Abstract
Social skills instruction has been recommended as a way of improving behavioral and social outcomes for students with emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD). A brief social skills intervention (Stop and Think (Knoff in The stop & think social skills program, Sopris West, Longmont, CO, 2001) was used to extend the current literature base for students with EBD. A multiple-baseline across classrooms design was used to examine negative social behavior of five participants attending a self-contained school setting for students with challenging behavior. The primary intervention components included: (a) teach, (b) model, (c) role play, and (d) performance feedback. Specific social skills addressed in intervention were listening, using nice talk, accepting consequences, ignoring others, and following directions. Participants were taught to use a 5-step process for each social skill: (1) stop and think, (2) identify good and bad choices, (3) identify steps to performing the good choice, (4) implement steps, and (5) reflect on the good choice you made. Results indicated students benefitted from 12 sessions of explicit social skills instruction as evidenced by decreases in negative social behavior. Social behavior improvements maintained during 2-week follow-up observations. Decreasing negative social behaviors is important in improving general social and behavioral outcomes as well as demonstrating growth toward being prepared to transition back to less restrictive environments. Limitations, recommendations for future research, and practice implications are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the child behavior checklist/4–18 and 1991 profile. Burlington, VT: Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont.
Alwell, M., & Cobb, B. (2009). Social and communicative interventions and transition outcomes for you with disabilities: A systematic review. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32(2), 94–107. doi:10.1177/0885728809336657.
Cheney, D., Stage, S., Hawken, L., Lynass, L., Mielenz, C., & Waugh, M. (2009). A two-year outcome study of the check, connect, and expect intervention for students at-risk of severe behavior problems. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 17, 226–243. doi:10.1177/1063426609339186.
Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Pearson.
Gage, N. A., Lierheimer, K. S., & Goran, L. G. (2012). Characteristics of students with high-incidence disabilities broadly defined. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 23(3), 168–178. doi:10.1177/1044207311425385.
Goodman, R. (1997). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 38, 581–586.
Gresham, F. M. (2015). Evidence-based social skills interventions for students at risk for EBD. Remedial and Special Education, 36(2), 100–104. doi:10.1177/0741932514556183.
Gresham, F. M., & Elliott, S. N. (1990). Social skills rating scales. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.
Gresham, F. M., Van, M. B., & Cook, C. R. (2006). Social skills training for teaching replacement behaviors: Remediating acquisition deficits in at-risk students. Behavioral Disorders, 31(4), 363–377.
Hall, J. D., Jones, C. H., & Claxton, A. F. (2008). Evaluation of the stop & think social skills program with kindergarten students. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 24, 265–283. doi:10.1080/153779008202093280.
Hill, C. R., & Hughes, J. N. (2007). An examination of the convergent and discriminant validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. School Psychology Quarterly, 22(3), 380–406.
Hinshaw, S. P. (1992). Academic underachievement, attention deficits, and aggression: comorbidity and implications for intervention. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 893–903.
Jitendra, A. K., Burgess, C., & Gajria, M. (2011). Cognitive strategy instruction for improving expository text comprehension of students with learning disabilities: The quality of evidence. Exceptional Children, 77, 135–159.
Jolivette, K., McDaniel, S. C., Sprague, J. R., Swain-Bradway, J., & Ennis, R. (2012). Embedding the positive behavioral interventions and supports framework into the complex array of practices within alternative education settings: A decision-making process. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 38, 15–29. doi:10.1177/1534508412454450.
Knoff, H. M. (2001). The stop & think social skills program. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
Knoff, H. M. (2005). The stop & think social skills program: Exploring its research base and rationale. Retrieved November 1st from http://arspdg.org/assets/files/Documents/StopAndThinkResearchBaseTAPaper111.pdf.
Knoff, H. M., & Batsche, G. M. (1994). Project ACHIEVE: A collaborative, school-based reform process improving the academic and social progress of at-risk underachieving students (report no. CG 026 122). East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Learning, (ERIC document reproduction service no. ED383963).
Knoff, H. M., & Batsche, G. M. (1995). Project ACHIEVE: Analyzing a school reform process for at-risk and underachieving students. School Psychology Review, 24, 579–603.
Lane, K. L., Menzies, H., Bruhn, A. L., & Crnobori, M. (2011). Managing challenging behaviors in schools: Research-based strategies that work. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Maag, J. (2005). Social skills training for youth with emotional and behavioral disorders and learning disabilities: Problems, conclusions, and suggestions. Exceptionality, 13, 155–172. doi:10.1207/s15327035ex1303_2.
Maag, J. W. (2006). Social skills training for students with emotional and behavioral disorders: A review of reviews. Behavioral Disorders, 32, 4–17.
McDaniel, S. C., & Bruhn, A. L. (2015). Using a changing-criterion design to evaluate the effects of individualized goals within check-in/check-out. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions. pbi.sagepub.com: doi:10.1177/1098300715588263.
McDaniel, S., Bruhn, A. L., & Mitchell, B. (2015). Tier 2: A framework for identification and intervention. Beyond Behavior, 24(1), 10–17.
McIntosh, K., Sadler, C., & Brown, J. A. (2012). Kindergarten reading skill level and change as risk factors for chronic problem behavior. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 14(1), 17–28. doi:10.1177/1098300711403153.
Reddy, L. A., Newman, E., De Thomas, C. A., & Chun, V. (2009). Effectiveness of school-based prevention and intervention programs for children and adolescents with emotional disturbance: A meta-analysis. Journal of School Psychology, 47(2), 77–99. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2008.11.0001.
Rutter, M. (1967). A children’s behavior questionnaire for completion by teachers: Preliminary findings. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 8(1), 1–11.
Sullivan, A. L., & Sadeh, S. S. (2014). Is there evidence to support the use of social skills interventions for students with emotional disabilities? Journal of Applied School Psychology, 30(2), 107–131. doi:10.10810/153.77903.2014.888528.
Tsai, S., & Cheney, D. (2012). The impact of the adult-child relationship on school adjustment for children at risk of serious behavior problems. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 20(2), 105–114. doi:10.117/1063426611418974.
Wagner, M., Newman, L., Cameto, R., & Levine, P. (2005). Changes over time in the early postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities. A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition study (NLTS) and the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. (ERIC document reproduction service no. ED494920).
Wentzel, K. (2009). Peers and academic functioning at school. In K. Rubin, W. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 531–547). New York, NY: Guildford Press.
Witt, J. C., & Elliot, S. N. (1985a). Intervention rating profile-15: Acceptability of classroom intervention strategies. In T. R. Kratochwill (Ed.), Advances in school psychology (pp. 251–288). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Witt, J. C., & Elliot, S. N. (1985b). Children’s intervention rating profile: Acceptability of classroom intervention strategies. In T. R. Kratochwill (Ed.), Advances in school Psychology (pp. 251–288). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Sara C. McDaniel, Allison L. Bruhn, and Leonard Troughton declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McDaniel, S.C., Bruhn, A.L. & Troughton, L. A Brief Social Skills Intervention to Reduce Challenging Classroom Behavior. J Behav Educ 26, 53–74 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-016-9259-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-016-9259-y