Top

Gepubliceerd in:

17-10-2016 | Letter to the Editor

Does the CSM really provide a consistent framework for understanding self-management?

Auteurs: Frank Doyle, Barbara Mullan

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Behavioral Medicine | Uitgave 2/2017

Excerpt

Despite Leventhal et al. (2016) providing a 50-year overview of their Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation (CSM), they fail to cite the null findings in relation to the CSM and adherence, as found by at least two reviews (Brandes & Mullan, 2014; Law et al., 2014). …

vorige artikel Weight control behaviors of highly successful weight loss maintainers: the Portuguese Weight Control Registry

volgende artikel Choose (and use) your tools wisely: “Validated” measures and advanced analyses can provide invalid evidence for/against a theory

Brandes, K., & Mullan, B. (2014). Can the common-sense model predict adherence in chronically ill patients? A meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review, 8, 129–153. doi:10.1080/17437199.2013.820986 CrossRefPubMed

Donnelly, N. A., Hickey, A., Burns, A., Murphy, P., & Doyle, F. (2015). Systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of carer stress on subsequent institutionalisation of community dwelling older people. PLoS One, 10, e0128213. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0128213 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ferguson, C. J., & Heene, M. (2012). A vast graveyard of undead theories: Publication bias and psychological science’s aversion to the null. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 555–561. doi:10.1177/1745691612459059 CrossRefPubMed

Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med, 2, e124. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Johnston, M. (2016). A science for all reasons: A comment on Ogden (2016). Health Psychology Review, 10, 256–259. doi:10.1080/17437199.2016.1190292 CrossRefPubMed

Law, G. U., Tolgyesi, C. S., & Howard, R. A. (2014). Illness beliefs and self-management in children and young people with chronic illness: A systematic review. Health Psychology Review, 8, 362–380. doi:10.1080/17437199.2012.747123 CrossRefPubMed

Leventhal, H., Phillips, L. A., & Burns, E. (2016). The Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation (CSM): A dynamic framework for understanding illness self-management. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. doi:10.1007/s10865-016-9782-2

Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349, aac4716. doi:10.1126/science.aac4716 CrossRef

Titel: Does the CSM really provide a consistent framework for understanding self-management?
Auteurs: Frank Doyle
Barbara Mullan
Publicatiedatum: 17-10-2016
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Behavioral Medicine / Uitgave 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0160-7715
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3521
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-016-9806-y

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Excerpt

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2017

Global life satisfaction predicts ambulatory affect, stress, and cortisol in daily life in working adults

Dispositional optimism and sleep quality: a test of mediating pathways

Pre-surgical depression and anxiety and recovery following coronary artery bypass graft surgery

Communicating about cigarette smoke constituents: an experimental comparison of two messaging strategies

Day-to-day variations in health behaviors and daily functioning: two intensive longitudinal studies

Breast cancer delay in Latinas: the role of cultural beliefs and acculturation