Skip to main content
Log in

Living near a trail is associated with increased odds of walking among patients using community clinics

  • Published:
Journal of Community Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that living near a walking or cycling trail was associated with greater odds of walking. This has been previously studied in healthy and unselected populations, but to our knowledge has not been studied in patients attending community clinics. A cross-sectional survey was completed by 1211 persons in five community clinics that serve poor populations. We performed univariate analysis and developed a multivariate logistic regression model for walking adjusting for 12 independent variables including self-rated health, frequent mental distress, lifestyle and demographic variables, and environmental characteristics of the neighborhood including perceived proximity to a walking or cycling trail. Compared to those who reported not living close to a trail, persons who reported living near a trail were more likely to meet recommended levels of walking of at least 30 minutes fives times per week (unadjusted odds ratio = 1.49, 95% confidence intervals = 1.04–2.13). In the multivariate model, male gender (unadjusted odds ratio = 1.63, 95% confidence intervals = 1.15–2.30), having three or more convenient destinations (unadjusted odds ratio = 1.78, 95% confidence intervals = 1.37–2.32), and living near a trail (unadjusted odds ratio = 1.45, 95% confidence intervals = 1.01–2.09) were positively associated with walking at statistically significant levels. The odds of walking were lower in non-Hispanic blacks (odds ratio = 0.59, 95% confidence intervals = 0.40–0.87) and current smokers (odds ratio = 0.66, 95% confidence intervals = 0.57–0.76). For patients attending community clinics, environmental strategies to encourage walking may include mixed-land-use neighborhoods and construction of trails.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Committee on Physical Activity, Health, Transportation, and Land Use. Transportation Research Board, Institute of Medicine. Does the built environment influence physical activity? TRB Special Report 282. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences, 2005

  2. McCormack G, Giles-Corti B, Lange A, Smith T, Martin K, Pikora TJ (2004) An update of the recent evidence of the relationship between objective and self-reported measures of the physical environment and physical activity behaviors. J Sci Med Sport 7(1 Suppl):81–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cunningham GO, Michael YL (2004) Concepts guiding the study of the impact of the built environment on physical activity for older adults: a review of the literature. Am J Health Promot 18:435–443

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sturm R (2005) Economics and physical activity: a research agenda. Am J Prev Med 28 (2 Suppl 2):141–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Owen N, Humpel N, Leslie E, Bauman A, Sallis JF (2004) Understanding environmental influences on walking; review and research agenda. Am J Prev Med 27:67–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Matson-Koffman DM, Brownstein JN, Neiner JA, Greaney ML (2005) A site-specific literature review of policy and environmental interventions that promote physical activity and nutrition for cardiovascular health: what works?. Am J Health Promot 19:167–193

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Physical Activity and Health. A Report of the Surgeon General. Washington DC; 1996

  8. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. Physical Activity: Fundamental to Preventing Disease. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Washington DC; 2002

  9. Wang G, Macera C, Scuder-Soucie B, Schmid T, Pratt M, Buchner D (2004) Cost effectiveness of a bicycle/pedestrian trail development in health promotion. Prev Med 38:237–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang G, Macera C, Scuder-Soucie B, Schmid T, Pratt M, Buchner D, et al. (2004) Cost analysis of the built environment: the case of bike and pedestrian trials in Lincoln, Neb. Am J Public Health 94:549–543

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Huston SL, Evenson KR, Bors P, Gizlice Z. (2003) Neighborhood environment, access to places for activity, and leisure-time activity in a diverse North Carolina population. Am J Health Promot 18:58–69

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Parks SE, Housemann RA, Brownson RC. (2003) Differential correlates of physical activity in urban and rural adults of various socioeconomic backgrounds in the United States. J Epidemiol Community Health 57:29–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. King WC, Brach JS, Belle S, Killingsworth R, Fenton M, Kriska AM (2003) The relationship between convenience of destinations and walking levels in older women. J Health Promot 18:74–82

    Google Scholar 

  14. Troped PJ, Saunders RP, Pate RR, Reininger B, Ureda JR, Thompson SJ (2001) Association between self-reported and objective physical environmental factors and use of a community rail-trail. Prev Med 32:191–200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Booth ML, Owen N, Bauman A, Clavisi O, Leslie E (2000) Social - cognitive and perceived environmental influences associated with physical activity in older Australians. Prev Med 31:15–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Brownson RC, Baker EA, Housemann RA, Brennan LK, Bacak SJ (2001) Environmental and policy determinants of physical activity in the United States. Am J Public Health 91:1995–2003

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Troped PJ, Saunders RP, Pate RR, Reininger B, Addy CL (2003) Correlates of recreational and transportation physical activity among adults in a New England community. Prev Med 37:304–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hoehner CM, Brennan Ramirez LK, Elliott MB, Handy SL, Brownson RC (2005) Perceived and objective environmental measures and physical activity among urban adults. Am J Prev Med 28 (2 Suppl 2):105–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Foster C, Hillsdon M, Thorogood M (2004) Environmental perceptions and walking in English adults. J Epidemiol Community Health 58:924–928

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Reed JA, Ainsworth BE, Wilson DK, Mixon G, Cook A (2004) Awareness and use of community walking trails. Prev Med 39:903–908

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Evenson KR, Herring AH, Huston SL (2005) Evaluation change in physical activity with the building a multi-use trail. Am J Prev Med 28(2 Suppl 2):177–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rohrer J, Pierce JR Jr, Denison A (2004) Walkability and self-rated health in primary care patients. BMC Family Practice 5:29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Burstrom B, Fredlund P (2001) Self rated health: Is it as good a predictor of subsequent mortality among adults in lower as well as in higher social classes?. J Epidemiology Community Health 55:836–840

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Finch BK, Hummer RA, Reindl M, Vega WA (2002) Validity of self-rated health among Latino(a)s. Amer J Epidemiol 155:755–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shadbolt B, Barresi J, Craft P (2002) Self-rated health as a predictor of survival among patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:2514–2519

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Meurer LN, Layde PM, Guse CE (2001) Self-rated health status: a new vital sign for primary care?. WMJ 100(7):35–39

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Shi L, Starfield B, Politzer R, Regan J (2002) Primary care, self-rated health, and reductions in social disparities in health. Health Serv Res 37:529–550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Heidrich J, Liese AD, Lowell H, Keil U (2002) Self-rated health and its relation to all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in southern Germany. Results from the MONICA Augsburg cohort study, 1984–95. Ann Epidemiol 12:338–345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Eyler AA, Brownson RC, Bacak SJ, Housemann RA (2003) The epidemiology of walking for physical activity in the United States. Med Sci Sports Exerc 35:1529–1536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Siegel PZ, Brackbill R, Health GW (1995) The epidemiology of walking for exercise: implications for promoting activity among sedentary groups. Am J Public Health 85:706–710

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Greenberg MR, Renne J (2005) Where does walkability matter the most? An environmental justice interpretation of New Jersey data. J Urban Health 82:90–100

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Giles-Corti B, MacIntyre S, Clarkson JP, Pikora J, Donovan RJ. (2003) Environmental and lifestyle factors associated with overweight and obesity in Perth, Australia. Am J Health Promot 18:93–102

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Siminski RR, Poston WS, Petosa RL, Stevens E, Katzenmoyer LM (2005) Features of the neighborhood environment and walking by U.S. adults. Am J Prev Med 28:149–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Humpel N, Owen N, Iverson D, Leslie E, Bauman A (2004) Perceived environmental attributes, residential location, and walking for particular purposes. Am J Prev Med 26:119–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Giles-Corti B, Donovan RJ (2003) Relative influence of individual, social environmental, and physical environmental correlates of walking. Am J Public Health 93:1583–1589

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Weinstein A, Feigley P, Pullen P, Mann L, Redman L (1996) Neighborhood safety and the prevalence of physical activity - selected states, 1996. MMWR 48:143–146

    Google Scholar 

  37. King AC, Castro C, Wilcox S, Eyler AA, Sallis JF, Brownson RC (2000) Personal and environmental factors associated with physical inactivity among different racial-ethnic groups of U.S. middle aged and older women. Health Psychol 19:354–364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Gordon PM, Zizzi SJ, Pauline J. Use of a community trail among new and habitual exercisers: a preliminary assessment. Prev Chronic Dis [serial online] 2004 Oct. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2004/oct/04_0058.htm; accessed 09 August 2005

  39. Brownson RC, Baker EA, Boyd RL, et al (2004) A community-based approach to promoting walking in rural areas. Am J Prev Med 27:28–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gauvin L, Richard L, Craig CL, et al (2005) From walkability to active living potential: an “ecometric” validation study. Am J Prev Med 28 (2 Suppl 2):126–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Black JB, Chen D (2003) Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: an environment scale evaluation. Am J Public Health 93:1552–1558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Leslie E, Saelens B, Frank L, Owen N, Bauman A, Coffee N, Hugo G (2005) Residents’ perception of walkability attributes in objectively different neighborhoods: a pilot study. Health Place 11:227–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Amarillo Veterans Affairs Medical Center provided in-kind support for this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Rush Pierce Jr. MD, MPH.

Additional information

J. Rush Pierce, Jr., is Health Authority for the Amarillo Bi-City-County Health District, Amarillo, Texas, and Associate Professor and Chief, Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas; Anne V. Denison, Ahmed A. Arif, Assistant Professor, and James E. Rohrer, Professor, are with the Division of Health Services Research, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pierce, J.R., Denison, A.V., Arif, A.A. et al. Living near a trail is associated with increased odds of walking among patients using community clinics. J Community Health 31, 289–302 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-006-9014-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-006-9014-8

Keywords

Navigation