Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Differentiating Parents with Faking-Good Profiles from Parents with Valid Scores on the Child Abuse Potential Inventory

  • Issues in Assessment of Family Violence
  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Parental capacity assessments (PCAs) remain common during child abuse investigations, and “best practice” approaches to evaluations consist of using a comprehensive assessment (Budd et al. 2011). The Child Abuse Potential Inventory (CAP; Milner 1986) is one risk assessment measure used during PCAs, but results may be confounded by faking-good behavior. Currently, there is a small amount of literature examining the characteristics and implications of parents who fake good on the CAP. The present study examined differences between physically abusive parents with a faking or non-faking profile on the CAP by demographic information, psychopathology, behavioral observation data, and abuse recidivism. Parents differed significantly by IQ and depression scores, but no significant differences were found on any other variable including recidivism rates at posttreatment. Implications of study outcomes, and the emphasis for a multimethod approach to PCAs will be discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aragona, J. A. (1983). Physical child abuse: an interactional analysis. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B. Sciences and Engineering, 44(4-B), 1225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aragona, J. A., & Eyberg, S. M. (1981). Neglected children: others’ report of child behavior problems and observed verbal behavior. Child Development, 52, 596–602. doi:10.2307/1129179.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Azar, S. T., Lauretti, A. F., & Loding, B. V. (1998). The evaluation of parental fitness in termination of parental rights cases: a functional-contextual perspective. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 1(2), 77–100. doi:10.1023/A:1021883611965.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561–671. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162. doi:10.1037/h0036215.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bessmer, J. L. (1998). The Dyadic Parent-Child Interaction Coding System II (DPICS II): reliability and validity with mother-child dyads. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B. Sciences and Engineering, 58(7-B), 3961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, K. M., Donohue, B., Cross, C., Urgelles, J., & Allen, D. N. (2011). Examination of the relationship between parental satisfaction and child maltreatment potential while considering social desirability. Journal of Family Violence, 26, 545–549. doi:10.1007/s10896-011-9389-x.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, A., & Finkelhor, D. (1986). Impact of child sexual abuse: a review of the research. Psychological Bulletin, 99(1), 66–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Budd, K. S., Heilman, N. E., & Kane, D. (2000). Psychosocial correlates of child abuse potential in multiply disadvantaged mothers. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24(5), 611–625. doi:10.1016/S0145-2134(00)00122-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Budd, K. S., Connell, M., & Clark, J. R. (2011). Evaluation of parenting capacity in child protection. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, G. D., Moretti, M. M., & Cue, B. J. H. (2005). Evaluating parenting capacity: validity problems with the MMPI-2, PAI, CAPI, and ratings of child adjustment. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36(2), 188–196. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.36.2.188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaffin, M. (2004). Physical Abuse Treatment Outcome Project: Application of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) to Physically Abusive Parents (Dataset). Retrieved from National Archive on Child Abuse and Neglect Web Site: http://www.ndacan.cornell.edu.

  • Chaffin, M., & Valle, L. A. (2003). Dynamic prediction characteristics of the Child Abuse Potential Inventory. Child Abuse & Neglect, 27, 463–481. doi:10.1016/S0145-2134(03)00036-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaffin, M., Silovsky, J. F., Funderburk, B., Valle, L. A., Brestan, E. V., Balachova, T., et al. (2004). Parent–child interaction therapy with physically abusive parents: efficacy for reducing future abuse reports. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(3), 500–510. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.72.3.500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, G. R. (2010). MMPI-2 defensiveness in child custody evaluations: the role of education and socioeconomic level. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 28(2), 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, J., & Widom, C. S. (2010). Long-term consequences of child abuse and neglect on adult economic well-being. Child maltreatment, 15(2), 111–120. doi:10.1177/1077559509355316.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dominguez, T. E., Chalom, R., & Costarino, A. T. (2001). The severity and cost of child abuse in the pediatric intensive care unit. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine, 16, 35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyberg, S. M., & Robinson, E. A. (1982). Parent-child interaction training: effects on family functioning. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 11, 130–137. doi:10.1080/15374418209533076.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyberg, S., Bessmer, J., Newcomb, K., Edwards, D., & Robinson, E. (1994). Dyadic Parent Child Interaction Coding System-II manual. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville.

  • Fang, X., & Corso, P. S. (2007). Child maltreatment, youth violence, and intimate partner violence: developmental relationships. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 14(4), 281–290. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2007.06.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, X., Brown, D. S., Florence, C. S., & Mercy, J. A. (2012). The economic burden of child maltreatment in the United States and implications for prevention. Child Abuse & Neglect, 36(2), 156-165 doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.10.006.

  • Felitti, V. J., Anda, R. F., Nordenberg, D., Williamson, D. F., Spitz, A. M., Edwards, V., et al. (1998). Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults. The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 14(4), 245–258. doi:10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00017-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foote, R. C. (2000). The Dyadic Parent-Child Interaction Coding System II (DPICS II): reliability and validity with father-child dyads. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B. Sciences and Engineering, 60(9-B), 4886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, A. M., Murphy, K. R., & Anderson, S. L. (1991). Increasing adolescent mothers’ knowledge of child development: an intervention program. Adolescence, 26, 73–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gannon, T. A., & Polaschek, D. L. L. (2005). Do child molesters deliberately fake good on cognitive distortion questionnaires? An information processing-based investigation. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 17(2), 183–200. doi:10.1177/107906320501700208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goethe, J. W., & Ahmadi, K. S. (1991). Comparison of a diagnostic interview schedule to psychiatrist diagnoses of alcohol use disorder in psychiatric in-patients. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 17, 61–69. doi:10.3109/00952999108992810.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goethe, J. W., & Fischer, E. H. (1995). Functional capabilities of depressed patients 1 year after hospitalization. Psychiatric Services, 46, 1187–1188.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodhart, D. E. (1985). Some psychological effects associated with positive and negative thinking about stressful event outcomes: was Pollyanna right? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(1), 216–232. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.1.216.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hasin, D., & Grant, B. F. (1987). Psychiatric diagnosis of patients with substance abuse problems: a comparison of two procedures, the DIS, and the SADS-L: alcoholism, drug abuse/dependence, anxiety disorders, and antisocial personality disorder. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 21, 7–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haskett, M. E., Scott, S. S., & Fann, K. D. (1995). Child Abuse Potential Inventory and parenting behavior. Relationships with high-risk correlates. Child Abuse & Neglect, 19(12), 1483–1495. doi:10.1016/0145-2134(95)00107-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, W. C., & Sammel, M. D. (2005). Brief communication: physical abuse of boys and possible associations with poor adult outcomes. Annals of Internal Medicine, 143(8), 581–586.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1990). K-BIT: Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test manual. Circle Pines: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolko, D. J. (1992). Characteristics of child victims of physical violence: research findings and clinical implications. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7(2), 244–276. doi:10.1177/088626092007002009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeb, R. T., Paulozzi, L., Melanson, C., Simon, T., & Arias, I. (2007). Child maltreatment surveillance: Uniform definitions for public health and recommended data elements, Version 1.0. Retrieved from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control: http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/CM_Surveillance-a.pdf

  • McNeil, C. B., & Hembree-Kigin, T. (2010). Parent-child interaction therapy (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Medoff, D. (1999). MMPI-2 validity scales in child custody evaluations: clinical versus statistical significance. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 17, 409–411.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T. R., Handal, P. J., Gilner, F. H., & Cross, J. F. (1991). The relationship of abuse and witnessing violence on the Child Abuse Potential Inventory with Black adolescents. Journal of Family Violence, 6, 351–363. doi:10.1007/BF00980538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milner, J. S. (1986). CAP Inventory Manual, 2nd Ed., An Interpretive Manual for the CAP Inventory. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner, J. S., & Crouch, J. L. (1997). Impact and detection of response distortions on parenting measures used to assess risk for child physical abuse. Journal of Personality Assessment, 69(3), 633–650. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6903_15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milner, J. S., Charlesworth, J. R., Gold, R. G., Gold, S. R., & Friesen, M. R. (1988). Convergent validity of the Child Abuse Potential Inventory. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 281–285. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(198803)44:2<281::AID-JCLP2270440232>3.0.CO;2-J.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto, R. K., Edens, J. F., & Barcus, E. H. (2000). The use of psychological testing in child custody evaluations. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 38, 312–340. doi:10.1111/j.174-1617.2000.tb00578.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, L. D. (1993). The Kaufman brief intelligence test: an introduction and review. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 26(2), 152–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prewett, P. N. (1995). A comparison of two screening tests (the Matrix Analogies Test—Short Form and the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test) with the WISC-III. Psychological Assessment, 7(1), 69–72. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.1.69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Psychological Corporation. (1997). Weschler adult intelligence scale – Third edition manual. San Antonio: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psychological Corporation. (1999). Weschler Abbreviated Intelligence Scale manual. San Antonio: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, L., Helzer, J., Croughan, J., & Ratcliff, K. (1981). National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule: its history, characteristics, and validity. Archives of General Psychiatry, 38, 381–389. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1981.01780290015001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumann, E., Foote, R., Eyberg, S., Boggs, S., & Algina, J. (1998). Efficacy of parent–child interaction therapy: interim report of a randomized trial with short-term maintenance. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 27, 34–45. doi:10.1207/s15374424jccp2701_4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stringer, S. A., & LaGreca, A. M. (1985). Correlates of child abuse potential. Journal of Abnormal Clinical Psychology, 13, 217–226. doi:10.1007/BF00910643.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Children, Youth, and Families (2009). Child Maltreatment 2007. Retrieved from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm07/index.htm

  • Walfish, S. (2011). Reducing MMPI-2 defensiveness in professionals presenting for evaluation. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 30, 75–80. doi:10.1080/10550887.2010.531666.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The data used in this publication were made available by the National Data Archive on Child Abuse and Neglect, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, and have been used with permission. Data from Physical Abuse Treatment Outcome Project: Application of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) to Physically Abusive Parents were originally collected by Mark Chaffin. Funding for the project was provided by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, The Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children’s Bureau, Office on Child Abuse and Neglect (Award Number: 90CA1633). The collector of the original data, the funder, NDACAN, Cornell University and their agents or employees bear no responsibility for the analyses or interpretations presented here. We also wish to thank Dr. Mark Chaffin for his support in allowing us to utilize his dataset for secondary analyses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, West Virginia University, PO Box 6040, 53 Campus Drive, 1208 Life Sciences Building, Morgantown, WV, 26506-6040, USA

    Amanda H. Costello & Cheryl B. McNeil

Authors
  1. Amanda H. Costello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cheryl B. McNeil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheryl B. McNeil.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Costello, A.H., McNeil, C.B. Differentiating Parents with Faking-Good Profiles from Parents with Valid Scores on the Child Abuse Potential Inventory. J Fam Viol 29, 79–88 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-013-9557-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-013-9557-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation