Skip to main content
Log in

Parents’ Perceptions of Child Care for Children with Disabilities

  • Published:
Early Childhood Education Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sixteen Minnesota families with children with disabilities participated in a 2-year interview study of their care experiences. Findings show that families developed a network of care providers, struggled to pay additional costs for care, were not informed of community services and programs, and believed that their children received adequate child care. This study highlights the need to provide information to families and providers and to link services in both rural and urban communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This study is part of the Minnesota Child Care Policy Research Partnership. Funding for the Partnership is made possible by a grant from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Child Care Bureau (Project Number 90YE0010) with additional support from the Minnesota Department of Human Services. This manuscript does not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of the Child Care Bureau or the Minnesota Department of Human Services.

  2. The authors will refer to families’ child care usage versus child care choice because in most cases the parents participating in this study had few child care choices. As Wagner (2007) states, the child care arrangements families use are often utilized because there are limited options available. The different types of child care arrangements may prompt some parents to think that there are many quality options available to them when choosing care for their young children. This is not necessarily the case.

References

  • Booth, C., & Kelly, F. (1998). Child-care characteristics of infants with and without special needs: Comparisons and concerns. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 13, 603–621. doi:10.1016/S0885-2006(99)80063-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, C., Owen, M. T., McCartney, K., Vandell, D. L., & Clarke-Stewart, K. A. (2002). Child care usage and mother-infant “quality time”. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 64(1), 16–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth-LaForce, C., & Kelly, F. (2004). Childcare patterns and issues for families of preschool children with disabilities. Infants and Young Children, 17(1), 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buell, M. J., Gamel-McCormick, M., & Hallam, R. A. (1999). Inclusion in a childcare context: Experiences and attitudes of family childcare providers. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 19, 217–223. doi:10.1177/027112149901900402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cost, Q., & Child Quality Outcomes Study Team. (1995). Cost, quality, and child outcomes in child care centers: Key findings and recommendations. Young Children, 50(4), 40–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cryer, D., Tietze, W., & Wessels, H. (2002). Parents’ perceptions of their children’s child care: A cross-national comparison. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 17, 259–277. doi:10.1016/S0885-2006(02)00148-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, D. (2000). The practices and politics of interpretation. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 897–922). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devore, S., & Bowers, B. (2006). Childcare for children with disabilities: Families search for specialized care and cooperative childcare partnerships. Infants and Young Children, 19(3), 203–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinnebeil, L., McInerney, J., Fox, C., & Juchartz-Pendry, K. (1998). An analysis of the perceptions and characteristics of childcare personnel regarding inclusion of young children with special needs in community-based programs. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 18, 118–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Draper, A. (2004). Workshop on ‘developing qualitative research method skills: analysing and applying your results’. The principles and application of qualitative research. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 63, 641–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillebrand, B., Kok, R., & Biemans, W. (2001). Theory-testing using case studies: A comment on Johnston, Leach, and Liu. Industrial Marketing Management, 30(8), 651–657. doi:10.1016/S0019-8501(00)00115-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King Teleki, J., & Buck-Gomez, S. (2004). Child care and early educators’ satisfaction with services among rural families. Early Childhood Education Journal, 29(3), 161–166. doi:10.1023/A:1014532524941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoche, L., Peterson, C. A., Edwards, C. P., & Jeon, H. J. (2006). Childcare for children with and without disabilities: The provider, observer, and parent perspectives. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21, 93–109. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.01.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landis, L. (1992). Marital, employment, and childcare status of mothers with infants and toddlers with disabilities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 12(4), 496–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawerence-Lightfoot, S., & Davis, J. (1997). The art and science of portraiture. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parish, S., Cloud, J., Hennig, A. N., & Huh, J. (2005). Childcare, disability, and family structure: Use and quality in a population-based sample of low-income preschool children. Children and Youth Services Review, 27, 905–919. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2004.12.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D., Mekos, D., Starr, S., McCartney, K., & Abbott-Shim, M. (2000). Within and beyond the classroom door: Assessing quality in childcare centers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 15(4), 475–496. doi:10.1016/S0885-2006(01)00077-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shearn, J., & Todd, S. (2000). Maternal employment and family responsibilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 13, 109–131. doi:10.1046/j.1468-3148.2000.00021.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd, S., & Jones, S. (2003). “Mum’s the word!:” Maternal accounts of dealings with the professional world. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 16(3), 229–244. doi:10.1046/j.1468-3148.2003.00163.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2005). Retrieved March 15, 2007, from http://www.census.gov.

  • Wagner, J. (2007). Reasons families use their child care arrangements. Unpublished master’s project, University of North Carolina Charlotte, Charlotte, NC.

  • Warfield, M. E., & Hauser-Cram, P. (1996). Childcare needs, arrangements, and satisfaction of mothers of children with developmental disabilities. Mental Retardation, 34, 294–302.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deborah Ann Ceglowski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ceglowski, D.A., Logue, M.E., Ullrich, A. et al. Parents’ Perceptions of Child Care for Children with Disabilities. Early Childhood Educ J 36, 497–504 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-009-0309-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-009-0309-0

Keywords

Navigation