Skip to main content
Log in

Searching for the sunk cost fallacy

  • Published:
Experimental Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We seek to isolate in the laboratory factors that encourage and discourage the sunk cost fallacy. Subjects play a computer game in which they decide whether to keep digging for treasure on an island or to sink a cost (which will turn out to be either high or low) to move to another island. The research hypothesis is that subjects will stay longer on islands that were more costly to find. Eleven treatment variables are considered, e.g. alternative visual displays, whether the treasure value of an island is shown on arrival or discovered by trial and error, and alternative parameters for sunk costs. The data reveal a surprisingly small sunk cost effect that is generally insensitive to the proposed psychological drivers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arkes, H.R., & Ayton, P. (1999). The sunk cost and concorde effects: Are humans less rational than lower animals? Psychological Bulletin, 125(5), 591–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arkes, H.R., & Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 124–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, E. (1968). Dissonance theory: Progress and problems. In R. Abelson et al (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A Sourcebook. pp. 5–27. Rand McNally and Co.

  • Barron, J.M., Chulkov, D.V., & Waddell, G.R. (2001). The escalation phenomenon and executive turnover: Theory and evidence. Mimeo, Purdue University.

  • Bazerman, M.H. (1986). Judgment in managerial decision making (2nd Ed. Chapter 4). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

  • Camerer, C.F., & Weber, R.A. (1999). The econometrics and behavioral economics of escalation of commitment: A re-examination of Staw and Hoang’s NBA data. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 39(1), 59–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael, L., & MacLeod, W.B. (2003). Caring about sunk costs: A behavioral solution to the hold-up problem. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 19(1), 106–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, J., & Oaxaca, R. (1989). Laboratory experiments with a finite-horizon job-search model. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2, 301–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, J., & Oaxaca, R. (1992). Direct tests of the reservation wage property. The Economic Journal, 102, 1423–1432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cura-Juri, M., & Galiani, S. (2004). In D. Friedman & A. Cassar (Eds.), Economics lab: An intensive course in experimental economics, Chapter 18. London and New York, Routledge.

  • Dixit, A., & Pindyck, R.H. (1994). Investment under uncertainty. Princeton University Press.

  • Economist. (2003). The space shuttle: Old, unsafe and costly. Economist magazine., pp. 77.

  • Elliott, S.R., & Curme, M. (1998). Understanding the sunk cost effect: An experimental approach. Mimeo, Miami University.

  • Eyster, E. (2002). Rationalizing the past: A taste for consistency. Nuffield College, Oxford, Job-Market Paper.

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland, H., & Conlan, D.E. (1998). Too close to quit: The role of project completion in maintaining commitment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(22), 2025–2048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garland, H., & Newport, S. (1991). Effects of absolute and relative sunk costs on the decision to persist with a course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 48, 55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, G.W., & Morgan, P. (1990). Search intensity in experiments. Economic Journal, 100, 478–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C. (1995). Escalation and De-escalation of commitment in response to sunk costs: The role of budgeting in mental accounting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62(1), 38– 54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hey, J.D. (1982). Search for rules for search. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3, 65–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hey, J.D. (1987). Still searching. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 8, 137–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanodia, C., Bushman, R., & Dickhaut, J. (1989). Escalation errros and the sunk cost effect: An explanation based on reputation and information asymmetries. Journal of Accounting Research, 27(1), 59– 77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J., Moon, Y., & Picard, R. W. (1999). This computer responds to user frustration. MIT Media Laboratory. 1999 Vision and Modeling Group Technical Report #502.

  • Kogut, C. A. (1990). Consumer search behavior and sunk costs. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 14, 381–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manley, S., & Seltzer, M. (1997, December 1997). Web facts and fantasy. Proceedings of the 1997 USENIX Symposium on Internet Technologies and Systems, Monterey, CA.

  • Meyer, D. J. (1993). First price auctions with entry: An experimental investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics and Finance, 33(2), 107–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1992). Economics, organization, and management. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northcraft, G.B., & Neale, M.A. (1986). Opportunity costs and the framing of resource allocation decisions. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 348–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Offerman, T., & Potters, J. (2001). Does auctioning of entry licenses induce collusion? An experimental study. Working paper, University of Amsterdam.

  • Phillips, O.R., Battalio, R.C., & Kogut, C.A. (1991). Sunk and opportunity costs in valuation and bidding. Southern Economic Journal, 58(1), 112–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schotter, A., & Braunstein, Y.M. (1981). Economic search: An experimental study. Economic Inquiry, 19, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, E.I. (1999, June 8). In E.I. Schwartz (Ed.), Digital Darwinism: 7 Breakthrough Business Strategies for Surviving in the Cutthroat Web Economy. Broadway Books.

  • Sonnemans, J. (1998). Strategies of search. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organziation, 35(3), 309–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnemans, J. (2000). Decision and strategies in a sequential search experiment. Journal of Economic Psychology, 21, 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staw, B.M. (1976). Knee deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staw, B.M., & Hoang, H. (1995). Sunk costs in the NBA: Why draft order affects playing time and survival in professional basketball. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 474–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, H.-T., & Yates, F.J. (1995). Sunk cost effects: The influences of instruction and future return estimates. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63(3), 311–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1, 39–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R.L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.

  • Whyte, G. (1993). Escalating commitment in individual and group decision making: A prospect theory approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54(3), 430–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, G., Sacks, A.M., & Hook, S. (1997). When success breeds failure: The role of self-efficacy in escalating commitment to a losing course of action. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(5), 415–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Friedman.

Additional information

Jel Classification C91, D11

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Friedman, D., Pommerenke, K., Lukose, R. et al. Searching for the sunk cost fallacy. Exp Econ 10, 79–104 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-006-9134-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-006-9134-0

Keywords

Navigation