Top

Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment

Gepubliceerd in:

14-04-2020

Validation of the Persian Translation of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale—Self-Report (LPFS-SR): Comparison of College Students and Patients with Personality Disorders

Auteurs: Azad Hemmati, Leslie C. Morey, Morgan N. McCredie, Farzin Rezaei, Amin Nazari, Fateh Rahmani

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment | Uitgave 3/2020

Abstract

The Levels of Personality Functioning Scale—Self-Report (LPFS-SR) is a freely available self-report instrument that corresponds directly in content to the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD) Criterion A, which assesses global pathology of personality functioning. The present study translated the LPFS-SR into Persian and examined the psychometrics of the translated measure in a sample of 471 college students and 142 hospitalized patients with a diagnosed personality disorder (PD). Results indicate that the Persian translation of the LPFS-SR is highly internally consistent and concurrently valid with related indicators of personality pathology. Additionally, the LPFS-SR significantly discriminated between the college sample and clinical sample, while also demonstrating considerable incremental validity over the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis II Personality Questionnaire (SCID-II-PQ) in the prediction of personality disorder diagnosis. The majority of indices supported a unidimensional structure for the LPFS-SR. Six items showed negative item-total correlations and may necessitate refinement in order to capture pathology-related content more adequately for Iranian culture. Overall, the findings of the present study support the use of the Persian translation of the LPFS-SR.

vorige artikel Exploring the Psychometric Properties of Two Primary Domains in the Revised Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire (R-OBVQ) among Primary School Learners in South Africa

volgende artikel Abnormal EEG Power Spectrum in Individuals with High Autistic Personality Traits: an eLORETA Study

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

Al-Dajani, N., Gralnick, T. M., & Bagby, R. M. (2016). A psychometric review of the personality inventory for DSM–5 (PID–5): Current status and future directions. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(1), 62–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1107572.CrossRefPubMed

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). Washington D.C.: American Psychiatric Pub.CrossRef

Amini, M., Pourshabaz, A., Mohammadkhani, P., & Khodaie Ardakani, M. R. (2014). The validity of dimensional model of DSM-V in antisocial and borderline personality disorders. Tehran: University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation.

Amini, M., Pourshahbaz, A., Mohammadkhani, P., Ardakani, M.-R. K., Lotfi, M., & Ramezani, M. A. (2015a). The relationship between five-factor model and diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder-personality traits on patients with antisocial personality disorder. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences : The Official Journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, 20(5), 470–476.CrossRef

Amini, M., Pourshahbaz, A., Mohammadkhani, P., Khodaie Ardakani, M. R., & Lotfi, M. (2015b). The DSM-5 levels of personality functioning and severity of Iranian patients with antisocial and borderline personality disorders. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal, 17(8), e19885. https://doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.17(5)2015.19885.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Bach, B., & Hutsebaut, J. (2018). Level of personality functioning scale–brief form 2.0: Utility in capturing personality problems in psychiatric outpatients and incarcerated addicts. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100, 660–670.CrossRef

Bender, D. S., Morey, L. C., & Skodol, A. E. (2011). Toward a model for assessing level of personality functioning in DSM–5, part I: A review of theory and methods. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(4), 332–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.583808.CrossRefPubMed

Bennett, D. A. (2001). How can I deal with missing data in my study? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 25(5), 464–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.2001.tb00294.x.CrossRefPubMed

Bernstein, D. P., Iscan, C., & Maser, J. (2007). Opinions of personality disorder experts regarding the DSM-IV personality disorders classification system. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21(5), 536–551. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2007.21.5.536.CrossRefPubMed

Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301.CrossRef

Church, A. T. (2010). Measurement issues in cross-cultural research. The Sage handbook of measurement, 151–177.

DeClercq, B., DeFruyt, F., DeBolle, M., VanHiel, A., Markon, K. E., & Krueger, R. F. (2014). The hierarchical structure and construct validity of the PID-5 trait measure in adolescence. Journal of Personality, 82(2), 158–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12042.CrossRef

Derogatis, L. R. (1992). The SCL–90–R, administration, scoring and procedures manual (2nd ed.). Towson: Clinical Psychometric Research.

Eremenco, S. L., Cella, D., & Arnold, B. J. (2005). A comprehensive method for the translation and cross-cultural validation of health status questionnaires. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 28(2), 212–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278705275342.CrossRef

Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2017). Program FACTOR at 10: origins, development and future directions/10 anos del programa factor: una revision critica de sus origenes, desarrollo y lineas futuras. Psicothema, 29(2), 236–241.PubMed

First, M. B., Gibbon, M., Spitzer, R. L., & Benjamin, L. S. (1997). User's guide for the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis II personality disorders: SCID-II. Washington D.C.: American psychiatric pub.

Fossati, A., Krueger, R. F., Markon, K. E., Borroni, S., & Maffei, C. (2013). Reliability and validity of the personality inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5): Predicting DSM-IV personality disorders and psychopathy in community-dwelling Italian adults. Assessment, 20(6), 689–708. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113504984.CrossRefPubMed

Frances, A. (1982). Categorical and dimensional systems of personality diagnosis: A comparison. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 23(6), 516–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-440X(82)90043-8.CrossRefPubMed

Fyer, M. R., Frances, A. J., Sullivan, T., Hurt, S. W., & Clarkin, J. (1988). Suicide attempts in patients with borderline personality disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 145(6), 737–739. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.145.6.737.CrossRefPubMed

Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C., & Beaton, D. (1993). Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46(12), 1417–1432. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-N.CrossRefPubMed

Hambleton, R. K., & Rovinelli, R. J. (1986). Assessing the dimensionality of a set of test items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 10(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168601000307.CrossRef

Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation Modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53–60.

Hopwood, C. J., & Zanarini, M. C. (2010). Five-factor trait instability in borderline relative to other personality disorders. Personality Disorders, 1(1), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018230.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hopwood, C. J., Good, E. W., & Morey, L. C. (2018). Validity of the DSM–5 levels of personality functioning scale–self report. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1420660.

Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02289447.CrossRefPubMed

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRef

Huprich, S. K., Nelson, S. M., Meehan, K. B., Siefert, C. J., Haggerty, G., Sexton, J., . . . Baade, L. (2017). Introduction of the DSM-5 levels of personality functioning questionnaire. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, No Pagination Specified-No Pagination Specified. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000264.

Hutsebaut, J., Feenstra, D. J., & Kamphuis, J. H. (2016). Development and preliminary psychometric evaluation of a brief self-report questionnaire for the assessment of the DSM–5 level of personality functioning scale: The LPFS brief form (LPFS-BF). Personality Disorders, Theory, Research, and Treatment, 7(2), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000159.CrossRef

Hyler, S. E. (1994). Personality diagnostic questionnaire-4. New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute.

Karterud, S., Friis, S., Irion, T., Mehlum, L., Vaglum, P., & Vaglum, S. (1995). A SCL-90-R derived index of the severity of personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 9, 112–123.CrossRef

Kline, R. B. (2005). Measurement models and confirmatory factor analysis. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 22005, 133–145.

Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42(9), 1879–1890. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291711002674.CrossRefPubMed

Livesley, W. J. (2009). General assessment of personality disorder (GAPD). Toronto: Sigma Assessment Systems, Inc..

Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Van Ginkel, J. R. (2016). Multiple imputation of missing values in exploratory factor analysis of multidimensional scales: Estimating latent trait scores. Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology, 32(2), 596–608. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.32.2.215161.CrossRef

Lorenzo-Seva, U., Timmerman, M. E., & Kiers, H. A. (2011). The Hull method for selecting the number of common factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46(2), 340–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2011.564527.CrossRefPubMed

Lotfi, M., Bach, B., Amini, M., & Simonsen, E. (2018). Structure of DSM-5 and ICD-11 personality domains in Iranian community sample. Personality and Mental Health, 12(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1409.CrossRefPubMed

Maffei, C., Fossati, A., Agostoni, I., Barraco, A., Bagnato, M., Deborah, D., Namia, C., Novella, L., & Petrachi, M. (1997). Interrater reliability and internal consistency of the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis II personality disorders (SCID-II), version 2.0. Journal of Personality Disorders, 11(3), 279–284. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.1997.11.3.279.CrossRefPubMed

Mohammadkhani, P., Jokar, M., Jahani-Tabesh, O., & Tamannaei-Far, S. (2011). Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis II personality disorders (Persian version). Tehran: Danjeh.

Morey, L. C. (1991). Personality assessment inventory. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Morey, L. C. (2014). Personality assessment inventory (PAI). The Encyclopedia of Clinical Psychology, 1–10.

Morey, L. C. (2017). Development and initial evaluation of a self-report form of the DSM–5 level of personality functioning scale. Psychological Assessment, 29(10), 1302–1308. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000450.CrossRefPubMed

Morey, L. C. (2019). Thoughts on the assessment of the DSM-5 alternative model for personality disorders: Comment on Sleep et al. (2019). Psychological Assessment.

Morey, L. C., Bender, D. S., & Skodol, A. E. (2013). Validating the proposed diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th edition, severity Indicator for personality disorder. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 201(9), 729–735. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0b013e3182a20ea8.CrossRefPubMed

Morey, L. C., Benson, K. T., Busch, A. J., & Skodol, A. E. (2015). Personality disorders in DSM-5: Emerging research on the alternative model. Current Psychiatry Reports, 17(4), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-015-0558-0.CrossRef

O’connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32(3), 396–402. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03200807.CrossRef

Persson, B. N., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2019). Social status as one key indicator of successful psychopathy: An initial empirical investigation. Personality and Individual Differences, 141, 209–217.CrossRef

Pincus, A. L. (2018). An interpersonal perspective on criterion a of the DSM-5 alternative model for personality disorders. Current Opinion in Psychology, 21, 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.08.035.CrossRefPubMed

Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–163.CrossRef

Roskam, I., Galdiolo, S., Hansenne, M., Massoudi, K., Rossier, J., Gicquel, L., & Rolland, J.-P. (2015). The psychometric properties of the French version of the personality inventory for DSM-5. PLoS One, 10(7), e0133413. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133413.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Schriesheim, C. A., & Eisenbach, R. J. (1995). An exploratory and confirmatory factor-analytic investigation of item wording effects on the obtained factor structures of survey questionnaire measures. Journal of Management, 21(6), 1177–1193. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639502100609.CrossRef

Schriesheim, C. A., & Hill, K. D. (1981). Controlling acquiescence response Bias by item reversals: The effect on questionnaire validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41(4), 1101–1114. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448104100420.CrossRef

Sharp, C., Wright, A. G. C., Fowler, J. C., Frueh, B. C., Allen, J. G., Oldham, J., & Clark, L. A. (2015). The structure of personality pathology: Both general (‘g’) and specific (‘s’) factors? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124(2), 387–398. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000033.CrossRefPubMed

Skodol, A. E., Bender, D. S., Morey, L. C., Clark, L. A., Oldham, J. M., Alarcon, R. D., . . . Siever, L. J. (2011). Personality disorder types proposed for DSM-5. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25(2), 136–169. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2011.25.2.136.

Sleep, C. E., Lynam, D. R., Widiger, T. A., Crowe, M. L., & Miller, J. D. (2019). An evaluation of DSM–5 Section III personality disorder Criterion A (impairment) in accounting for psychopathology. Psychological Assessment, 31(10), 1181.

Smith, P. B. (2004). Acquiescent response Bias as an aspect of cultural communication style. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35(1), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022103260380.CrossRef

Thylstrup, B., Simonsen, S., Nemery, C., Simonsen, E., Noll, J. F., Myatt, M. W., & Hesse, M. (2016). Assessment of personality-related levels of functioning: A pilot study of clinical assessment of the DSM-5 level of personality functioning based on a semi-structured interview. BMC Psychiatry, 16(1), 298. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-1011-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Timmerman, M. E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023353.CrossRefPubMed

van der Heijden, P., Ingenhoven, T., Berghuis, H., & Rossi, G. (2014). DSM-5 persoonlijkheidsvragenlijst [DSM-5 personality inventory]. PID-5-NL.

Velicer, W. F. (1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41, 321–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293557.CrossRef

Watson, D., Clark, A. L., & Chmielewski, M. (2008). Structures of personality and their relevance to psychopathology: II. Further articulation of a comprehensive unified trait structure. Journal of Personality, 76(6), 1545–1586. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00531.x.CrossRefPubMed

Weekers, L. C., Hutsebaut, J., & Kamphuis, J. H. (2019). The level of personality functioning scale-brief form 2.0: Update of a brief instrument for assessing level of personality functioning. Personality and Mental Health, 13(1), 3–14.CrossRef

Widiger, T. A. (1992). Categorical versus dimensional classification: Implications from and for research. Journal of Personality Disorders, 6(4), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.1992.6.4.287.CrossRef

Widiger, T. A. (2011). The DSM-5 dimensional model of personality disorder: Rationale and empirical support. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25(2), 222–234. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2011.25.2.222.CrossRefPubMed

Widiger, T. A., & Mullins-Sweatt, S. N. (2010). Clinical utility of a dimensional model of personality disorder. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 41(6), 488–494. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021694.CrossRef

Widiger, T. A., & Trull, T. J. (2007). Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: Shifting to a dimensional model. American Psychologist, 62(2), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.62.2.71.CrossRefPubMed

Wong, N., Rindfleisch, A., & Burroughs, J. E. (2003). Do reverse-worded items confound measures in cross-cultural consumer research? The case of the material values scale. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(1), 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1086/374697.CrossRef

Woods, C. M. (2006). Careless responding to reverse-worded items: Implications for confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 28(3), 186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-005-9004-7.CrossRef

Wright, A. G. C., Hopwood, C. J., Skodol, A. E., & Morey, L. C. (2016). Longitudinal validation of general and specific structural features of personality pathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125(8), 1120–1134. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000165.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Zachar, P., Krueger, R. F., & Kendler, K. S. (2016). Personality disorder in DSM-5: An oral history. Psychological Medicine, 46(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291715001543.CrossRefPubMed

Zimmermann, J., Altenstein, D., Krieger, T., Holtforth, M. G., Pretsch, J., Alexopoulos, J., Spitzer, C., Benecke, C., Krueger, R. F., Markon, K. E., & Leising, D. (2014a). The structure and correlates of self-reported DSM-5 maladaptive personality traits: Findings from two German-speaking samples. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28(4), 518–540. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2014_28_130.CrossRefPubMed

Zimmermann, J., Benecke, C., Bender, D. S., Skodol, A. E., Schauenburg, H., Cierpka, M., & Leising, D. (2014b). Assessing DSM–5 level of personality functioning from videotaped clinical interviews: A pilot study with untrained and clinically inexperienced students. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(4), 397–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2013.852563.CrossRefPubMed

Zimmermann, J., Böhnke, J. R., Eschstruth, R., Mathews, A., Wenzel, K., & Leising, D. (2015). The latent structure of personality functioning: Investigating criterion a from the alternative model for personality disorders in DSM–5. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124(3), 532–548. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000059.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Validation of the Persian Translation of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale—Self-Report (LPFS-SR): Comparison of College Students and Patients with Personality Disorders
Auteurs: Azad Hemmati
Leslie C. Morey
Morgan N. McCredie
Farzin Rezaei
Amin Nazari
Fateh Rahmani
Publicatiedatum: 14-04-2020
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment / Uitgave 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0882-2689
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3505
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-019-09775-6

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2020

Working Memory Capacity and ADHD Symptoms in Boys: Examining the Heterogeneity of Working Memory Functioning Using Latent Profile Analysis

Measurement Invariance Across Adult Self-Ratings of Current and Retrospective Childhood ADHD Symptoms

Sex Differences in Externalizing and Internalizing Symptoms in ADHD, Autism, and General Population Samples

Exploring the Psychometric Properties of Two Primary Domains in the Revised Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire (R-OBVQ) among Primary School Learners in South Africa

Changes in College Student Endorsement of ADHD Symptoms across DSM Edition

A Multi-Informant Study of the Validity of the Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits in a Sample of Norwegian Adolescents with Behavior Problems