Skip to main content
Log in

Peers’ Attitudes Toward Autism Differ Across Sociometric Groups: An Exploratory Investigation

  • Published:
Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined the influence of sociometric status and the interactive effects of sociometric status and causal information on peers’ initial impressions of an unfamiliar child with autism. Children (N = 576) enrolled in regular education completed sociometric nominations and responded to videotapes of a child portraying autistic behavior. In contrast to sociometrically average and rejected children, neglected children reported more negative attitudes toward the child with autism and less willingness to engage in academic activities with him. Popular children did not differ from other sociometric groups on self-reported attitudes and behavioral intentions toward the child with autism. We predicted that popular children would be the most responsive to causal information about autism; however, rejected children reported more willingness to engage in activities with the child with autism in the presence of explanatory information when compared to other sociometric groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alderfer, M. A., Wiebe, D. J., and Hartmann, D. P. (2001). Social behaviour and illness information interact to influence the peer acceptance of children with chronic illness. Br. J. Health Psychol. 6: 243–255.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, M. P., Shores, R. E., McEvoy, M. A., Ellis, D., and Fox, J. J. (1987). Increasing social interactions of severely handicapped autistic children. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 17: 375–390.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. M., Ferguson, J. E., Herzinger, C. V., Jackson, J. N., and Marino, C. (2004). Combined descriptive and explanatory information improves peers’ perceptions of autism. Res. Dev. Disabil. 25: 321–329.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coie, J. D., and Dodge, K. A. (1983). Continuities and changes in children’s social status: A five-year longitudinal study. Merrill Palmer Q. 29: 261–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crick, N., and Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychol. Bull. 115: 74–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederickson, N. L., and Furnham, A. F. (1998). Sociometric classification methods in school peer groups: A comparative investigation. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 39: 921–933.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Georgia Department of Education (2002). The 2001–2002 Georgia Public Education Report Card. Retrieved June 2, 2003, from Georgia Public Education Report Card Online via http://accountability.doe.k12.ga.us/Report02/.

  • Harrower, J. K., and Dunlap, G. (2001). Including children with autism in general education classrooms: A review of effective strategies. Behav. Modif. 25: 762–784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, L. D., and Bracken, B. A. (1998). Relationship between students’ social status and global and domain-specific self-concepts. J. Sch. Psychol. 36: 233–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juvonen, J. (1992). Negative peer reactions from the perspective of the reactor. J. Educ. Psychol. 84: 314–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lease, A. M., Kennedy, C. A., and Axelrod, J. L. (2002). Children’s social constructions of popularity. Soc. Dev. 11: 87–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maag, J. W., Vasa, S. F., and Reid, R. (1995). Social and behavioral predictors of popular, rejected, and average children. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 55: 196–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon-Lewis, C., Rabiner, D., and Starnes, R. (1999). Predicting boys’ social acceptance and aggression: The role of mother-child interactions and boys’ beliefs about peers. Dev. Psychol. 35: 632–639.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGee, G. G., Almeida, M. C., Sulzer-Azaroff, B., and Feldman, R. S. (1992). Promoting reciprocal interactions via peer incidental teaching. J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 25: 117–126.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, S. B., Walker, M., Bieberich, A., and Bell, S. (1996). The Shared Activities Questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN.

  • Newcomb, A. F., Bukowski, W. M., and Pattee, L. (1993). Children’s peer relations: A meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status. Psychol. Bull. 113: 99–128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, K., and Schreibman, L. (1995). Increasing complex social behaviors in children with autism: Effects of peer-implemented pivotal response training. J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 28: 285–295.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rabiner, D. L., Keane, S. P., and MacKinnon-Lewis, C. (1993). Children’s beliefs about familiar and unfamiliar peers in relation to their sociometric status. Dev. Psychol. 29: 236–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, S. J. (2000). Interventions that facilitate socialization in children with autism. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 30: 399–409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sasso, G. A., and Rude, H. A. (1987). Unprogrammed effects of training high-status peers to interact with severely handicapped children. J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 20: 35–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siperstein, G. N. (1980). Development of the Adjective Checklist: An Instrument for Measuring Children’s Attitudes Toward the Handicapped. Unpublished manuscript, University of Massachusetts, Boston.

  • Siperstein, G. N., and Bak, J. (1977). Instruments to Measure Children’s Attitudes Toward the Handicapped: Adjective Checklist and Activity Preference List. Unpublished manuscript, University of Massachusetts, Boston.

  • Siperstein, G. N., and Bak, J. J. (1985). Effects of social behavior on children’s attitudes toward their mildly and moderately mentally retarded peers. Am. J. Ment. Retard. 90: 319–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strain, P. S., Kerr, M. M., and Ragland, E. U. (1979). Effects of peer-mediated social initiations and prompting/reinforcement procedures on the social behavior of autistic children. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 9: 41–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swaim, K. F., and Morgan, S. B. (2001). Children’s attitudes and behavioral intentions toward a peer with autistic behaviors: Does a brief educational intervention have an effect? J. Autism Devel. Disorders 31: 195–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terry, R., and Coie, J. D. (1991). A comparison of methods for defining sociometric status among children. Dev. Psychol. 27: 867–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, K. J., Rubin, E. C., and Graczyk, P. A. (2002). Aggressive children’s perceptions of behaviorally similar peers: The influence of one’s own behavioral characteristics on perceptions of deviant peers. J. Soc. Pers. Relat. 19: 755–775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, B. (1993). On sin versus sickness: A theory of perceived responsibility and social motivation. Am. Psychol. 48: 957–965.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan M. Campbell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Campbell, J.M., Ferguson, J.E., Herzinger, C.V. et al. Peers’ Attitudes Toward Autism Differ Across Sociometric Groups: An Exploratory Investigation. J Dev Phys Disabil 17, 281–298 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-005-4386-8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-005-4386-8

Keywords

Navigation