Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 2/2017

06-06-2016

The Nature of Social Positive Illusory Bias: Reflection of Social Impairment, Self-Protective Motivation, or Poor Executive Functioning?

Auteurs: Julia D. McQuade, Saaid A. Mendoza, Kristy L. Larsen, Rosanna P. Breaux

Gepubliceerd in: Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology | Uitgave 2/2017

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

The present study examined if a social positive illusory bias (PIB) is: a) simply a reflection of low adult-rated social acceptance, b) evident when children’s perceived social acceptance is measured implicitly, and c) directly relates to impaired executive functioning (EF). Participants were 8 to 12 year-old children (N = 120; 55 boys and 65 girls) with and without clinical symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Ratings of the child’s social acceptance were obtained from an adult and the child using the Self-Perception Profile for Children (Harter 2012); social bias was calculated as the discrepancy between standardized adult- and child-ratings. Children also completed a reaction time measure to assess implicit perceptions of social acceptance and a battery of EF measures. Depression symptoms were assessed based on parent report. Group comparisons were focused on the presence or absence of social PIB rather than on ADHD diagnostic status. Relative to non-PIB children, those with a social PIB were significantly higher in self-reported social acceptance, but significantly lower on adult reports and implicit perceived social acceptance; these children also were significantly higher in depression symptoms. EF impairments were indirectly related to social PIB as a function of adult-rated social impairment. Results suggest that social PIB is not merely a reflection of low adult-ratings of social acceptance. However, the high explicit self-reports of social acceptance in children with a social PIB are not fully consistent with their implicit self-perceptions of social acceptance. Results are discussed in light of the self-protective and cognitive deficits hypotheses regarding the nature of social PIB.
Voetnoten
1
One additional child from the original sample was excluded due to non-compliance with study procedures which invalidated relevant measures. Four additional participants (3 with ADHD and 1 control) were excluded because their accuracy on the IAT was more than 2.5 standard deviations below the mean accuracy for children without ADHD (63 %).
 
2
Parent and teacher reports of symptoms were based on children’s unmedicated behavior; however for a subset of medicated children (n = 10), teachers did not have an opportunity to observe the child unmedicated and provided symptom ratings based on medicated behavior.
 
3
Of the 65 control children, 63 had no more than 3 symptoms in either ADHD symptom domain and no more than 4 symptoms total. The remaining 2 subjects classified as controls had 4 symptoms of inattention or hyperactivity-impulsivity (but not both); neither of these children displayed a social PIB. Because of the dimensional approach to data analysis, these additional control subjects were retained, even though their symptom levels were slightly elevated.
 
4
For 16 % of participants, teachers declined to complete study measures; when teacher data was not available, parent data was used instead. For children who had multiple teachers, the teacher who was most familiar with the child was selected to provide ratings.
 
5
Some researchers have measured a social PIB as the discrepancy between unstandardized adult- and child-ratings and have defined extreme PIB as a score greater than one (Linnea et al. 2012; McQuade et al. 2011). Using this alternative definition, the –PIB group was too small to be examined (n = 6). However, the +PIB (n = 25) and No-Bias (n = 83) group differences were consistent for adult-rated (p < 0.001) and implicit social acceptance (p = 0.033), depression (p = 0.003), and EF (p = 0.001). For self-perceived social acceptance, the +PIB group (M = 3.42, SD = 0.61) was higher than the No-Bias group (M = 3.24, SD = 0.58) but this difference was not significant (p = 0.174). This non-significant effect may be due to a reduction in power from the smaller sample size of the +PIB group. Additionally, the non-standardized discrepancy score was more strongly associated with adult-rated social acceptance (r = −0.72) than child rated acceptance (r = 0.40). This may bias results such that effects are stronger for adult-rated measures but weaker for child-rated measures (De Los Reyes and Kazdin 2004).
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families. Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.
go back to reference American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing.CrossRef American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing.CrossRef
go back to reference Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.CrossRefPubMed Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi:10.​1037/​0022-3514.​51.​6.​1173.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Clark, C., Prior, M., & Kinsella, G. (2002). The relationship between executive function abilities, adaptive behaviour, and academic achievement in children with externalising behaviour problems. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43, 785–796. doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00084.CrossRefPubMed Clark, C., Prior, M., & Kinsella, G. (2002). The relationship between executive function abilities, adaptive behaviour, and academic achievement in children with externalising behaviour problems. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43, 785–796. doi:10.​1111/​1469-7610.​00084.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Diener, M. B., & Milich, R. (1997). Effects of positive feedback on the social interactions of boys with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a test of the self-protective hypothesis. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 26, 256–265. doi:10.1207/s15374424jccp2603_4.CrossRefPubMed Diener, M. B., & Milich, R. (1997). Effects of positive feedback on the social interactions of boys with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a test of the self-protective hypothesis. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 26, 256–265. doi:10.​1207/​s15374424jccp260​3_​4.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Emeh, C. C., Mikami, A. Y., & Teachman, B. A. (2015). Explicit and implicit positive illusory bias in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Attention Disorders. doi:10.1177/1087054715612261. Advance online publicationPubMed Emeh, C. C., Mikami, A. Y., & Teachman, B. A. (2015). Explicit and implicit positive illusory bias in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Attention Disorders. doi:10.​1177/​1087054715612261​. Advance online publicationPubMed
go back to reference Fried, R., Hirshfeld-Becker, D., Petty, C., Batchelder, H., & Biederman, J. (2015). How informative is the CANTAB to assess executive functioning in children with ADHD? A controlled study. Journal of Attention Disorders, 19, 468–475. doi:10.1177/1087054712457038.CrossRefPubMed Fried, R., Hirshfeld-Becker, D., Petty, C., Batchelder, H., & Biederman, J. (2015). How informative is the CANTAB to assess executive functioning in children with ADHD? A controlled study. Journal of Attention Disorders, 19, 468–475. doi:10.​1177/​1087054712457038​.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Gresham, F. M., Lane, K. L., MacMillan, D. L., Bocian, K. M., & Ward, S. L. (2000). Effects of positive and negative illusory biases: comparisons across social and academic self-concept domains. Journal of School Psychology, 38, 151–175. doi:10.1016/S0022-4405(99)00042-4.CrossRef Gresham, F. M., Lane, K. L., MacMillan, D. L., Bocian, K. M., & Ward, S. L. (2000). Effects of positive and negative illusory biases: comparisons across social and academic self-concept domains. Journal of School Psychology, 38, 151–175. doi:10.​1016/​S0022-4405(99)00042-4.CrossRef
go back to reference Harter (2012). Self-perception profile for children: Manual and questionnaires. Denver: University of Denver, Department of Psychology.CrossRef Harter (2012). Self-perception profile for children: Manual and questionnaires. Denver: University of Denver, Department of Psychology.CrossRef
go back to reference Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York: The Guilford Press. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York: The Guilford Press.
go back to reference Hoza, B., Murray-Close, D., Arnold, L. E., Hinshaw, S. P., & Hechtman, L. (2010). Time- dependent changes in positively biased self-perceptions of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a developmental psychopathology perspective. Development and Psychopathology, 22, 375–390. doi:10.1017/S095457941000012X.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hoza, B., Murray-Close, D., Arnold, L. E., Hinshaw, S. P., & Hechtman, L. (2010). Time- dependent changes in positively biased self-perceptions of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a developmental psychopathology perspective. Development and Psychopathology, 22, 375–390. doi:10.​1017/​S095457941000012​X.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Hoza, B., Vaughn, A., Waschbusch, D. A., Murray-Close, D., & McCabe, G. (2012). Can children with ADHD be motivated to reduce bias in self-reports of competence? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 80, 245–254. doi:10.1037/a0027299.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hoza, B., Vaughn, A., Waschbusch, D. A., Murray-Close, D., & McCabe, G. (2012). Can children with ADHD be motivated to reduce bias in self-reports of competence? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 80, 245–254. doi:10.​1037/​a0027299.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Hoza, B., McQuade, J. D., Murray-Close, D., Shoulberg, E., Molina, B. G., Arnold, L. E., et al. (2013). Does childhood positive self-perceptual bias mediate adolescent risky behavior in youth from the MTA study? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 81, 846–858. doi:10.1037/a0033536.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hoza, B., McQuade, J. D., Murray-Close, D., Shoulberg, E., Molina, B. G., Arnold, L. E., et al. (2013). Does childhood positive self-perceptual bias mediate adolescent risky behavior in youth from the MTA study? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 81, 846–858. doi:10.​1037/​a0033536.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Huang-Pollock, C. L., Mikami, A. Y., Pfiffner, L., & McBurnett, K. (2009). Can executive functions explain the relationship between attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and social adjustment? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37, 679–691. doi:10.1007/s10802-009-9302-8.CrossRefPubMed Huang-Pollock, C. L., Mikami, A. Y., Pfiffner, L., & McBurnett, K. (2009). Can executive functions explain the relationship between attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and social adjustment? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37, 679–691. doi:10.​1007/​s10802-009-9302-8.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hymel, S., Bowker, A., & Woody, E. (1993). Aggressive versus withdrawn unpopular children: variations in peer and self-perceptions in multiple domains. Child Development, 64, 879–896. doi:10.2307/1131224.CrossRefPubMed Hymel, S., Bowker, A., & Woody, E. (1993). Aggressive versus withdrawn unpopular children: variations in peer and self-perceptions in multiple domains. Child Development, 64, 879–896. doi:10.​2307/​1131224.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2004). Kaufman brief intelligence test (second ed.). Bloomington: Pearson, Inc.. Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2004). Kaufman brief intelligence test (second ed.). Bloomington: Pearson, Inc..
go back to reference Kurman, J., Rothschild-Yakar, L., Angel, R., & Katz, M. (2015). How good am I? Implicit and explicit self-esteem as a function of perceived parenting styles among children with ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders. doi:10.1177/1087054715569599. Advance online publicationPubMed Kurman, J., Rothschild-Yakar, L., Angel, R., & Katz, M. (2015). How good am I? Implicit and explicit self-esteem as a function of perceived parenting styles among children with ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders. doi:10.​1177/​1087054715569599​. Advance online publicationPubMed
go back to reference Laird, R. D., & Weems, C. F. (2011). The equivalence of regression models using difference scores and models using separate scores for each informant: implications for the study of informant discrepancies. Psychological Assessment, 23, 388–397. doi:10.1037/a0021926.CrossRefPubMed Laird, R. D., & Weems, C. F. (2011). The equivalence of regression models using difference scores and models using separate scores for each informant: implications for the study of informant discrepancies. Psychological Assessment, 23, 388–397. doi:10.​1037/​a0021926.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Luciana, M., & Nelson, C. A. (2002). Assessment of neuropsychological function in children through the Cambridge neuropsychological testing automated battery (CANTAB): normative performance in 4 to 12 year-olds. Developmental Neuropsychology, 22, 595–624. doi:10.1207/S15326942DN2203_3.CrossRefPubMed Luciana, M., & Nelson, C. A. (2002). Assessment of neuropsychological function in children through the Cambridge neuropsychological testing automated battery (CANTAB): normative performance in 4 to 12 year-olds. Developmental Neuropsychology, 22, 595–624. doi:10.​1207/​S15326942DN2203_​3.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Mikami, A. E., Calhoun, C. D., & Abikoff, H. B. (2010). Positive illusory bias and response to treatment among children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 39, 373–385. doi:10.1080/15374411003691735.CrossRef Mikami, A. E., Calhoun, C. D., & Abikoff, H. B. (2010). Positive illusory bias and response to treatment among children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 39, 373–385. doi:10.​1080/​1537441100369173​5.CrossRef
go back to reference Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., & Howerter, A. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex ‘frontal lobe’ tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100. doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0734.CrossRefPubMed Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., & Howerter, A. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex ‘frontal lobe’ tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100. doi:10.​1006/​cogp.​1999.​0734.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2005). Understanding and using the implicit association test: II. Method variables and construct validity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 166–180. doi:10.1177/0146167204271418.CrossRefPubMed Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2005). Understanding and using the implicit association test: II. Method variables and construct validity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 166–180. doi:10.​1177/​0146167204271418​.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Owens, J. S., Goldfine, M. E., Evangelista, N. M., Hoza, B., & Kaiser, N. M. (2007). A critical review of self-perceptions and the positive illusory bias in children with ADHD. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 10, 335–351. doi:10.1007/s10567-007-0027-3.CrossRefPubMed Owens, J. S., Goldfine, M. E., Evangelista, N. M., Hoza, B., & Kaiser, N. M. (2007). A critical review of self-perceptions and the positive illusory bias in children with ADHD. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 10, 335–351. doi:10.​1007/​s10567-007-0027-3.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Scanlon, G., McEnteggart, C., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2014). Using the implicit relational assessment procedure (IRAP) to assess implicit gender bias and self-esteem in typically-developing children and children with ADHD and with dyslexia. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 19, 48–59. doi:10.1037/h0100577.CrossRef Scanlon, G., McEnteggart, C., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2014). Using the implicit relational assessment procedure (IRAP) to assess implicit gender bias and self-esteem in typically-developing children and children with ADHD and with dyslexia. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 19, 48–59. doi:10.​1037/​h0100577.CrossRef
go back to reference Shaffer, D., Fisher, P., Lucas, C. P., Dulcan, M. K., & Schwab-Stone, M. E. (2000). NIMH diagnostic interview schedule for children version IV (NIMH DISC-IV): description, differences from previous versions, and reliability of some common diagnoses. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 39, 28–38. doi:10.1097/00004583-200001000-00014.CrossRefPubMed Shaffer, D., Fisher, P., Lucas, C. P., Dulcan, M. K., & Schwab-Stone, M. E. (2000). NIMH diagnostic interview schedule for children version IV (NIMH DISC-IV): description, differences from previous versions, and reliability of some common diagnoses. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 39, 28–38. doi:10.​1097/​00004583-200001000-00014.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Swanson, E. N., Owens, E. B., & Hinshaw, S. P. (2012). Is the positive illusory bias illusory? Examining discrepant self-perceptions of competence in girls with ADHD. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40, 987–998. doi:10.1007/s10802-012-9615-x.CrossRefPubMed Swanson, E. N., Owens, E. B., & Hinshaw, S. P. (2012). Is the positive illusory bias illusory? Examining discrepant self-perceptions of competence in girls with ADHD. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40, 987–998. doi:10.​1007/​s10802-012-9615-x.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
The Nature of Social Positive Illusory Bias: Reflection of Social Impairment, Self-Protective Motivation, or Poor Executive Functioning?
Auteurs
Julia D. McQuade
Saaid A. Mendoza
Kristy L. Larsen
Rosanna P. Breaux
Publicatiedatum
06-06-2016
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology / Uitgave 2/2017
Print ISSN: 2730-7166
Elektronisch ISSN: 2730-7174
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-016-0172-6

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2017

Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 2/2017 Naar de uitgave