Skip to main content
Log in

Psychometric Properties of the Family Quality of Life Scale in Greek Families with Intellectual Disabilities

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years intellectual disability has changed from the individual quality of life to an evaluation of the quality concerning the whole family. The aims of the present study were to examine the psychometric properties of the Greek version of Family Quality of Life Scale (FQoL). A total of 180 caregivers of people with intellectual disabilities participated in the current study. The participants were all informal caregivers of adults with disabilities and comorbidities (other chronic diseases), belonging to the intimate family context (cousins, uncles, neighbours, professional in-home caregivers, neighbours, etc.). The Beach Center Family Quality of Life Scale (FQoL) was administered twice, with a 7 day interval to 44 eligible caregivers. Factor analysis yielded a three-factor solution, explaining explaining 71.63 % of the total variance. Cronbach alpha for the three factors were between 0.883 to 0.960. Construct validity showed a high correlation between FQoL factors and APGAR scores. More specifically high correlations were found between “Family interaction and support” (r = 0.855), “Family care” (r = 0.630), “Disability related support” (r = 0.683) and APGAR scores (p < 0.0005 respectively). The test/retest reliability indicated that the scales scores were remarkably consistent between the two occasions. The current results support that the Greek version of FQoL is a measure with satisfactory psychometric properties, and is a valid research tool for Greek caregivers supporting people with intellectual disabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abidin, R. R. (1995). Parenting stress index: professional manual (3rd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2006). Amos 7.0 User’s Guide. Amos Development Corporation, Chicago: SPSS Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Aznar, A. S., & Castañón, D. G. (2005). Quality of life from the point of view of Latin American families: a participative research study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49, 784–788.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, D., Scarborough, A., Hebbeler, K., Spiker, D., & Mallik, S. (2004). National Early Intervention Longitudinal Study: Family outcomes at the end of early intervention (NEILS Data Report No. 6; SRI Project 11247). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balcells-Balcells, A., Giné, C., Guàrdia-Olmos, J., & Summers, J. A. (2011). Family quality of life: adaptation to Spanish population of several family support questionnaires. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 55, 1151–1163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, I., Anand, S., Fung, W. L. A., Isaacs, B., & Baum, N. (2003). Family quality of life: Canadian results from an international study. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 15, 207–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, I., & Brown, R. I. (2004). Concepts for beginning study in family quality of life. In A. P. Turnbull, I. Brown, & H. R. Turnbull III (Eds.), Families and people with mental retardation and quality of life: International perspectives (pp. 25–47). Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, G., & Bramston, P. (1996). Quality of life in the families of young people with intellectual disabilities. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 5, 120–130.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (1997). Assessing quality of life. In R. I. Brown (Ed.), Quality of life for people with disabilities: Models, research and practice (pp. 116–150). Cheltenham, UK: Stanley Thornes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunst, C. J., & Bruder, M. B. (2002). Valued outcomes of service coordination, early intervention, and natural environments. Exceptional Children, 68, 361–375.

  • Dunst, C. J., Jenkins, V., & Trivette, C. M. (1984). Family support scale: reliability and validity. Journal of Individual, Family, and Community Wellness, 1, 45–52.

  • Felce, D. (1997). Defining and applying the concept of quality of life. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 41, 126–135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fortinsky, R. H., Tennen, H., Frank, N., & Affleck, G. (2007). Health and psychological consequences of caregiving. In C. Aldwin, C. Park, & R. Spiro (Eds.), Handbook of health psychology and aging (pp. 227–249). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, W. N., Greenberg, M. T., & Crnic, K. (1983). A short-form of the questionnaire on resources and stress. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 88(1), 41–48.

  • Gardiner, E., & Iarocci, G. (2012). Unhappy (and happy) in their own way: A developmental psychopathology perspective on quality of life for families living with developmental disability with and without autism. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33, 2177–2192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goode, D. (1997). Quality of life as international disability policy: Implications for international research. In R. L. Schalock (Ed.), Quality of life volume II: Application to persons with disabilities (pp. 211–221). Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, L., Marquis, J., Poston, D., Summers, J. A., & Turnbull, A. (2006). Assessing family outcomes: psychometric evaluation of the Beach Center Family Quality of Life Scale. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 1069–1083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, X., Summers, J. A., Turnbull, A., & Zuna, N. (2011). The quantitative measurement of family quality of life: a review of available instruments. Journal of Intellectual Disabilty Research, 55(12), 1098–1114.

  • Hu, X., Wang, M., & Fei, X. (2012). Family quality of life of Chinese families of children with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56, 30–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matinopoulou-Perri, I. (1990). The problems that families with mentally retarded children face in Greece. Journal of Social Work, 19, 145–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moen, P., Robison, J., & Dempster-McClain, D. (1995). Caregiving and women’s well-being: A life course approach. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36, 259–273.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oken, M. M., Creech, R. H., Tormey, D. C., Horton, J., Davis, T. E., McFadden, E. T., & Carbone, P. P. (1982). Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern cooperative oncology group. American Journal of Clinical Oncology, 5(6), 649–655.

  • Park, J., Hoffman, L., Marquis, J., Turnbull, A. P., Poston, D., Mannan, H., et al. (2003). Toward assessing family outcomes of service delivery: validation of a Family Quality of Life Survey. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 47, 367–384.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pearlin, L. I., Mullan, J. T., Semple, S. J., & Skaff, M. M. (1990). Caregiving and the stress process: an overview of concepts and their measures. Gerontologist, 30(5), 583–594.

  • Pinquart, M., & Sörensen, S. (2003). Differences between caregivers and noncaregivers in psychological health and physical health: A metaanalysis. Psychology and Aging, 18, 250–267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robison, J., Fortinsky, R., Kleppinger, A., Shugrue, N., & Porter, M. (2009). A broader view of family caregiving: effects of caregiving and caregiver conditions on depressive symptoms, health, work, and social isolation. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbp015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robison, J., Moen, P., & Dempster-McClain, D. (1995). Women’s caregiving: Changing profi les and pathways. Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 50, S362–S373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savla, J., Almeida, D. M., Davey, A., & Zarit, S. H. (2008). Routine assistance to parents: Effects on daily mood and other stressors. Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 63, S154–S161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schalock, R. L., Brown, I., Brown, R., Cummins, R. A., Felce, D., Matikka, L., et al. (2002). Conceptualization, measurement, and application of quality of life for persons with intellectual disabilities: Report of an international panel of experts. Mental Retardation, 40, 457–470.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, R., & Beach, S. R. (1999). Caregiving as a risk factor for mortality: the caregiver health effects study. JAMA, 282(23), 2215–2219.

  • Schulz, R., & Martire, L. M. (2004). Family caregiving of persons with dementia: prevalence, health effects, and support strategies. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 12(3), 240–249.

  • Smilkstein, G. (1978). The Family APGAR: A proposal for family function test and its use by physicians. Journal of Family Practice, 6(6), 1231–1239.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smilkstein, G., Ashworth, C., & Montano, D. (1982). Validity and reliability of the Family APGAR as a test of family function. Journal of Family Practice, 15, 303–311.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Son, J., Erno, A., Shea, D. G., Femia, E. E., Zarit, S. H., & Stephens, M. A. (2007). The caregiver stress process and health outcomes. Journal of Aging and Health, 19(6), 871–887.

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, J. A., Hoffman, L., Marquis, J., Turnbull, A., Poston, D., & Elson, L. L. (2005). Measuring the quality of family-professional partnership in special education services. Exceptional Children, 72, 65–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torti, F. M., Gwyther, L., Reed, S., Friedman, J., & Schulman, K. (2004). A multinational review of recent trends and reports in dementia caregiver burden. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 18, 99–109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, A. P., & Turnbull, R. (2001). Families, Professionals and Exceptionality. New Jersey, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.

  • Turnbull, A. P., Turnbull, H. R., Poston, D., Beegle, G., Blue-Banning, M., et al. (2004). Enhancing quality of life of families of children and youth with developmental disabilities in the United States. In A. Turnbull, I. Brown, & H. R. Turnbull (Eds.), Families and People with Mental Retardation and Quality of Life: International Perspectives (pp. 51–100). Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakabayashi, C., & Donato, K. M. (2006). Does caregiving increase poverty among women in later life? Evidence from the Health and Retirement Survey. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 47, 258–274.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M., & Brown, R. (2009). Family quality of life: A framework for policy and social services provisions to support families of children with disabilities. Journal of Family Social Work, 12, 144–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yau, M. K. S. & Li-Tsang,W. P. C. (1999). Adjustment and adaptation in parents of children with developmental disability in two-parent families: a review of the characteristics and attributes. The British Journal of Developmental Disability, 45, 38–51.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyriaki Mystakidou.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Parpa, E., Katsantonis, N., Tsilika, E. et al. Psychometric Properties of the Family Quality of Life Scale in Greek Families with Intellectual Disabilities. J Dev Phys Disabil 28, 393–405 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-016-9477-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-016-9477-1

Keywords

Navigation