Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Status and Characteristics of Couple Violence in China

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A couple’s relationship is very important to marital well-being as well as the harmony of family and society. Violent behaviors in marriage have bad effects on people’s physical and mental health and cause large social burdens. In this study, we investigated 194 couples in Beijing to explore the status and characteristics of couple violence from three aspects by using Revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2). We conclude that: (1) Couple violence is universal, although the frequency is not so high. Prevalence and frequency of psychological violence are higher than physical and sexual violence; rate of wives’ victimization is significantly higher than that of husbands; frequency of the perpetration of sexual violence by husbands is significantly higher than that by wives. (2) There is concurrence of different types of couple violence. Specifically, physical and sexual violence are usually accompanied by psychological violence; however, psychological violence exists independently. (3) Couple violence is often bidirectional, especially in psychological violence. (4) Marital length is negatively correlated to wives’ perpetration of physical violence and their victimization of sexual violence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, K. L. (2002). Perpetrator or victim? Relationship between intimate partner violence and well-Being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(4), 851–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, J. (2002). Sex differences in physically aggressive acts between heterosexual partners: a meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 313–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogat, G. A., Levendosky, A. A., & Eye, A. V. (2005). The future of research on intimate partner violence: person-oriented and variable-oriented perspectives. American Journal of Community Psychology, 36(1/2), 49–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Calvete, E., Estevez, A., & Corral, S. (2007). Intimate partner violence and depressive symptoms in women: cognitive schemas as moderators and mediators. Behavior Research and Therapy, 45(4), 791–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. C., & Alford, P. (1989). The dark consequences of marital rape. American Journal of Nursing, 89, 946–949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, Y. (2006). Hunan Province, the overall epidemiology of domestic violence report. Journal of Epidemiology, 27(3).

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2005). Intimate partner violence injuries—Oklahoma. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 54(41), 1041–1045.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coker, A. L., Smith, P. H., McKeown, R. E., & King, M. J. (2000). Frequency and correlates of intimate partner violence by type: physical, sexual and psychological battering. American Journal of Public Health, 90(4), 553–559.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D. G., Saunders, Starzomki, A., & Bartholomew, K. (1994). Intimacy—anger and insecure attachment as precursors of abuse in intimate relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(15), 1367–1386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D. G., Starzomski, A., & Ryan, L. (1996). Antecedents of abusive personality and abusive behavior in wife assaulters. Journal of Family Violence, 11(2), 113–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gage, A. J. (2005). Women’s experience of intimate partner violence in Haiti. Social Science & Medicine, 61, 343–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Linares, M. I., Pico-Alfonso, M. A., Sanchez-Lorente, S., Savall-Rodriguez, F., Celda-Navarro, N., Blasco-Ros, C., et al. (2005). Assessing physical, sexual, and psychological violence perpetrated by intimate male partners toward women: a Spanish cross-sectional study. Violence and Victims, 20(1), 99–123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guo S., Zhao F., & Wang L. (2006). Response to domestic violence among married women in rural China. Chinese Women and Children’s Health, 21(15), 2117–2119.

  • Hastings, J. E., & Hamberger, L. K. (1988). Personality characteristics of spouse abusers: a controlled comparison. Violence and Victims, 3(1), 31–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaukinen, C. (2004). Status compatibility, physical violence, and emotional abuse in intimate relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family., 66(2), 452–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. Y., & Sung, K. (2000). Conjugal violence in Korean American families: A residue of the cultural tradition. Journal of Family Violence, 15(4), 331–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, M. S. (2002). Gender symmetry’ in domestic violence: a substantive and methodological research review. Violence Against Women, 8(11), 1332–1363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landolt, M. A., & Dutton, D. G. (1997). Power and personality: an analysis of gay male intimate abuse. Sex Roles, 37(5/6), 335–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Bureau of Statistics of China (2006) http://www.stats.gov.cn/was40/gjtjj_data_outline.jsp?page=2&searchword=%B1%B1%BE%A9&channelid=9401

  • Magdol, L., Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., & Silva, P. (1998). Developmental antecedents of partner abuse: a prospective-longitudinal study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107, 375–389.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malcoe, L. H., Duran, B. M., & Montgomery, J. M. (2004). Socioeconomic disparities in intimate partner violence against Native American women: a cross-sectional study. British Medical Council Medicine, 24(2), 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, H. S., Neidig, P. H., & O’Leary, K. D. (1994). Predicting mild and severe husband-to-wife physical aggression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62(5), 975–981.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phelan, M. B., Hamberger, L. K., & Guse, C. E. (2005). Domestic violence among male and female patients seeking emergency medical services. Violence Victim, 20(2), 187–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinsor, W. M., & Wynne, L. C. (1995). The efficacy of marital and family therapy: an empirical overview conclusions, and recommendations. Journal of Marriage and Family Therapy, 21(4), 5–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratner, P. A. (1993). The incidence of wife abuse and mental health status in abused wives in Edmonton, Alberta. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 84(4), 246–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennison, C. M., & Welchans, S. (2000). Intimate partner violence. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report (NCJ 178247). U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.

  • Russell, R. J. H., & Hulson, B. (1992). Physical and psychological violence of heterosexual partners. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(4), 457–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, C., Koziol-McLain, J., Glass, N., Webster, D., & Cambell, J. (2002). A population-based survey assessing support for mandatory domestic violence reporting by health care personnel. Women & Health, 35(2/3), 121–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharon, B. (2005). Intimate relationships. (H. Guo &, B. Xiao, Trans.). Beijing: Posts & Telecom Press.

  • Stets, J. E., & Straus, M. A. (1989). The Marriage license as a hitting license: a comparison of assaults in dating, cohabiting, and married couples. Journal of Family Violence, 4(2), 161–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, W. F. (2001). Behavioral couples’ therapy for male methadone maintenance patients: effects on drug—using behavior and relationship adjustment. Behavior Therapy, 32, 391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A. (1980). Behind closed doors: Violence in the American family. New York: Dell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A., & Gelles, R. J. (1986). Societal change and change in family violence from 1975 to 1985 as revealed by two national surveys. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 465–479.

  • Straus, M. A., & Hamby, S. L. (1996). The revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2). Journal of Family Issues, 17(3), 283–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, C. S. (1998). Psychological violence of Chinese wives. Journal of Family Violence, 13(3), 299–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence: Findings from the national violence against women survey. Washington: National Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. (2003). Family violence perspective: modern city life, a tumor. (2003, April, 3). People’s Daily, p.7.

  • Wu, C. (2001). Concern on domestic violence: protect women’s physical and mental health. Psychology & Health, 50, 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Revised Conflict Tactics Scale was provided by Prof. Norman Epstein at University of Maryland, College Park.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoyi Fang.

Additional information

This study was supported by National Demonstrative Study on Comprehensive Screening, Evaluation and Intervention for Issues of Family, Marriage and Parent–child Relation (Project Number: 2009BAI77B05), and Program of Ministry of Education for New Century Excellent Talents (NCET-04-0147).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hou, J., Yu, L., Ting, SM.R. et al. The Status and Characteristics of Couple Violence in China. J Fam Viol 26, 81–92 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-010-9343-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-010-9343-3

Keywords

Navigation