Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pro-environmental behavior correlates with present and future subjective well-being

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports structural associations between psychological states, pro-environmental behavior, and present and future subjective well-being. A mailed questionnaire surveyed residents in Stockholm County, Sweden, to gather data on pro-environmental behaviors in water and energy saving at home, universalism and intrinsic satisfaction as motivational factors, and present and future subjective well-being. Results of path analysis suggest that: (1) Psychological factors (i.e., universalism, frugality, and participation categories of intrinsic satisfaction) correlate with pro-environmental behavior; (2) pro-environmental behavior could enhance not only present subjective well-being but expectations of future subjective well-being; and (3) expectations of future subjective well-being are negatively associated with current pro-environmental behavior. An important implication of this study is that expectation of better future subjective well-being may not always facilitate pro-environmental behavior. These results suggest that psychological factors both as antecedents and consequences play a significant role in building a sustainable society and improving our quality of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamse, W., & Steg, L. (2009). How do socio-demographic and psychological factors relate to households’ direct and indirect energy use and savings? Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(5), 711–720. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2009.05.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamse, W., & Steg, L. (2011). Factors related to household energy use and intention to reduce it: The role of psychological and socio-demographic variables. Research in Human Ecology, 18(1), 30–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, S. (2003). Strategies for sustainability: citizens and responsible environmental behaviour. Area, 35(3), 227–240. doi:10.1111/1475-4762.00172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, H., Pieters, R., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2008). Future-oriented emotions: Conceptualization and behavioral effects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(4), 685–696. doi:10.1002/ejsp.467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M., & Freeman, E. H. (1983). Tests for stability in linear structural equation systems. Psychometrika, 48(1), 143–145. doi:10.1007/BF02314682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börjesson, M., Eliasson, J., Hugosson, M. B., & Brundell-Freij, K. (2012). The Stockholm congestion charges—5 years on. Effects, acceptability and lessons learnt. Transport Policy, 20, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.11.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. W., & Kasser, T. (2005). Are psychological and ecological well-being compatible? The role of values, mindfulness, and lifestyle. Social Indicators Research, 74(2), 349–368. doi:10.1007/s11205-004-8207-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busseri, M. A., Choma, B. L., & Sadava, S. W. (2009). “As good as it gets” or “The best is yet to come”? How optimists and pessimists view their past, present, and anticipated future life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 352–356. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busseri, M. A., Malinowski, A., & Choma, B. L. (2013). Are optimists oriented uniquely toward the future? Investigating dispositional optimism from a temporally-expanded perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 533–538. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.04.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corral Verdugo, V. (2012). The positive psychology of sustainability. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 14(5), 651–666. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9346-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corral-Verdugo, V., Bonnes, M., Tapia-Fonllem, C., Fraijo-Sing, B., Frías-Armenta, M., & Carrus, G. (2009). Correlates of pro-sustainability orientation: The affinity towards diversity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(1), 34–43. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.09.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corral-Verdugo, V., Mireles-Acosta, J., Tapia-Fonllem, C., & Fraijo-Sing, B. (2011). Happiness as correlate of sustainable behavior: A study of pro-ecological, frugal, equitable and altruistic actions that promote subjective wellbeing. Research in Human Ecology, 18(2), 95–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. doi:10.1007/BF02310555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Young, R. (1985). Encouraging environmentally appropriate behavior: The role of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Environmental Systems, 15(4), 281–292. doi:10.2190/3FWV-4WM0-R6MC-2URB.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Young, R. (1986). Some psychological aspects of recycling: The structure of conservation satisfactions. Environment and Behavior, 18(4), 435–449. doi:10.1177/0013916586184001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Young, R. (1996). Some psychological aspects of reduced consumption behavior: The role of intrinsic satisfaction and competence motivation. Environment and Behavior, 28(3), 358–409. doi:10.1177/0013916596283005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Young, R. (2000). Expanding and evaluating motives for environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 509–526. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. (2012). New finding and future directions for subjective well-being research. American Psychologist, 37, 590–597. doi:10.1093/acprof.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, T., Fitzgerald, A., & Shwom, R. (2005). Environmental values. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30(1), 335–372. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eliasson, J., & Jonsson, L. (2011). The unexpected “yes”: Explanatory factors behind the positive attitudes to congestion charges in Stockholm. Transport Policy, 18, 636–647. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.03.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, R., Scannell, L., Kormos, C., Smolova, L., Biel, A., Boncu, S., et al. (2009). Temporal pessimism and spatial optimism in environmental assessments: An 18-nation study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.06.001.

  • Gilg, A., & Barr, S. (2006). Behavioural attitudes towards water saving? Evidence from a study of environmental actions. Ecological Economics, 57, 400–414. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgetta, C., Grecucci, A., Zuanon, S., Perini, L., Balestrieri, M., Bonini, N., et al. (2012). Reduced risk-taking behavior as a trait feature of anxiety. Emotion, 12(6), 1373–1383. doi:10.1037/a0029119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, V., Grob, A., & Orth, U. (2013). The adaptive power of the present: Perceptions of past, present, and future life satisfaction across the life span. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 626–633. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.06.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. (2014). Observed changes and their causes (Chapter 1). In Synthesis Report Core Writing Team, R. K. Pachauri, & L. Meyer (Eds.), Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Geneva: IPCC.

  • Jacob, J., Jovic, E., & Brinkerhoff, M. B. (2009). Personal and planetary well-being: Mindfulness meditation, pro-environmental behavior and personal quality of life in a survey from the social justice and ecological sustainability movement. Social Indicators Research, 93, 275–294. doi:10.1007/s11205-008-9308-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaida, N., & Kaida, K. (2014). Spillover effect of congestion charging on pro-environmental behavior. Environment, Development and Sustainability. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10668-014-9550-9.

  • Kesebir, P., & Diener, E. (2008). In pursuit of happiness: Empirical answers to philosophical questions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(2), 117–125. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00069.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y.-J., & De Young, R. (1993). Intrinsic satisfaction derived from office recycling behavior: A case study in Taiwan. Social Indicators Research, 31, 63–76. doi:10.1007/BF01086514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansbridge, J. J. (1990). Beyond self-interest. London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordlund, A. M., & Garvill, J. (2002). Value structures behind proenvironmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 34(6), 740–756. doi:10.1177/001391602237244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordlund, A. M., & Garvill, J. (2003). Effects of values, problem awareness, and personal norm on willingness to reduce personal car use. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(4), 339–347. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00037-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Social Indicators Research, 39, 101–117. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, P. W., Gouveia, V. V., Cameron, L. D., Tankha, G., Schmuck, P., & Franek, M. (2005). Values and their relationship to environmental concern and conservation behavior. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(4), 457–475. doi:10.1177/0022022105275962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, P. W., & Kaiser, F. G. (2012). Promoting pro-environmental behavior. In S. Clayton (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (pp. 556–580). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, P. W., & Zelezny, L. (1999). Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: Evidence for consistency across 14 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 255–265. doi:10.1006/jevp.1999.0129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 221–279). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structures of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). Orlando: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19–45. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P., Railton, P., Baumeister, R. F., & Sripada, C. (2013). Navigating into the future or driven by the past. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(2), 119–141. doi:10.1177/1745691612474317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Lacante, M. (2004). Placing motivation and future time perspective theory in a temporal perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 16(2), 121–139. doi:10.1023/B:EDPR.0000026609.94841.2f.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Sweden. (2013a). Average age of the population by region and sex. The Statistical Database. Retrieved November 01, 2013, from http://www.scb.se/.

  • Statistics Sweden. (2013b). Population by region, level of education, sex and period. The Statistical Database. Retrieved November 01, 2013, from http://www.scb.se/.

  • Statistics Sweden. (2013c). Disposable income of households by county. The Statistical Database. Retrieved November 01, 2013, from http://www.scb.se/.

  • Steg, L., Bolderdijk, J. W., Keizer, K., & Perlaviciute, G. (2014). An integrated framework for encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: The role of values, situational factors and goals. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 104–115. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steg, L., & de Groot, J. I. M. (2012). Environmental values. In S. Clayton (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (pp. 81–92). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309–317. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Research in Human Ecology, 6(2), 81–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabernero, C., & Hernandez, B. (2011). Self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation guiding environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 43(5), 658–675. doi:10.1177/0013916510379759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapia-Fonllem, C., Corral-Verdugo, V., Fraijo-Sing, B., & Durón-Ramos, M. F. (2013). Assessing sustainable behavior and its correlates: A measure of pro-ecological, frugal, altruistic and equitable actions. Sustainability, 5(2), 711–723. doi:10.3390/su5020711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thøgersen, J., & Ölander, F. (2002). Human values and the emergence of a sustainable consumption pattern: A panel study. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23(5), 605–630. doi:10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00120-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thøgersen, J., & Ölander, F. (2003). Spillover of environment-friendly consumer behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(3), 225–236. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00018-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNEP. (2011). Paving the way for sustainable consumption and production: The Marrakech process progress report. Nairobi: UNEP.

  • UNEP. (2012a). Global outlook on sustainable consumption and production policies: Taking action together. Nairobi: UNEP.

  • UNEP. (2012b). 21 issues for the 21st century: Results of the UNEP foresight process on emerging environmental issues. Nairobi: UNEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN General Assembly. (2012). The future we want (resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 27 July 2012). New York: UN.

  • United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat). (2013). Environmental sustainability and the prosperity of cities (Chapter 2.5). In UN-Habitat (Ed.), State of the world’s cities 2012/2013: Prosperity of cities. New York: Routledge.

  • Vlek, C., & Steg, L. (2007). Human behavior and environmental sustainability: Problems, driving forces, and research topics. Journal of Social Issues, 63(1), 1–19. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00493.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallach, M., & Wallach, L. (1983). Psychology's sanction of selfishness: The error of egoism in theory and therapy. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by TEPCO Memorial Foundation (Research Grant fiscal year 2007). Authors thank survey participants.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Engineering, Information and Systems, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 3058573, Japan

    Naoko Kaida

  2. Human Technology Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba Central 6-11, 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 3058566, Japan

    Kosuke Kaida

Authors
  1. Naoko Kaida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kosuke Kaida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naoko Kaida.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaida, N., Kaida, K. Pro-environmental behavior correlates with present and future subjective well-being. Environ Dev Sustain 18, 111–127 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9629-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9629-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation