Abstract
Dependent-origination, possibly the most fundamental Buddhist philosophical principle, is generally understood as a description of all that exists. Mental as well as physical phenomena are believed to come into being only in relation to, and conditioned by, other phenomena. This paper argues that such an understanding of pratītya-samutpāda is mistaken with regard to the earlier meanings of the concept. Rather than relating to all that exists, dependent-origination related originally only to processes of mental conditioning. It was an analysis of the self, not of reality, embedded in the Upaniṣadic search for the ātman. The teaching also possessed important ontological implications regarding the nature of the relation between consciousness and reality. These implications suggest that rather than things being conditioned by other things, they are actually conditioned by consciousness.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bodhi, B. (tr.) (2000). The connected discourses of the Buddha: A translation of the Saṃyutta Nikaya. Boston: Wisdom Publications.
Bodhi, B., Ñāṇamoli, B. (1995). The middle length discourses of the Buddha: A new translation of the Majjhima Nikaya. Boston: Wisdom Publications in Association with the Barre Center for Buddhist Studies.
Boisvert M. (1995). The five aggregates: Understanding Theravāda psychology and soteriology. Sri Satguru Publications, Delhi
Bronkhorst J. (1998). Did the Buddha believe in Karman and rebirth?. Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 21(1): 1–19
Bucknell R. (1999). Conditioned arising evolves: Variation and change in textual accounts of the Paṭicca-samuppāda doctrine. Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 22(2): 311–342
Collins S. (1982). Selfless persons: Imagery and thought in Theravāda Buddhism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Cox, C. (1993). Dependent origination: Its elaboration in early Sarvāstivādin Abhidharma texts. In R. K. Sharma (Ed.), Researches in Indian and Buddhist philosophy: Essays in honour of Professor Alex Wayman. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Gethin R. (1998). The foundations of Buddhism. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Glass, A. (2006). Connected discourse in Gandhāra: A study, edition, and translation of four Saṃyuktāgama-type Sūtras from the senior collection. PhD Dissertation, University of Washington.
Gombrich R. (1996). How Buddhism began. Athlone, London & Atlantic Highlands, NJ
Hamilton, S. (1996). Identity and experience: The constitution of the human being according to early Buddhism. London: Luzac Oriental.
Harris, I. C. (1991). The continuity of Madhyamaka and Yogācāra in Indian Mahāyāna Buddhism. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
Harvey, P. (1995). The selfless mind: Personality, consciousness and Nirvana in early Buddhism. Richmond: Curzon.
Jurewicz, J. (2000). Playing with fire: The pratītyasamutpada from the perspective of vedic thought. Journal of the Pali Text Society, XXVI, 77–104.
Kalupahana D.J. (1975). Causality: The central philosophy of Buddhism. University of Hawai’i press, Honolulu
Kragh, U. T. (2006). Early Buddhist theories of action and result: A study ofkarmaphalasambandha, Candrakīrti’s Prasannapadā, Verses 17.1–20. Vienna: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien Universität Wien.
Lamotte, E. (1980). Conditioned co-production and supreme enlightenment. In S. Balasooriya, et al. (Eds.), Buddhist studies in Honor of Walpola Rahula. London: Gordon Fraser.
Lamotte, E. (1988). History of Indian Buddhism. Sarah Boin-Webb, trans. Louvain: Oeeters Press.
Minh Ciau, B. (1991). The Chinese Madhyama Āgama and the Pāli Majjhima Nikāya: A comparative study. Delhi: Motilal Banarasidass.
Nagao G. (1991). Mādhyamika and Yogācāra. SUNY, New York
Nakamura, H. (1980). The theory of ‘Dependent origination’ in its incipient stage. In S. Bala- sooriya, et al. (Eds.), Buddhist studies in Honor of Walpola Rahula. London: Gordon Fraser.
Nakamura, H. (1989 [1980]). Indian Buddhism: A survey with bibliographical notes. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Norman, K. R. (1983). Pali literature: Including the canonical literature in Prakrit and Sanskrit of all the Hinayana schools of Buddhism. Wiesbade: O. Harrassowitz.
Norman, K. R. (1989). The Pāli language and scriptures. In T. Skorupski (Ed.), The Buddhist heritage: Papers delivered and the symposium of the same name convened at the School of Oriental and African studies, University of London, November 1985. Tring, UK: The institute of Buddhist Studies.
Nyanatiloka, M. (1971). A guide through the Abhidhamma-Piṭaka: Being a synopsis of the philosophical collection belonging to the Buddhist Pali Canon, Followed by an essay on the Paṭiccasamuppāda. Kandy: Buddhist Publication Society.
Ong W.J. (1982). Orality and literacy. Routledge, London
Piyadassi T. (1959). Dependent originatioṇPaṭicca Samuppāda. Kandy: Buddhist Publication Society.
Rahula, W. (1974 [1959]). What the Buddha taught. New York, Grove Press.
Ronkin N. (2005). Early Buddhist metaphysics: The making of a philosophical tradition. RoutledgeCurzon, London
Salomon R. (1999). Ancient Buddhist scrolls from Gandhāra. Washington University Press, Seatlle
Schmithausen, L. (1987). Ālayavijñāṇa: On the origin and the early development of a central concept of Yogācāra philosophy. Tokyo: The International Institute for Buddhist Studies.
Schmithausen, L. (1990). Preface. In D. S. Ruegg & L. Schmithausen (Eds.), Panels of the VIIth World Sanskrit Conference, Vol. II: Earliest Buddhism and Madhyamaka. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
Schmithausen L. (1997). The early Buddhist traditions and ecological ethics. Journal of Buddhist Ethics 4, 1–74
Schmithausen, L. (2000). Zur Zwölfgliedrigen Formel des Entsehens in Abhängigkeit. Hōrin: Vergleichende Studien zur Japanischen Kultur, 7, 41–76.
Schopen, G. (1985). Two problems in the history of Indian Buddhism: The Layman/Monk distinction and the doctrines of the transference of merit. Originally published in Studien Zur Indologie und Iranistik, 10, 9–47. Reprinted in Schopen, G. (1997). Bones, stones and Buddhist Monks: Collected papers on the Archaeology, Epigraphy, and Texts of Monastic Buddhism in India. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
Stcherbatskey, T. (2005 [1922]). The central conception of Buddhism and the meaning of the word “Dharma.” Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Varma V.P. (1971). Early Buddhism and its origins. Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers, New Delhi
Vetter T. (1988). The ideas and meditative practices of early Buddhism. E. J. Brill, Leiden
Wayman A. (1971). Buddhist dependent origination. History of Religions 10, 185–203
Wayman A. (1980). Dependent origination – The Indo-Tibetan tradition. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 7, 275–300
Williams D. (1974). The translation and interpretation of the 12 terms in the Paṭiccasamuppāda. Numen 21, 35–63
Wynne A. (2004). The early transmission of early Buddhist literature. Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 27(1): 97–127
Yamada I. (1980). Premises and implications of interdependence. In: Balasooriya S. et al. (eds), Buddhist studies in Honor of Walpola Rahula. Gordon Fraser, London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shulman, E. Early Meanings of Dependent-Origination. J Indian Philos 36, 297–317 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-007-9030-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-007-9030-8