Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mediators between Parenting History and Expected At-Risk Parenting: Role of Conformity, Coping, and Attitudes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Child and Family Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current study used a multimethod approach to consider potential mediators and moderators of the relationship between harsh, authoritarian parenting history and future at-risk parenting defined as child abuse potential and authoritarian parenting. The study involved 114 childless undergraduate students, a group that could represent a potential target group for child abuse prevention efforts. The role of coping, conformity, and attitudes towards harsh discipline were evaluated and considered as potential moderators or mediators of future at-risk parenting. Attitudes that approve of parent-child aggression and greater conformity were found to partially mediate the relationship between a history of authoritarian parenting and future at-risk parenting. In other words, approval of parent-child aggression and an inclination to be more socially conformist partly explained the relationship between a history of harsh, authoritarian discipline as children and whether participants expected to become harsh parents. However, neither greater coping skill nor lower conformity moderated the association between parenting history and at-risk parenting. This study implies that altering the acceptability of parent-child aggression could serve as an important prevention target in pre-parents to minimize the likelihood of adopting at-risk parenting practices. Additionally, the role of social conformity in at-risk parenting warrants further investigation given the current findings suggest that part of why one may later assume a harsh at-risk parenting approach reflects embracing a conformist style.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ateah, C., & Durrant, J. E. (2005). Maternal use of physical punishment in response to child misbehaviour: Implications for child abuse prevention. Child Abuse and Neglect, 29, 177–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, J. A., Hill, K. G., Oesterle, S., & Hawkins, J. D. (2009). Parenting practices and problem behavior across three generations: Monitoring, harsh discipline and drug use in the intergenerational transmission of externalizing behavior. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1214–1226.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, J., & Calam, R. (2011). A public health approach to safeguarding in the 21st century. Child Abuse Review, 20, 238–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumrind, D. (1966). Effects of authoritative parental control on child behavior. Child Development, 37(4), 887–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumrind, D. (1971). Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology, 4, 1–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bavolek, S. J., & Keene, R. G. (2001). Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory (AAPI-2): Administration and Development Handbook. Park City, UT: Family Development Resources, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower-Russa, M. (2005). Attitudes mediate the association between childhood disciplinary history and disciplinary responses. Child Maltreatment, 10, 272–282.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bronte-Tinkew, J., Anderson, K., & Carrano, J. (2006). Father-child relationship, parenting styles, and adolescent risk behaviors in intact families. Journal of Family Issues, 27(6), 850–881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buri, J. R. (1991). Parental authority questionnaire. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57(1), 110–119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J., & Gilmore, L. (2007). Intergenerational continuities and discontinuities in parenting styles. Australian Journal of Psychology, 59, 140–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantos, A. L., Neale, J. M., O’Leary, K. D., & Gaines, R. W. (1997). Assessment of coping strategies of child abusing mothers. Journal of Child abuse and Neglect, 21(7), 631–636.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chesney, M. A., Neilands, T. B., Chambers, D. B., Taylor, J. M., & Folkman, S. (2006). A validity and reliability study of the coping self-efficacy scale. British Journal of Health Psychology, 11, 421–437.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Conger, R. D., Neppl, T., Kim, K. J., & Scaramella, L. (2003). Angry and aggressive behavior across three generations: A prospective, longitudinal study of parents and children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 31(2), 143–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conners, N. A., Whiteside-Mansell, L., Deere, D., Ledet, T., & Edwards, M. C. (2006). Measuring the potential for child maltreatment: The reliability and validity of the adult adolescent parenting inventjory-2. Child Abuse and Neglect, 30, 39–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Counts, J. M., Buffington, E. S., Chang-Rios, K., Rasmussen, H. N., & Preacher, K. J. (2010). The development and validation of the protective factors survey: A self-report measure of protective factors against child maltreatment. Child Abuse and Neglect, 34, 762–772.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeGarmo, D. S., Reid, J. B., & Knutson, J. F. (2006). Direct laboratory observations and analog measures in research definitions of child maltreatment. In M. Feerick, J. F. Knutson, P. Trickett, S. Flanzier (Eds.), Child abuse and neglect: Definitions, classifications, and a framework for research (pp. 293–123). Baltimore, MD: Brooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eid, M., & Diener, E. (2006). Introduction: The need for multimethod measurement in psychology. In M. Eid, E. Diener (Eds.), Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology (pp. 3–8). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297–327.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, S. (2003). Enforcing social conformity: A theory of authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 24, 41–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gershoff, E. E., & Grogan-Kaylor, A. (2016). Spanking and child outcomes: Old controversies and new meta-analyses. Journal of Family Psychology, 30, 453–469.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graziano, A. M. (1994). Why we should study abusive violence against children. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 9, 412–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, R. L., Bank, L., Reid, J. B., & Knutson, J. F. (1997). A discipline mediated model of excessively punitive-parenting. Aggressive Behavior, 23, 259–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haskett, M. E., Scott, S. S., & Fann, K. D. (1995). Child Abuse Potential Inventory and parenting behavior: Relationships with high-risk correlates. Child Abuse and Neglect, 19, 1483–1495.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, G. W. (2001). Attitude toward spanking (ATS). In J. Touliatos, B. R. Perlmutter, G. W. Holden (Eds.), Handbook of family measurement techniques, Abstracts: Vol. 2 (pp. 209) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden, G. W., Coleman, S. M., & Schmidt, K. L. (1995). Why 3-year-old children get spanked: Parent and child determinants as reported by college-educated mothers. Merrill–Palmer Quarterly, 41, 431–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollenstein, T., Lichtwarck-Aschoff, A., & Potworowski, G. (2013). A modes of socioemotional flexibility at three time scales. Emotion Review, 5, 397–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, M. L., Grace, N., & Elliott, S. N. (1990). Acceptability of positive and punitive discipline methods: Comparisons among abusive, potentially abusive, and nonabusive parents. Child Abuse and Neglect, 14(2), 219–226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knafo, A. (2003). Authoritarians, the next generation: Values and bullying among adolescent children of authoritarian fathers. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 3, 199–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E., & Martin, J. A. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent–child interaction. In P. Mussen, E. M. Hetherington (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology, Vol. IV: Socialization, personality, and social development. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzeske, D., & Stright, A. D. (2009). Parenting styles and emotion regulation: The role of behavioral and psychological control during young adulthood. Journal of Adult Development, 16, 223–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolin, G., Gordis, E. B., Medina, A. M., & Oliver, P. (2003). The co-occurrence of husband-to-wife aggression, family-of origin aggression, and child abuse potential in a community sample: Implications for parenting. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18(4), 413–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milner, J. S. (1994). Assessing physical child abuse risk: The child abuse potential inventory. Clinical Psychology Review, 14, 547–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milner, J. S. (2000). Social information processing and child physical abuse: Theory and research. In D. J. Hansen (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation, Vol. 46, 1998: Motivation and child maltreatment (pp. 39–84). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moncher, F. J. (1995). Social isolation and child-abuse risk. Families in Society, 76, 421–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neppl, T. K., Conger, R. D., Scaramella, L. V., & Ontai, L. L. (2009). Intergenerational continuity in parenting behavior: Mediating pathways and child effects. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1241–1256.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nosek, B. A. (2007). Implicit-explicit relations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 65–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pears, K. C., & Capaldi, D. M. (2001). Intergenerational transmission of abuse: A two-generational prospective study of an at-risk sample. Child Abuse and Neglect, 25(11), 1439–1461.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reitman, D., Rhode, P. C., Hupp, S. D., & Altobello, C. (2002). Development and validation of the parental authority questionnaire-revised. Journal of Psychological Behavioral Assessment, 24(2), 119–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinaldi, C. M., & Howe, N. (2012). Mothers’ and fathers’ parenting styles and associations with toddlers’ externalizing, internalizing, and adaptive behaviors. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(2), 266–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robyn, S., & Fremouw, W. J. (1996). Cognitive and affective styles of parents who physically abuse their children. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 14, 63–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, C. M. (2010a). Parent-child aggression: Association with child abuse potential and parenting styles. Violence and Victims, 25(6), 728–741.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, C. M. (2010b). Personal contextual characteristics and cognitions: Predicting child abuse potential and disciplinary style. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(2), 315–335.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, C.M. & Boppana, S. (2016). Evaluation of an alternate version of the Parent-Child Aggression Acceptability Movie Task. Poster presented at the Annual Conference of the Southeastern Psychological Association, New Orleans, LA.

  • Rodriguez, C. M., & Henderson, R. C. (2010). Who spares the rod? religious orientation, social conformity, and child abuse potential. Child Abuse and Neglect, 34(2), 84–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, C. M., Russa, M. B., & Harmon, N. (2011). Assessing abuse risk beyond self-report: Analog task of acceptability of parent-child aggression. Child Abuse and Neglect, 35(3), 199–209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, C. M., Smith, T. L., & Silvia, P. J. (2016a). Multimethod prediction of physical parent-child aggression risk in expectant mothers and fathers with social information processing theory. Child Abuse and Neglect, 51, 106–119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, C. M., Smith, T. L., & Silvia, P. J. (2016b). Parent-child aggression risk in expectant mothers and fathers: A multimethod theoretical approach. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25, 3220–3235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, C. M., & Sutherland, D. (1999). Predictors of parents’ physical disciplinary practice. Child Abuse and Neglect, 23(7), 651–657.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, C. M., & Tucker, M. C. (2011). Behind the cycle of violence, beyond abuse history: A brief report on the association of parental attachment to physical child abuse potential. Violence and Victims, 26, 246–256.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, C. M., Tucker, M. C., & Palmer, K. (2016). Emotion regulation in relation to emerging adults’ mental health and delinquency: A multi-informant approach. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25, 1916–1925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedlak, A.J., Mettenburg, J., Basena, M., Petta, I., McPherson, K., Greene, A., & Li, S. (2010). Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS–4): Report to Congress, Executive Summary. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, http://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/opre/nis4_report_congress_full_pdf_jan2010.pdf.

  • Straus, M. A., & Donnelly, D. A. (2001). Beating the devil out of them: Corporal punishment in American families and its effects on children. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A. (2001). Corporal punishment in American families and its effects on children. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A., & Stewart, J. H. (1999). Corporal punishment by American parents: National data on prevalence, chronicity, severity, and duration, in relation to child, and family characteristics. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 2(2), 55–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics. New York, NY: HarperCollins College Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. A., Lee, S. J., Guterman, N. B., & Rice, J. C. (2010). Use of spanking for 3-year-old children and associated intimate partner aggression or violence. Pediatrics, 126, 415–424.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Trickett, P. K., & Susman, E. J. (1988). Childrearing attitudes and practices in abusive and nonabusive parents. Developmental Psychology, 24, 270–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children’s Bureau. (2017). Child physical maltreatment 2015. https://www.acf.hhs.gov/cb/resource/child-maltreatment-2015.

  • Winebarger, A. A., Leve, L. D., Fagot, B. I. & May, P. (1993). Adult retrospective impressions of parenting behaviors. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the Westeran Psychological Association, Tucson, AZ.

  • Whipple, E. E., & Richey, C. A. (1997). Crossing the line from physical discipline to child abuse: How much is too much? Child Abuse and Neglect, 21(5), 431–444.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zolotor, A. J., Theodore, A. D., Chang, J. J., Berkoff, M. C., & Runyan, D. K. (2008). Speak softly--and forget the stick. Corporal punishment and child physical abuse. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 35(4), 364–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author Contributions

S.B. collaborated with designing the study, executing the study, and writing the manuscript. C.M. collaborated with designing the study, executing the study, analyzing data, and writing and editing the final manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS, USA

    Shilpa Boppana

  2. Department of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 2nd Ave South, Birmingham, AL, 35294-1170, USA

    Christina M. Rodriguez

Authors
  1. Shilpa Boppana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christina M. Rodriguez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christina M. Rodriguez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all study participants.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boppana, S., Rodriguez, C.M. Mediators between Parenting History and Expected At-Risk Parenting: Role of Conformity, Coping, and Attitudes. J Child Fam Stud 26, 3237–3245 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0812-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0812-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation