Abstract
The SIPAT is a standardized measure for pre-transplant psychosocial evaluation. Previous SIPAT studies utilized a relatively small lung transplant sample and only included listed patients. This study characterized the SIPAT in 147 lung transplant candidates to better elucidate its utility. The average score corresponded to a minimally acceptable rating and nearly half of the patients had relative or absolute contraindications. Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) patients scored more favorably than non-ILD patients (U = 7.69, p < .05). The Total (β = − .05, SE = .018, p < .01), Social Support Subscale (β = − .133, SE = .058, p < .05), and Psychosocial Stability and Psychopathology Subscale (β = − .103, SE = .040, p < .05) significantly predicted listing status. The SIPAT has a unique profile in lung transplant candidates and demonstrated utility for guiding transplant decisions. Future research should examine which lung transplant outcomes are significantly associated with SIPAT scores.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chambers, D. C., Cherikh, W. S., Harhay, M. O., Hayes, D., Hsich, E., Khush, K. K., & Singh, T. P. (2019). The International Thoracic Organ Transplant Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Thirty-sixth adult lung and heart–lung transplantation Report—2019; Focus theme: Donor and recipient size match. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 38(10), 1042–1055.
Craven, J. (1990). Psychiatric aspects of lung transplant: The Toronto Lung Transplant Group. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 35, 759–764.
Craven, J. L., Bright, J., & Dear, C. L. (1990). Psychiatric, psychosocial, and rehabilitative aspects of lung transplantation. Clinics in Chest Medicine, 11(2), 247–257.
Dew, M. A., DiMartini, A. F., Dabbs, A. D. V., Myaskovsky, L., Steel, J., Unruh, M., & Greenhouse, J. B. (2007). Rates and risk factors for nonadherence to the medical regimen after adult solid organ transplantation. Transplantation, 83(7), 858–873.
Dew, M. A., Rosenberger, E. M., Myaskovsky, L., DiMartini, A. F., Dabbs, A. J. D., Posluszny, D. M., & Greenhouse, J. B. (2015). Depression and anxiety as risk factors for morbidity and mortality after organ transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transplantation, 100(5), 988.
Dew, M. A., Switzer, G. E., DiMartini, A. F., Matukaitis, J., Fitzgerald, M. G., & Kormos, R. L. (2000). Psychosocial assessments and outcomes in organ transplantation. Progress in Transplantation, 10(4), 239–261.
Dobbels, F., De Geest, S., Cleemput, I., Fischler, B., Kesteloot, K., Vanhaecke, J., & Vanrenterghem, Y. (2001). Psychosocial and behavioral selection criteria for solid organ transplantation. Progress in Transplantation, 11(2), 121–132.
Goetzmann, L., Ruegg, L., Stamm, M., Ambühl, P., Boehler, A., Halter, J., & Spindler, A. (2008). Psychosocial profiles after transplantation: a 24-month follow-up of heart, lung, liver, kidney and allogeneic bone-marrow patients. Transplantation, 86(5), 662–668.
Hosmer, D. W. & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied Logistic Regression (2nd Ed.). John Wiley and Sons.
Kugler, C., Fischer, S., Gottlieb, J., Welte, T., Simon, A., Haverich, A., & Strueber, M. (2005). Health-related quality of life in two hundred-eighty lung transplant recipients. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 24(12), 2262–2268.
Maldonado, J. R., Dubois, H. C., David, E. E., Sher, Y., Lolak, S., Dyal, J., & Witten, D. (2012). The Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation (SIPAT): a new tool for the psychosocial evaluation of pre-transplant candidates. Psychosomatics, 53(2), 123–132.
Maldonado, J. R., Sher, Y., Lolak, S., Swendsen, H., Skibola, D., Neri, E., & Standridge, K. (2015). The Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation: a prospective study of medical and psychosocial outcomes. Psychosomatic Medicine, 77(9), 1018–1030.
Olbrisch, M. E., Levenson, J. L., & Hamer, R. (1989). The PACT: A rating scale for the study of clinical decision-making in psychosocial screening of organ transplant candidates. Clinical Transplantation, 3(3), 164–169.
Orens, J. B., Estenne, M., Arcasoy, S., Conte, J. V., Corris, P., Egan, J. J., & Martinez, F. J. (2006). International guidelines for the selection of lung transplant candidates: 2006 update—a consensus report from the Pulmonary Scientific Council of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 25(7), 745–755.
Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. General Considerations in the Assessment for Transplant Candidacy. Available at: https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/resources/ethics/general-considerations-in-assessment-for-transplant-candidacy/.
Owen, J. E., Bonds, C. L., & Wellisch, D. K. (2006). Psychiatric evaluations of heart transplant candidates: predicting post-transplant hospitalizations, rejection episodes, and survival. Psychosomatics, 47(3), 213–222.
Parekh, P. I., Blumenthal, J. A., Babyak, M. A., Merrill, K., Carney, R. M., Davis, R. D., & Investigators, I. N. S. P. I. R. E. (2003). Psychiatric disorder and quality of life in patients awaiting lung transplantation. Chest, 124(5), 1682–1688.
Rivard, A. L., Hellmich, C., Sampson, B., Bianco, R. W., Crow, S. J., & Miller, L. W. (2005). Preoperative predictors for postoperative problems in heart transplantation: psychiatric and psychosocial considerations. Progress in Transplantation, 15(3), 276–282.
Rosenberger, E. M., DiMartini, A. F., Dabbs, A. J. D., Bermudez, C. A., Pilewski, J. M., Toyoda, Y., & Dew, M. A. (2016). Psychiatric predictors of long-term transplant-related outcomes in lung transplant recipients. Transplantation, 100(1), 239.
Singer, H. K., Ruchinskas, R. A., Riley, K. C., Broshek, D. K., & Barth, J. T. (2001). The psychological impact of end-stage lung disease. Chest, 120(4), 1246–1252.
Søyseth, T. S., Lund, M. B., Bjørtuft, Ø., Heldal, A., Søyseth, V., Dew, M. A., & Malt, U. F. (2016). Psychiatric disorders and psychological distress in patients undergoing evaluation for lung transplantation: a national cohort study. General Hospital Psychiatry, 42, 67–73.
Steinman, T. I., Becker, B. N., Frost, A. E., Olthoff, K. M., Smart, F. W., Suki, W. N., & Wilkinson, A. H. (2001). Guidelines for the referral and management of patients eligible for solid organ transplantation. Transplantation, 71(9), 1189–1204.
Twillman, R. K., Manetto, C., Wellisch, D. K., & Wolcott, D. L. (1993). The transplant evaluation rating scale: A revision of the psychosocial levels system for evaluating organ transplant candidates. Psychosomatics, 34(2), 144–153.
Weill, D., Benden, C., Corris, P. A., Dark, J. H., Davis, R. D., Keshavjee, S., & Snell, G. I. (2015). A consensus document for the selection of lung transplant candidates: 2014—an update from the Pulmonary Transplantation Council of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 34(1), 1–15.
Woodman, C. L., Geist, L. J., Vance, S., Laxson, C., Jones, K., & Kline, J. N. (1999). Psychiatric disorders and survival after lung transplantation. Psychosomatics, 40(4), 293–297.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Yelena Chernyak, Danielle R. Henderson, Lisa Teh, Anna-Leigh Powell, Kendra E. Hinton, Chadi A. Hage declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights
We received ethics approval from the Indiana University Institutional Review Board for the secondary data analysis of clinical data.
Informed consent
This research was classified as exempt and as such informed consent was waived. All procedures were part of routine clinical care.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chernyak, Y., Henderson, D.R., Teh, L. et al. Characterization of the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant (SIPAT) in Lung Transplant Candidates. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 29, 137–149 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-021-09788-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-021-09788-y