Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Improving HCV Risk Assessment and Testing in a Federally Qualified Health Center Setting in Baltimore, Maryland

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Community Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Approximately 4.1 million adults in the United States have past or current hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Despite efforts to test at least once for the 1945–1965 birth cohort population and others identified at risk, the completion of the annual risk assessment tool and testing of these patients has been suboptimal. The aim of this project was to reduce HCV risk assessment and testing barriers and improve both these rates by 30% within a federally qualified health center setting in Baltimore, Maryland. As part of ongoing efforts to promote HCV risk screening and testing, targeted interventions of staff education, streamlined risk screening assessment, automated electronic health record alerts, push reports, and standing orders were integrated into current screening and testing practices. This study examined the risk assessment tool use and testing rates for 1 month before and after project implementation. All patients who were seen for a primary care visit during the month preceding (n = 8911) and following (n = 8228) the intervention were evaluated. A total of 2973 risk assessments and 1831 HCV tests were completed pre-intervention compared to 3708 risk assessments and 3790 tests post-intervention, demonstrating a 35% and 125% improvement respectively. Seropositivity prevalence of 2.1% pre-intervention increased to 2.9% post-intervention. Efficiencies in workflow processes and staff education successfully impacted the HCV risk screening tool completions and testing rates for the birth cohort and non-birth cohort patients. Integrating such strategies in the primary care workflow can increase HCV detection and timely follow up for vulnerable populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2017) Surveillance for viral hepatitis—United States. Retrieved July 6, 2019, from https://www.cdc.gov/hepatitis/statistics/2017surveillance/index.htm.

  2. Ng, M. H., Chou, J. Y., Chang, T. J., et al. (2013). High prevalence but low awareness of hepatitis C virus infection among heroin users who received methadone maintenance therapy in Taiwan. Addictive Behaviors,38(4), 2089–2093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Porter, J. C., Lusk, H. M., & Katz, A. R. (2014). Prevalence of HCV infection among clients in community-based health settings in Hawaii, 2002–2010: Assessing risk factors. American Journal of Public Health,104(8), 1534–1539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. United States Preventive Task force (2013) Hepatitis C screening. Retrieved August 12 2019, from https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Document/UpdateSummaryFinal/hepatitis-c-screening.

  5. Maryland Department of Health (2019) Maryland hepatitis C strategic plan. Retrieved August 8 2019, from https://phpa.health.maryland.gov/OIDPCS/AVHPP/AVHPP%20Documents/2019MarylandHepatitisCStrategicPlan.pdf.

  6. Falade-Nwulia, O., Mehta, S. H., Lasola, J., et al. (2016). Public health clinic-based hepatitis C testing and linkage to care in Baltimore. Journal of Viral Hepatitis,23(5), 366–374.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Barocas, J. A., Brennan, M. B., Hull, S. J., Stokes, S., Fangman, J. J., & Westergaard, R. P. (2014). Barriers and facilitators of hepatitis C screening among people who inject drugs: A multi-city, mixed-methods study. Harm Reduction Journal,11, 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chak, E. W., Sarkar, S., & Bowlus, C. (2016). Improving healthcare systems to reduce healthcare disparities in viral hepatitis. Digestive Diseases and Sciences,61(10), 2776–2783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Southern, W. N., Norton, B., Steinman, M., et al. (2015). A Birth-cohort testing intervention identified hepatitis c virus infection among patients with few identified risks: A cross-sectional study. BMC Infectious Diseases,15, 553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tohme, R. A., Xing, J., Liao, Y., & Holmberg, S. D. (2013). Hepatitis C testing, infection, and linkage to care among racial and ethnic minorities in the United States, 2009–2010. American Journal of Public Health,103(1), 112–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hojat, L., Kaelber, D., & Avery, A. (2017). Population-level hepatitis C testing using a personal electronic health portal system significantly improves screening rates in baby boomers. Open Forum Infectious Diseases,4(Suppl 1), S329–S329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Titler, M. G., Everett, L. Q., & Adams, S. (2007). Implications for implementation science. Nursing Research,56(4 Suppl), S53–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ali, P. A., & Watson, R. (2018). Language barriers and their impact on provision of care to patients with limited English proficiency: Nurses' perspectives. Journal of Clinical Nursing,27(5–6), e1152–e1160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Trooskin, S. B., Poceta, J., Towey, C. M., et al. (2015). Results from a geographically focused, community-based HCV screening, linkage-to-care and patient navigation program. Journal of General Internal Medicine,30(7), 950–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Coyle, C., & Kwakwa, H. (2016). Dual-routine HCV/HIV testing: Seroprevalence and linkage to Care in four community health centers in Philadelphia. Pennsylvania. Public Health Reports,131(Suppl 1), 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sidlow, R., & Msaouel, P. (2015). Improving hepatitis C virus screening rates in primary care: A targeted intervention using the electronic health record. The Journal for Healthcare Quality,37(5), 319–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jewett, A., Garg, A., Meyer, K., et al. (2015). Hepatitis C virus testing perspectives among primary care physicians in four large primary care settings. Health Promotion Practice,16(2), 256–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was supported in part by the Gilead Foundation (Grant 11242) to Baltimore Medical System for report modifications. The content of this publication is solely the responsibility of the authors and do not represent the views of the funding agency. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Rose Layman and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RL, JT, SK: material preparation, data collection, and analysis. RL: first draft of the manuscript was written and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rose A. Layman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Layman, R.A., Turner, B.S., Harmon, J.L. et al. Improving HCV Risk Assessment and Testing in a Federally Qualified Health Center Setting in Baltimore, Maryland. J Community Health 45, 712–716 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-019-00785-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-019-00785-9

Keywords

Navigation