Abstract
Intimate partner stalking (IPS) is a significant public health and public safety issue, yet it remains a largely understudied area especially related to effective practices for victim engagement and response. This study uses systematic review methods to assess the range of criminal justice responses to IPS victimization and the extent to which these responses are successful in promoting survivor safety, well-being, and justice. Multiple scholarly and gray-literature databases were searched to locate studies on criminal justice responses to IPS. Over 336 records were reviewed dating back to 1993 and screened for inclusion in the study, resulting in a final sample size of 22 studies. Findings identify both formal and informal strategies used by the criminal justice system to address IPS. However, pervasive barriers exist including a lack of knowledge and training on stalking, difficulties in investigation and prosecution, and negative perceptions of victims. Successful strategies for mitigating IPS were linked to increased training of law enforcement and prosecution and the granting and enforcement of civil protective orders. Complexity of charging decisions was identified as a challenge for criminal justice entities and methodological and definitional issues make stalking a difficult area to study. Despite numerous barriers in effectively responding to victims of IPS, recommendations for improving responses across the criminal justice system include enhanced training and periodic refreshers across criminal justice entities, coordinated reviews of IPS cases, and better incorporation of the stalker’s criminal history to strategically pursue charges.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
*Included in the review
Bailey, B., & Morris, M. C. (2018). Longitudinal associations among negative cognitions and depressive and posttraumatic stress symptoms in women recently exposed to stalking. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518807905.
Baum, K., Catalano, S., Rand, M., & Rose, K. (2009). National Crime Victimization Survey: Stalking victimization in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
*Bennett Cattaneo, L., Cho, S., & Botuck, S. (2011). Describing intimate partner stalking over time: An effort to inform victim-centered service provision. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(17), 3428–3454.
Blaauw, E., Winkel, F. W., Arensman, E., Sheridan, L., & Freeve, A. (2002). The toll of stalking: The relationship between features of stalking and psychopathology of victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17(1), 50–63.
Black, M. C., Basile, K. C., Breiding, M. J., Smith, S. G., Walters, M. L., Merrick, M. T., Chen, J., & Stevens, M. R. (2011). The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Brady, P. Q., & Hayes, B. E. (2018). The intersection of stalking and the severity of intimate partner abuse. Violence and Victims, 33(2), 218–238.
Breiding, M. J., Smith, S. G., Basile, K. C., Walters, M. L., Chen, J., & Merrick, M. T. (2015). Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization—National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, United States, 2011. American journal of public health, 105(4), e11–e12.
*Brewster, M. P. (2001). Legal help-seeking experiences of former intimate-stalking victims. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 12(2), 91–112.
Campbell, J. C., Webster, D., Koziol-McLain, J., Block, C., Campbell, D., Curry, M. A., ... & Sharps, P. (2003). Risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships: Results from a multisite case control study. American journal of public health, 93(7), 1089-1097.
Catalano, S. (2012). Stalking victims in the United States- revised. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
*Dunn, J. L. (2001). Innocence lost: Accomplishing victimization in IPS cases. Symbolic Interaction, 24(3), 285–313.
Edwards, K. M., & Gidycz, C. A. (2014). Stalking and psychosocial distress following the termination of an abusive dating relationship: A prospective analysis. Violence Against Women, 20(11), 1383–1397.
Fedina, L., Backes, B. L., Sulley, C., Wood, L., & Busch-Armendariz, N. (2019). Prevalence and sociodemographic factors associated with stalking victimization among college students. Journal of American College Health, 1-7.
Finfgeld-Connett, D. (2014). Use of content analysis to conduct knowledge-building and theory-generating qualitative systematic reviews. Qualitative Research, 14(3), 341–352.
Graham, L. M., Sahay, K. M., Rizo, C. F., Messing, J. T., & Macy, R. J. (2019). The validity and reliability of available intimate partner homicide and reassault risk assessment tools: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 1524838018821952.
*Jasinski, J.L. & Ehrhardt Mustaine, E. (2001). Police response to physical assault and stalking victimization: A comparison of influential factors. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 26(1), 23–41.
*Klein, A., Salomon, A., Huntington, N., Dubois, J., & Lang, D. (2012). Statewide study of stalking and its criminal justice response. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
*Lashley, S. D. (2016). Decision-making in a national sample of stalking victims: A quantitative analysis. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest. (10076386).
Littell, J. H., Corcoran, J., & Pillai, V. (2008). Systematic reviews and meta-analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
*Logan, T.K., & Cole, J. (2007). The impact of partner stalking on mental health and protective order outcomes over time. Violence and Victims, 22(5), 546–562.
Logan, T. K., & Cole, J. (2011). Exploring the intersection of partner stalking and sexual abuse. Violence Against Women, 17(7), 904–924.
Logan, T. K., & Walker, R. (2009). Civil protective order outcomes: Violations and perceptions of effectiveness. Journal of interpersonal violence, 24(4), 675–692.
*Logan, T. K., & Walker, R. T. (2010a). Civil protective order effectiveness: Justice or just a piece of paper?. Violence and Victims, 25(3), 332–348.
*Logan, T. K., & Walker, R. (2010b). Toward a deeper understanding of the harms caused by partner stalking. Violence and Victims 25(4), 440–455.
Logan, T. K., & Walker, R. (2019). The impact of stalking-related fear and gender on personal safety outcomes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 0886260519829280.
*Logan, T. K., Nigoff, A., Walker, R., & Jordon, C. (2002). Stalker profiles with and without protective orders: Reoffending or criminal justice processing?. Violence and Victims, 17(5), 541, 553.
*Logan, T. K., Cole, J., Shannon, L., & Walker, R. (2006a). Partner stalking: How women respond, cope, and survive. New York: Springer.
*Logan, T. K., Walker, R., Stewart, C., & Allen, J. (2006b). Victim service and justice system representative responses about partner stalking: What do professionals recommend?. Violence and Victims, 21(1), 49–66.
Logan, T., Walker, R., Hoyt, W., & Faragher, T. (2009). The Kentucky civil protective order study: A rural and urban multiple perspective study of protective order violation consequences, responses, and costs. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
*Lynch, K. R., & Logan, T. K. (2015). Police officers' attitudes and challenges with charging stalking. Violence and Victims, 30(6), 1037–1048.
McFarlane, J. M., Campbell, J. C., Wilt, S., Sachs, C. J., Ulrich, Y., & Xu, X. (1999). Stalking and intimate partner femicide. Homicide Studies, 3(4), 300–316.
McFarlane, J., Campbell, J., & Watson, K. (2002). Intimate partner stalking and femicide: Urgent implications for women's safety. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 20(1–2), 51–68.
*Melton, H. C. (2005). Stalking in the context of domestic violence. Women & Criminal Justice, 15(3–4), 33–58.
*Raphael, J. (2009). Talking about stalking: Interviews with Chicago patrol officers. Chicago: DePaul University College of Law. Schiller DuCanto & Fleck Family Law Center.
*Rosay, A., Wood, D., Rivera, M., Postle, G., TePas, K. (2011). Investigation and prosecution of sexual assault, domestic violence, and stalking. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
Rosay, A., Backes, B., & Wang, A. (2019). Psychometric analyses of stalking measures from the National Intimate Partner and sexual violence survey. Journal of Family Violence, 1–12.
*Spence-Diehl, E., & Potocky-Tripodi, M. (2001). Victims of stalking: A study of service needs as perceived by victim services practitioners. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16(1), 86–94.
*Storey, J. E., & Hart, S. D. (2011). How do police respond to stalking? An examination of the risk management strategies and tactics used in a specialized anti-stalking law enforcement unit. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 26(2), 128–142.
*Tarafdar, S. (2006). Stalking: A comprehensive experience. From identification to prosecution. (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest. (3273545).
*Tjaden, P. G., & Thoennes, N. (1998). Stalking in America: Findings from the national violence against women survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
*Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2002). The role of stalking in domestic violence crime reports generated by the Colorado Springs Police Department. In Davis, K.E., Hanson Frieze, I., & Maiuro, R. D. (Eds.), Stalking: Perspectives on victims and perpetrators (pp. 330–352). New York: Springer.
*Werden, K. A. (2004). A qualitative analysis of female heterosexual ex-intimate victims of stalking experience as a form of domestic violence. (Doctoral dissertation). Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences And Engineering.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS) Librarians James Fort and Scott Hertzberg for their assistance in the systematic search process.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Backes, B.L., Fedina, L. & Holmes, J.L. The Criminal Justice System Response to Intimate Partner Stalking: a Systematic Review of Quantitative and Qualitative Research. J Fam Viol 35, 665–678 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-020-00139-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-020-00139-3