Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Who Really Pays for Health Insurance? The Incidence of Employer-Provided Health Insurance with Sticky Nominal Wages

  • Published:
International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper addresses two seeming paradoxes in the realm of employer-provided health insurance: First, businesses consistently claim that they bear the burden of the insurance they provide for employees, despite theory and empirical evidence indicating that workers bear the full incidence. Second, benefit generosity and the percentage of premiums paid by employers have decreased in recent decades, despite the preferential tax treatment of employer-paid benefits relative to wages—trends unexplained by the standard incidence model. This paper offers a revised incidence model based on nominal wage rigidity, in an attempt to explain these paradoxes. The model predicts that when the nominal wage constraint binds, some of the burden of increasing insurance premiums will fall on firms, particularly small companies with low-wage employees. In response, firms will reduce employment, decrease benefit generosity, and require larger employee premium contributions. Using Current Population Survey data from 2000–2001, I find evidence for this kind of wage rigidity and its associated impact on the employment and premium contributions of low-wage insured workers during a period of rapid premium growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bertrand, M., E. Duflo and S. Mullainathan (2002). “How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates?”NBER Working Paper 8841. Cambridge MA: NBER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2002). ConsumerPrice Indices. Available at: < www.bls.gov/cpi/ >, accessedMarch 20, 2002.

  • Card, D. and D. Hyslop (1997). “Does Inflation ‘Grease the Wheels’ of the Labor Market?”In C.D. Romer, D.H. Romer (eds.) Reducing Inflation: Motivation and Strategy. NBER Studies in Business Cycles, vol 30. Chicago & London: Univ. Chicago Press, pp. 71–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Current Population Survey, March Supplement. (2000). Available at: < ferret.bls.census.gov/macro/032001/perinc/ new01_016.htm >, accessed January 6, 2002.

  • Cutler, D.M. and B.C. Madrian (1998). “Labor Market Responses to Rising Health Insurance Costs: Evidence on Hours Worked.”RAND Journal of Economics 23(3), 509–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dranove, D., K.E. Spier and L. Baker (2000). “Competition’ Among Employers Offering Health Insurance.”Journal of Health Economics 19, 121–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eissa, N. and J.B. Liebman (1996). “Labor Supply Response to the Earned Income Tax Credit.”Quarterly Journal of Economics 111(2), 605–637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, V.(1994). “The Clinton Plan: A Researcher Examines Reform.”Health Affairs Spring(I), 102–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J. and A. Krueger (1991). “The Incidence of Mandated Employer-Provided Insurance: Lessons from Workers’ Compensation Insurance.”In Tax Policy and the Economy. Cambridge: MIT Press for NBER, pp. 111–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J. R. McKnight (2003). “Why Did Employee Health Insurance Contributions Rise?”Journal of Health Economics 22(6), 1085–1104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J. (1994). “The Incidence of Mandated Maternity Benefits.”American Economic Review 84(3), 622–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J. (2000). “Health Insurance and the Labor Market.” In A.J. Cuyler and J.P. Newhouse (eds) The Handbook of Health Economics. Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 645–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, S. (1997). “Evidence of Nominal Wage Stickiness from Microdata.”American Economic Review 87(5), 993–1008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., J.L. Knetsch and R. Thaler (1986). “Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market.”American Economic Review 76(4), 728–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser Family Foundation [KFF]. (2001). “Employer Health Benefits: 2001 Summary of Findings.”Available at: < www.kff.org/content/2001/20010906a/EHB2001_sof.pdf >, accessed August 1, 2003.

  • Kaiser Family Foundation [KFF]. (2002). “Employer Health Benefits: 2002 Summary of Findings.”Available at: < www.kff.org/insurance/3251-index.cfm >, accessed July 15, 2004.

  • Krueger, A.B. and U.E. Reinhardt (1994). “The Economics of Employer Versus Individual Mandates.”Health Affairs Spring (II), 34–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, H.G. (1998). “Employee Contributions to Health Insurance Premiums, Part Two: Sticky Wages or Risk Sharing.”Chapter 4. In Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance: Costs, Coverage, and Contributions. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Princeton University.

  • New York Times. (2003). “Two Sides Seem Entrenched in Supermarket Dispute.”By S Greenhouse. 10 November 2003, p. 12.

  • Pauly, M.V. (1986). “Taxation, Health Insurance, and Market Failure in the Medical Economy.”Journal of Economic Literature 24(2), 629–675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, M.V. (1997). Health Benefits at Work. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, L.H. (1989). “Some Simple Economics of Mandated Benefits.”American Economic Review 79(2), 177–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swartz, K. (1986). “Interpreting the Estimates from Four National Surveys of the Number of People Without Health Insurance.”Journal of Economic and Social Measurement 14(3), 233–243.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin D. Sommers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sommers, B.D. Who Really Pays for Health Insurance? The Incidence of Employer-Provided Health Insurance with Sticky Nominal Wages. Int J Health Care Finance Econ 5, 89–118 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10754-005-6603-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10754-005-6603-5

Navigation