Abstract
Basic and applied research related to the effects of interspersing trials of maintenance (i.e., review) tasks among trials of acquisition tasks on academic skill development is reviewed. In general, empirical research suggests that interspersing procedures are effective in facilitating acquisition, learning rate, and maintenance. However, some inconsistency exists among the data that suggests student learning, in some instances, may be impeded. Research also suggests that interspersing procedures are not conducive to facilitating generalization. The discrepancy between various research findings and the consistent failure of research on interspersing procedures to increase generalization is critically reviewed in relation to a hierarchical learning theory set forth by Haring and Eaton (1978). From this hierarchical learning theory perspective, inconsistent results may be better understood and predicted. Implications for current practice and directions for future research are also discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cates, G. L., Skinner, C. H., Watkins, C. E., Rhymer, K. N., Miles, S. L., & McCurdy, M. (1999). Effects of interspersing additional brief math problems on student performance and perception of math assignments: Getting students to prefer to do more work. Journal of Behavioral Education, 9, 177–192.
Cates, G. L., & Skinner, C. H. (2000). Getting remedial mathematics students to choose homework with 20% and 40% more problems: An investigation of the strength of the interspersing procedure. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 339–347.
Cooke, N. L., Guzaukas, R., Pressley, J. S., & Kerr, K. (1993). Effects of using a ratio of new items to review items during drill and practice: Three experiments. Education and Treatment of Children, 16, 213–234.
Cooke, N. L., & Reichard, S. M. (1996). The effects of different interspersal drill ratios on acquisition and generalization of multiplication and division facts. Education and Treatment of Children, 19, 124–142.
Coulter, W. A., & Coulter, E. M. (1989). Curriculum-based assessment for instructional design. Unpublished training manual.
Cuvo, A. J., Davis, P. K., & Gluck, T. C. (1991). Cumulative and interspersal task sequencing in self-paced training for persons with mild handicaps. Mental Retardation, 29, 335–342.
DeVaney, T. (1998). Effect of interspersing less difficult problems on the completion and preference of assignments involving linear equations. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Mid-South Educational Research Association: New Orleans, LA.
Dunlap, G. (1984). The influence of task variation and maintenance tasks on the learning and affect of autistic children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37, 41–64.
Dunlap, G., & Koegel, R. L. (1980). Motivating autistic children through stimulus variation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 619–627.
Greenwood, C. R., Delquadri, J., & Hall, R. V. (1984). Opportunity to respond and student academic performance. In W. Heward, T. Heron, D. Hill, & J. Trap-Porter (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education (pp. 58–88). Columbus, OH: Charles E Merrill.
Haring, N. G., & Eaton, M. D. (1978). Systematic instructional procedures: An instructional hierarchy. In N. G. Haring, T. C. Lovitt, M. D. Eaton, & C. L. Hansen (Eds.), The fourth R: Research in the classroom (pp. 23–40). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Johns, G. A., Skinner, C. H., & Nail, G. L. (2000). Effects of interspersing briefer mathematics problems on assignment choice in students with learning disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 10, 95–106.
Logan, P., & Skinner, C. H. (1998). Improving students' perceptions of a mathematics assignment by increasing problem completion rates: Is problem completion a reinforcing event. School Psychology Quarterly, 13, 322–331.
Lovitt, T. C., & Hansen, C. L. (1976). The use of contingent skipping and drill to improve oral reading and comprehension. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 9, 20–26.
Martin, J., Skinner, C. H., & Neddenriep, C. E. (2001). Extending research on the interspersal procedure to perceptions of continuous reading assignments: Applied and theoretical implications of a failure to replicate. Psychology in the Schools, 38, 391–400.
McCurdy, M., Skinner, C. H., Grantham, K., Watson, T. S., & Hindman, P. M. (2001). Increasing on-task behavior in an elementary student during mathematics seatwork by interspersing additional brief problems. School Psychology Review, 30, 23–32.
Neef, N. A., Iwata, B. A., & Page, T. J. (1977). The effects of known-item interspersal on acquisition and retention of spelling and sight-reading words. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 738.
Neef, N. A., Iwata, B. A., & Page, T. J. (1980). The effects of interspersal training versus high-density reinforcement on spelling acquisition and retention. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 153–158.
Rhymer, K. N., Hennington, C., Skinner, C. H., & Looby, E. J. (1999). The effects of explicit timing on mathematics performance in second-grade Caucasian and African American students. School Psychology Quarterly, 14, 397–407.
Rhymer, K. N., Skinner, C. H., Henington, C., D'Reaux, R. A., & Sims, S. (1998). Effects of explicit timing on mathematics problem completion rates in African-American third grade elementary students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 673–677.
Roberts, M. L., & Shapiro, E. S. (1996). Effects of instructional ratios on students' reading performance in a regular education classroom. Journal of School Psychology, 34, 73–91.
Roberts, M. L., Turco, T. L., & Shaprio, E. S. (1991). Differential effects of fixed instructional ratios on students' progress in reading. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 9, 308–318.
Skinner, C. H. (1998). Preventing academic skills deficits. In T. S. Watson & F. M. Gresham, (Eds.), Handbook of child behavior therapy (pp. 61–82). New York: Plenum.
Skinner, C. H., Belfiore, P. J., & Watson, T. S. (1995). Assessing the relative effects of interventions in students with mild disabilities: Assessing instructional time. Assessment in Rehabilitation and Exceptionality, 2, 207–220.
Skinner, C. H., Fletcher, P. A., Wildmon, M., & Belfiore, P. J. (1996). Improving assignment preference through interspersal: Problem completion rates versus easy problems. Journal of Behavioral Education, 6, 427–437.
Skinner, C. H., Fletcher, P. A., & Henington, C. (1996). Increasing learning rates by increasing student response rates: A summary of research. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 313–325.
Skinner, C. H., Hall-Johnson, K., Skinner, A. L., Cates, G. L., & Johns, G. A., & Webber, J. (1999). Enhancing students' perceptions of mathematics assignments by increasing relative problem completion rates through the interspersal technique. Journal of Experimental Education, 68, 43–59.
Skinner, C. H., Robinson, S. L., Johns, G. A., Logan, P., & Belfiore, P. J. (1996). Applying Herrnstein's matching law to influence students' choice to complete difficult academic tasks. Journal of Experimental Education, 65, 5–17.
Skinner, C. H., & Shapiro, E. S. (1989). A comparison of taped-words and drill interventions on reading fluency in adolescents with behavior disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 12, 123–133.
Skinner, C. H., Turco, T. L., Beatty, K., & Rasavage, C. (1989). Cover, copy and compare: A method for increasing multiplication fluency in behavior disordered children. School Psychology Review, 18, 412–420.
Wildmon, M. E., Skinner, C. H., McCurdy, M., & Sims, S. (1999). Improving secondary students' perception of the “dreaded mathematics word problem assignment” by giving them more word problems. Psychology in the Schools, 36, 319–325.
Wildmon, M. E., Skinner, C. H., & McDade, A. (1998). Interspersing additional brief easy problems to increase assignment preference on mathematics reading problems. Journal of Behavioral Education, 8, 337–346.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cates, G.L. A Review of the Effects of Interspersing Procedures on the Stages of Academic Skill Development. J Behav Educ 14, 305–325 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-005-8652-8
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-005-8652-8