Abstract
Although the number of English Language Learner students is increasing in the US school system, little is known about the preferences of language of instruction, particularly among young students with autism. We implemented a choice assessment with five children with autism to determine preference between English and Spanish instruction using a concurrent-operant design. Participants were allowed to choose between English instruction, Spanish instruction, and a no-language control condition using BIGmack communication devices. We compared choice allocation between previously mastered skills (easy tasks) and targets in the acquisition phase of learning (difficult tasks). None of the participants indicated a preference for language of instruction during easy tasks, while four participants indicated a preference during difficult tasks. Results suggest that the concurrent-operant procedure is an effective method for assessing preference of language of instruction with students with autism.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bennett, T., Eatman, J., Garcia, G. E., Halle, J., McCollum, J., Ostrosky, L, et al. (2001). Cross-cultural considerations in early childhood special education. Retrieved from http://clas.uiuc.edu/techreport/tech14.html.
Brodhead, M. T., Durán, L., & Bloom, S. E. (2014). Cultural and linguistic diversity in recent verbal behavior research on individuals with disabilities: A review and implications for research and practice. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 30, 75–86.
Buckley, S., & Newchok, D. (2005). Differential impact of response effort within a response chain on use of mands in a student with autism. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 26, 77–85.
Chen, G. (1989). Relationships of the dimensions of intercultural communication competence. Communication Quarterly, 37, 118–133.
Chen, G. (2014). Intercultural communication competence: Summary of 30-year research and directions for future study. In X. Dai & G. Chen (Eds.), Intercultural communication competence: Conceptualization and its development in cultural contexts and interactions (pp. 14–40). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
DeLeon, I. G., & Iwata, B. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 519–533.
Deutsch, S. E., & Won, G. Y. M. (1963). Some factors in the adjustment of foreign nationals in the United States. Journal of Social Issues, 19, 115–122.
Fong, E. H., Catagnus, R. M., Brodhead, M. T., Quigley, S., & Field, S. (2016). Developing cultural awareness skills of behavior analysts. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 9, 84–94.
Fontes, L. A. (2012). Child abuse and culture: Working with diverse families. New York: Guilford.
Gast, D. L., & Ledford, J. R. (2014). Single case research and methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences. New York: Routledge.
Hammer, M., Gudykunst, W., & Wiseman, R. (1978). Dimensions of intercultural effectiveness. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2, 382–393.
Horner, R. H., & Day, M. H. (1991). The effects of response efficiency on functionally equivalent behaviors. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 719–732.
Kang, S., O’Reilly, M., Lancioni, G., Falcomata, T. S., Sigafoos, J., & Xu, Z. (2013). Comparison of the predictive validity and consistency among preference assessment procedures: A review of the literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 1125–1133.
Lang, R., Rispoli, M., Sigafoos, J., Lancioni, G., Andrews, A., & Ortega, L. (2011). Effects of language of instruction on response accuracy and challenging behavior in a child with autism. Journal of Behavioral Education, 20, 252–259.
Ortiz, A. A., & Artiles, A. J. (2012). Meeting the needs of ELLs with disabilities: A linguistically and culturally responsive model. In G. Li & P. Edwards (Eds.), Best practices in ELL instruction (pp. 247–272). New York: Guildford.
Ortiz, A. A., Wilkinson, C. Y., Robertson-Courtney, P., & Kushner, M. I. (2006). Considerations in implementing intervention assistance teams to support English Language Learners. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 53–63.
Padilla Dalmau, Y. C., Wacker, D. P., Harding, J. W., Berg, W. K., Schieltz, K. M., Lee, J. F., et al. (2011). A preliminary evaluation of functional communication training effectiveness and language preference when Spanish and English are manipulated. Journal of Behavioral Education, 20, 233–251.
Richman, D., Wacker, D., & Winborn, L. (2001). Response efficiency during functional communication training: Effects of effort on response allocation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 73–76.
Rispoli, M., O’Reilly, M., Lang, R., Sigafoos, J., Mulloy, A., Aguilar, J., et al. (2011). The effects of language of implementation on functional analysis outcomes. Journal of Behavioral Education, 20, 224–232.
Rogers-Adkinson, D. L., Ochoa, T. A., & Delgado, B. (2003). Developing cross-cultural competence: Serving families of children with significant developmental needs. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 18, 4–8.
Schopler, E., Reichler, J., & Renner, B. (1988). The Childhood Autism Rating Scale. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
Tincani, M. (2004). Comparing the picture exchange communication system and sign language training for children with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 19, 152–163.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2013). Language use in the United States: 2011 (ACS-22). Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/prod/2013pubs/acs-22.pdf.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). The condition of education 2016 (NCES 2016-144). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2016/2016144.pdf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aguilar, J.M., Chan, J.M., White, P.J. et al. Assessment of the Language Preferences of Five Children with Autism from Spanish-Speaking Homes. J Behav Educ 26, 334–347 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-017-9280-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-017-9280-9