Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 4/2018

17-09-2018

Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Structure of Adult ADHD Symptoms

Auteurs: Joanne L. Park, Mason Silveira, Madison Elliott, Victoria Savalei, Charlotte Johnston

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment | Uitgave 4/2018

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Previous research has examined the factor structure of ADHD symptoms in adults using confirmatory factor analysis and there is mixed support for two-factor, three-factor, or more complex bifactor models. The current study re-examines these factor structures on the basis of not only overall model fit, but also criteria such as chi-square difference tests, invariance, reliability, and validity. Three datasets were pooled to form a total sample of 430 adults (50% female). Participants completed questionnaires assessing their ADHD symptoms, education, psychopathology, and parenting (the latter as validity variables). Although the bifactor models demonstrated the best fit, the reliability and construct replicability of specific factors in these models was poor. The three-factor model had good fit and demonstrated good reliability, validity, construct replicability, and some invariance across gender and dataset. Our results replicate previous studies that find superior fit for bifactor models. However, the superior statistical fit may reflect only the increased complexity of these models. The more parsimonious three-factor model may demonstrate stronger validity and clinical utility.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Voetnoten
1
Our data are on a 4-point scale, which is on the threshold of recommendations to use either a categorical or continuous estimation method (Rhemtulla et al. 2012). Therefore, we also ran our analyses with the unweighted least squares estimator (ULSMV) for categorical data. Given that the pattern of results was similar, we only report findings with MLR. Results using ULSMV are presented in Table 4 and Figs. 4, 5 and 6 in Supplementary Materials.
 
2
We also tested strong invariance by comparing the configural model with the same model but with factor loadings and intercepts constrained to be equal across gender and dataset. Because the hypothesis of strong invariance was always rejected, we did not report these results.
 
3
The Satorra-Bentler scaled chi-square difference test (Satorra and Bentler 2010) was utilized for models estimated with MLR.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference American Psychiatric Association [APA]. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.CrossRef American Psychiatric Association [APA]. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.CrossRef
go back to reference Barkley, R. A. (2011). Barkley adult ADHD rating scale –IV (BAARS-IV). New York: Guilford. Barkley, R. A. (2011). Barkley adult ADHD rating scale –IV (BAARS-IV). New York: Guilford.
go back to reference Barkley, R. A., & Murphy, K. R. (2006). A clinical workbook: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press. Barkley, R. A., & Murphy, K. R. (2006). A clinical workbook: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
go back to reference Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press. Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
go back to reference DeMars, C. E. (2013). A tutorial on interpreting bifactor model scores. International Journal of Testing, 13, 354–378.CrossRef DeMars, C. E. (2013). A tutorial on interpreting bifactor model scores. International Journal of Testing, 13, 354–378.CrossRef
go back to reference Derogatis, L. R. (1993). Brief symptom inventory: Administration, scoring, and procedures manual. Minneapolis: National Computer Systems. Derogatis, L. R. (1993). Brief symptom inventory: Administration, scoring, and procedures manual. Minneapolis: National Computer Systems.
go back to reference Gomez, R., Burns, G. L., Walsh, J. A., & Hafetz, N. (2005). A multitrait-multisource confirmatory factor analytic approach to the construct validity of ADHD and ODD rating scales with Malaysian children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 241–254.CrossRef Gomez, R., Burns, G. L., Walsh, J. A., & Hafetz, N. (2005). A multitrait-multisource confirmatory factor analytic approach to the construct validity of ADHD and ODD rating scales with Malaysian children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 241–254.CrossRef
go back to reference Gomez, R., Vance, A., & Gomez, R. M. (2013). Validity of the ADHD bifactor model in general community samples of adolescents and adults, and a clinic-referred sample of children and adolescents. Journal of Attention Disorders. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054713480034. Gomez, R., Vance, A., & Gomez, R. M. (2013). Validity of the ADHD bifactor model in general community samples of adolescents and adults, and a clinic-referred sample of children and adolescents. Journal of Attention Disorders. Advance online publication. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​1087054713480034​.
go back to reference Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (2001). Rethinking construct reliability within latent variable systems. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit, & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future—A Festschrift in honor of Karl Jöreskog (pp. 195–216). Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International. Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (2001). Rethinking construct reliability within latent variable systems. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit, & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future—A Festschrift in honor of Karl Jöreskog (pp. 195–216). Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International.
go back to reference Holzinger, K. J., & Swineford, F. (1937). The bi-factor method. Psychometrika, 2, 41–54.CrossRef Holzinger, K. J., & Swineford, F. (1937). The bi-factor method. Psychometrika, 2, 41–54.CrossRef
go back to reference Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York: Guilford. Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York: Guilford.
go back to reference Normand, S., Flora, D. B., Toplak, M. E., & Tannock, R. (2012). Evidence for a general ADHD factor from a longitudinal general school population study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40, 555–567.CrossRef Normand, S., Flora, D. B., Toplak, M. E., & Tannock, R. (2012). Evidence for a general ADHD factor from a longitudinal general school population study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40, 555–567.CrossRef
go back to reference Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P. É., & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17, 354–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029315.CrossRefPubMed Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P. É., & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17, 354–373. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​a0029315.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Shelton, K. K., Frick, P. J., & Wootton, J. M. (1996). Assessment of parenting practices in families of elementary school-age children. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 25, 317–329.CrossRef Shelton, K. K., Frick, P. J., & Wootton, J. M. (1996). Assessment of parenting practices in families of elementary school-age children. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 25, 317–329.CrossRef
go back to reference Smith Jr., E. V., & Johnson, B. D. (1998). Factor structure of the DSM-IV criteria for college students using the adult behavior checklist. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 31, 164. Smith Jr., E. V., & Johnson, B. D. (1998). Factor structure of the DSM-IV criteria for college students using the adult behavior checklist. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 31, 164.
go back to reference Span, S. A., Earleywine, M., & Strybel, T. Z. (2002). Confirming the factor structure of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms in adult, nonclinical samples. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 24, 129–136.CrossRef Span, S. A., Earleywine, M., & Strybel, T. Z. (2002). Confirming the factor structure of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms in adult, nonclinical samples. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 24, 129–136.CrossRef
go back to reference Stanton, K., Forbes, M. K., Zimmerman, M. (2018). Distinct dimensions defining the adult ADHD self-report scale: Implications for assessing inattentive and hyperactive/impulsive symptoms. Psychological Assessment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000604 Stanton, K., Forbes, M. K., Zimmerman, M. (2018). Distinct dimensions defining the adult ADHD self-report scale: Implications for assessing inattentive and hyperactive/impulsive symptoms. Psychological Assessment. Advance online publication. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​pas0000604
go back to reference Swanson, J. M., Schuck, S., Porter, M. M., Carlson, C., Hartman, C. A., Sergeant, J. A., et al. (2012). Categorical and dimensional definitions and evaluations of symptoms of ADHD: History of the SNAP and the SWAN rating scales. The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment, 10, 51–70.PubMedPubMedCentral Swanson, J. M., Schuck, S., Porter, M. M., Carlson, C., Hartman, C. A., Sergeant, J. A., et al. (2012). Categorical and dimensional definitions and evaluations of symptoms of ADHD: History of the SNAP and the SWAN rating scales. The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment, 10, 51–70.PubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference WHO. (1992). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization. WHO. (1992). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization.
go back to reference Wolraich, M. L., Lambert, E. W., Baumgaertel, A., Garcia-Tornel, S., Feurer, I. D., Bickman, L., & Doffing, M. A. (2003). Teachers’ screening for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Comparing multinational samples on teacher ratings of ADHD. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 31, 445–455.CrossRef Wolraich, M. L., Lambert, E. W., Baumgaertel, A., Garcia-Tornel, S., Feurer, I. D., Bickman, L., & Doffing, M. A. (2003). Teachers’ screening for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Comparing multinational samples on teacher ratings of ADHD. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 31, 445–455.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Structure of Adult ADHD Symptoms
Auteurs
Joanne L. Park
Mason Silveira
Madison Elliott
Victoria Savalei
Charlotte Johnston
Publicatiedatum
17-09-2018
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment / Uitgave 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0882-2689
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-018-9698-y

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2018

Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 4/2018 Naar de uitgave