Abstract
The development of divergent thinking (DT) in school-age children and adolescents has received considerable attention in the educational psychology literature since the 1970s. A body of research has outlined the existence of slumps (i.e., temporary declines) in this development with, however, conflicting findings concerning the magnitude and timing of these slumps. This study is the first to meta-analyze prior research findings regarding DT development from Grades 1 to 12, with a particular emphasis on the widely controversial fourth-grade slump. A total of 2139 standardized means from 41 studies involving 40,918 subjects were analyzed using a meta-analytic three-level model. The findings showed an overall upward developmental trend of DT across grade levels, with some discontinuities. Specifically, there was no evidence of a general fourth-grade slump; rather, evidences for a seventh-grade slump were found. Moderator analyses indicated that a fourth-grade slump might be observed depending on DT test, task content domain, intellectual giftedness, and country of study. The existence of the seventh-grade slump was also moderated by DT test, task content domain, and gender. Together, this study deciphers a longstanding debate regarding DT development, a prerequisite knowledge to support age-appropriate educational strategies that encourage creativity development. Implications of these findings for creativity research and practice are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The middle eastern category was only included in the overall analysis due to insufficient data for this category at the indicator level.
References
Abraham, A., Thybusch, K., Pieritz, K., & Hermann, C. (2014). Gender differences in creative thinking: behavioral and fMRI findings. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 8(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-013-9241-4.
Acar, S., & Runco, M. A. (2019). Divergent thinking: new methods, recent research, and extended theory. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(2), 153–158. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000231.
Alexander, P. A. (2019). Seeking common ground: surveying the theoretical and empirical landscapes for curiosity and interest. Educational Psychology Review, 31(4), 897–904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09508-x.
Alfonso-Benlliure, V., & Santos, M. R. (2016). Creativity development trajectories in elementary education: differences in divergent and evaluative skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, 160–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.11.003.
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: a componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357.
Amabile, T. M., & Mueller, J. S. (2008). Studying creativity, its processes, and its antecedents: an exploration of the componential theory of creativity. In J. Zhou & C. E. Shalley (Eds.), Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 33–64). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Baer, J. (1998). The case for domain specificity in creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11(2), 173–177. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1102_7.
Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2008). Gender differences in creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(2), 75–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01289.x.
Barbot, B. (2019). Measuring creativity change and development. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(2), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000232.
Barbot, B., & Heuser, B. (2017). Creativity and the identity formation in adolescence: a developmental perspective. In M. Karwowski & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The creative self: Effect of beliefs, self-efficacy, mindset, and identity (pp. 87–98). San Diego: Academic Press.
Barbot, B., & Tinio, P. P. L. (2015). Where is the “g” in “creativity”? A specialization-differentiation hypothesis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1041. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.01041.
Barbot, B., Besançon, M., & Lubart, T. I. (2015). Creative potential in educational settings: its nature, measure, and nurture. Education, 3-13(43), 371–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2015.1020643.
Barbot, B., Besançon, M., & Lubart, T. I. (2016a). The generality-specificity of creativity: exploring the structure of creative potential with EPoC. Learning and Individual Differences, 52, 178–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.06.005.
Barbot, B., Lubart, T. I., & Besançon, M. (2016b). Peaks, slumps, and bumps: Individual differences in the development of creativity in children and adolescents. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 151(151), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20152.
Barbot, B., Hass, R. W., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2019). Creativity assessment in psychological research: (re)setting the standards. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(2), 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000233.
Barbot, B. (2020). Creativity and Self-esteem in Adolescence: A Study of Their Domain-Specific, Multivariate Relationships. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(2), 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.365
Barbot, B., & Rogh, W. (2020). Developmental Trends in Creative Abilities and Potentials. In S. Pritzker & M. Runco (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Creativity (Third Edition) (pp. 323–326). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.06167-8
Becker, B. J. (2000). Multivariate meta-analysis. In H. E. A. Tinsley & E. D. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 499–525). Orlando: Academic Press.
Besançon, M., & Lubart, T. I. (2008). Differences in the development of creative competencies in children schooled in diverse learning environments. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(4), 381–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2007.11.009.
Brewer, M. B., & Chen, Y.-R. (2007). Where (who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism. Psychological Review, 114(1), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.133.
Camp, G. C. (1994). A longitudinal study of psychological correlates of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 7(2), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419409534519.
Charles, R. E., & Runco, M. A. (2001). Developmental trends in the evaluative and divergent thinking of children. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3-4), 417–437. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_19.
Chow, J. C., & Ekholm, E. (2018). Do published studies yield larger effect sizes than unpublished studies in education and special education? A meta-review. Educational Psychology Review, 30(3), 727–744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9437-7.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Motivation and creativity: Towards a synthesis of structural and energistic approaches to cognition. New Ideas in Psychology, 6(2), 159–176.
Dai, D. Y. (2019). New directions in talent development research: a developmental systems perspective. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 168(168), 177–197. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20322.
Darvishi, Z., & Pakdaman, S. (2012). Fourth grade slump in creativity: development of creativity in primary school children. GSTF International Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 1, 40–48.
Deeks, J. J., Higgins, J. P. T., & Altman, D. G. (2008). Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In I. P. T. Higgins & S. Green (Eds.), Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (pp. 243–296). Chichester: Wiley.
Domínguez, A., Díaz-Pereira, M. P., & Martínez-Vidal, A. (2015). The evolution of motor creativity during primary education. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 10, 583–591. https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2015.102.05.
Dowd, R. J. (1966). The relationship of creative thinking to college success (Final report of Small Contract Project No. 5–8202). Washington, DC: U. S. Office of Education.
Egger, M., & Smith, G. D. (1997). Meta-analysis: potentials and promise. British Medical Journal, 315(7119), 1371–1374. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7119.1371.
Egger, M., Smith, G., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315(7109), 629–634.
Fernández-Castilla, B., Declercq, L., Jamshidi, L., Beretvas, S. N., Onghena, P., & Van den Noortgate, W. (2019). Detecting selection bias in meta-analyses with multiple outcomes: a simulation study. The Journal of Experimental Education., 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2019.1582470.
Fishkin, A. S. (1989). Effort of odyssey of the mind creative problem solving teams: effects on creativity, creative self-concept, locus of control and general self-concept in gifted children (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://shareok.org/bitstream/handle/11244/20996/Thesis-1989D-F537e.pdf
Fleith, D. S. (2016). Creativity, motivation to learn, family environment, and giftedness: a comparative study. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 32(spe), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-3772e32ne211.
Forthmann, B., Gerwig, A., Holling, H., Çelik, P., Storme, M., & Lubart, T. (2016). The be-creative effect in divergent thinking: the interplay of instruction and object frequency. Intelligence, 57, 25–32.
Forthmann, B., Lips, C., Szardenings, C., Scharfen, J., & Holling, H. (2020). Are speedy brains needed when divergent thinking is speeded—or unspeeded? The Journal of Creative Behavior., 54(1), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.350.
Gajda, A., Karwowski, M., & Beghetto, R. A. (2017). Creativity and academic achievement: a meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(2), 269–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000133.
Gardner, H. (1982). Art, mind, and brain: A cognitive approach to creativity. New York: Basic Books.
Gerlach, V. S., Schutz, R. E., Baker, R. L., & Mazer, G. E. (1964). Effects of variations in test directions on originality test response. Journal of Educational Psychology, 55(2), 79–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048187.
Glover, J. A., Ronning, R. R., & Reynolds, C. (Eds.). (1989). Handbook of creativity. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
Gonen-Yaacovi, G., de Souza, L. C., Levy, R., Urbanski, M., Josse, G., & Volle, E. (2013). Rostral and caudal prefrontal contribution to creativity: a meta-analysis of functional imaging data. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 465. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00465.
Gottfried, A. E., & Gottfried, A. W. (1996). A longitudinal study of academic intrinsic motivation in intellectually gifted children: childhood through early adolescence. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 40(4), 179–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629604000402.
Gralewski, J., Lebuda, I., Gajda, A., Jankowska, D. M., & Wiśniewska, E. (2016). Slumps and jumps: another look at developmental changes in creative abilities. Creativity Theories–Research-Applications, 3(1), 152–177. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2016-0011.
Guignard, J.-H., & Lubart, T. I. (2007). A comparative study of convergent and divergent thinking in intellectually gifted children. Gifted and Talented International, 22(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2007.11673481.
Guignard, J.-H., Kermarrec, S., & Tordjman, S. (2016). Relationships between intelligence and creativity in gifted and non-gifted children. Learning and Individual Differences, 52, 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.07.006.
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444–454.
Guilford, J. P. (1966). Measurement and creativity. Theory Into Practice, 5, 186–202.
Guilford, J. P. (1975). Creativity: a quarter century of progress. In I. A. Taylor & J. W. Getzels (Eds.), Perspectives in creativity (pp. 37–59). Chicago: Aldine.
Guilford, J. P. (1984). Varieties of divergent production. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 18(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1984.tb00984.x.
Haidich, A. B. (2010). Meta-analysis in medical research. Hippokratia, 14(Suppl 1), 29–37.
Hansenne, M., & Legrand, J. (2012). Creativity, emotional intelligence, and school performance in children. International Journal of Educational Research, 53, 264–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.03.015.
Hattie, J. A. (1980). Should creativity tests be administered under test-like conditions? An empirical study of three alternative conditions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.72.1.87.
Hennessey, B. A. (1995). Social, environmental, and developmental issues and creativity. Educational Psychology Review, 7(2), 163–183.
Hill, J. P., & Lynch, M. E. (1983). The intensification of gender-related role expectations during early adolescence. In J. Brooks-Gunn & A. C. Petersen (Eds.), Girls at puberty: biological and psychosocial perspectives (pp. 201–228). New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
Hong, E., & Milgram, R. M. (2010). Creative thinking ability: domain generality and specificity. Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), 272–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.503535.
Hopp, M. D. S., Zhang, Z. S., Hinch, L., O’Reilly, C., & Ziegler, A. (2019). Creative, thus connected: The power of sociometric creativity on friendship formation in gifted adolescents—a longitudinal network analysis of gifted students. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 168(168), 47–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20324.
Houtz, J. C., & Krug, D. (1995). Assessment of creativity: resolving a mid-life crisis. Educational Psychology Review, 7(3), 269–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02213374.
Hu, W., Shi, Q. Z., Han, Q., Wang, X., & Adey, P. (2010). Creative scientific problem finding and its developmental trend. Creativity Research Journal, 22(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410903579551.
Jaquish, G. A., & Ripple, R. E. (1984). A life-span developmental cross-cultural study of divergent thinking abilities. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 20(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.2190/RNJJ-NBD0-4A3K-0XPA.
Jastrzębska, D., & Limont, W. (2017). Not only jumps, slumps, but also mini plateau. Creative potential assessed by the Test for Creative Thinking-Drawing Production. A cross-sectional study of polish students aged from 7 to 18. Creativity Research Journal, 29(3), 337–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2017.1360060.
Jeffrey, B., & Craft, A. (2004). Teaching creatively and teaching for creativity: distinctions and relationships. Educational Studies, 30(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305569032000159750.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1994). Précis of beyond modularity: a developmental perspective on cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17(4), 693–745.
Karwowski, M., & Lebuda, I. (2014). Digit ratio predicts eminence of Polish actors. Personality and Individual Differences, 64, 30–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.02.014.
Kim, K. H. (2011). The creativity crisis: The decrease in creative thinking scores on the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 23(4), 285–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2011.627805.
Kim, K. H., Cramond, B., & Bandalos, D. L. (2006). The latent structure and measurement invariance of scores on the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking – Figural. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(3), 459–477. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282456.
Klausmeier, H. J., & Wiersma, W. (1964). Relationship of sex, grade level, and locale to performance of high IQ students on divergent thinking tests. Journal of Educational Psychology, 55(2), 114–119. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041717.
Kleibeuker, S. W., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Crone, E. A. (2013). The development of creative cognition across adolescence: distinct trajectories for insight and divergent thinking. Developmental Science, 16(1), 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01176.x.
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometric, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310.
Lau, S., & Cheung, P. C. (2010). Developmental trends of creativity: What twists of turn do boys and girls take at different grades? Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), 329–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.503543.
Light, R. J., & Pillemer, D. B. (1984). Summing up: the science of reviewing research. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Lin, W.-L., & Shih, Y.-L. (2016). The developmental trends of different creative potentials in relation to children’s reasoning abilities: from a cognitive theoretical perspective. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.08.004.
Littell, J. H., Corcoran, J., & Pillai, V. (2008). Systematic reviews and meta-analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
Long, B. H., & Henderson, E. H. (1965). Opinion formation and creativity in elementary school children. Psychological Reports, 17(1), 219–223. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1965.17.1.219.
Lopez, E. C., Esquivel, G. B., & Houtz, J. C. (1993). The creativity skills of culturally and linguistically gifted and diverse students. Creativity Research Journal, 6(4), 401–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419309534495.
Lubart, T. I. (2001). Models of the creative process: Past, present and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3-4), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_07.
Lubart, T. I., & Georgsdottir, A. (2004). Creativity: development and cross-cultural issues. In S. Lau, A. N. N. Hui, & G. Y. C. Ng (Eds.), Creativity: when east meets west (pp. 23–54). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
Lubart, T. I., & Lautrey, J. (1995). Relationships between creative development and cognitive development. Paper presented at the Seventh European Conference on Developmental Psychology, Krakow, Poland.
Mainemelis, C. (2010). Stealing fire: creative deviance in the evolution of new ideas. Academy of Management Review, 35(4), 558–578. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.35.4.zok558.
McCrae, R. R., Arenberg, D., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Declines in divergent thinking with age: cross-sectional, longitudinal, and cross-sequential analyses. Psychology and Aging, 2(2), 130–137. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.2.2.130.
Nelson, E. E., & Guyer, A. E. (2011). The development of the ventral prefrontal cortex and social flexibility. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 1(3), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2011.01.002.
Paterson, S., Heim, S., Friedman, J. T., Choudhury, N., & Benasich, A. (2006). Development of structure and function in the infant brain: implications for cognition, language and social behaviour. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(8), 1087–1105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.05.001.
Peterson, E. G., & Cohen, J. (2019). A case for domain-specific curiosity in mathematics. Educational Psychology Review, 31(4), 807–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09501-4.
Plucker, J. A., & Beghetto, R. A. (2004). Why creativity is domain general, why it looks domain specific, and why the distinction does not matter. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko, & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 153–167). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_1.
Plucker, J. A., Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2015). What we know about creativity. Washington, DC: Partnership for 21st Century Skills.
Reiter-Palmon, R., Forthmann, B., & Barbot, B. (2019). Scoring divergent thinking tests: a review and systematic framework. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(2), 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000227.
Rieben, L. (1978). Inteligencia global, inteligencia operatoria y creatividad. Barcelona, España: Médica y Técnica.
Rosenfield, S., & Houtz, J. C. (1978). Developmental patterns in problem solving and divergent thinking abilities in gifted elementary school children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 1(2), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235327800100207.
Rubenstein, L. D., Callan, G. L., & Ridgley, L. M. (2018). Anchoring the creative process within a self-regulated learning framework: inspiring assessment methods and future research. Educational Psychology Review, 30(3), 921–945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9431-5.
Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 657–687. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141502.
Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.652929.
Runco, M. A., & Albert, R. S. (1985). The reliability and validity of ideational originality in the divergent thinking of academically gifted and nongifted children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(3), 483–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448504500306.
Said-Metwaly, S., Kyndt, E., & Van den Noortgate, W. (2017a). Approaches to measuring creativity: a systematic literature review. Creativity. Theories - Research - Applications, 4(2), 238–275. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2017-0013.
Said-Metwaly, S., Kyndt, E., & Van den Noortgate, W. (2017b). Methodological issues in measuring creativity: a systematic literature review. Creativity. Theories - Research - Applications, 4(2), 276–301. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2017-0014.
Said-Metwaly, S., Fernández-Castilla, B., Kyndt, E., & Van den Noortgate, W. (2018). The factor structure of the Figural Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: a meta-confirmatory factor analysis. Creativity Research Journal, 30, 352–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.1530534.
Said-Metwaly, S., Fernández-Castilla, B., Kyndt, E., & Van den Noortgate, W. (2019). Testing conditions and creative performance: Meta-analyses of the impact of time limits and instructions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Advance online publication. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000244.
Sailer, M., & Homner, L. (2019). The gamification of learning: a meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 77–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09498-w.
Sak, U., & Maker, C. J. (2006). Developmental variation in children’s creative mathematical thinking as a function of schooling, age, and knowledge. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 279–291. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1803_5.
Sherwood, L. A., & Strahan, D. B. (1985). Developmental patterns of logical and creative thinking among gifted learners in the middle school. Middle School Research Selected Studies, 10(1), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/08851700.1985.11670261.
Shin, D. D., & Kim, S. (2019). Homo curious: curious or interested? Educational Psychology Review, 31(4), 853–874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09497-x.
Silvia, P. J. (2015). Intelligence and creativity are pretty similar after all. Educational Psychology Review, 27(4), 599–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9299-1.
Smith, J. K., & Smith, L. F. (2010). Educational creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 250–264). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Soilemezi, D., & Linceviciute, S. (2018). Synthesizing qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918768014.
Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1801_10.
Torrance, E. P. (1966). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: norms-technical manual. Lexington: Personal Press.
Torrance, E. P. (1967). Understanding the fourth grade slump in creative thinking (Report No. BR-5-0508; CRP-994). Washington, DC: U. S. Office of Education.
Torrance, E. P. (1968). A longitudinal examination of the fourth-grade slump in creativity. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 12(4), 195–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698626801200401.
Torrance, E. P. (1977). Creativity in the classroom: what research says to the teacher. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
Van den Bussche, E., Van den Noortgate, W., & Reynvoet, B. (2009). Mechanisms of masked priming: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 135(3), 452–477. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015329.
Van den Noortgate, W., López-López, J. A., Marín-Martínez, F., & Sánchez-Meca, J. (2013). Three- level meta-analysis of dependent effect sizes. Behavior Research Methods, 45(2), 576–594. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0261-6.
Walker, E., Hernandez, A. V., & Kattan, M. W. (2008). Meta-analysis: its strengths and limitations. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, 75(6), 431–439. https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.75.6.431.
Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children: a study of the creativity intelligence distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Wong, Y. Y., Chow, I. H., Lau, V. P., & Gong, Y. (2018). Benefits of team participative decision making and its potential to affect individual creativity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48(7), 369–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12517.
Yi, X., Hu, W., Plucker, J. A., & McWilliams, J. (2013). Is there a developmental slump in creativity in China? The relationship between organizational climate and creativity development in Chinese adolescents. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(1), 22–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.21.
Funding
This research was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research in Egypt to the first author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic Supplementary Material
ESM 1
(DOCX 41 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Said-Metwaly, S., Fernández-Castilla, B., Kyndt, E. et al. Does the Fourth-Grade Slump in Creativity Actually Exist? A Meta-analysis of the Development of Divergent Thinking in School-Age Children and Adolescents. Educ Psychol Rev 33, 275–298 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09547-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09547-9