Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Scalar implicatures and downward entailment in child Mandarin

  • Published:
Journal of East Asian Linguistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to test whether or not the computation of scalar implicatures in child Mandarin is influenced by the entailment properties of linguistic contexts. Experiment 1 compared adults’ and children’s interpretations of the scalar term huozhe ‘or’, when it appeared in the two arguments of the universal quantifier mei ‘every’. The results showed that Mandarin-speaking adults accepted huozhe as compatible with he ‘and’ in the (downward entailing) restrictor of mei, but not in the (non-downward entailing) nuclear scope of mei, indicating that adults’ calculation of scalar implicatures is sensitive to the influence of entailment patterns. Unlike adults, 4–5-year-old Mandarin-speaking children persistently interpreted huozhe as compatible with he in both contexts. Two further experiments confirmed that children were insensitive to scalar implicatures related to huozhe in non-downward entailing contexts (Experiment 2), unless alternative sentences containing the scalar terms huozhe and he were explicitly presented (Experiment 3). Taken together with previous child studies, the experimental findings suggest that scalar implicatures are not derived in downward entailing contexts. In addition, young children do not spontaneously compute scalar implicatures to the same extent as adults do in non-downward entailing contexts. In both cases, then, young children appear to interpret disjunction as its meaning in classical logic, i.e., inclusive-or.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barner, David, Neon Brooks, and Alan Bale. 2011. Accessing the unsaid: The role of scalar alternatives in children’s pragmatic inference. Cognition 188: 84–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen. 1995. On dou-quantification. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 4: 197–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, Gennaro. 2004. Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomena, and the syntax/pragmatics interface. In Structures and beyond, ed. Belleti Adriana, and Rizzi Luigi, 39–103. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, Gennaro. 2006. Broaden your views: Implicatures of domain widening and the “logicality” of language. Linguistic Inquiry 37: 535–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, Gennaro, Stephen Crain, Maria Teresa Guasti, Andrea Gualmini, and Luisa Meroni. 2001. The acquisition of disjunction: Evidence for a grammatical view of scalar implicatures. In Proceedings of the 25th annual Boston University conference on language development, ed. A.H.-J. Do, L. Domínguez, and A. Johansen, 157–168. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, Gennaro, Stephen Crain, Maria Teresa Guasti, and Rosalind Thornton. 1998. “Some” and “or”: A study on the emergence of logical form. In Proceedings of the 22nd Boston University conference on language development, ed. A. Greenhill, M. Hughes, H. Littlefield, and H. Walsh, 97–108. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, Gennaro, Maria Teresa Guasti, Andrea Gualmini, Luisa Meroni, Stephen Crain, and Francesca Foppolo. 2004. Semantic and pragmatic competence in children’s and adults’ comprehension of or. In Experimental pragmatics, ed. I.A. Noveck, and D. Sperber, 283–300. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crain, Stephen. 2008. The interpretation of disjunction in universal grammar. Language and Speech 51: 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crain, Stephen. 2012. The emergence of meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Crain, Stephen, and Drew Khlentzos. 2008. Is logic innate? Biolinguistics 2: 24–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crain, Stephen, and Drew Khlentzos. 2010. The logic instinct. Mind and Language 25: 30–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crain, Stephen, and Rosalind Thornton. 1998. Investigations in universal grammar: A guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax and semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, Herbert Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Syntax and semantics, vol. 3, ed. P. Cole, and J.L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gualmini, Andrea, Stephen Crain, and Luisa Meroni. 2000. Acquisition of disjunction in conditional sentences. In Proceedings of the 24th Boston University conference on language development, ed. S.C. Howell, S.A. Fish, and T. Keith-Lucas, 326–378. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gualmini, Andrea, Stephen Crain, Luisa Meroni, Gennaro Chierchia, and Maria Teresa Guasti. 2001. At the semantics/pragmatics interface in child language. In Proceedings of SALT XI, ed. R. Hastings, B. Jackson, and Z. Zvolenszky, 231–247. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guasti, Maria Teresa, Gennaro Chierchia, Stephen Crain, Francesca Foppolo, Andrea Gualmini, and Luisa Meroni. 2005. Why children and adults sometimes (but not always) compute implicatures. Language and Cognitive Processes 20: 667–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, James. 1991. Either/or. In Proceedings of NELS 21, ed. T. Sherer, 143–155. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, Laurence. 1972. On the semantic properties of logical operators in English. Ph.D. diss., University of California, Los Angeles.

  • Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Ph.D. diss., MIT.

  • Huang, Yi Ting, and Jesse Snedeker. 2009. Semantic meaning and pragmatic interpretation in five-year olds: Evidence from real time spoken language comprehension. Developmental Psychology 45: 1723–1739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jing, Chunyuan, Stephen Crain, and Ching-Fen Hsu. 2005. The interpretation of focus in Chinese: Child vs. adult language. In Proceedings of the 6th Tokyo conference on psycholinguistics, ed. Y. Otsu, 165–190. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo Publishing.

  • Katsos, Napoleon, and Dorothy V.M. Bishop. 2011. Pragmatic tolerance: Implications for the acquisition of informativeness and implicature. Cognition 120: 67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladusaw, William. 1979. Negative polarity as inherent scope relations. Ph.D. diss., University of Texas.

  • Lee, Thomas Hun-Tak. 1986. Studies on quantification in Chinese. Ph.D. diss., University of California, Los Angeles.

  • Lin, Jo-Wang. 1998. Distributivity in Chinese and its implications. Natural Language Semantics 6: 201–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, Bradley J. 2008. Logically speaking: Evidence for item-based acquisition of the connectives AND & OR. Journal of Cognition and Development 9: 67–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notley, Anna, Peng Zhou, Britta Jensen, and Stephen Crain. 2012. Children’s interpretation of disjunction in the scope of ‘before’: A comparison of English and Mandarin. Journal of Child Language 39: 482–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noveck, Ira A. 2001. When children are more logical than adults: Experimental investigations of scalar implicature. Cognition 78: 165–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noveck, Ira A., Gennaro Chierchia, Florelle Chevaux, Raphaelle Guelminger, and Emmanuel Sylvestre. 2002. Linguistic-pragmatic factors in interpreting disjunctions. Thinking and Reasoning 8: 297–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noveck, Ira A., and Anne Reboul. 2008. Experimental pragmatics: A Gricean turn in the study of language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12: 425–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, H.H. 2006. Focus, tripartite structure, and the semantic interpretation of Mandarin dou. Research and Exploration on Grammar 13: 163–184. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Panizza, Daniele, Gennaro Chierchia, and Charles Clifton Jr. 2009. On the role of entailment patterns and scalar implicatures in the processing of numerals. Journal of Memory and Language 61: 503–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papafragou, Anna. 2006. From scalar semantics to implicature: Children’s interpretation of aspectuals. Journal of Child Language 33: 721–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papafragou, Anna, and Julien Musolino. 2003. Scalar implicatures: Experiments at the semantics–pragmatics interface. Cognition 86: 253–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papafragou, Anna, and Niki Tantalou. 2004. Children’s computation of implicatures. Language Acquisition 12: 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partee, Barbara H., Alice ter Meulen, and Robert E. Wall. 1990. Mathematical methods in linguistics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Portner, Paul. 2002. Topicality and (non-)specificity in Mandarin. Journal of Semantics 19: 275–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pouscoulous, Nausicaa, Ira A. Noveck, Guy Politzer, and Anne Bastide. 2007. A developmental investigation of processing costs in implicature production. Language Acquisition 14: 347–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, Tanya. 2006. The acquisition of scalar implicatures. In Interface strategies-optimal and costly computations, ed. T. Reinhart, 272–292. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, Yi (Esther) and Stephen Crain. 2013 April. Children’s knowledge of disjunction and universal quantification in Mandarin Chinese. Language and Linguistics.

  • Su, Yi (Esther) and Stephen Crain. 2010. Disjunction and conditionals in child Mandarin. In Proceedings of the 22nd North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL-22) and the 18th Annual Meeting of the International Association of Chinese Linguistics (IACL-18), ed. Clemens, L.E. and C.-M. L. Liu, 187-202. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.

  • Su, Yi (Esther), Peng Zhou, and Stephen Crain. 2012. Downward entailment in child Mandarin. Journal of Child Language. 39:957–990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ARC Centre of Excellence for Cognition and its Disorders, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia

    Yi Esther Su

  2. Mental Health Institute, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, People’s Republic of China

    Yi Esther Su

Authors
  1. Yi Esther Su
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi Esther Su.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Su, Y.E. Scalar implicatures and downward entailment in child Mandarin. J East Asian Linguist 22, 167–187 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-012-9101-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-012-9101-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation