Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Development of a Short Version of the Dutch Version of the Spielberger STAI Trait Anxiety Scale in Women Suspected of Breast Cancer and Breast Cancer Survivors

  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of the current study was to develop a short form of the Dutch version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) Trait scale and to provide initial validation data in a sample of breast cancer patients and survivors. This short trait anxiety (A-Trait) scale was designed to reduce time and effort required of severely ill or handicapped patients involved in extensive assessment procedures. Another goal was to assess A-Trait with minimal overlap with content that reflects Quality of Life (QoL) and fatigue. Three groups of women either completed the original Trait scale (Groups 1 and 2) or the 10-item trait version (Group 3). In Group 1, exploratory factor analysis with the Scree test, Velicer’s MAP criteria and parallel analysis as tests for factor retention, indicated a 10-item Trait version reflecting two factors: Anxiety Present and Anxiety Absent. In the other groups, confirmatory factor analysis showed that the two-factor short form provided the best fit. In all three groups Trait Anxiety was highly related to Neuroticism. The correlation between Overall QoL and General Health and the Anxiety Present short scale was lower than the correlation between Overall QoL and General Health and the full form (Z = 2.20, p = .03). With this short A-Trait scale it becomes possible to study the relationship between dispositional anxiety and clinically important outcome variables without inflating estimates of these relations through psychometric contamination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (1999). Amos 4.0 user’s guide. Chicago, IL: SmallWaters Corporation.

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleiker, E. M. A., Pouwer, F., Van der Ploeg, H. M., Leer, J. W. H., & Adèr, H. J. (2000). Psychological distress two years after diagnosis of breast cancer: Frequency and prediction. Patient Education and Counseling, 40, 209–217. doi:10.1016/S0738-3991(99)00085-3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bonomi, A. E., Patrick, D. L., Bushnell, D. M., & Martin, M. (2000). Validation of the United States’ version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) instrument. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 53, 1–12. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00123-7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. H. (1991). Mood congruity of social judgments. In J. Forgas (Ed.), Emotion and social judgments (pp. 31–53). Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canals, J., Esparó, G., & Fernández-Ballart, J. D. (2002). How anxiety levels during pregnancy are linked to personality dimensions and sociodemographic factors. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 253–259. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00149-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 140–161. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caumo, W., Schmidt, A. P., Schneider, C. N., Bergmann, J., Iwamoto, C. W., Adamatti, L. C., et al. (2002). Preoperative predictors of moderate to intense acute postoperative pain in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 46, 1265–1271. doi:10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.46105.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. doi:10.1207/s15328007SEM0902_5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., Jr, & McCrae, R. R. (1989). NEO-PI/FFI manual supplement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, J., Michielsen, H. J., Van Heck, G. L., & Drent, M. (2004). Measuring fatigue in sarcoidosis: The Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS). British Journal of Health Psychology, 9, 279–291. doi:10.1348/1359107041557048.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, J., Van der Steeg, A. F., & Roukema, J. A. (2010). Psychometric properties of the Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS) in women with breast problems. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 10, 125–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, J., & Van Heck, G. L. (1995). De Nederlandse versie van de WHOQOL-100 [The Dutch version of the WHOQOL-100]. Tilburg: Tilburg University.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, J., & Van Heck, G. L. (1997). The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment Instrument (WHOQOL-100): Validation study with the Dutch version. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 13, 164–178. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.13.3.164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272–299. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foot, M., & Koszycki, D. (2004). Gender differences in anxiety-related traits in patients with panic disorders. Depression and Anxiety, 20, 123–130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forgas, J. (2001). The Affect Infusion Model (AIM): An integrative theory of mood effects on cognition and judgments. In L. Martin & G. L. Clore (Eds.), Theories of mood and cognition: A user’s guidebook (pp. 99–134). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glorfeld, L. W. (1995). An improvement on Horn’s parallel analysis methodology for selecting the correct number of factors to retain. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 377–393. doi:10.1177/0013164495055003002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, R., & Gomez, A. (2005). Convergent, discriminant and concurrent validities of measures of the behavioural approach and behavioural inhibition systems: Confirmatory factor analytic approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 87–102. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2004.03.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorsuch, R. L. (1997). Exploratory factor analysis: Its role in item analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 532–560. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6803_5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hishinuma, E. S., Miyamoto, R. H., Nishimura, S. T., Nahulu, L. B., Andrade, N. N., Makini, G. K., Jr, et al. (2000). Psychometric properties of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Asian/Pacific-islander adolescents. Assessment, 7, 17–36. doi:10.1177/107319110000700102.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra, H.A., Ormel, J., & De Fruyt, F. (1996). Handleiding bij de NEO Persoonlijkheids vragenlijsten NEO-PI-R, NEO-FFI [Manual for the NEO Personality Inventories NEO-PI-R and NEO-FFI]. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger B.V.

  • Hoekstra, H.A., Ormel, J., & De Fruyt, F. (2003). NEO-PI-R/NEO-FFI Big Five Persoonlijkheidsvragenlijst: Handleiding [NEO-PI-R/NEO-FFI Big Five Personality questionnaire: Manual]. Lisse: Harcourt Assessment.

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, P. (1987). Factor analysis and personality theory. European Journal of Personality, 1, 21–36. doi:10.1002/per.2410010105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langford, P. H. (2003). A one-minute measure of the Big Five? Evaluating and abridging Shafer’s (1999a) Big Five markers. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1127–1140. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00323-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marteau, T. M., & Bekker, H. (1992). The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 31, 301–306. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8260.1992.tb00997.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Michielsen, H. J., De Vries, J., & Van Heck, G. L. (2003). Psychometric qualities of a brief self-rated fatigue measure: The Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS). Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 54, 345–352. doi:10.1016/S0022-3999(02)00392-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, G. H., David, D., Goldfarb, A. B., Silverstein, J. H., Weltz, C. R., Birk, J. S., et al. (2003). Sources of anticipatory distress among breast surgery patients. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 26, 153–164. doi:10.1023/A:1023034706298.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Carroll, R. E., Smith, K., Couston, M., Cossar, J. A., & Hayes, P. C. (2000). A comparison of the WHOQOL-100 and the WHOQOL-BREF in detecting change in quality of life following liver transplantation. Quality of Life Research, 9, 121–124. doi:10.1023/A:1008901320492.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 32, 396–402. doi:10.3758/BF03200807.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-markers: A brief version of Goldberg’s unipolar big-five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 506–516. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6303_8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schreier, A. M., & Williams, S. A. (2004). Anxiety and quality of life of women who receive radiation or chemotherapy for breast cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum, 31, 127–130. doi:10.1188/04.ONF.127-130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shek, D. T. L. (1988). Reliability and factorial structure of the Chinese version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 10, 303–317. doi:10.1007/BF00960624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D. (1983). State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970). The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D., Vagg, P. R., Barker, L. R., Donham, G. W., & Westberry, L. G. (1980). The factor structure of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. In I. G. Sarason & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Stress and anxiety (Vol. 7, pp. 95–109). Washington, DC: Hemiphere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tluczek, A., Henriques, J. B., & Brown, R. L. (2009). Support for the reliability and validity of a six-item state anxiety scale derived from the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 17, 19–28. doi:10.1891/1061-3749.17.1.19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1–10. doi:10.1007/BF02291170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Ploeg, H. M., Defares, P. B., & Spielberger, C. D. (1980). Handleiding bij de Zelf-Beoordelings Vragenlijst ZBV: Een Nederlandstalige bewerking van de Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory STAI-DY [Manual for the Self-Judgment Questionnaire ZBV: A Dutch adaptation of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory STAI-DY]. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger. doi:10.1245/s10434-006-9175-9.

  • Van der Steeg, A. F. W., De Vries, J., Van der Ent, F. W. C., & Roukema, J. A. (2007). Personality predicts quality of life six months after the diagnosis and treatment of breast disease. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 14, 678–685.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Knippenberg, F. C. E., Duivenvoorden, H. J., Bonke, B., & Passchier, J. (1990). Shortening the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43, 995–1000. doi:10.1016/0895-4356(90)90083-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Velicer, W. F. (1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41, 321–327. doi:10.1007/BF02293557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vercoulen, J. H. M. M., Alberts, M., & Bleijenberg, G. (1999). De Checklist Individual Strength [The Checklist Individual Strength]. Gedragstherapie, 32, 131–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHOQOL Group. (1995). Field Trial WHOQOL-100 February 1995: Facet definitions and questions. Geneva: WHO (MNH/PSF/95.1.B).

  • WHOQOL group. (1998). The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): Development and general psychometric properties. Social Science and Medicine, 46, 1569–1585. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00009-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zechmeister, J. S., Zechmeister, E. B., & Shaughnessy, J. J. (2001). Essentials in research methods in psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill. doi:1036/0072388153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 432–442. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guus L. Van Heck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Vries, J., Van Heck, G.L. Development of a Short Version of the Dutch Version of the Spielberger STAI Trait Anxiety Scale in Women Suspected of Breast Cancer and Breast Cancer Survivors. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 20, 215–226 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-012-9325-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-012-9325-0

Keywords

Navigation