Top

Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology

Gepubliceerd in:

01-04-2015

The Role of Individual and Collective Moral Disengagement in Peer Aggression and Bystanding: A Multilevel Analysis

Auteurs: Gianluca Gini, Tiziana Pozzoli, Kay Bussey

Gepubliceerd in: Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology | Uitgave 3/2015

Abstract

This study investigates the relationships between individual and collective moral disengagement and aggression-related behaviors (peer aggression, defending, and passive bystanding) among 918 adolescents (55.8 % boys; M _age = 14.1 years, SD = 1.1). Hierarchical linear modeling showed that, at the individual level, aggressive behavior was significantly explained by both individual moral disengagement and student perceived collective moral disengagement, which was also positively associated with defending. Student perceived collective moral disengagement moderated the link between individual moral disengagement and peer aggression. At the class level, classroom collective moral disengagement explained between-class variability in all the three aggression-related behaviors. These results extend previous research by demonstrating the role of collective moral disengagement at the individual and the class levels and have potential implications for interventions.

vorige artikel Dimensions of Oppositional Defiant Disorder in Young Children: Model Comparisons, Gender and Longitudinal Invariance

volgende artikel Physical and Sexual Abuse and Early-Onset Bipolar Disorder in Youths Receiving Outpatient Services: Frequent, but Not Specific

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

The interactions between age and gender and the two forms of moral disengagement were also entered to test for moderations. None of the interactions with age and gender were significant, so they were excluded from the final models.

We thank an anonymous reviewer for this suggestion.

Ahmed, E., & Braithwaite, V. (2004). “What, me ashamed?” Shame management and school bullying. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 41, 269–294. doi:10.1177/0022427804266547.CrossRef

Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716–723. doi:10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705.CrossRef

Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. In W. M. Kurtines & G. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development: theory, research and applications (Vol. 1, pp. 71–129). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

Bandura, A. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31, 101–119. doi:10.1080/0305724022014322.CrossRef

Bandura, A. (2004). Selective exercise of moral agency. In T. A. Thorkildsen & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Nurturing morality (pp. 37–57). Boston: Kluwer.CrossRef

Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 364–374. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364.CrossRef

Barchia, K., & Bussey, K. (2011a). Individual and collective social cognitive influences on peer aggression: Exploring the contribution of aggression efficacy, moral disengagement, and collective efficacy. Aggressive Behavior, 37, 107–120. doi:10.1002/ab.20375.CrossRefPubMed

Barchia, K., & Bussey, K. (2011b). Predictors of student defenders of peer aggression victims: Empathy and social cognitive factors. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35, 1–9. doi:10.1177/0165025410396746.CrossRef

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Caprara, G. V., Pastorelli, C., & Bandura, A. (1995). La misura del disimpegno morale in età evolutiva [Measuring age differences in moral disengagement]. Età Evolutiva, 51, 18–29.

Caprara, G. V., Regalia, C., Scabini, E., Barbaranelli, C., & Bandura, A. (2004). Assessment of filial, parental, marital, and collective family efficacy beliefs. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20, 247–261. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.20.4.247.CrossRef

Caravita, S. C. S., Gini, G., & Pozzoli, T. (2012). Main and moderated effects of moral cognition and status on bullying and defending. Aggressive Behavior, 38, 456–468. doi:10.1002/ab.21447.CrossRefPubMed

Caravita, S. C. S., Sijtsema, J. J., Rambaran, A. J., & Gini, G. (2013). Peer influences on moral disengagement in late childhood and early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. doi:10.1007/s10964-013-9953-1.PubMed

Card, N. A., Stucky, B. D., Sawalani, G. M., & Little, T. D. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development, 79(5), 1185–1229. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01184.x.CrossRefPubMed

Cehajic, S., Brown, R., & González, R. (2009). What do I care? Perceived ingroup responsibility and dehumanization as predictors of empathy felt for the victim group. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 715–729. doi:10.1177/1368430209347727.CrossRef

Doll, B., Song, S., & Siemers, E. (2004). Classroom ecologies that support or discourage bullying. In D. L. Espelage & S. M. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in american schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention (pp. 161–183). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Espelage, D. L., & Swearer, S. M. (2004). Bullying in american schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention. Mahweh: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Espelage, D., Holt, M., & Henkel, R. (2003). Examination of peer-group contextual effects on aggression during early adolescence. Child Development, 74, 205–220. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00531.CrossRefPubMed

Evers, K. E., Prochaska, J. O., Van Marter, D. F., Johnson, J. L., & Prochaska, J. M. (2007). Transtheoretical-based bullying prevention effectiveness trials in middle schools and high schools. Journal of Educational Research, 49, 397–414. doi:10.1080/00131880701717271.CrossRef

Faris, R., & Ennett, S. (2012). Adolescent aggression: the role of peer group status motives, peer aggression, and group characteristics. Social Networks, 34, 371–378. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2010.06.003.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Forsberg, C., Thornberg, R., & Samuelsson, M. (2014). Bystanders to bullying: fourth- to seventh-grade students’ perspectives on their reactions. Research Papers in Education. doi:10.1080/02671522.2013.878375.

Gibbs, J. C. (2010). Moral development and reality: Beyond the theories of Kohlberg and hoffman (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.

Gibbs, J. C. (2014). Moral development and reality: Beyond the theories of Kohlberg, Hoffman, and Haidt. New York

Gini, G. (2006). Bullying as a social process: the role of group membership in students’ perception of inter-group aggression at school. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 51–65. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2005.12.002.CrossRef

Gini, G. (2008). Italian elementary and middle school students’ blaming the victim of bullying and perception of school moral atmosphere. Elementary School Journal, 108, 1–20. doi:10.1086/528975.CrossRef

Gini, G., & Pozzoli, T. (2013). Bullied children and psychosomatic problems: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 132, 720–729. doi:10.1542/peds.2013-0614.CrossRefPubMed

Gini, G., Albiero, P., Benelli, B., & Altoè, G. (2008). Determinants of adolescents’ active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying. Journal of Adolescence, 31, 93–105. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.05.002.CrossRefPubMed

Gini, G., Pozzoli, T., & Hauser, M. (2011). Bullies have enhanced moral competence to judge relative to victims, but lack moral compassion. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 603–608. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.12.002.CrossRef

Gini, G., Pozzoli, T., & Bussey, K. (2014a). Collective moral disengagement: initial validation of a scale for adolescents. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 11, 386–395. doi:10.1080/17405629.2013.851024.CrossRef

Gini, G., Pozzoli, T., & Hymel, S. (2014b). Moral disengagement among children and youth: a meta-analytic review of links to aggressive behavior. Aggressive Behavior, 40, 56–68. doi:10.1002/ab.21502.CrossRefPubMed

Gini, G., Pozzoli, T., Vieno, A., & Lenzi, M. (2014c). Bullying victimization at school and headache: A meta-analysis of observational studies. Headache, early view online. doi: 10.1111/head.12344

Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: an integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 252–264. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4.CrossRefPubMed

Henry, D., Guerra, N., Huesmann, R., Tolan, P., Van Acker, R., & Eron, L. (2000). Normative influences on aggression in urban elementary school classrooms. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 59–81.CrossRefPubMed

Hoffman, D. A. (2002). Issues in multilevel research: Theory, development, measurement, and analysis. In S. G. Rogelberg (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 247–274). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

Huitsing, G., & Veenstra, R. (2012). Bullying in classrooms: participant roles from a social network perspective. Aggressive Behavior, 38, 494–509. doi:10.1002/ab.21438.CrossRefPubMed

Hyde, L., Shaw, D., & Moilanen, K. (2010). Developmental precursors of moral disengagement and the role of moral disengagement in the development of antisocial behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 197–209. doi:10.1007/s10802-009-9358-5.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Hymel, S., Schonert-Reichl, K. A., Bonanno, R. A., Vaillancourt, T., & Rocke Henderson, N. (2010). Bullying and morality. Understanding how good kids can behave badly. In S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer, & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools. An international perspective (pp. 101–118). New York: Routledge.

Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Little, T., Poskiparta, E., Kaljonen, A., & Salmivalli, C. (2011). A large-scale evaluation of the KiVa anti-bullying program. Child Development, 82, 311–330. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01557.x.CrossRefPubMed

Lahelma, E. (2004). Tolerance and understanding? Students and teachers reflect on differences at school. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10, 3–19.CrossRef

Lenzi, M., Vieno, A., Gini, G., Pozzoli, T., Pastore, M., Santinello, M., et al. (2014). Perceived teacher unfairness, instrumental goals and bullying behavior in early adolescence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. doi:10.1177/0886260513511694.

Nesdale, D., Durkin, K., Maass, A., Kiesner, J., & Griffiths, J. A. (2008). Effects of group norms on children’s intentions to bully. Social Development, 17, 889–907. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00475.x.CrossRef

Obermann, M. L. (2011a). Moral disengagement in self-reported and peer-nominated school bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 37, 133–144. doi:10.1002/ab.20378.CrossRefPubMed

Obermann, M. L. (2011b). Moral disengagement among bystanders to school bullying. Journal of School Violence, 10, 239–257. doi:10.1080/15388220.2011.578276.CrossRef

Olweus, D. (2010). Understanding and researching bullying: Some critical issues. In S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer, & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 9–34). Routledge: New York.

Oser, F. K. (1986). Moral education and values education: The discourse perspective. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 917–941). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Paciello, M., Fida, R., Tramontano, C., Lupinet, C., & Caprara, G. V. (2008). Stability and change of moral disengagement and its impact on aggression and violence in late adolescence. Child Development, 79, 1288–1309. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01189.x.CrossRefPubMed

Pellegrini, A. D., & Long, J. D. (2002). A longitudinal study of bullying, dominance, and victimization during the transition from primary school through secondary school. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 259–280. doi:10.1348/026151002166442.CrossRef

Pelton, J., Gound, M., Forehand, R., & Brody, G. (2004). The Moral Disengagement Scale: Extension with an American minority sample. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26, 31–39. doi:10.1023/B:JOBA.0000007454.34707.a5.CrossRef

Pepler, D. J., & Craig, W. M. (1995). A peek behind the fence: Naturalistic observations of aggressive children with remote audiovisual recording. Developmental Psychology, 31, 548–553. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/dev/index.aspx.CrossRef

Pfetsch, J., Steffgen, G., Gollwitzer, M., & Ittel, A. (2011). Prevention of aggression in schools through a bystander intervention training. International Journal of Developmental Science, 5, 139–149. doi:10.3233/dev-2011-11078.

Polanin, J. R., Espelage, D. L., & Pigott, T. D. (2012). A meta-analysis of school-based bullying prevention programs’ effects on bystander intervention behavior. School Psychology Review, 41, 47–65.

Pöyhönen, V., Juvonen, J., & Salmivalli, C. (2010). What does it take to defend the victimized peer? The interplay between personal and social factors. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 56, 143–163. doi:10.1353/mpq.0.0046.CrossRef

Pöyhönen, V., Juvonen, J., & Salmivalli, C. (2012). Standing up for the victim, siding with the bully or standing by? Bystander responses in bullying situations. Social Development, 21, 686–703. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2012.00662.x.CrossRef

Pozzoli, T., & Gini, G. (2010). Active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying: The role of personal characteristics and perceived peer pressure. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 815–827. doi:10.1007/s10802-010-9399-9.CrossRefPubMed

Pozzoli, T., & Gini, G. (2013). Why do bystanders of bullying help or not? A multidimensional model. Journal of Early Adolescence, 33, 315–340. doi:10.1177/0272431612440172.CrossRef

Pozzoli, T., Gini, G., & Vieno, A. (2012). The role of individual correlates and class norms in defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying: A multilevel analysis. Child Development, 83, 1917–1931. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01831.x.CrossRefPubMed

Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical Linear Models (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 112–120. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.007.CrossRef

Salmivalli, C., & Voeten, M. (2004). Connections between attitudes, group norms, and behaviour in bullying situations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 246–258. doi:10.1080/01650250344000488.CrossRef

Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Bjorkqvist, K., Osterman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1–15.

Salmivalli, C., Voeten, M., & Poskiparta, E. (2011). Bystanders matter: Associations between reinforcing, defending, and the frequency of bullying behavior in classrooms. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 40, 668–676. doi:10.1080/15374416.2011.597090.CrossRef

Sandstrom, M., Makover, H., & Bartini, M. (2012). Social context of bullying: Do misperceptions of group norms influence children’s responses to witnessed episodes? Social Influence, 8, 196–215. doi:10.1080/15534510.2011.651302.CrossRef

Sijtsema, J. J., Rambaran, J. A., Caravita, S. C. S., & Gini, G. (in press). Friendship selection and influence in bullying and defending: Effects of moral disengagement. Developmental Psychology

Sijtsema, J., Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S. S., & Salmivalli, C. (2009). Empirical test of bullies’ status goals: Assessing direct goals, aggression, and prestige. Aggressive Behavior, 34, 1–11. doi:10.1002/ab.20282.

Smith, P. K. (2010). Bullying in primary and secondary schools: Psychological and organizational comparisons. In S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer, D. L. Espelage (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools. An international perspective (pp. 137–150). New York: Routledge.

Teräsahjo, T., & Salmivalli, C. (2003). ‘She is not actually bullied’: The discourse of harassment in student groups. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 134–154.CrossRef

Thornberg, R. (2013). School bullying as a collective action: Stigma processes and identity struggling. Children & Society. doi:10.1111/chso.12058.

Thornberg, R., & Jungert, T. (2013). Bystander behavior in bullying situations: Basic moral sensitivity, moral disengagement and defender self-efficacy. Journal of Adolescence, 36, 475–483. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.02.003.CrossRefPubMed

Thornberg, R., Pozzoli, T., Gini, G., & Jungert, T. (in press). Unique and interactive effects of moral emotions and moral disengagement on bullying and defending among school children. Elementary School Journal

Tisak, M. S., Tisak, J., & Goldstein, S. E. (2006). Aggression, delinquency, and morality: A social-cognitive perspective. In M. Killen & J. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of Moral Development (pp. 611–632). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

Troop-Gordon, W., & Ladd, G. W. (2013). Teachers’ victimization-related beliefs and strategies: Associations with students’ aggressive behavior and peer victimization. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. doi:10.1007/s10802-013-9840-y.PubMed

Ttofi, M. M., Farrington, D. P., Losel, F., & Loeber, R. (2011). The predictive efficiency of school bullying versus later offending: A systematic/meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies. Criminal Behavior and Mental Health, 21, 80–89. doi:10.1002/cbm.808.CrossRef

White, J., Bandura, A., & Bero, L. (2009). Moral disengagement in the corporate world. Accountability in Research, 16, 41–74. doi:10.1080/08989620802689847.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: The Role of Individual and Collective Moral Disengagement in Peer Aggression and Bystanding: A Multilevel Analysis
Auteurs: Gianluca Gini
Tiziana Pozzoli
Kay Bussey
Publicatiedatum: 01-04-2015
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology / Uitgave 3/2015
Print ISSN: 2730-7166
Elektronisch ISSN: 2730-7174
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-014-9920-7

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2015

Parental Perfectionism and Overcontrol: Examining Mechanisms in the Development of Child Anxiety

Dimensions of Oppositional Defiant Disorder in Young Children: Model Comparisons, Gender and Longitudinal Invariance

Additional JACP Reviewer Acknowledgements 2013–2014

Stress Sensitivity Interacts with Depression History to Predict Depressive Symptoms Among Youth: Prospective Changes Following First Depression Onset

Exposure and Response Prevention Process Predicts Treatment Outcome in Youth with OCD

Kindergarteners’ Self-Reported Social Inhibition and Observed Social Reticence: Moderation by Adult-Reported Social Inhibition and Social Anxiety Disorder Symptoms