Abstract
Using data from two rounds of surveys on students in the Washington State Achievers (WSA) program, this study examined the relationship between student engagement in college activities and student persistence in college. Different approaches using student engagement measures in the persistence models were compared. The results indicated that the relationship between student engagement and the probability of persisting was not linear. Even though a higher level of social engagement was related to an increased probability of persisting, a higher level of academic engagement was negatively related to such probability. The findings have strong implications for educational research, policy, and practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college: Four critical years revisited. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Astin, A. W. (1999). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 40(5), 518–529.
Bean, J. P. (1980). Dropouts and turnover: The synthesis of a causal model of student attrition. Research in Higher Education, 12(2), 155–187.
Bean, J. P. (1982). Student attrition, intentions and confidence: Interaction effects in a path model. Research in Higher Education, 17(4), 425–429.
Bean, J. P., & Metzner, B. S. (1985). A conceptual model of nontraditional undergraduate student attrition. Review of Educational Research, 55(4), 485–540.
Braxton, J. M. (Ed.). (2002). Reworking the student departure puzzle. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
Braxton, J. M., Milem, J. F., & Sullivan, A. S. (2000). The influence of active learning on the college student departure process: Toward a revision of Tinto’s theory. Journal of Higher Education, 71(5), 569–590.
Braxton, J. M., Hirschy, A. S., & McClendon, S. A. (2004). Understanding and reducing college student departure. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Cabrera, A. F., Casteneda, M. B., Nora, A., & Hengstler, D. (1992). The convergence between two theories of college persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 63(2), 143–164.
Cabrera, A. F., Nora, A., & Castañeda, M. B. (1993). College persistence: Structural equations modeling test of an integrated model of student retention. The Journal of Higher Education, 64(2), 123–139.
Institute for Higher Education Policy. (2010). Expanding access and opportunity: The Washington State Achievers program. Washington, DC: Author.
Kuh, G., & Hu, S. (2001). The effects of faculty-student interaction in the 1990s. Review of Higher Education, 24(3), 309–332.
Kuh, G. D., Hu, S., & Vesper, N. (2000). “They shall be known by what they do”: An activities-based typology for college students. Journal of College Student Development, 41(2), 228–244.
Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H., Whitt, E. J., & Associates. (2005). Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Buckley, J., Bridges, B., & Hayek, J. (2007). Piecing together the student success puzzle: Research, propositions, and recommendations. ASHE Higher Education Report, Vol. 32, No. 5. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Kuh, G. D., Cruce, T. M., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 540–563.
National Commission on the Future of Higher Education. (2006). A test of leadership: Charting the future of U.S. higher education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
National Opinion Research Center. (2005). Design of the Washington State Achievers longitudinal surveys of scholars and non-recipients. Chicago, IL: Author.
National Survey of Student Engagement. (2004). Student engagement: Pathways to collegiate success. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University, Center for Postsecondary Research.
National Survey of Student Engagement. (2005). Student engagement: Exploring different dimensions of student engagement. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University, Center for Postsecondary Research.
National Survey of Student Engagement. (2007). Experiences that matter: Enhancing student learning and success. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University, Center for Postsecondary Research.
Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Peng, C. Y. J., So, T. H. S., Stage, F. K., & St. John, E. P. (2002). The use and interpretation of logistic regression in higher education journals: 1988-1999. Research in Higher Education, 43(3), 259–294.
Pike, G. R. (2004). Measuring quality: A comparison of US News rankings and NSSE benchmarks. Research in Higher Education, 45(2), 193–208.
Sedlacek, W. E. (2004). Beyond the big test: Noncognitive assessment in higher education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Tinto, V. (1975). Drop out from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125.
Tinto, V. (1987). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Tinto, V. (1998). Colleges as communities: Taking research on student persistence seriously. Review of Higher Education, 21(2), 167–177.
Acknowledgement
Data for this research were provided by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and coordinated by the Institute for the Higher Education Policy (IHEP). The research findings reflect only the author’ opinions and not those of the Gates Foundation or IHEP.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hu, S. Reconsidering the Relationship Between Student Engagement and Persistence in College. Innov High Educ 36, 97–106 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-010-9158-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-010-9158-4