Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Factors associated with intrusive cancer-related worries in women undergoing cancer genetic risk assessment

  • Published:
Familial Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 11 June 2009

Abstract

One hundred and twenty-eight women undergoing assessment for genetic risk of breast/ovarian cancer completed questionnaires at entry into the assessment process and following risk provision. The key variable of interest was the level of intrusive worries at each time, and factors associated with the level of intrusive worries following risk provision. Based on the CARA model (Renner, Pers Soc Psychol Bull 30:384–396, 2004), it was expected that an unexpected risk assessment (whether good or bad) would result in high levels of intrusive thoughts. Other potential moderators of worry included neuroticism, level of threat experienced (low control, high perceived risk), the use of differing coping efforts, and the available social support. Of note was that while levels of intrusive thoughts fell in all risk groups following risk provision, unexpectedly only women found to be at population risk reported an increase of active attempts to distract from intrusive worries at this time. The CARA model was not supported. However, intrusion scores were independently associated with higher levels of neuroticism, a lack of confidant support, and a confrontive coping response. Active avoidance scores were uniquely associated with being assigned as population risk, neuroticism, lack of confidant and affective support, and the use of avoidant coping. Together, these variables accounted for 33% of the variance in intrusion scores and 31% of the variance in avoidance scores. The implications of these findings is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gramling R, Anthony D, Lowery J, Ballinger L, Ma D, Habbal R, Leighton N, Bowen D (2005) Association between screening family medical history in general medical care and lower burden of cancer worry among women with a close family history of breast cancer. Genet Med 7:640–645. doi:10.1097/01.gim.0000187123.76699.e9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hay JL, McCaul KD, Magnan RE (2006) Does worry about breast cancer predict screening behaviors? A meta-analysis of the prospective evidence. Prev Med 42:401–408. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.03.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Phelps C, Wood F, Bennett P, Brain K, Gray J (2007) Knowledge and expectations of women undergoing cancer genetic risk assessment: a qualitative analysis of free-text questionnaire comments. J Genet Couns 16:505–514. doi:10.1007/s10897-007-9086-3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Abramson LY, Alloy LB, Hankin BL (2002) Cognitive vulnerability-stress models of depression in a self-regulatory and psychobiological context. In: Gotlib IH, Hammen CL (eds) Handbook of depression. Guilford, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dorval M, Gauthier G, Maunsell E, Dugas MJ, Rouleau I, Chiquette J, Plante M, Laframboise R, Gaudet M, Bridge PJ, Simard J (2005) No evidence of false reassurance among women with an inconclusive BRCA1/2 genetic test result. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14:2862–2867. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0512

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Trask PC, Paterson AG, Wang C, Hayasaka S, Milliron KJ, Blumberg LR, Gonzalez R, Murray S, Merajver SD (2001) Cancer-specific worry interference in women attending a breast and ovarian cancer risk evaluation program: impact on emotional distress and health functioning. Psychooncology 10:349–360. doi:10.1002/pon.510

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Watson M, Foster C, Eeles R, Eccles D, Ashley S, Davidson R, Mackay J, Morrison PJ, Hopwood P, Evans DG, Psychosocial StudyCollaborators (2004) Psychosocial impact of breast/ovarian (BRCA1/2) cancer-predictive genetic testing in a UK multi-centre clinical cohort. Br J Cancer 91:1787–1794. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bennett P, Wilkinson C, Turner J, Brain K, Tudor-Edwards R, Griffith G, France B, Gray J (2008) Psychological factors associated with emotional responses to receiving genetic risk information. J Genet Couns 17:234–241. doi:10.1007/s10897-007-9136-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brain K, Norman P, Gray J, Rogers C, Mansel R, Harper P (2002) A randomized trial of specialist genetic assessment: psychological impact on women at different levels of familial breast cancer risk. Br J Cancer 86:233–238. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6600051

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Meiser B, Collins V, Warren R, Gaff C, St John DJ, Young MA, Harrop K, Brown J, Halliday J (2004) Psychological impact of genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer. Clin Genet 66:502–511. doi:10.1111/j.1399-0004.2004.00339.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lloyd S, Watson M, Waites B, Meyer L, Eeles R, Ebbs S, Tylee A (1996) Familial breast cancer: a controlled study of risk perception, psychological morbidity and health beliefs in women attending for genetic counselling. Br J Cancer 74:482–487

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bish A, Sutton S, Jacobs C et al (2002) No news is (not necessarily) good news: impact of preliminary results for BRCA1 mutation searches. Gend Med 4:353–358

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bish A, Sutton S, Jacobs C, Levene S, Ramirez A, Hodgson S (2002) Changes in psychological distress after cancer genetic counselling: a comparison of affected and unaffected women. Br J Cancer 86:43–50. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6600030

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fry A, Cull A, Appleton S, Rush R, Holloway S, Gorman D, Cetnarskyj R, Thomas R, Campbell J, Anderson E, Steel M, Porteous M, Campbell H (2004) A randomised controlled trial of breast cancer genetics services in South East Scotland: psychological impact. Br J Cancer 89:653–659. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6601170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. de Bruin GA, Rassin E, Muris P (2007) The prediction of worry in non-clinical individuals: the role of intolerance of uncertainty, meta-worry, and neuroticism. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 29:93–100. doi:10.1007/s10862-006-9029-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Taillefer SS, Kirmayer LJ, Robbins JM, Lasry JC (2003) Correlates of illness worry in chronic fatigue syndrome. J Psychosom Res 54:331–337. doi:10.1016/S0022-3999(02)00332-X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gerend MA, Aiken LS, West SG (2004) Personality factors in older women’s perceived susceptibility to diseases of aging. J Pers 72:243–270. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00262.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hopwood P, Shenton A, Lalloo F, Evans DG, Howell A (2001) Risk perception and cancer worry: an exploratory study of the impact of genetic risk counselling in women with a family history of breast cancer. J Med Genet 38:139. doi:10.1136/jmg.38.2.139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. van Oostrom I, Meijers-Heijboer H, Duivenvoorden HJ, Bröcker-Vriends AH, van Asperen CJ, Sijmons RH, Seynaeve C, Van Gool AR, Klijn JG, Tibben A (2006) Experience of parental cancer in childhood is a risk factor for psychological distress during genetic cancer susceptibility testing. Ann Oncol 17:1090–1095. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdl069

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Abela JR, Brozin K, Seligman ME (2004) A test of integration of the activation hypothesis and the diathesis-stress component of the hopelessness theory of depression. Br J Clin Psychol 43:111–128. doi:10.1348/014466504323088006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lazarus R (1991) Emotion and adaptation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  22. Renner B (2004) Biased reasoning: adaptive responses to health risk feedback. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 30:384–396. doi:10.1177/0146167203261296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fang CY, Daly MB, Miller SM, Zerr T, Malick J, Engstrom P (2006) Coping with ovarian cancer risk: the moderating effects of perceived control on coping and adjustment. Br J Health Psychol 11:561–580. doi:10.1348/135910705X60517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tercyak KP, Lerman C, Peshkin BN, Hughes C, Main D, Isaacs C, Schwartz MD (2001) Effects of coping style and BRCA1 and BRCA2 test results on anxiety among women participating in genetic counseling and testing for breast and ovarian cancer risk. Health Psychol 20:217–222. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.20.3.217

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wylie JE, Smith KR, Botkin JR (2003) Effects of spouses on distress experienced by BRCA1 mutation carriers over time. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 119:35–44. doi:10.1002/ajmg.c.10002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Costa PTJ, McCrea RR (1991) Revised NEO personality inventory and NEO five-factor inventory professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa

    Google Scholar 

  27. Horowitz M (1979) Impact of event scale: a measure of subjective stress. Psychosom Med 4:209–218

    Google Scholar 

  28. Feifel J, Strack S, Nagy V (1987) Degree of life-threat and differential use of coping modes. J Psychosom Res 31:91–99. doi:10.1016/0022-3999(87)90103-6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Broadhead WE, Gehlbach SH, DeGruv FV, Berton HK (1988) The DUKE-UNC functional social support questionnaire: measurement of social support in family medicine patients. Med Care 26:709–723. doi:10.1097/00005650-198807000-00006

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Braithwaite D, Emery J, Walter F, Prevost AT, Sutton S (2004) Psychological impact of genetic counseling for familial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 96:122–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Phelps C, Bennett P, Iredale R, Brain K, Gray J (2005) The development of a distraction-based coping intervention for women waiting for genetic risk information: a phase 1 qualitative study. Psychooncology 15:169–173. doi:10.1002/pon.937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bennett P, Phelps C, Brain K, Hood K, Gray J (2007) A randomised controlled trial of a brief self-help coping intervention designed to reduce distress when awaiting genetic risk information. J Psychosom Res 63:59–64. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.01.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bennett P, Wilkinson C, Griffith G, France B, Brain K, Gray J (2007) The impact of breast cancer genetic risk assessment on intentions to perform cancer surveillance behaviors. J Genet Couns 16:617–623. doi:10.1007/s10897-007-9100-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Bennett.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10689-009-9254-8

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bennett, P., Wilkinson, C., Turner, J. et al. Factors associated with intrusive cancer-related worries in women undergoing cancer genetic risk assessment. Familial Cancer 8, 159–165 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-008-9221-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-008-9221-9

Keywords

Navigation