaluation Among Buyers in Emmen and the Achterhoek), B & A Groep, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • B & A Group (2001b) —De effecten van de verkoop van sociale huurwoningen. Een onderzoek onder kopers in Rotterdam (The Effects of the Sale of Social Rented Dwellings. An Evaluation Among Buyers in Rotterdam), B & A Groep, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Rotterdam (2003) Rotterdam zet door. Op weg naar een stad in balans (Rotterdam Perseveres. Towards a City in Balance), Rotterdam.

  • City of The Hague (1998) —Volkshuisvestingsverslag Den Haag 1998. Over de betekenis van nieuwbouw voor de bestaande stad (Housing Report The Hague 1998. On the Meaning of New Construction for the Existing City), Department of Urban Development, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, I., Gidley, G., Ritchie, C., Simpson, D. and Wishart, B. (1997) Creating Communities of Welfare Housing? A Study of Housing Association Developments in Yorkshire/Humberside, Chartered Institute of Housing, Coventry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, I. and Shayer, S. (1998) Beyond Housing Investment: Regeneration, Sustainability and the Role of Housing Associations, Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research, Sheffield Hallam University.

  • Companen (2002) Onderzoek herstructurering Textielbuurt; waardering bewoners (Research into the Restructuring Project of the Textile Estate. Evaluation of Residents' Opinions), Companen, Arnhem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council for Societal Development (1997) —Stedelijke Vernieuwing. Advies nr. 2 (Urban Renewal. Advisory Report No. 2), Council for Societal Development, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of the Environment (1991) New Life for Local Authority Estates: Guidance for LAs on Estate Action and Housing Action Trusts and Links with Related Programmes, Department of the Environment, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of the Environment (1995) Our Future Houses, Opportunities, Choices, Responsibilities. The Governments's Housing Policies For England and Wales, The Stationery Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions (1999) Towards an Urban Renaissance. Final Report of the Urban Task Force chaired by Lord Rogers of Riverside, The Stationery Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions (2000a) Regeneration that Lasts, The Stationery Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions (2000b) Quality and Choice: A Decent Home for All: The Housing Green Paper, The Stationery Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekstro¨ m, M. (1994) Elderly People's Experiences of Housing Renewal and Forced Relocation: Social Theories and Contextual Analysis in Explanations of Emotional Experiences, Housing Studies, 9, 369–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union (2002) Housing Statistics in the European Union 2002. Available at: http://mrw.wallonie.be/dgatlp/HousingStats (accessed on October 30th, 2003).

  • Flint, J. and Rowlands, R. (2003) Commodification, Normalisation and Intervention: Cultural, Social and Symbolic Capital in Housing Consumption and Governance, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 18, 213–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, R. and Kearns, A. (1999) Joined-up Places? Social Cohesion and Neighbourhood Regeneration, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, R. and Kearns, A. (2001) Social Cohesion, Social Capital and the Neighbourhood, Urban Studies, 38, 2125–2143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichs, J. and Blasius, J. (2003) Social Norms in Distressed Neighbourhoods: Testing the Wilson Hypothesis, Housing Studies, 18(6), 807–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans, H.J. (1961) The Balanced Community. Homogeneity or Heterogeneity in Residential Areas? Journal of The American Institute of Planners, 27(3), 176–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, B. and Cole, I. (2001) Social Balance and Mixed Neighbourhoods in Britain Since 1979: a Review of Discourse and Practice in Social Housing, Environment and Planning D, 19(1), 103–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, R., Middleton, A., Murie, A. and Broughton, K. (2003) Neighbourhoods That Work: A Study of the Bournville Estate, Birmingham, The Policy Press, Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helleman, G. and Wassenberg, F. (2004), The Renewal of What Was Tomorrow's Idealistic City. Amsterdam's Bijlmermeer High-rise, Cities, 21, 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiscock, R., Kearns, A., Macintyre, S. and Ellaway, A. (2001) Ontological Security and Psycho-Social Benefits from the Home: Qualitative Evidence on Issues of Tenure, Housing, Theory and Society, 18(1), 50–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiscock, R. (2002) Mixing Tenures: Is it Good for Social Well Being? Paper presented at the ENHR Conference, Vienna, 1–5 July 2002.

  • Hja¨ rne, L. (1994) Experiences from Mixed Housing in Sweden, Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 11, 253–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office (2001) Community Cohesion: A Report of the Independent Review Team Chaired by Ted Cantle, Home Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jupp, B. (1999) Living Together. Community Life on Mixed Tenure Estates, Demos, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearns, A. (2004) Social Capital, Regeneration and Urban Policy. CNR Paper 15, Centre for Neighbourhood Research, Glasgow/Bristol. Available at www. neighbourhoodcentre.org.uk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempen, R. van and Priemus, H. (1999) Undivided Cities in the Netherlands: Present Situation and Political Rhetoric, Housing Studies, 14(5), 641–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempen, R. van and Priemus, H. (2002) Revolution in Social Housing in the Netherlands: Possible Effects of New Housing Policies, Urban Studies, 39(2), 237–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennet, P. and Forrest, R. (2003) From Planned Communities to Deregulated Spaces: Social and Tenurial Change in High Quality State Housing, Housing Studies, 18(4), 73–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesteloot, C. (1998) —Over de beperkingen van sociale mix als beleidsstrategie (On the Limitations of Social Mix as a Policy Stategy), Planologisch Nieuws, 3, 144–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinhans, R.J. (2003) Displaced but still Moving Upwards in the Housing Career? Implications of Forced Residential Relocation in The Netherlands, Housing Studies, 18(4), 473–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinhans, R.J., Veldboer, L. and Duyvendak, J.W. (2000) —Integratie door differentiatie? Een onderzoek naar de sociale effecten van gemengd bouwen (Integration through Redifferentiation? A Study of Social Effects of Diversified Construction), Ministry of Housing, Planning and Environment, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox, M., Alcock, D., Roderick, A. and Iles, J. (2002) Approaches to Community Governance: Models for Mixed Tenure Communities, The Policy Press, Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruythoff, H.M. (2003) Dutch Urban Restructuring Policy in Action Against Socio-Spatial Segregation: Sense or Nonsense? European Journal of Housing Policy, 3(2), 193–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loopmans, M. (2000) —Het bedrog van de buurt. Residentie¨ le sociale mix in de strijd tegen sociale uitsluiting (The Deceit of the Neighbourhood. Residential Social Mix as a Tool against Social Exclusion), Agora, 16(3), 26–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malpass, P. and Murie, A. (1999) Housing Policy and Practice, Macmillan, Basingstoke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, G. and Watkinson, J. (2003) Rebalancing Communities: Introducing Mixed Incomes into Existing Rented Housing Estates, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York.

    Google Scholar 

  • MVROM (1997) Nota Stedelijke Vernieuwing (Policy Memorandum Urban Renewal), Ministry of Housing, Planning and Environment, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • MVROM (2000) Mensen wensen wonen: wonen in de 21ste eeuw (What People Want, Where People Live), Ministry of Housing, Planning and Environment, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • MVROM (2003) Cijfers over wonen 2003 (Statistics about Housing 2003), Ministry of Housing, Planning and Environment, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musterd, S., Ostendorf, W. and De Vos, S. (2003) Neighbourhood Effects and Social Mobility: A Longtitudinal Analysis, Housing Studies, 18(6), 877–892.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noordanus, P. (1999) —Bouwen en de buurt: over de ideologie van de stedelijke vernieuwing (To Build and the Neighbourhood: on the Ideology of Urban Renewal), Socialisme en Democratie, 56, 443–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostendorf, W., Musterd, S. and De Vos, S. (2001) Social Mix and the Neighbourhood Effect. Policy Ambitions and Empirical Evidence, Housing Studies, 16(3), 371–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, D. and Boughton, R. (1997) Mixed Tenure Housing Estates: A Study Undertaken for Notting Hill, Notting Hill Housing Association, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, M. (1998) Combating Social Exclusion: Lessons from Area-based Programmes in Europe, The Policy Press, Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawson, H., Karryn, K. and MacIntosh, S. (2000) Assessing the Impact of Tenure Diversification: The Case of Niddrie, Edinburgh, Scottish Homes, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priemus, H. (2003) Dutch Housing Associations: Current Developments and Debates, Housing Studies, 18(3), 327–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohe, W. and Basolo, V. (1997) Long Term Effects of Home Ownership on the Self Perceptions and Social Interaction of Low-income Persons, Environment and Behaviour 29(6), 793–819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, J.E., Stroh, L.K. and Flynn, C.A (1998) Lake Parc Place: A Study of Mixed-Income Housing, Housing Policy Debate, 9(4), 703–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkissian, W. (1976) The Idea of Social Mix in Town Planning: An Historical Review, Urban Studies, 13, 231–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skifter Andersen, H. (2002) Can Deprived Housing Areas be Revitalised? Efforts against Segregation and Neighbourhood Decay in Denmark and Europe, Urban Studies, 39(4), 767–790.

    Google Scholar 

  • Social Exclusion Unit (1998) Bringing Britain Together: A National Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal, The Stationery Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Social Exclusion Unit (2001) A New Commitment to Neighbourhood Renewal. National Strategy Action Plan, The Stationery Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel, E. (2001) —Soziale Stabilisirung durch soziale Mischung, Forum Wohneigentum 2, April 2001, 75–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staatsblad (2000) Wet ter stimulering van de integrale stedelijke vernieuwing (Act on Urban Renewal), No. 504, 15 November, Den Haag.

  • Tunstall, R. (2002) The Promotion of Mixed Tenure: in Search of the Evidence Base. Paper presented at the Housing Studies Association Conference, York, Spring 2002.

  • Tunstall, R. (2003) 'Mixed Tenure’ Policy in the UK: Privatisation, Pluralism or Euphemism? Housing Theory and Society, 20(3), 153–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uitermark, J. (2003) 'social Mixing’ and the Management of Disadvantaged Neighbourhoods: The Dutch Policy of Urban Restructuring Revisited, Urban Studies, 40(3), 531–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. (1987) The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, M. (2003) A Balancing Act? Tenure Diversification in Australia and the UK, Urban Policy and Research, 21(1), 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kleinhans, R. Social implications of housing diversification in urban renewal: A review of recent literature. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 19, 367–390 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-004-3041-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-004-3041-5

Navigation