Top

Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology

Gepubliceerd in:

01-02-2014

Peer Bystanders to Bullying: Who Wants to Play with the Victim?

Auteurs: Anne M. Howard, Steven Landau, John B. Pryor

Gepubliceerd in: Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology | Uitgave 2/2014

Abstract

Given widespread concern associated with school-based bullying, researchers have looked beyond a dyadic perspective (i.e., bullies and victims only), and now consider the broader social ecology of the peer group. In this research, we examined how the behaviors of peer bystanders influence subsequent reactions to bullies and their victims. Two hundred and six 10- to 15-year-old boys (Mage = 12.46) were invited to play a computer game with three other boys allegedly located at another school. Before the start of the game, participants “met the other players” apparently sitting in a waiting room. These child actors depicted an escalating bullying episode in which the behavior of the bystander was manipulated: aide to the bully, defender of the victim, or passive outsider. Immediately after exposure to the bullying, each participant played a ball toss game (Cyberball) with the three other boys in the video. Individual differences among participants were examined as moderators of the effect of bystander behavior on participants’ willingness to include the “victim” in the game. Results indicated that, when exposed to a passive bystander, boys’ normative beliefs about aggression, as well as their tendency to morally disengage from observed egregious acts, decreased their willingness to include the victim in the game.

vorige artikel Adolescents’ Text Message Communication and Growth in Antisocial Behavior Across the First Year of High School

volgende artikel The Behaviour of Young Children with Social Communication Disorders During Dyadic Interaction with Peers

Bandura, A. (1990). Mechanisms of moral disengagement. In W. Reich (Ed.), Origins of terrorism: Psychologies, ideologies, theologies, states of mind (pp. 161–191). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193–209.PubMedCrossRef

Bandura, A., Bararanelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 364–374.CrossRef

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical consideration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.

Caplan, M. Z., & Hay, D. F. (1989). Preschoolers’ responses to peers’ distress and beliefs about bystander intervention. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 30, 231–242.PubMedCrossRef

Charach, A., Pepler, D., & Ziegler, S. (1995). Bullying at school - a Canadian perspective: a survey of problems and suggestions for intervention. Education Canada, 35, 12–18.

Chekroun, P., & Brauer, M. (2002). The bystander effect and social control behavior: the effect of the presence of others on people’s reactions to norm violations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 853–867.CrossRef

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Cook, C. R., Williams, K. R., Guerra, N. G., Kim, T. E., & Sadek, S. (2010). Predictors of bullying and victimization in childhood and adolescence: a meta-analytic investigation. School Psychology Quarterly, 25, 65–83.CrossRef

Cowie, H., Naylor, P., Rivers, I., Smith, P. K., & Pereira, B. (2001). Measuring workplace bullying. Aggressive and Violent Behavior, 7, 33–51.CrossRef

Crick, N. C., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74–101.CrossRef

Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710–722.PubMedCrossRef

Darley, J., & Latané, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 377–383.PubMedCrossRef

Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.

Endersen, I. M., & Olweus, D. (2001). Self-reported empathy in Norwegian adolescents: Sex differences, age trends, and relationship to bullying. In A. C. Bohart & D. J. Stipek (Eds.), Constructive and destructive behavior: Implications for family, school, and society (pp. 147–165). Washington: American Psychological Association.CrossRef

Frey, K. S., Hirschstein, M. K., Snell, J. L., Van Schoiack Edstrom, L., MacKenzie, E. P., & Broderick, C. J. (2005). Reducing playground bullying and supporting beliefs: An experimental trial of the Steps to Respect Program. Developmental Psychology, 41, 479–491.

Gini, G., Albiero, P., Benelli, B., & Altoe, G. (2007). Does empathy predict adolescents’ bullying and defending behavior? Aggressive Behavior, 33, 467–476.

Gini, G., Pozzoli, T., Borghi, F., & Franzoni, L. (2008). The role of bystanders in students’ perception of bullying and sense of safety. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 617–638.

Hawkins, D. L., Pepler, D. J., & Craig, W. M. (2001). Naturalistic observations of peer interventions in bullying. Social Development, 10, 512–527.CrossRef

Howard, A. M., & Landau, S. (2005). Psychopathy and bullying: Effect of aggressors’ characteristics on peer bystander devaluation of the victim. Poster presented at the National Association of School Psychologists Annual Convention, Atlanta, GA.

Huesmann, L. R., & Guerra, N. G. (1997). Children’s normative beliefs about aggression and aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 408–419.PubMedCrossRef

Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Poskiparta, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2010). Vulnerable children in varying classroom contexts. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 56, 261–282.CrossRef

Langdon, S., & Preble, W. (2008). The relationship between levels of perceived respect and bullying in 5th through 12th graders. Adolescence, 43, 485–503.PubMed

Latané, B., & Darley, J. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help? New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.

Latané, B., & Nida, S. (1981). Ten years of research on group size and helping. Psychological Bulleting, 89, 308–324.CrossRef

Litvack-Miller, W., McDougall, D., & Romney, D. M. (1997). The structure of empathy during middle childhood and its relationship to prosocial behavior. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 123, 303–324.PubMed

Nansel, T. R., Overpeck, M., Pilla, R. S., Ruan, W. J., Simon-Morton, B., & Scheidt, P. (2001). Bullying behaviors among U.S. youth: prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 2094–2100.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Oh, I., & Hazler, R. J. (2009). Contributions of personal and situational factors to bystanders’ reactions to school bullying. School Psychology International, 30, 291–310.

O’Connell, P., Pepler, D., & Craig, W. (1999). Peer involvement in bullying: insights and challenges for intervention. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 437–452.PubMedCrossRef

Pellegrini, A. D., & Bartini, M. (2000). A longitudinal study of bullying, victimization, and peer affiliation during the transition from primary school to middle school. American Education Research Journal, 37, 699–725.CrossRef

Polanin, J. R., Espelage, D. L., & Pigott, T. D. (2012). A meta-analysis of school-based bullying prevention programs’ effects on bystander intervention behavior. School Psychology Review, 41, 47–65.

Pozzoli, T., & Gini, G. (2010). Active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying: the role of personal characteristics and perceived peer pressure. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 815–827.PubMedCrossRef

Rigby, K., & Johnson, B. (2006). Expressed readiness of Australian schoolchildren to act as bystanders in support of children who are being bullied. Educational Psychology, 26, 425–440.CrossRef

Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: a review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 112–120.CrossRef

Salmivalli, C., Huttunen, A., & Lagerspetz, K. M. (1997). Peer networks and bullying schools. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 38, 305–312.CrossRef

Salmivalli, C., Voeten, M., & Poskiparta, E. (2011). Bystanders matter: associations between reinforcing, defending, and the frequency of bullying behavior in classrooms. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 40, 668–676.PubMedCrossRef

Staub, E., Fellner, D., Jr., Berry, J., & Morange, K. (2003). Passive and active bystandership across grades in response to students bullying other students. In E. Staub (Ed.), The psychology of good and evil. Why children, adults, and groups help and harm others (pp. 240–243). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Thornberg, R. (2007). A classmate in distress: schoolchildren as bystanders and their reasons for how they act. Social Psychology of Education, 10, 5–28.CrossRef

Thornberg, R. (2010). A student in distress: moral frames and bystander behavior in school. The Elementary School Journal, 110, 585–608.CrossRef

Ttofi, M. M. & Farrington, D. P. (2011). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: a systematic and meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7, 27–56.

van den Berg, Y. H. M., Segers, E., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2012). Changing peer perceptions and victimization through classroom arrangements: a field experiment. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40, 403–412.PubMedCrossRef

Wesselmann, E. D., Wirth, J. H., Pryor, J. B., Reeder, G. D. & William, K. D. (2012). When do we ostracize? Social Psychological and Personality Science. Online first version of record. Apr 12, 2012.

Titel: Peer Bystanders to Bullying: Who Wants to Play with the Victim?
Auteurs: Anne M. Howard
Steven Landau
John B. Pryor
Publicatiedatum: 01-02-2014
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology / Uitgave 2/2014
Print ISSN: 2730-7166
Elektronisch ISSN: 2730-7174
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-013-9770-8

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2014

Relation Between Parent Psychiatric Symptoms and Youth Problems: Moderation through Family Structure and Youth Gender

JACP Reviewer Acknowledgements 2013

Three Dimensions of Oppositionality in Autism Spectrum Disorder

Adolescents’ Text Message Communication and Growth in Antisocial Behavior Across the First Year of High School

Externalizing Disorders in Adolescence Mediate the Effects of Maternal Depression on Substance Use Disorders

Adolescent Conflict as a Developmental Process in the Prospective Pathway from Exposure to Interparental Violence to Dating Violence