Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Examining the Behavior of a System: An Outcome Evaluation of a Coordinated Community Response to Domestic Violence

  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One goal of a coordinated community response (CCR) to domestic violence is to create an infrastructure that will facilitate systems-level, and ultimately societal-level change. This study evaluated whether a CCR implemented in two counties in Georgia would be effective at increasing criminal justice system sanctions for male domestic violence offenders (i.e., arrests, prosecutions, convictions, sentencing, and referrals to batterer intervention programs). Time series analyses revealed that, in both counties, there was a significant increase in arrests of male offenders; however, law enforcement agencies also arrested more women following the intervention. More men were sentenced to probation and to attend a batterer’s intervention program post-intervention in one county; in the second county, there was no change in these outcomes. Results highlight the importance of examining how a CCR may affect the behavior of criminal justice systems, especially in terms of the unintended consequences for women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Babcock, J. C., & Steiner, R. (1999). The relationship between treatment, incarceration, and recidivism of battering: A program evaluation of Seattle’s coordinated community response to domestic violence. Journal of Family Psychology, 13, 46–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, L. W., & Williams, O. J. (2001). Intervention programs for man who batter. In C. M. Renzetti, J. L. Edleson, & R. K. Bergen (Eds.), Sourcebook on Violence Against Women (pp. 261–278). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, C. (1987). Public opinion on domestic violence: A review of the New Jersey survey. Response Victimization Women Children, 10, 6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, M. A., Blackwell, B. S., Stalans, L. J., Studdard, S., & Dugan, L. (2004). Dual arrest decisions in domestic violence cases: The influence of departmental policies. Crime and Delinquency, 50, 565–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgia County Guide (1997). University of Georgia, Athens, GA.

  • Hagan, F. (2000). Research methods in criminal justice and criminology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huisman, K., Martinez, J., & Wilson, C. (2005). Training police officers on domestic violence and racism. Violence Against Women, 11, 792–821.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hilton, N. Z. (1993). Legal responses to wife assault: Current trends and evaluations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschel, D., & Buzawa, E. S. (2002). Understanding the context of dual arrest with directions for future research. Violence Against Women, 8(12), 1449–1473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iovanni, L., & Miller, S. L. (2001). Criminal justice system response to domestic violence: Law enforcement and the courts. In C. M. Renzetti, J. L. Edleson, & R. K. Bergen (Eds.), Sourcebook on Violence Against Women (pp. 303–328). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judicial Qualifications Commission (1984). Judicial Code of Conduct of the State of Georgia. Retrieved January 13, 2006 from http://www.georgiacourts.org/agencies/jqc/Pages/canons.html.

  • Klein, E., Campbell, J. C., Solar, E., & Ghez, M. (1997). Ending domestic violence: Changing public perceptions/halting the epidemic. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koski, P. R., & Mangold, W. D. (1988). Gender effects in attitudes about family violence. Journal of Family Violence, 3, 225–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrenz, F., Lembo, J. F., & Schade, T. (1988). Time series analysis of the effect of a domestic violence directive on the number of arrests per day. Journal of Criminal Justice, 16, 493–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mancoske, R. J., Standifer, D., & Cauley, C. (1994). The effectiveness of brief counseling services for battered women. Research on Social Work Practices, 4, 53–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. E. (1997). Double your trouble: Dual arrest in family violence. Journal of Family Violence, 12, 139–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maton, K. (2000). Making a difference: The social ecology of social transformation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 25–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. L. (2001). The paradox of women arrested for domestic violence. Criminal justice professionals and service providers respond. Violence Against Women, 7, 1339–1376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, C. M., Musser, P. H., & Maton, K. (1998). Coordinated community intervention for domestic abusers: Intervention system involvement and criminal recidivism. Journal of Family Violence, 13, 263–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prilleltensky, I. (1989). Psychology and the status quo. American Psychologist, 44, 795–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, K. H., & Bezold, A. (1996). Dating violence and prevention: a didactic support groups for young women. Journal of Counseling and Development, 74, 521–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, A. (1991). The effectiveness of outreach counseling and support groups for battered women. Research on Social Work Practices, 1, 332–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salazar, L. F., & Cook, S. L. (2002). Violence against women: Is psychology part of the problem or the solution? A content analysis of psychological research from 1990 through 1999. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 410–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, E. (1983). Unexamined premises of social problem solving. In E. Seidman (Ed.), Handbook of Social Intervention (pp. 48–67). Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, M. (1992). Predicting batterer recidivism five years after intervention. Journal of Family Violence, 7, 167–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, M. F. (1999). Evaluating a coordinated community response. In M. F. Shepard & E. L. Pence (Eds.), Coordinating community responses to domestic violence (pp. 169–191). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, M. F., & Pence, E. L. (Eds.) (1999). Coordinating community responses to domestic violence. Lessons from Duluth and Beyond. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Sigler, R. T. (1989). Domestic violence in context: An assessment of community attitudes. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, L. M. J. (1995). A therapeutic jurisprudence approach to the legal processing of domestic violence cases. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1, 43–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinman, M. (1990). Lowering recidivism among men who batter women. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 7, 124–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, E. (2001). Health intervention with battered women: From crisis intervention to complex social prevention. In C. M. Renzetti, J. L. Edleson, & R. K. Bergen (Eds.), Sourcebook on Violence Against Women (pp. 45–70). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, C. M., & Allen, N. E. (2001). Evaluating coordinated community responses for abused women and their children. In S. A. Graham-Bermann, & J. L. Edleson (Eds.), Domestic Violence in the Lives of Children: The Future of Research, Intervention, and Social Policy (pp. 269–282). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, C. M., Tan, C., Basta, J., Rumptz, M., & Davidson, W. S. (1992). An advocacy intervention for women with abusive partners: Initial evaluation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 20, 309–332.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Syers, M., & Edleson, J. L. (1992). The combined effects of coordinated criminal justice intervention in woman abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7, 490–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, R. M., & Weisz, A. N. (1995). Coordinated community intervention for domestic violence: The effects of arrest and prosecution on recidivism of woman abuse perpetrators. Crime and Delinquency, 41, 481–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tutty, L. M., Bidgood, B. A., & Rothery, M. A. (1993). Support groups for battered women: Research on their efficacy. Journal of Family Violence, 8, 325–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valente, R. L., Hart, B. J., Zeya, S., & Malefyt, M. (2001). The violence against women act of 1994: The federal commitment to ending domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, and gender-based crimes of violence. In C. M. Renzetti, J. L. Edleson, & R. K. Bergen (Eds.), Sourcebook on Violence Against Women (pp. 279–302). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wandersman, A., & Florin, P. (2003). Community interventions and effective prevention. American Psychologist, 58, 441–448.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weisz, A. N. (1999). Legal advocacy for domestic violence survivors: The power of an informative relationship. Families in Society, 80, 138–147.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This research was supported by a cooperative agreement (U50/CCU411282-02) between the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Men Stopping Violence.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura F. Salazar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Salazar, L.F., Emshoff, J.G., Baker, C.K. et al. Examining the Behavior of a System: An Outcome Evaluation of a Coordinated Community Response to Domestic Violence. J Fam Viol 22, 631–641 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-007-9116-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-007-9116-9

Keywords

Navigation