Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Parental Involvement in Residential Care: Distance, Frequency of Contact, and Youth Outcomes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Child and Family Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationship between physical distance to program, different types of family contact, and youth behavioral outcomes, discharge assessment, and 6-month follow-up was examined. Data came from clinical record information for 350 youth who had been admitted to a group home program between July 2009 and October 2011. Path analysis was used to examine the hypothesized pattern of interrelationships among the variables. Study results found that home visits of youth with their families were related to better outcomes, while program visits by family were unrelated to outcomes. Phone contacts during the week were also unrelated to youth outcomes, whereas weekend phone contacts were significantly related to less successful outcomes. Findings suggest that family contact is important for the health and wellbeing of youth in residential care, but that not all family/friend contacts are equally beneficial and that some can even undermine a youth’s progress. Specific recommendations are made for future research to inform practice on how to make the most of these opportunities. Ultimately, all family and friend contact should be a positive factor in the youth’s treatment and outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1305 et seq. (1980).

  • Administration for Children and Families. (2010). Family involvement in the Improving child welfare outcomes through systems of care initiative. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attar-Schwartz, S. (2009). School functioning of children in residential care: The contributions of multilevel correlates. Child Abuse and Neglect, 33, 429–440. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.12.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Avery, K. N. L., Metcalfe, C., Nicklin, J., Barham, C. P., Alderson, D., Donovan, J. L., et al. (2006). Satisfaction with care: An independent outcome measure in surgical oncology. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 13, 817–822. doi:10.1245/ASO.2006.08.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, B. L., Blacher, J., & Pfeiffer, S. (1993). Family involvement in residential treatment of children with psychiatric disorder and mental retardation. Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 44, 561–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, A. J. L., Kurland, D., Curtis, P., Alexander, G., & Papa-Lentini, C. (2007). Mental health and behavioral problems of youth in the child welfare system: Residential treatment centers compared to therapeutic foster care in the Odyssey Project population. Child Welfare, 86, 97–123.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, J. G., & Delfabbro, P. H. (2009). The profile and progress of neglected and abused children in long-term foster care. Child Abuse and Neglect, 33, 421–428. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2006.03.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Nir, D., & Schmid, H. (1998). Psychosocial treatment and relations between children in residential boarding schools and their parents. Child and Family Social Work, 3, 247–257. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2206.1998.00077.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. D., Barrett, K., Ireys, H. T., Allen, K., Pires, S. A., & Blau, G. (2010). Family-driven youth-guided practices in residential treatment: Findings from a national survey of residential treatment facilities. Residential Treatment for Children and Youth, 27, 149–159. doi:10.1080/0886571X.2010.500137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, P., Price, J. M., Reid, J. B., Landsverk, J., Fisher, P. A., & Stoolmiller, M. (2006). Who disrupts from placement in foster and kinship care? Child Abuse and Neglect, 30, 409–424.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Connor, D. F., Doerfler, L. A., Toscano, P. F., Volungis, A. M., & Steingard, R. J. (2004). Characteristics of children and adolescents admitted to a residential treatment center. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 13, 497–510. doi:10.1023/B:JCFS.0000044730.66750.57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, D. L., & Davis, J. L. (2003). Long-term residential program training manual. Boys Town, NE: Boys Town Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degner, J., Henriksen, A., & Oscarsson, L. (2007). Youths in coercive residential care: Perception of parents and social network involvement in treatment programs. Therapeutic Communities, 28, 416–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frensch, K. M., & Cameron, G. (2002). Treatment of choice or a last resort? A Review of residential mental health placements for children and youth. Child & Youth Care Forum, 31, 313–345. doi:10.1023/A:1016826627406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geurts, E. M. W., Boddy, J., Noom, M. J., & Knorth, E. J. (2012). Family-centred residential care: The new reality? Child and Family Social Work, 17, 170–179. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2012.00838.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, R. P., Almeida, M. C., Fabry, B., & Reitz, A. L. (1992). A scale to measure restrictiveness of living environments for troubled children and youths. Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 43, 54–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, C., Goddard, J., Gorin, S., & van der Spek, N. (1999). State child care: Looking after children?. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J., & Kammerer, N. (2009). Adolescents’ perspectives on placement moves and congregate settings: Complex and cumulative instabilities in out-of-home care. Children and Youth Services Review, 31, 265–273. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.07.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. M. (1999). Multiple dimensions of family-centered practice in residential group care: Implications regarding the roles of stakeholders. Child & Youth Care Forum, 28, 123–141. doi:10.1023/A:1021993222772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruzich, J. M., Jivanjee, P., Robinson, A., & Friesen, B. J. (2003). Family caregivers’ perceptions of barriers to and supports of participation in their children’s out-of-home treatment. Psychiatric Services, 54, 1513–1518. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.54.11.1513.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lakin, B. L., Brambila, A. D., & Sigda, K. B. (2004). Parental involvement as a factor in the readmission to a residential treatment center. Residential Treatment for Children and Youth, 22, 37–52. doi:10.1300/J007v22n02_03.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, W., Salzer, M. S., & Bickman, L. (1998). Clinical outcome, consumer satisfaction, and ad hoc ratings of improvement in children’s mental health. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 270–279.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Landsman, M. J., Groza, V., Tyler, M., & Malone, K. (2001). Outcomes of family-centered residential treatment. Child Welfare, 80, 351–379.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L. J. (2011). Adult visitation and permanency for children following residential treatment. Children and Youth Services Review, 33, 1288–1297. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.03.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, M., Kohm, A., & Thompson, R. W. (2005). The impact of residential placement on child development: Research and policy implications. International Journal of Social Welfare, 14, 200–209. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2397.2005.00360.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGill, P., Tennyson, A., & Cooper, V. (2006). Parents whose children with learning disabilities and challenging behaviour attend 52-week residential schools: Their perceptions of services received and expectations of the future. British Journal of Social Work, 36, 597–616. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bch297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2002). How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 599–620. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0904_8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, A. B., Brooks, J. L., Colby, S. A., Rickert, J. M., & Salamone, F. J. (2006). Family involvement in residential treatment: Staff, parent, and adolescent perspectives. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 15, 681. doi:10.1007/s10826-006-9041-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, A. B., Colby, S. A., Brooks, J. L., Rickert, J. M., & Salamone, F. J. (2007). Transitioning youth from residential treatment to the community: A preliminary investigation. Child & Youth Care Forum, 36, 73–86. doi:10.1007/s10566-007-9032-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogilvy, R. S. (2012). An examination of individual packages of care for young people under ministerial guardianship in South Australia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Flinders University of South Australia.

  • Oyserman, D., & Benbenishty, R. (1992). Keeping in touch: Ecological factors related to foster care visitation. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 9, 541–554. doi:10.1007/BF00845413;10.1007/BF00845413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palareti, L., & Berti, C. (2010). Relational climate and effectiveness of residential care: Adolescent perspectives. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community, 38, 26–40. doi:10.1080/10852350903393426.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prentice-Dunn, S., Wilson, D. R., & Lyman, R. D. (1981). Client factors related to outcome in a residential and day treatment program for children. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 10, 188–191. doi:10.1080/15374418109533047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pumariega, A. J. (2007). Residential treatment for children and youth: Time for reconsideration and reform. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 77, 343–345.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A. D., Kruzich, J. M., Friesen, B. J., Jivanjee, P., & Pullmann, M. D. (2005). Preserving family bonds: Examining parent perspectives in the light of practice standards for out-of-home treatment. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 75, 632–643. doi:10.1037/0002-9432.75.4.632.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robst, J., Armstrong, M., Dollard, N., Rohrer, L., Sharrock, P., Batsche, C., et al. (2013a). Characteristics related to family involvement in youth residential mental health treatment. Children and Youth Services Review, 35, 40–46. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.10.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robst, J., Rohrer, L., Armstrong, M., Dollard, N., Sharrock, P., Batsche, C., et al. (2013b). Family involvement and changes in child behavior during residential mental health treatment. Child & Youth Care Forum, 42, 225–238. doi:10.1007/s10566-013-9201-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, J. P., & Yang, H. (2005). Family contact and recidivism: A longitudinal study of adjudicated delinquents in residential care. Social Work Research, 29, 31–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M., McKay, E., & Chakrabarti, M. (2004). What works for us—boys’ views of their experiences in a former List D school. British Journal of Special Education, 31, 89–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stage, S. A. (1998). Predicting adolescents’ discharge status following residential treatment. Residential Treatment for Children and Youth, 16, 37–56. doi:10.1300/J007v16n03_03.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stroul, B. A., & Friedman, R. M. (1986). A system of care for children and youth with severe emotional disturbances. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Child Development Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunseri, P. A. (2001). The prediction of unplanned discharge from residential treatment. Child & Youth Care Forum, 30, 283–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vorria, P., Rutter, M., Pickles, A., Wolkind, S., & Hobsbaum, A. (1998). A comparative study of Greek children in long-term residential group care and in two-parent families: II. Possible mediating mechanisms. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 237–246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, U. M., & Petr, C. G. (2008). Family-centered residential treatment: Knowledge, research, and values converge. Residential Treatment for Children and Youth, 25, 1–16. doi:10.1080/08865710802209594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, J. K. (1979). Caring for troubled children. San Fransisco, CA: Josey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, E., & Gray, A. (2011). New roles for families in child welfare: Strategies for expanding family involvement beyond the case level. Children and Youth Services Review, 33, 1212–1216. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.02.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan C. Huefner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huefner, J.C., Pick, R.M., Smith, G.L. et al. Parental Involvement in Residential Care: Distance, Frequency of Contact, and Youth Outcomes. J Child Fam Stud 24, 1481–1489 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-014-9953-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-014-9953-0

Keywords

Navigation