Abstract
Purpose
Patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) who undergo cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may spontaneously recover sinus rhythm during follow-up. We tested the feasibility and efficacy of electrical cardioversion attempted after 3 months of CRT in patients with permanent AF and measured the long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm.
Methods
Twenty-eight consecutive patients with permanent AF in whom CRT defibrillators had been implanted were scheduled for internal electrical cardioversion after 3 months (group A) and were compared with a control group of 27 patients (group B).
Results
In group A, 22 patients (79 %) were eligible for cardioversion; sinus rhythm was restored in 18 (82 %) of these, with no procedural complications. After 12 months, 16 patients (58 %) in group A were in sinus rhythm, compared with one group B patient who spontaneously recovered sinus rhythm (4 %, p < 0.001). On 12-month evaluation, ejection fraction had improved in both groups, but a reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume was recorded only in group A patients (p = 0.018 versus baseline).
Conclusions
In patients with permanent AF, the rhythm control strategy consisting of internal cardioversion, performed by means of the implanted cardioverter–defibrillator after 3 months of CRT, was associated with a high rate of sinus rhythm resumption on long-term follow-up and with a better echocardiographic response to CRT than that seen in patients treated according to a rate control strategy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dickstein, K., Bogale, N., Priori, S., Auricchio, A., Cleland, J. G., Gitt, A., Limbourg, T., Linde, C., van Veldhuisen, D. J., Brugada, J., Committee, S., & Coordinators, N. (2009). The European cardiac resynchronization therapy survey. Eur Heart J, 30, 2450–2460.
Gasparini, M., Auricchio, A., Regoli, F., Fantoni, C., Kawabata, M., Galimberti, P., Pini, D., Ceriotti, C., Gronda, E., Klersy, C., Fratini, S., & Klein, H. H. (2006). Four-year efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy on exercise tolerance and disease progression: the importance of performing atrioventricular junction ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol, 48, 734–743.
Gasparini, M., Auricchio, A., Metra, M., Regoli, F., Fantoni, C., Lamp, B., Curnis, A., Vogt, J., & Klersy, C. (2008). Multicentre Longitudinal Observational Study (MILOS) Group: long-term survival in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy: the importance of performing atrio-ventricular junction ablation in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J, 29, 1644–1652.
Upadhyay, G. A., Choudhry, N. K., Auricchio, A., Ruskin, J., & Singh, J. P. (2008). Cardiac resynchronization in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. J Am Coll Cardiol, 52, 1239–1246.
Van Gelder, I. C., & Crijns, H. J. (1997). Cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and subsequent maintenance of sinus rhythm. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol, 20, 2675–2683.
Gasparini, M., Steinberg, J. S., Arshad, A., Regoli, F., Galimberti, P., Rosier, A., Daubert, J. C., Klersy, C., Kamath, G., & Leclercq, C. (2010). Resumption of sinus rhythm in patients with heart failure and permanent atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy: a longitudinal observational study. Eur Heart J, 31, 976–983.
Dittrich, H. C., Erickson, J. S., Schneiderman, T., Blacky, A. R., Savides, T., & Nicod, P. H. (1989). Echocardiographic and clinical predictors for outcome of elective cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol, 63, 193–197.
European Heart Rhythm Association; European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Camm, A. J., Kirchhof, P., Lip, G. Y., Schotten, U., Savelieva, I., Ernst, S., Van Gelder, I. C., Al-Attar, N., Hindricks, G., Prendergast, B., Heidbuchel, H., Alfieri, O., Angelini, A., Atar, D., Colonna, P., De Caterina, R., De Sutter, J., Goette, A., Gorenek, B., Heldal, M., Hohloser, S. H., Kolh, P., Le Heuzey, J. Y., Ponikowski, P., & Rutten, F. H. (2010). Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J, 31, 2369–2429.
Saxon, L. A., Greenfield, R. A., Crandall, B. G., Nydegger, C. C., Orlov, M., & Van Genderen, R. (2006). Results of the multicenter RENEWAL 3 AVT clinical study of cardiac resynchronization defibrillator therapy in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 17, 520–525.
Boriani, G., Biffi, M., Camanini, C., Corazza, I., Martignani, C., Valzania, C., Gallina, M., Grigioni, F., Zannoli, R., Rapezzi, C., & Branzi, A. (2004). Efficacy of internal cardioversion for chronic atrial fibrillation in patients with and without left ventricular dysfunction. Int J Cardiol, 95, 43–47.
Tse, H. F., & Lau, C. P. (1999). Safety and efficacy of internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in patients with impaired left ventricular systolic function. Am J Cardiol, 84, 1090–1092.
Hügl, B., Bruns, H. J., Unterberg-Buchwald, C., Grosse, A., Stegemann, B., Lauer, B., Geller, J. C., & Gasparini, M. (2006). Atrial fibrillation burden during the post-implant period after crt using device-based diagnostics. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 17, 813–817.
Kiès, P., Leclercq, C., Bleeker, G. B., Crocq, C., Molhoek, S. G., Poulain, C., van Erven, L., Bootsma, M., Zeppenfeld, K., van der Wall, E. E., Daubert, J. C., Schalij, M. J., & Bax, J. J. (2006). Cardiac resynchronisation therapy in chronic atrial fibrillation: impact on left atrial size and reversal to sinus rhythm. Heart, 92, 490–494.
Maisel, W. H., & Stevenson, L. W. (2003). Atrial fibrillation in heart failure: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and rationale for therapy. Am J Cardiol, 91, 2D–8D.
Cazeau, S., Bordachar, P., Jauvert, G., Lazarus, A., Alonso, C., Vandrell, M. C., Mugica, J., & Ritter, P. (2003). Echocardiographic modeling of cardiac dyssynchrony before and during multisite stimulation: a prospective study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol, 26, 137–143.
Israel, C. W., & Barold, S. S. (2008). Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation: is atrial lead implantation necessary? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol, 31, 263–265.
Yu, C. M., Chau, E., Sanderson, J. E., Fan, K., Tang, M. O., Fung, W. H., Lin, H., Kong, S. L., Lam, Y. M., Hill, M. R., & Lau, C. P. (2002). Tissue Doppler echocardiographic evidence of reverse remodeling and improved synchronicity by simultaneously delaying regional contraction after biventricular pacing therapy in heart failure. Circulation, 105, 438–445.
Disclosures
Carmine Ciardiello is an employee of Boston Scientific, Inc. No other conflicts of interest exist.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Editorial Commentary
Patients with permanent atrial fibrillation can and do spontaneously achieve sinus rhythm after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), likely due to ventricular and atrial reverse remodeling; this occurs in a minority of patients. This study looked at 28 patients with systolic dysfunction who were functional Class III-IV, who had permanent atrial fibrillation and who received CRT; at 3 months, after pre-treatment with amiodarone, 22/28 were internally cardioverted to sinus rhythm, and the maintenance of sinus rhythm over a specified time period was assessed . A control group consisted of 27 patients not cardioverted who achieved spontaneous sinus rhythm over the followup period. Successful cardioversion to sinus rhythm was achieved in 82 % of these heart failure patients, and the majority (58 %) maintained sinus rhythm at one year, compared to a single patient who achieved sinus rhythm spontaneously.
The study results indicate that electrical cardioversion in CRT patients may well be warranted, as sinus rhythm can be achieved and maintained and is associated with substantially improved echocardiographic outcomes. Although ventricular remodeling after CRT may take up to 6 months to be appreciated (at least echocardiographically) , and thus cardioversion at 3 months may be premature in judging the overall effects of this procedure (achievement and maintenance of sinus rhythm), spontaneous resumption of sinus rhythm, if it occurs, takes on average about 4 months to occur and thus an earlier cardioversion attempt could result in optimization of further management strategy (rhythm vs. rate ‘control’) in individual patients.
This is a provocative study which could potentially change our approach to patients with ‘permanent’ AF who undergo CRT, and which, if confirmed in larger trials, could change even the definition of ‘permanent’ AF itself.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Turco, P., D’Onofrio, A., Stabile, G. et al. Feasibility and efficacy of electrical cardioversion after cardiac resynchronization implantation in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 35, 331–336 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-012-9713-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-012-9713-2