Skip to main content
Log in

Gesturing for oneself

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most research on gestures (especially in the field of Mathematics Education) has focused on gestures in communication with others. In contrast, here, we focus on gestures which are not directed at others, but which we assume accompany inner speech or embodied thought, such as the gesticulation one makes by touching one’s fingers whilst silently counting; that is, whilst thinking, or communicating with oneself. Typically, these gestures are accompanied by eye gaze, which is detached from others who are present and turned either inwards or towards relevant artefacts present. Additionally, these gestures—whilst structurally similar—are much smaller than “normal” gestures used in interpersonal communication, suggesting an attenuation parallel to that found in inner speech. These physical gestures are in effect objectifications for oneself, which we can interpret as a not-quite-yet “underground” part of embodied thought. We suggest that they might be particularly vital for understanding the imagistic, visuospatial dimension of mathematics in general and fractions in particular.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Follow this link (http://stream.manchester.ac.uk/Play.aspx?VideoId=5592) to view Zak’s gestures.

  2. Follow this link (http://stream.manchester.ac.uk/Play.aspx?VideoId=5591) to view Nora’s gestures.

References

  • Behr, M. J., Harel, G., Post, T., & Lesh, R. (1992). Rational number, ratio, proportion. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 296–333). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, K. A., Post, T. R., & delMas, R. C. (2002). Initial fraction learning by fourth- and fifth-grade students: A comparison of the effects of using commercial curricula with the effects of using the rational number project curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(2), 111–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, L. (2009). Gestures and conceptual integration in mathematical talk. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70, 127–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Empson, S. B., Junk, D., Dominguez, H., & Turner, E. (2005). Fractions as the coordination of multiplicatively related quantities: A cross-sectional study of children’s thinking. In T. Dreyfus, B. Barton, P. Boero, N. C. Presmeg, & H. Steinbring (Eds.). Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63, 1–28.

  • Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). The two faces of gestures: Language and thought. Gesture, 5, 241–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin-Meadow, S. (2006). Talking and thinking with our hands. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 34–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendon, A. (2004). Reviews [Review of the hearing gesture: How our hands help us think, by S. Goldin-Meadow]. Gesture, 4, 91–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Nunez, R. (1997). The metaphorical structure of mathematics: Sketching out cognitive foundation for a mind-based mathematics. In L. English (Ed.), Mathematical reasoning: Analogies, metaphors and images (pp. 21–89). New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Nunez, R. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamon, S. J. (1996). The development of unitizing: Its role in children’s partitioning strategies. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 2, 170–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mamede, E., Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (2005). The equivalence and ordering of fractions in part–whole and quotient situations. In H. L. Chick & J. L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 281–288). Australia: University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, E. E., & Nelson, M. (2002). Egg cartons revisited. In G. Dunn, R. Stewart, and H. Williams (Eds.). Mathematics Teaching, 179, 11–14.

  • Nunez, R., Edwards, L., & Matos, J. F. (1999). Embodied cognition as grounding for situatedness and context in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39(1–3), 45–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radford, L. (2005). Why do gestures matter? Gestures as semiotic means of objectification. In H. L. Chick & J. L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 143–145). Australia: University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, L. (2006). Algebraic thinking and the generalization of patterns: A semiotic perspective. In S. Alatorre, J. L. Cortina, M. Saiz, & A. Mendez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 2–21). Mérida: Universidad Pedagógica Nacional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, L. (2008). The ethics of being and knowing: Towards a cultural theory of learning. In L. Radford, G. Schubring, & F. Seeger (Eds.), Semiotics in mathematics education: Epistemology, history, classroom and culture (pp. 215–234). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, L. (2009). Why gestures matter? Sensuous cognition and the palpability of mathematical meanings. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(3), 111–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, J., & Williams, J. (2007). Children’s mathematics 4–15: Learning from errors and misconceptions. UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabena, C., Yoon, C., Arzarello, F., Dreyfus, T., Paola, D., & Thomas, M. (2009). Relationships and control within semiotic bundles. In M. Tzekaki, M. Kaldrimidou, & H. Sakonidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 5, pp. 33–40). Greece: PME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. In Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S., & Souberman, E. (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Vygotsky, L. (2000) (Original, 1934). Thought and language (A. Kozulin, Ed. & Trans.). USA: MIT.

  • Williams, J. (2009). Embodied multi-modal communication from the perspective of activity theory. Educational Studies of Mathematics, 70, 201–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, C., Thomas, M. O. J., & Dreyfus, T. (2009). Gestures and virtual space. In M. Tzekaki, M. Kaldrimidou, & H. Sakonidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 5, pp. 409–416). Greece: PME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zurina Harun (2010). Evaluating the teaching and learning of fractions through modelling in Brunei: Measurement and semiotic analyses. Thesis, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harun Zurina.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zurina, H., Williams, J. Gesturing for oneself. Educ Stud Math 77, 175–188 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9294-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9294-x

Keywords

Navigation