Top

Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment

Gepubliceerd in:

01-03-2013

Women Inmate Substance Abusers’ Reactivity to Visual Alcohol, Cigarette, Marijuana, and Crack-Cocaine Cues: Approach and Avoidance as Separate Dimensions of Reactivity

Auteurs: Robert C. Schlauch, Mary J. Breiner, Paul R. Stasiewicz, Rita L. Christensen, Alan R. Lang

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment | Uitgave 1/2013

Abstract

Despite the growing recognition for multidimensional assessments of cue-elicited craving, few studies have attempted to measure multiple response domains associated with craving. The present study evaluated the Ambivalence Model of Craving (Breiner et al. Alcohol Research and Health 23:197–206, 1999; Stritzke et al. 2007) using a unique cue reactivity methodology designed to capture both the desire to use (approach inclination) and desire to not consume (avoidance inclination) in a clinical sample of incarcerated female substance abusers. Participants were 155 incarcerated women who were participating in or waiting to begin participation in a nine-month drug treatment program. Results indicated that all four substance cue-types (alcohol, cigarette, marijuana, and crack cocaine) had good reliability and showed high specificity. Also, the validity of measuring approach and avoidance as separate dimensions was supported, as demonstrated by meaningful clinical distinctions between groups evincing different reactivity patterns and incremental prediction of avoidance inclinations on measures of stages of change readiness. Taken together, results continue to highlight the importance of measuring both approach and avoidance inclinations in the study of cue-elicited craving.

vorige artikel Differential Attention as a Mechanism of Change in Parent–Child Interaction Therapy: Support from Time-Series Analysis

volgende artikel The Interactive Contributions of Perceived Control and Anxiety Sensitivity in Panic Disorder: A Triple Vulnerabilities Perspective

The following variables were examined for potential effects of treatment on avoidance inclinations: 1) number of months in prison, 2) stages of change, and 3) treatment waitlist status. Findings for all analyses were unchanged; therefore, the most parsimonious models are presented in the manuscript.

Astin, A. W. (1962). “Bad habits” and social deviation: a proposed revision in conflict theory. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 18, 227–231.PubMedCrossRef

Baker, T. B., Morse, E., & Sherman, J. E. (1987). The motivation to use drugs: A psychobiological analysis of urges. In C. Rivers (Ed.), The Nebraska symposium on motivation: Vol. 34, alcohol and addictive behavior (pp. 257–323). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Baker, T. B., Piper, M., McCarthy, D., Majeskie, M., & Fiore, M. (2004). Addiction motivation reformulated: an affective processing model of negative reinforcement. Psychological Review, 111, 33–51.PubMedCrossRef

Breiner, M. J., Stritzke, W. G. K., & Lang, A. R. (1999). Approaching avoidance: a step essential to the understanding of craving. Alcohol Research & Health, 23, 197–206.

Carter, B. L., & Tiffany, S. T. (1999). Meta-analysis of cue-reactivity in addiction research. Addiction, 94, 327–340.PubMedCrossRef

Coffey, S. F., Saladin, M. E., Drobes, D. J., Dansky, B. S., Wieselquist, J., & Brady, K. T. (1998, June). The development of crack cocaine picture slides for cue reactivity studies: A preliminary normative study. Poster session presented at the 60th Annual Scientific Meeting of the College on Problems of Drug Dependence, Scottsdale, AZ.

Curtin, J. J., Barnett, N. P., Colby, S. M., Rohsenow, D. J., & Monti, P. M. (2005). Cue reactivity in adolescents: measurement of separate approach and avoidance reactions. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 66, 332–343.PubMed

Davidson, D., Tiffany, S., Johnston, W., Flury, L., & Li, T. K. (2003). Using the cue-availability paradigm to assess cue reactivity. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 27, 1251–1256.PubMedCrossRef

Heather, N. (1998). A conceptual framework for explaining drug addiction. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 12, 3–7.PubMedCrossRef

Klein, A. A., Stasiewicz, P. R., Koutsky, J. R., Bradizza, C. M., & Coffey, S. F. (2007). A psychometric evaluation of the Approach and Avoidance of Alcohol Questionnaire (AAAQ) in alcohol dependent outpatients. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavior Assessment, 4, 231–240.CrossRef

Lang, P. J. (1995). The emotion probe: studies of motivation and attention. American Psychologist, 50, 372–385.PubMedCrossRef

Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1999). International affective picture system (IAPS): Instruction manual and affective ratings. Gainesville: Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.

Langan, N. P., & Pelissier, B. (2001). Gender differences among prisoners in drug treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse, 13, 291–301.PubMedCrossRef

LeDoux, J. (2000). Emotion circuits in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, 155–184.PubMedCrossRef

McClellan, D. S., Farabee, D., & Crouch, B. M. (1997). Early victimization, drug use, and criminality: a comparison of male and female prisoners. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24, 455–476.CrossRef

McEvoy, P., Stritzke, W. G. K., French, D. J., Lang, A., & Ketterman, R. L. (2004). Comparison of three models of alcohol craving in young adults: a cross-validation. Addiction, 99, 482–497.PubMedCrossRef

Miller, W. R., & Tonigan, J. S. (1996). Assessing drinkers’ motivation for change: the stages of change readiness and treatment eagerness scale (SOCRATES). Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 10, 81–89.CrossRef

Niaura, R. S., Rohsenow, D. J., Binkoff, J. A., & Monti, P. M. (1988). Relevance of cue reactivity to understanding alcohol and smoking relapse. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. Special Issue: Models of addiction, 97, 133–152.CrossRef

Orford, J. (2001). Excessive appetites: A psychological view of addictions (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

Pelissier, B., Camp, S., Gaes, G., Saylor, W., & Rhodes, W. (2003). Gender differences in outcomes from prison-based residential treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 24, 149–160.PubMedCrossRef

Peters, R., Strozier, A., Murrin, M., & Kearns, W. (1997). Treatment of substance-abusing jail inmates: examination of gender differences. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 14, 339–349.PubMedCrossRef

Powell, J., Gray, J., & Bradley, B. (1993). Subjective craving for opiates: Evaluation of a cue exposure protocol for use with detoxified opiate addicts. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 32, 39–53.

Robbins, S. J., & Ehrman, R. N. (1992). Designing studies of drug conditioning in humans. Psychopharmacology, 106, 143–153.PubMedCrossRef

Sayette, M., Shiffman, S., Tiffany, S., Niaura, R., Martin, C., & Shadel, W. (2000). The measurement of drug craving. Addiction, 95, S189–S210.PubMed

Schlauch, R. C., Stasiewicz, P. R., Bradizza, C. M., Gudleski, G. D., Coffey, S. F., & Gulliver, S. B. (2012). Relationship between approach and avoidance inclinations to use alcohol and treatment outcomes. Addictive Behaviors 37, 824–830.

Smith-Hoerter, K. E., Stasiewicz, P. R., & Bradizza, C. M. (2004). Subjective reactions to alcohol cue exposure: a qualitative analysis of patients’ self-reports. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18, 402–406.PubMedCrossRef

Stasiewicz, P. R., & Maisto, S. A. (1993). Two-factor avoidance theory: the role of negative affect in the maintenance of substance use and substance use disorder. Behavior Therapy, 24, 337–356.CrossRef

Stewart, J., de Wit, H., & Eikelboom, R. (1984). Role of unconditioned and conditioned drug effects in the self-administration of opiates and stimulants. Psychological Review, 91, 251–268.PubMedCrossRef

Stritzke, W. G. K., Breiner, M. J., Curtin, J. J., & Lang, A. R. (2004). Assessment of substance cue reactivity: advances in reliability, specificity, and validity. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18, 148–159.PubMedCrossRef

Stritzke, W. G. K., McEvoy, P. M., Wheat, L. R., Dyer, K. R., & French, D. J. (2007). The yin and yang of indulgence and restraint: The ambivalence model of craving. In P. W. O’Neal (Ed.), Motivation of health behavior (pp. 31–47). Hauppauge: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.

Tiffany, S. (1990). A cognitive model of drug urges and drug-use behavior: role of automatic and nonautomatic processes. Psychological Review, 97, 147–168.PubMedCrossRef

Wertz, J. M., & Sayette, M. (2001). Effects of smoking opportunity on attentional bias in smokers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 15(3), 268–271.PubMedCrossRef

Williams, K. (2001). Women and drug misuse. Issues in Forensic Psychology, 2, 29–34.

Titel: Women Inmate Substance Abusers’ Reactivity to Visual Alcohol, Cigarette, Marijuana, and Crack-Cocaine Cues: Approach and Avoidance as Separate Dimensions of Reactivity
Auteurs: Robert C. Schlauch
Mary J. Breiner
Paul R. Stasiewicz
Rita L. Christensen
Alan R. Lang
Publicatiedatum: 01-03-2013
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment / Uitgave 1/2013
Print ISSN: 0882-2689
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3505
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-012-9313-6

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2013

Intrusive Imagery Experiences in a High Dysmorphic Concern Population

The Interactive Contributions of Perceived Control and Anxiety Sensitivity in Panic Disorder: A Triple Vulnerabilities Perspective

The Emotional Experience Associated with Worrying in Adolescents

Validation of Self-Report Measures of Emotional and Physical Distress Tolerance

Youth’s Negative Self-Statements as Related to Social Self-Efficacy Among Differing Relationships

Penn State Worry Questionnaire: Findings Form Normative and Clinical Samples in Denmark