Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 8/2006

01-11-2006 | Original paper

The Effect of Retention Interval on Stimulus Over-selectivity using a Matching-to-sample Paradigm

Auteur: Phil Reed

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders | Uitgave 8/2006

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

The conditions under which stimulus over-selectivity occurred were studied using a matching-to-sample procedure with non-autistic adults. A matching-to-sample discrimination learning task with a number of sample-comparison retention intervals was used. The results demonstrated that an increase in retention interval increased the degree of stimulus overselectivity displayed. In addition, it was shown that the matching-to-sample procedure is suitable for eliciting overselectivity in a non-autistic adult sample.
Literatuur
go back to reference Bickel, W. K., Stella, M. E., & Etzel, B. C. (1984). A reevaluation of stimulus overselectivity: Restricted stimulus control or stimulus control hierarchies. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 14, 137–157.CrossRef Bickel, W. K., Stella, M. E., & Etzel, B. C. (1984). A reevaluation of stimulus overselectivity: Restricted stimulus control or stimulus control hierarchies. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 14, 137–157.CrossRef
go back to reference Dube, W. V., Lombard, K. M., Farren, K. M., Flusser, D. S., Balsamo, L. M., & Fowler, T. R. (1999). Eye tracking assessment of stimulus overselectivity in individuals with mental retardation. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 13, 267–271. Dube, W. V., Lombard, K. M., Farren, K. M., Flusser, D. S., Balsamo, L. M., & Fowler, T. R. (1999). Eye tracking assessment of stimulus overselectivity in individuals with mental retardation. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 13, 267–271.
go back to reference Dube, W. V., & McIlvane, W. J. (1997) Reinforcer frequency and restricted stimulus control. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behaviour, 68, 303–316.CrossRef Dube, W. V., & McIlvane, W. J. (1997) Reinforcer frequency and restricted stimulus control. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behaviour, 68, 303–316.CrossRef
go back to reference Dube, W. V., & McIlvane, W. J. (1999). Reduction of stimulus overselectivity with nonverbal differential observing responses. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 25–33.CrossRef Dube, W. V., & McIlvane, W. J. (1999). Reduction of stimulus overselectivity with nonverbal differential observing responses. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 25–33.CrossRef
go back to reference Gibson, E., & Reed, P. (2005). Stimulus over selectivity in rats. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35, 851–859.PubMedCrossRef Gibson, E., & Reed, P. (2005). Stimulus over selectivity in rats. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35, 851–859.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Jolliffe, T., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1999) A test of central coherence theory: Linguistic processing in high-functioning adults with autism or Asperger syndrome: Is local coherence impaired? Cognition, 71, 149–185.PubMedCrossRef Jolliffe, T., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1999) A test of central coherence theory: Linguistic processing in high-functioning adults with autism or Asperger syndrome: Is local coherence impaired? Cognition, 71, 149–185.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Koegel, R. L., & Schreibman, L. (1977) Teaching autistic children to respond to simultaneous multiple cues. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 24, 299–311.PubMedCrossRef Koegel, R. L., & Schreibman, L. (1977) Teaching autistic children to respond to simultaneous multiple cues. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 24, 299–311.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Koegel, R. L., & Wilhelm, H. (1973) Selective responding to the components of multiple visual cues by autistic children. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 15, 442–453. Koegel, R. L., & Wilhelm, H. (1973) Selective responding to the components of multiple visual cues by autistic children. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 15, 442–453.
go back to reference Kovattana, P. M., & Kraemer, H. (1974). Response to multiple visual cues of color, size, and form by autistic children. Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia, 4, 251–261.PubMedCrossRef Kovattana, P. M., & Kraemer, H. (1974). Response to multiple visual cues of color, size, and form by autistic children. Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia, 4, 251–261.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Lovaas, O. I., & Schreibman, L. (1971) Stimulus overselectivity of autistic children in a two stimulus situation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 9, 305–310.PubMedCrossRef Lovaas, O. I., & Schreibman, L. (1971) Stimulus overselectivity of autistic children in a two stimulus situation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 9, 305–310.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Lovaas, O. I., Schreibman, L., Koegel, R., & Rehm, R. (1971) Selective responding by autistic children to multiple sensory input. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 77, 211–222.PubMedCrossRef Lovaas, O. I., Schreibman, L., Koegel, R., & Rehm, R. (1971) Selective responding by autistic children to multiple sensory input. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 77, 211–222.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Mottron, L., Belleville, S., & Menard, E. (1999) Local bias in autistic subjects as evidenced by graphic tasks: Perceptual hierarchization or working memory deficit? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 40, 743–755. Mottron, L., Belleville, S., & Menard, E. (1999) Local bias in autistic subjects as evidenced by graphic tasks: Perceptual hierarchization or working memory deficit? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 40, 743–755.
go back to reference Reed, P., & Gibson, E. (2005). The effect of concurrent task load on stimulus over selectivity. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35, 601–614.PubMedCrossRef Reed, P., & Gibson, E. (2005). The effect of concurrent task load on stimulus over selectivity. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35, 601–614.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Sonoyama, S., & Kobayashi, S. (1986) Stimulus overselectivity in autistic and normal children: The effects of different visual stimulus complexes. Japanese Journal of Behaviour Therapy, 12, 62–72. Sonoyama, S., & Kobayashi, S. (1986) Stimulus overselectivity in autistic and normal children: The effects of different visual stimulus complexes. Japanese Journal of Behaviour Therapy, 12, 62–72.
go back to reference Wayland, S., & Taplin, J. E. (1985). Feature-processing deficits following brain injury: I. Overselectivity in recognition memory for compound stimuli. Brain and Cognition, 4, 338–355.PubMedCrossRef Wayland, S., & Taplin, J. E. (1985). Feature-processing deficits following brain injury: I. Overselectivity in recognition memory for compound stimuli. Brain and Cognition, 4, 338–355.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference White, K. G., & Ruske, A. C. (2002). Memory deficits in Alzheimer’s disease: The encoding hypothesis and cholinergic function. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 426–437.PubMed White, K. G., & Ruske, A. C. (2002). Memory deficits in Alzheimer’s disease: The encoding hypothesis and cholinergic function. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 426–437.PubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
The Effect of Retention Interval on Stimulus Over-selectivity using a Matching-to-sample Paradigm
Auteur
Phil Reed
Publicatiedatum
01-11-2006
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders / Uitgave 8/2006
Print ISSN: 0162-3257
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3432
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-006-0148-4

Andere artikelen Uitgave 8/2006

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 8/2006 Naar de uitgave

Acknowledgement

Acknowledgements