Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Firearms and Protective Orders in Intimate Partner Homicides

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To determine differences among intimate partner homicides (IPH) by whether or not a firearm was used in and whether a protective order (PO) was filed prior to IPH. We identified all incidents of IPH recorded in the National Violent Death Reporting System from 2003 to 2018, based on the relationship between victim and perpetrator. We characterized incidents, perpetrators and victims in IPH cases by whether or not a firearm was used, and whether a PO had been sought or issued prior to the IPH. We identified 8375 IPH incidents with a total of 9130 victims. Overall 306 (3.3%) victims were killed in a firearm IPH with PO, 4519 (53.9%) in a firearm IPH without PO, 176 (2.1%) in a non-firearm IPH with PO and 3416 (40.7%) in a non-firearm IPH without PO. Based on review of incident narratives, 5.4% (n = 451) of incidents involved a previously-granted or sought PO, and none of which had explicitly mentioned firearm removal as a part of the PO. The majority of victims were killed with a firearm. Prior literature suggests that POs with firearm removal may be effective strategies for reducing risk of IPH, but we found no documentation in the narratives that firearm removal was a condition in the POs identified. As very few IPH narratives included documentation of a PO, it is likely that ascertainment of PO status is incomplete and could be an area for improvement in NVDRS data collection efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Bar Association Commission on Domestic Violence (2008). Standards of proof for domestic violence civil protection orders by state. Baltimore, MD.

  • Azrael, D., Hepburn, L., Hemenway, D., & Miller, M. (2017). The stock and flow of U.S. firearms: Results from the 2015 national firearms survey. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of Social Sciences, 3(4), 38–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiding, M., Chen, J., & Black, M. (2010). Intimate partner violence in the United States - 2010. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. C., Webster, D., Koziol-McLain, J., Block, C., Campbell, D., & Curry, M. A. (2003). Risk factors for femicide in abuse relationships: Results from a multisite case control study. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1089–1097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattaneo, L. B., Grossmann, J., & Chapman, A. R. (2016). The goals of IPV survivors receiving orders of protection: An application of the empowerment process model. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(17), 2889–2911. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515581905.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2000). Use of medical care, police assistance, and restraining orders by women reporting intimate partner violence—Massachusetts, 1996–1997. MMWR 2000, 49(22), 485–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, (2016). CDC’s National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS). Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/nvdrs.

  • Chabot, H. F., Tracy, T. L., Manning, C. A., & Poisson, C. A. (2009). Sex, attribution, and severity influence intervention decisions of informal helpers in domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(10), 1696–1713. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260509331514.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Durfee, A., & Goodmark, L. (2019). Gender, protection orders, and intimate partner violence in later life: A study of protective order filings in Arizona. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 886260519884688, 088626051988468. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519884688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J. A., & Fridel, E. (2017). Gender differences in patterns and trends in U.S. homicide, 1976–2015. Violence and Gender, 4(2), 37–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fridel, E. E., & Fox, J. A. (2019). Gender differences in patterns and trends in U.S. homicide, 1976–2017. Violence and Gender, 6(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1089/vio.2019.0005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford’s Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence (2019). Domestic violence & firearms. Retrieved November 14, 2019, from https://lawcenter.giffords.org/gun-laws/policy-areas/who-can-have-a-gun/domestic-violence-firearms/.

  • Goggins, B., & Gallegos, A. (2016). State Progress in record reporting for firearm-related background checks: Protection order submissions.

  • Goodyear, A., Rodriguez, M., & Glik, D. (2019). The role of firearms in intimate partner violence: Policy and research considerations. Journal of Public Health Policy., 41, 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-019-00198-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, V. L., Kernic, M. A., Wolf, M. E., & Rivara, F. P. (2003). Do protection orders affect the likelihood of future partner violence and injury? American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 24(1), 16–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandil, C. (2018, June). California law forbids abusers to own guns, but poli1ce lack resources to take them away. California Health Report.

  • Kivisto, A. J., & Porter, M. (2020). Firearm use increases risk of multiple victims in domestic homicides. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 48(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.003888-20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, A. R. (2006). Enforcing domestic violence firearm prohibitions: A report on promising practices. Washington (DC): Office on Violence Against Women at the National Center on Full Faith and Credit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kothari, C. L., Rhodes, K. V, Wiley, J. A., Fink, J., Overholt, S., Dichter, M. E., … Cerulli, C. (2012). Protection orders protect against assault and injury: A longitudinal study of police-involved women victims of intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(14), 2845–2868. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260512438284.

  • Lucken, K., Rosky, J. W., & Watkins, C. (2015). She said, he said, judge said: Analyzing judicial decision making in civil protection order hearings. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(12), 2038–2066. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514552276.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Coalition Against Domestic Violence (2016). Guns & domestic violence. Retrieved from http://ncadv.org/files/Gun Fact Sheet.pdf.

  • National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges (1994). Family violence: A model state code. Mid-Winter Meeting.

  • National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges (2010). Civil protection orders: A guide for improving practice. Reno, NV.

  • Paulozzi, L. J., Saltzman, L. E., Thompson, M. P., & Holmgreen, P. (2001). Surveillance for homicide among intimate partners - United States, 1981-1998. MMWR Surveillance Summaries, 50, 1–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petrosky, E., Blair, J. M., Betz, C. J., Fowler, K. A., Jack, S. P. D., & Lyons, B. H. (2017). Racial and ethnic differences in homicides of adult women and the role of intimate partner violence — United States, 2003–2014. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 66(28), 741–746. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6628a1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. G., Fowler, K. A., & Niolon, P. H. (2014). Intimate partner homicide and corollary victims in 16 states: National Violent Death Reporting System, 2003–2009. American Journal of Public Health, 104(3), 461–466. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301582.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • StataCorp. (2015). Stata statistical software: Release 15. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Seattle Times Editorial Board. (2018, March). New Seattle-King County task force makes gun laws work. The Seattle Times.

  • Tjaden, P., & Theonnes, N. (2000). Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence: Findings from the National Violence against Women Survey. U.S. Department of Justice: Washington (DC).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vittes, K. A., & Sorenson, S. B. (2008). Restraining orders among victims of intimate partner homicide. Injury Prevention: Journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention, 14(3), 191–195. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.2007.017947.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vittes, K. A., Webster, D. W., Frattaroli, S., Claire, B. E., & Wintemute, G. J. (2013). Removing guns from batterers: Findings from a pilot survey of domestic violence restraining order recipients in California. Violence Against Women, 19(5), 602–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801213490561.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, S., & Hemenway, D. (2005). Intimate partner violence: Homicides followed by suicides in Kentucky. The Journal of the Kentucky Medical Association, 103(1), 10–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weisz, A. N., & Schell, M. (2019). Responding to intimate partner violence: Urban Women’s decisions about getting personal protection orders when other resources are scarce. Violence Against Women, 1077801219854537, 107780121985453. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801219854537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wintemute, G. J., Frattaroli, S., Claire, B. E., Vittes, K. A., & Webster, D. W. (2014). Identifying armed respondents to domestic violence restraining orders and recovering their firearms: Process evaluation of an initiative in California. American Journal of Public Health, 104(2), e113–e118. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301484.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M. E., Holt, V. L., Kernic, M. A., & Rivara, F. P. (2000). Who gets protection orders for intimate partner violence? American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 19(4), 286–291.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization & Pan American Health Organization (2012). Intimate partner violence. WHO/RHR/12.36.

  • Zeoli, A. (2018). Retraction: “Analysis of the strength of legal firearms restrictions for perpetrators of domestic violence and their associations with intimate partner homicide”. American Journal of Epidemiology, 187(11), 2491. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwy169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeoli, A. M., Frattaroli, S., Roskam, K., & Herrera, A. K. (2019). Removing firearms from those prohibited from possession by domestic violence restraining orders: A survey and analysis of state Laws. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 20(1), 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838017692384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vivian H. Lyons.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lyons, V.H., Adhia, A., Moe, C. et al. Firearms and Protective Orders in Intimate Partner Homicides. J Fam Viol 36, 587–596 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-020-00165-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-020-00165-1

Keywords

Navigation