Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Child and Family Studies 1/2019

04-10-2018 | Original Paper

Understanding Couple Shared Reality: The Case of Combined Couple Versus Discrepancy Assessments in Understanding Couple Forgiveness

Auteurs: Dean M. Busby, Randal D. Day, Joseph Olsen

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Child and Family Studies | Uitgave 1/2019

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

In this methodological study we use the concept of couple forgiveness to explore how to utilize couple data to assess and analyze the systemic idea of a shared reality and other constructs. That is, when couples have a shared reality about a given topic (forgiveness) does that shared view enhance marital outcomes? Shared reality theory, would predict that if forgiveness is scored using a discrepancy calculation, net of previous marital quality and other standard controls, there will be significant and positive increases in relationship quality as discrepancy decreases. Data to evaluate these ideas were collected over three-years from interviews of a community sample of 324 couples. The initial ideas about a shared reality were confirmed in only a few instances. However, individual and combined ratings were significantly associated with couple outcomes but the amount of shared reality was generally not. These findings imply that couple data continues to be crucial for predicting relationship outcomes but combining scores may be more helpful than evaluating discrepancy, at least with a relational construct like forgiveness. Additionally, we found that women’s assessment of personal or partner forgiveness was more statistically powerful in predicting positive marital outcomes than men’s assessments.
Literatuur
go back to reference Baucom, B. R., & Atkins, D. C. (2013). Understanding marital distress: polarization processes. In M. A. Fine & F. D. Fincham (Eds.), Handbook of family theories (pp. 145–166). New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. Baucom, B. R., & Atkins, D. C. (2013). Understanding marital distress: polarization processes. In M. A. Fine & F. D. Fincham (Eds.), Handbook of family theories (pp. 145–166). New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
go back to reference Berger, C. R., & Kellner, H. (1964). Marriage and the construction of social reality. Diogenes, 46, 1–64.CrossRef Berger, C. R., & Kellner, H. (1964). Marriage and the construction of social reality. Diogenes, 46, 1–64.CrossRef
go back to reference Bernard, J. (1982). The future of marriage. New York, NY: World. Bernard, J. (1982). The future of marriage. New York, NY: World.
go back to reference Broderick, C. B. (1993). Understanding family process: basics of family systems theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Broderick, C. B. (1993). Understanding family process: basics of family systems theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
go back to reference Burr, W. R., Marks, L. D., & Day, R. D. (2011). Sacred matters: religion and spirituality in families.. New York, NY: Routledge. Burr, W. R., Marks, L. D., & Day, R. D. (2011). Sacred matters: religion and spirituality in families.. New York, NY: Routledge.
go back to reference Busby, D. M., Holman, T. B., & Niehuis, S. (2009). The association between partner enhancement and self-enhancement and relationship quality outcomes. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 71(3), 449–464.CrossRef Busby, D. M., Holman, T. B., & Niehuis, S. (2009). The association between partner enhancement and self-enhancement and relationship quality outcomes. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 71(3), 449–464.CrossRef
go back to reference Busby, D. M., & Poulsen, F. O. (2014). Measurement issues with couple- and family-level data. In R. B. Miller & L. N. Johnson (Eds.), Advanced Methods in Family Therapy Research: A Focus on Validity and Change. New York, NY: Rutledge. Busby, D. M., & Poulsen, F. O. (2014). Measurement issues with couple- and family-level data. In R. B. Miller & L. N. Johnson (Eds.), Advanced Methods in Family Therapy Research: A Focus on Validity and Change. New York, NY: Rutledge.
go back to reference Eaton, J., & Struthers, C. W. (2006). The reduction of psychological aggression across varied interpersonal contexts through repentance and forgiveness. Aggressive Behavior, 32(3), 195–206.CrossRef Eaton, J., & Struthers, C. W. (2006). The reduction of psychological aggression across varied interpersonal contexts through repentance and forgiveness. Aggressive Behavior, 32(3), 195–206.CrossRef
go back to reference Fenell, D. L. (1993). Characteristics of long-term first marriages. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 15(4), 446–460. Fenell, D. L. (1993). Characteristics of long-term first marriages. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 15(4), 446–460.
go back to reference Fincham, F. D. (2009). Forgiveness: integral to a science of close relationships. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association. Fincham, F. D. (2009). Forgiveness: integral to a science of close relationships. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
go back to reference Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. H. (2010). Marriage in the new millennium: a decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(2), 630–649.CrossRef Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. H. (2010). Marriage in the new millennium: a decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(2), 630–649.CrossRef
go back to reference Fincham, F. D., Hall, J. H., & Beach, S. R. H. (2006). Forgiveness in marriage: current status and future directions. Family Relations, 55(3), 415–427.CrossRef Fincham, F. D., Hall, J. H., & Beach, S. R. H. (2006). Forgiveness in marriage: current status and future directions. Family Relations, 55(3), 415–427.CrossRef
go back to reference Finkel, E. J., Rusbult, C. E., Kumashiro, M., & Hannon, P. A. (2002). Dealing with betrayal in close relationships: does commitment promote forgivess? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(4), 956–974.CrossRefPubMed Finkel, E. J., Rusbult, C. E., Kumashiro, M., & Hannon, P. A. (2002). Dealing with betrayal in close relationships: does commitment promote forgivess? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(4), 956–974.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Gordon, K. C., & Baucom, D. H. (2003). Forgiveness and marriage: preliminary support for a measure based on a model of recovery from a marital betrayal. American Journal of Family Therapy, 31(3), 179–199.CrossRef Gordon, K. C., & Baucom, D. H. (2003). Forgiveness and marriage: preliminary support for a measure based on a model of recovery from a marital betrayal. American Journal of Family Therapy, 31(3), 179–199.CrossRef
go back to reference Hoyt, W. T., Fincham, F. D., McCullough, M. E., Maio, G., & Davila, J. (2005). Responses to interpersonal transgressions in families: forgivingness, forgivability, and relationship-specific effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(3), 375–394.CrossRefPubMed Hoyt, W. T., Fincham, F. D., McCullough, M. E., Maio, G., & Davila, J. (2005). Responses to interpersonal transgressions in families: forgivingness, forgivability, and relationship-specific effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(3), 375–394.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kantor, D., & Lehr, W. (1975). Inside the family. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Kantor, D., & Lehr, W. (1975). Inside the family. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
go back to reference Ledermann, T., & Kenny, D. A. (2017). Analyzing dyadic data with multilevel modeling versus structural equation modeling: A tale of two methods. Journal of Family Psychology, 31, 442–452.CrossRefPubMed Ledermann, T., & Kenny, D. A. (2017). Analyzing dyadic data with multilevel modeling versus structural equation modeling: A tale of two methods. Journal of Family Psychology, 31, 442–452.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Malcom, W., Belicki, K., & DeCourville, N. (2008). Women’s relfections on the complexities of forgiveness. In W. Malcom, N. DeCourville & K. Belicki (Eds.), Women’s reflections on the complexities of forgiveness (pp. 19–28). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. Malcom, W., Belicki, K., & DeCourville, N. (2008). Women’s relfections on the complexities of forgiveness. In W. Malcom, N. DeCourville & K. Belicki (Eds.), Women’s reflections on the complexities of forgiveness (pp. 19–28). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
go back to reference McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., Worthington, E. L., Brown, S. W., & Hight, T. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II. theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(6), 1586–1603.CrossRefPubMed McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., Worthington, E. L., Brown, S. W., & Hight, T. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II. theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(6), 1586–1603.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference McCullough, M. E., Worthington, E. L., & Rachal, K. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 321–336.CrossRefPubMed McCullough, M. E., Worthington, E. L., & Rachal, K. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 321–336.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996). The benefits of positive illusions: idealization and the construction of satisfaction in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 79–98.CrossRef Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996). The benefits of positive illusions: idealization and the construction of satisfaction in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 79–98.CrossRef
go back to reference Muthen, B., & Muthen, L. (2010). Mplus user’s guide. 6th edn. Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen. Muthen, B., & Muthen, L. (2010). Mplus user’s guide. 6th edn. Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.
go back to reference Nickerson, R. S. (1999). How we know - and sometimes misjudge - what others know: imputing one’s own knowledge to others. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 737–759.CrossRef Nickerson, R. S. (1999). How we know - and sometimes misjudge - what others know: imputing one’s own knowledge to others. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 737–759.CrossRef
go back to reference Norton, R. (1983). Measuring marital quality: a critical look at the dependence variable. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45(1), 141–151.CrossRef Norton, R. (1983). Measuring marital quality: a critical look at the dependence variable. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45(1), 141–151.CrossRef
go back to reference Padilla-Walker, L. M., Harper, J. M., & Bean, R. A. (2011). Pathways to parental knowledge: the role of family process and family structure. Journal of Early Adolescence, 31, 604–627.CrossRef Padilla-Walker, L. M., Harper, J. M., & Bean, R. A. (2011). Pathways to parental knowledge: the role of family process and family structure. Journal of Early Adolescence, 31, 604–627.CrossRef
go back to reference Paleari, F. G., Regalia, C., & Fincham, F. D. (2010). Forgiveness and conflict resolution in close relationships: within and cross partner effects. Universitas Psychologica, 9(1), 35–56.CrossRef Paleari, F. G., Regalia, C., & Fincham, F. D. (2010). Forgiveness and conflict resolution in close relationships: within and cross partner effects. Universitas Psychologica, 9(1), 35–56.CrossRef
go back to reference Sillars, A. L., Folwell, A. L., Hill, K. C., Maki, B. K., Hurst, A. P., & Casan, R. A. (1994). Marital communication and the persistence of misunderstanding. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11(3), 611–617.CrossRef Sillars, A. L., Folwell, A. L., Hill, K. C., Maki, B. K., Hurst, A. P., & Casan, R. A. (1994). Marital communication and the persistence of misunderstanding. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11(3), 611–617.CrossRef
go back to reference Schaffnuser, K., Mathias, M., Werner, C. S., & Martin, M. (2016). Discrepancy in personality perceptions is related to relationship satisfaction: Findings from dyadic latent discrepancy analyses. Journal of Personality, 84, 658–670.CrossRef Schaffnuser, K., Mathias, M., Werner, C. S., & Martin, M. (2016). Discrepancy in personality perceptions is related to relationship satisfaction: Findings from dyadic latent discrepancy analyses. Journal of Personality, 84, 658–670.CrossRef
go back to reference Sillars, A. L., & Scott, M. D. (1983). Interpersonal perception between intimates: an integrative review. Human Communication Research, 10(1), 153–176.CrossRef Sillars, A. L., & Scott, M. D. (1983). Interpersonal perception between intimates: an integrative review. Human Communication Research, 10(1), 153–176.CrossRef
go back to reference Trobst, K. K., Collins, R. L., & Embree, J. M. (1994). The role of emotion in social support provision: gender, empathy, and expressions of distress. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships, 11, 45–62.CrossRef Trobst, K. K., Collins, R. L., & Embree, J. M. (1994). The role of emotion in social support provision: gender, empathy, and expressions of distress. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships, 11, 45–62.CrossRef
go back to reference von Collani, G., & Werner, R. (2005). Self–related and motivational constructs as determinants of aggression. An analysis and validation of a German version of the Buss–Perry Aggression Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1631–1643.CrossRef von Collani, G., & Werner, R. (2005). Self–related and motivational constructs as determinants of aggression. An analysis and validation of a German version of the Buss–Perry Aggression Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1631–1643.CrossRef
go back to reference Wade, S. H. (1989). The development of a scale to measure forgiveness. Unpublished doctoral disseration, Fuller Graduate School of Psychology, Pasadena, CA. Wade, S. H. (1989). The development of a scale to measure forgiveness. Unpublished doctoral disseration, Fuller Graduate School of Psychology, Pasadena, CA.
go back to reference Wheaton, B. (1990). Life transitions, role histories, and mental health. American Sociological Review, 55, 209–223.CrossRef Wheaton, B. (1990). Life transitions, role histories, and mental health. American Sociological Review, 55, 209–223.CrossRef
go back to reference Worthington, E. L. (2005). Initial questions about the art and science of forgiving. In E. L. Worthington (Ed.), Handbook of Forgiveness (pp. 1–13). New York, NY: Routlege. Worthington, E. L. (2005). Initial questions about the art and science of forgiving. In E. L. Worthington (Ed.), Handbook of Forgiveness (pp. 1–13). New York, NY: Routlege.
Metagegevens
Titel
Understanding Couple Shared Reality: The Case of Combined Couple Versus Discrepancy Assessments in Understanding Couple Forgiveness
Auteurs
Dean M. Busby
Randal D. Day
Joseph Olsen
Publicatiedatum
04-10-2018
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Child and Family Studies / Uitgave 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1062-1024
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1263-5

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2019

Journal of Child and Family Studies 1/2019 Naar de uitgave