Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

EYE MOVEMENTS REVEAL STUDENTS’ STRATEGIES IN SIMPLE EQUATION SOLVING

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Equation rearrangement is an important skill required for problem solving in mathematics and science. Eye movements of 40 university students were recorded while they were rearranging simple algebraic equations. The participants also reported on their strategies during equation solving in a separate questionnaire. The analysis of the behavioral and eye tracking data, namely the accuracy, reaction times, and the number of fixations, revealed that the participants improved their performance during the time course of the measurement. The type of equation also had a significant effect on the score. The results indicated that the number of fixations represents a reliable and sensitive measure that can give valuable insights into participants’ flow of attention during equation solving. A correlation between the number of fixations and participants’ efficiency in equation solving was found, suggesting that the more efficient participants developed adequate strategies, i.e. “knew where to look.” The comparison of eye movement data and questionnaire reports was used for assessing the validity of participants’ metacognitive insights. The measures derived from eye movement data were found to be more objective and reliable than the participants’ reports. These results indicate that the measurement of eye movements provides insights into otherwise unavailable cognitive processes and may be used for exploring problem difficulty, student expertise, and metacognitive processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J. R. & Gluck, K. (2001). What role do cognitive architectures play in intelligent tutoring systems? In V. Klahr & S. M. Carver (Eds.), Cognition & instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 227–262). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariasi, N. & Mason, L. (2011). Uncovering the effect of text structure in learning from a science text: An eye-tracking study. Instructional Science, 39, 581–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brysbaert, M. & Vitu, F. (1998). Word skipping: Implications for theories of eye movement control in reading. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and sceen perception (pp. 125–148). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chesney, D. L., McNeil, N. M., Brockmole, J. R. & Kelley, K. (2013). An eye for relations: eye-tracking indicates long-term negative effects of operational thinking on understanding of math equivalence. Memory & Cognition, 41, 1079–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohors-Fresenborg, E., Kramer, S., Pundsack, F., Sjuts, J. & Sommer, N. (2010). The role of metacognitive monitoring in explaining differences in mathematics achievement. ZDM Mathematics Education, 42, 231–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, M., Wiebe, E. N. & Carter, G. (2008). The influence of prior knowledge on viewing and interpreting graphics with macroscopic and molecular representations. Science Education, 92, 848–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Corte, E., Verschaffel, L. & Pauwels, A. (1990). Influence of the semantic structure of word problems on second graders’ eye movements. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 359–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drieghe, D., Brysbaert, M., Desmet, T. & De Baecke, C. (2004). Word skipping in reading: On the interplay of linguistic and visual factors. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 79–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duchowski, A. (2007). Eye tracking methodology: theory and practice. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epelboim, J. & Suppes, P. (2001). A model of eye movements and visual working memory during problem solving in geometry. Vision Research, 41, 1561–1574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gegenfurtner, A., Lehtinen, E. & Säljö, R. (2011). Expertise differences in the comprehension of visualizations: A meta-analysis of eye-tracking research in professional domains. Educational Psychology Review, 23, 523–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, E. R. & Spivey, M. J. (2003). Eye movements and problem solving: Guiding attention guides thought. Psychological Science, 14, 462–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, M. (1992). Mental animation: Inferring motion from static diagrams of mechanical systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1084–1102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, M., Mayer, R. E. & Green, C. E. (1992). Comprehension of arithmetic word problems: Evidence from students’ eye fixations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 76–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyönä, J. (2010). The use of eye movements in the study of multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 20, 172–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inhoff, A. W. & Radach, R. (1998). Definition and computation of oculomotor measures in the study of cognitive processes. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and sceen perception (pp. 29–54). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, A. R., Marriott, K. & Yelland, G. W. (2007). Parsing of algebraic expressions by experienced users of mathematics. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 286–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoblich, G., Ohlsson, S. & Raney, E. G. (2001). An eye movement study of insight problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 29, 1000–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramarski, B. & Mevarech, Z. R. (2003). Enhancing mathematical reasoning in the classroom: The effects of cooperative learning and metacognitive training. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 281–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landy, D., Jones, M. N., & Goldstone, R. L. (2008). How the appearance of an operator affects its mathematical precedence. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Washington DC, USA (pp. 2109–2114). Austin: Cognitive Science Society.

  • Liu, C. J. & Shen, M. H. (2011). The influence of different representations on solving concentration problems at elementary school. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20, 621–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H. C., Lai, M. L. & Chuang, H. H. (2011). Using eye-tracking technology to investigate the redundant effect of multimedia web pages on viewers’ cognitive processes. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 2410–2417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, A. M., Larson, A. M., Loschky, L. C. & Rebello, N. S. (2012). Differences in visual attention between those who correctly and incorrectly answer physics problems. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 8, 010122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, A. M., Rouinfar, A., Larson, A.M., Loschky, L. C. & Rebello, N.S. (2013). Can short duration visual cues influence students’ reasoning and eye movements in physics problems? Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 9, 020104-1–020104-16

  • Maltese, A. V., Balliet, R. N. & Riggs, E. M. (2013). Through their eyes: Tracking the gaze of students in a geology field course. Journal of Geoscience Education, 61, 81–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, L., Pluchino, P. & Tornatora, M. C. (2013a). Effects of picture labeling on science text processing and learning: Evidence from eye movements. Reading Research Quarterly, 48, 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, L., Tornatora, M. C. & Pluchino, P. (2013b). Do fourth graders integrate text and picture in processing and learning from an illustrated science text? Evidence from eye-movement patterns. Computers & Education, 60, 95–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2010). Unique contributions of eye-tracking research to the study of learning with graphics. Learning and Instruction, 20, 167–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merkley, R. & Ansari, D. (2010). Using eye tracking to study numerical cognition: The case of the ratio effect. Experimental Brain Research, 206, 455–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moeller, K., Fischer, M. H., Nuerk, H. C. & Willmes, K. (2009). Sequential or parallel decomposed processing of two-digit numbers? Evidence from eye-tracking. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 323–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moeller, K., Klein, E., Nuerk, H. C. & Willmes, K. (2011). Three processes underlying the carry effect in addition—Evidence from eye tracking. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 623–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nitschke, K., Ruh, N., Kappler, S., Stahl, C. & Kaller, C. P. (2012). Dissociable stages of problem solving (I): Temporal characteristics revealed by eye-movement analyses. Brain and Cognition, 80, 160–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, M., Carter, G. & Wiebe, E. (2005). Visual representations of DNA replication: Middle grades students’ perceptions and interpretations. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 14, 353–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin, Y., Carter, C. S., Silk, E., Stenger, V. A., Fissell, K., Goode, A. & Anderson, J. R. (2004). The change of the brain activation patterns as children learn algebra equation solving. Proceedings of National Academy of Science, 101, 5686–5691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reingold, E. M., Charness, N., Pomplun, M. & Stampe, D. M. (2001). Visual span in expert chess players: Evidence from eye movements. Psychological Science, 12, 48–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmerón, L., Baccino, T., Cañas, J. J., Madrid, R. I. & Fajardo, I. (2009). Do graphical overviews facilitate or hinder comprehension in hypertext? Computers & Education, 53, 1308–1319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • San Diego, J. P., Aczel, J. C., Hodgson, B. K. & Scanlon, E. (2012). Digital approaches to researching learners’ computer interactions using gazes, actions, utterances and sketches. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60, 859–881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, E., Maruyama, M., Dehaene, S. & Sigman, M. (2012). Eye gaze reveals a fast, parallel extraction of the syntax of arithmetic formulas. Cognition, 125, 475–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • She, H. S. & Chen, Y. Z. (2009). The impact of multimedia effect on science learning: Evidence from eye movements. Computers & Education, 53, 1297–1307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. D., Mestre, J. P. & Ross, B. H. (2010). Eye-gaze patterns as students study worked-out examples in mechanics. Physical Review Special Topics: Physics Education Research, 6, 020118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sohn, M. H., Goode, A., Koedinger, K. R., Stenger, V. A., Fissell, K., Carter, C. S. & Anderson, J. R. (2004). Behavioral equivalence but not neural equivalence: Neural evidence of alternative strategies in mathematical thinking. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 1193–1194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tai, R. H., Loehr, F. J. & Brigham, F. J. (2006). An exploration of the use of eye-gaze tracking to study problem-solving on standardized science assessments. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 29, 185–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, H. & Pienta, N. (2012). Eye-tracking study of complexity in gas law problems. Journal of Chemical Education, 89, 988–994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terry, P. W. (1992). The reading problem in arithmetic. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 70–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, L. E. & Lleras, A. (2007). Moving eyes and moving thought: On the spatial compatibility between eye movements and cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 663–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, J. T. & Ashby, F. G. (1978). Methods of modeling capacity in simple processing systems. In N. J. Castellan Jr. & F. Restle (Eds.), Cognitive theory (Volume IIIth ed., pp. 199–239). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, M. J., Hou, H. T., Lai, M. L., Liu, W. Y. & Yang, F. Y. (2012). Visual attention for solving multiple-choice science problem: An eye-tracking analysis. Computers & Education, 58, 375–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Gog, T. & Scheiter, K. (2010). Eye tracking as a tool to study and enhance multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 20, 95–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Gog, T. & Jarodzka, H. (2013). Eye tracking as a tool to study and enhance cognitive and metacognitive processes in computer-based learning environments. In R. Azevedo & V. Aleven (Eds.), International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies (pp. 143–156). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Veenman, M. V. J., Prins, F. J. & Verheij, J. (2003). Learning styles: Self-reports versus thinking aloud measures. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 357–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition Learning, 1, 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, V. M., Hegarty, M., Deslongchamps, G., Williamson, K. C. & Shultz, M. J. (2013). Identifying student use of ball-and-stick images versus electrostatic potential map images via eye tracking. Journal of Chemical Education, 90, 159–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia

    ANA SUSAC, JURICA KAPONJA & MAJA PLANINIC

  2. Chair for Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Split, Split, Croatia

    ANDREJA BUBIC

  3. Laboratory for Psycholinguistic Research, Department of Speech and Language Pathology, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia

    MARIJAN PALMOVIC

Authors
  1. ANA SUSAC
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. ANDREJA BUBIC
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. JURICA KAPONJA
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. MAJA PLANINIC
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. MARIJAN PALMOVIC
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to ANA SUSAC.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

SUSAC, A., BUBIC, A., KAPONJA, J. et al. EYE MOVEMENTS REVEAL STUDENTS’ STRATEGIES IN SIMPLE EQUATION SOLVING. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 12, 555–577 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9514-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9514-4

Key words

Search

Navigation