Top

Gepubliceerd in:

15-03-2018 | Original Paper

Dimensionality and Measurement Invariance of a Brief Form of the Young Schema Questionnaire for Adolescents

Auteurs: Laura Santos, Paula Vagos, Daniel Rijo

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Child and Family Studies | Uitgave 7/2018

Abstract

The current work aims to develop and examine the psychometric properties of the Brief form of the Young Schema Questionnaire for Adolescents (B-YSQ-A), so that Early Maladaptive Schemas can be accurately measured in younger populations. Early Maladaptive Schemas are self-defeating core themes underlying maladaptive cognition, affect, and behavior. A community sample of 877 adolescents, aged 12–18 years old, filled out self-report instruments on maladaptive schemas, anger management, and internalizing and externalizing symptoms. The items composing the B-YSQ-A were selected based on statistical and content analyses criteria. Its internal structure, reliability, age- and gender-based invariance, and between-gender mean differences were examined, as well as its relationship with external variables. Results indicated a satisfying fit for the 18 original schema factors through confirmatory factor analysis. These schemas also showed adequate internal consistency and test-retest reliability, with the exception of the entitlement/grandiosity and self-sacrifice schemas. The B-YSQ-A was found to be age and gender invariant. Concerning gender differences, boys scored higher on the entitlement/grandiosity, insufficient self-control/discipline, approval/recognition seeking, unrelenting standards/hyper-criticalness and punitiveness schemas, whereas girls scored higher on the abandonment/instability, mistrust/abuse, and self-sacrifice schemas. Furthermore, evidence was found for construct validity in relation to measures of internalizing and externalizing symptomatology and of anger expression. Findings offer support for the use of the B-YSQ-A with adolescents, both for research and intervention purposes.

vorige artikel Parental Opioid Abuse: A Review of Child Outcomes, Parenting, and Parenting Interventions

volgende artikel Psychometric Properties of the Parental Bonding Instrument: Data from a Chinese Adolescent Sample in Hong Kong

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Integrative guide for the 1991 CBCL/4-18, YSR, and TRF profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.

Bach, B., Simonsen, E., Christoffersen, P., & Kriston, L. (2015). The Young Schema Questionnaire 3 Short Form (YSQ-S3) Psychometric Properties and Association With Personality Disorders in a Danish Mixed Sample. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000272.

Bernstein, D. (2008). Agreement of raters in identifying schema modes from videotapes of therapy sessions. Communication presented at 3rd Annual Meeting of International Society of Schema Therapy, Coimbra.

Calvete, E., Orue, I., & González-Diez, Z. (2013). An examination of the structure and stability of Early Maladaptive Schemas by means of the Young Schema Questionnaire-3. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 29, 283–290. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000158.CrossRef

Calvete, E., Orue, I., & Hankin, B. L. (2013). Early maladaptive schemas and social anxiety in adolescents: The mediating role of anxious automatic thought. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 27, 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2013.02.011.CrossRefPubMed

Calvete, E., Orue, I., & Hankin, B. L. (2015). A longitudinal test of the vulnerability-stress model with early maladaptive schemas for depressive and social anxiety symptoms in adolescents. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 37, 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-014-9438-x.CrossRef

Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834.CrossRef

Dimitrov, D. M. (2006). Comparing groups on latent variables: A structural equation modeling approach. Work, 26, 429–36.PubMed

Fan, X. F., Miller, B. C., Park., K., Winward, B. W., Christensen, M., Grotevant, H. D., & Tai, R. H. (2006). Exploratory study about inaccuracy and invalidity in adolescent self-report surveys. Field Methods, 18, 223–244.CrossRef

Fonseca, A. C., & Monteiro, C. M. (1999). Um inventário de problemas do comportamento para crianças e adolescentes: O Youth Self-Report de Achenbach [An inventory of behavioral problem for children and adolescents: The Youth Self-Report of Achenbach]. Psychologica, 21, 79–96.

Gaderman, A. M., Guhn, M., & Zumbo, B. D. (2012). Estimating ordinal reliability for likert-type and ordinal item response data: A conceptual, empirical and practical guide. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(3). http://pareonline.net/pdf/v17n3.pdf.

González-Jiménez., A. J., & Hernández-Romera, M. M. (2014). Early Maladaptive Schemas in adolescence: A quantitative study. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 132, 504–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.344.CrossRef

Hawke, L. D., & Provencher, M. D. (2012). The Canadian French Young Schema Questionnaire: Confirmatory factor analysis and validation in clinical and nonclinical samples. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 44(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026197.CrossRef

Hoffart, A., Sextton, H., Hedley, L. M., Wang, C. E., Holthe, H., Haugum, J. A., & Holte, A. (2005). The structure of maladaptive schemas: A confirmatory factor analysis and a psychometric evaluation of factor-derived scales. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 29(6), 627–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-005-9630-0.CrossRef

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 61, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRef

Instituto Nacional de Estatística. (2011). Classificação Portuguesa das profissões 2010 [2010 Portuguese classification of professions]. Lisboa: Instituto Nacional de Estatística.

Kriston, L., Schäfer, J., Wolf, A. V., Härter, M., & Hölzel, L. P. (2012). The latent factor structure of Young’s early maladaptive schemas: Are schemas organized into domains? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68(6), 684–698. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.21846.CrossRefPubMed

Kriston, L., Schäfer, J., Jacob, G. A., Härter, M., & Hölzel, L. P. (2013). Reliability and validity of the German version of the Young Schema Questionnaire – Short Form 3 (YSQ-S3). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 29, 205–212. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000143.CrossRef

Li, C. H. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 936–949. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7.CrossRefPubMed

Loose, C., Graaf, P., & Zarbock, G. (2013). Schema Therapy for Children and Adolescents. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.

Maughan, B., Rowe, R., Messer, J., Goodman, R., & Meltzer, H. (2004). Conduct disorder and oppositional defiant disorder in a national sample: Developmental epidemiology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 609–621. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00250.x.CrossRefPubMed

Muris, P. (2006). Maladaptive schemas in non-clinical adolescents: Relations to perceived parental earing behaviours, big five personality factors, and psychopathological symptoms. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 13, 405–413. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.506.CrossRef

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus User’s Guide. 7th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

Pinto Gouveia, J., Rijo, D., & Salvador, M.C. (Unpublished). Questionário de Esquemas de Young [Young Schema Questionnaire].

Rijkeboer, M. M., & Boo, G. M. (2010). Early maladaptive schemas in children: Development and validation of the schema inventory for children. Journal of Behavioral Therapy & Experimental Psychiatry, 41, 102–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2009.11.001.CrossRef

Rijo, D. (2009). Esquemas Mal-adaptativos precoces: Validação do conceito e dos métodos de avaliação [Early Maladaptive Schemas: Validation of the concept and evaluation methods]. Coimbra: University of Coimbra. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.

Rijo, D. (2017). O questionário de esquemas de Young (YSQ-S3) [The Young Schema Questionnaire]. In M. Gonçalves, M. R. Simões & L. Almeida (Eds), Psicologia clínica e da saúde: instrumentos de avaliação [Clinical and health psychology: Assessment] (pp. 159–173). Lisbon: PACTOR.

RStudio Team (2015). RStudio: Integrated Development for RStudio, Inc. Boston, MA. http://www.rstudio.com/.

Saritaş, D., & Gençöz, T. (2011). Psychometric properties of “Young Schema Questionnaire-Short Form 3” in a Turkish adolescent sample. Journal of Cognitive and Behavioral Psychotherapies, 11, 83–96.

Sawyer, S. N., Afifi, R. A., Bearinger, L. H., Blakemore, S., Dick, B., Ezeh, A. C., & Patton, G. C. (2012). Adolescence: A foundation for future health. The Lancet, 379(9826), 1630–1640. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60072-5.CrossRef

Silva, D. R., Campos, R., & Prazeres, N. (1999). O Inventário de estado-traço de raiva (STAXI) e sua adaptação para a população portuguesa [The state-trait anger inventory (STAXI) and its adaptation to the Portuguese population]. Revista Portuguesa Délelőtt Psicologia, 34, 55–81.

Simons, J., & Free, M. (2000). Development of a Children’s Schema Questionnaire. Brisbane: Griffith University. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.

Shorey, R. C., Anderson, S. E., & Stuart, G. L. (2012). Gender differences in early maladaptive schemas in a treatment-seeking sample of alcohol-dependent adults. Substance Use and Misuse, 47, 108–116. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826084.2011.629706.CrossRefPubMed

Soygüt, G., Karaosmanoglu, A., & Cakir, Z. (2009). Assessment of early maladaptive schemas: A psychometric study of the Turkish Young Schema Questionnaire-Short Form-3. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry, 20, 75–84.PubMed

Spielberger, C. D. (1988). Manual for the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI). Odessa, Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Stallard, P. (2007). Early maladaptive schemas in children: Stability and differences between a community and a clinic referred sample. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 14(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.511.CrossRef

Stallard, P., & Rayner, H. (2005). The development and preliminary evaluation of a Schema Questionnaire for children (SQC). Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 33, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465804001912.CrossRef

Van Vlierberghe, L., & Braet, C. (2007). Dysfunctional schemas and psychopathology in referred obese adolescents. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 14, 342–351. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.546.CrossRef

Van Vlierberghe, L. V., Braet, C., Bosmans, G., Rosseel, Y., & Bogels, S. (2010). Maladaptive schemas and psychopathology in adolescence: On the utility of Young’s schema theory in youth. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 34, 316–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-009-9283-5.CrossRef

Waller, G., Meyer, C., & Ohanian, V. (2001). Psychometric properties of the long and short versions of the Young Schema Questionnaire: Core beliefs among bulimic and comparison women. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 25, 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026487018110.CrossRef

Welburn, K., Coristine, M., Dagg, P., Pontefract, A., & Jordan, S. (2002). The Schema Questionnaire – Short form: Factor analysis and relationship between schemas and symptoms. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 26(4), 519–530. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016231902020.CrossRef

Young, J. E (1999). Cognitive therapy for personality disorders: A schema-focused approach (3rd ed.). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.

Young, J. E. (2005). Young Schema Questionnaire S3. New York: Cognitive Therapy Center of New York.

Young, J. E., & Brown, G. (1990). Young schema questionnaire. New York: Cognitive Therapy Center of New York.

Young, J. E., Klosko, J. S., & Weishaar, M. E. (2003). Schema Therapy: A practitioner’s guide. New York: Guildford Press.

Titel: Dimensionality and Measurement Invariance of a Brief Form of the Young Schema Questionnaire for Adolescents
Auteurs: Laura Santos
Paula Vagos
Daniel Rijo
Publicatiedatum: 15-03-2018
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Child and Family Studies / Uitgave 7/2018
Print ISSN: 1062-1024
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2843
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1050-3

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 7/2018

The Association Between Self-Critical Rumination and Parenting Stress: The Mediating Role of Mindful Parenting

Parenting and Child Self-Regulation in Chinese Families: A Multi-Informant Study

Correction to: Parents’ Planning for Physical Activity for their Pre-School Aged Children: The Role of Psycho-Social Mediators and Moderators

Trait Forgiveness and Dyadic Adjustment Predict Postnatal Depression

Parental Influences and Child Internalizing Outcomes across Multiple Generations

Parental Opioid Abuse: A Review of Child Outcomes, Parenting, and Parenting Interventions