Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Parental mediation of adolescent Internet use: Combining strategies to promote awareness, autonomy and self-regulation in preparing youth for life on the web

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study examines parental mediation strategies of adolescent Internet use and their relation to adolescent age, concerns of online risks, online activities and risky behavior. Prior research on parental mediation is inconclusive about the effectiveness or superiority of any mediation strategy. Additionally, concerns and awareness of risks were not previously studied with respect to mediation strategies. A mixed-method study involved a survey of 357 adolescents ages 12–18 and 156 young adolescents ages 9–11, followed by semi-structured interviews with parents, teachers and adolescents. Various behavioral, attitudinal, perceptual and habitual aspects of adolescent Internet use and types of parental mediation were measured. Results illustrate how parents combine mediation strategies in a variety of formats and contexts. Restrictive mediation correlated with increased adolescent concerns, suggesting an internalization of risks and consequences of Internet use. However, restrictive mediation correlated with decreased Internet activity and increased risks, possibly due to lack of adolescent experience and autonomy in navigating online risks. Conversely, active mediation correlated with increased Internet activity of any sort, which enables experimentation and autonomy in using the Internet, and did not correlate with risk. The study compares mediation strategies with parenting styles and concludes that a balanced combination of restrictive and active mediation, arguably supplies the best grounds for adolescents to develop a strong set of norms and boundaries and be able to self-regulate their own Internet activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data and material cannot be made publicly available as it contains information on minors and interview data. Upon reasonable request, the author may share some data with colleagues.

References

  • Berger, A. A. (2018). Media and communication research methods: An introduction to qualitative and quantitative approaches. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleakley, A., Ellithorpe, M., & Romer, D. (2016). The role of parents in problematic internet use among US adolescents. Media and Communication, 4(3), 24–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borca, G., Bina, M., Keller, P. S., Gilbert, L. R., & Begotti, T. (2015). Internet use and developmental tasks: adolescents’ point of view. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D., & Hargittai, E. (2013). Connected and concerned: variation in parents’ online safety concerns. Policy & Internet, 5(3), 245–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, F. C., Miao, N. F., Chiu, C. H., Chen, P. H., Lee, C. M., Chiang, J. T., & Chuang, H. Y. (2016). Urban–rural differences in parental internet mediation and adolescents’ internet risks in Taiwan. Health, Risk & Society, 18(3–4), 188–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, V. H. H., & Chng, G. S. (2016). Active and restrictive parental mediation over time: effects on youths’ self-regulatory competencies and impulsivity. Computers & Education, 98, 206–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chng, G. S., Li, D., Liau, A. K., & Khoo, A. (2015). Moderating effects of the family environment for parental mediation and pathological internet use in youths. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 18(1), 30–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, L. S. (2011). Parental mediation theory for the digital age. Communication Theory, 21(4), 323–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dashan, M. (2012). Shiput Musari Shel Bnei-Noar Basviva Havirtualit [Moral judgment of teens on the virtual environment] (Doctoral dissertation). Bar-Ilan University.

  • Dinev, T., & Hart, P. (2004). Internet privacy concerns and their antecedents - measurement validity and a regression model. Behaviour & Information Technology, 23(6), 413–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duerager, A., & Livingstone, S. (2012). How can parents support children’s internet safety? London: EU Kids Online.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eklund, L., & Helmersson Bergmark, K. (2013). Parental mediation of digital gaming and internet use. In FDG 2013-The 8th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (pp. 63-70).

  • EU kids online. (2010). Survey Questionnaires. Retrieved July 3, 2018 from http://www.lse.ac.uk/media-and-communications/research/research-projects/eu-kids-online/toolkit/survey-questionnaires

  • Ford, J. K., MacCallum, R. C., & Tait, M. (1986). The application of exploratory factor analysis in applied psychology: A critical review and analysis. Personnel Psychology, 39(2), 291–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadekar, R., & Pant, S. (2015). Exploring Facebook users’ privacy knowledge, enactment and attitude: a study on Indian youth. International Journal of Communication Research, 5(4), 273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garmendia, M., Garitaonandia, C., Martínez, G., & Casado, M. Á. (2012). The effectiveness of parental mediation. In S. Livingstone, L. Haddon, & A. Gorzig (Eds.), Children, risk and safety on the internet: Research and policy challenges in comparative perspective (pp. 231–244). Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glatz, T., Crowe, E., & Buchanan, C. M. (2018). Internet-specific parental self-efficacy: developmental differences and links to internet-specific mediation. Computers in Human Behavior, 84, 8–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2011). Applied thematic analysis. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israelashvili, M. K., & Bukobza, G. (2012). Adolescents’ over-use of the cyber world-internet addiction or identity exploration? Journal of Adolescence, 35(2), 417–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennrich, R. I., & Sampson, P. F. (1966). Rotation for simple loadings. Psychometrika, 31(3), 313–323.

  • Kaiser, H. F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23(3), 187–200.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kalmus, V., Blinka, L., & Olafsson, K. (2015). Does it matter what mama says: evaluating the role of parental mediation in European adolescents’ excessive internet use. Children & Society, 29(2), 122–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karaseva, A., Siibak, A., & Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, P. (2015). Relationships between teacherspedagogical beliefs, subject cultures, and mediation practices of students' use of digital technology. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 9(1).

  • Koivusilta, L. K., Lintonen, T. P., & Rimpelä, A. H. (2007). Orientations in adolescent use of information and communication technology: a digital divide by sociodemographic background, educational career, and health. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 35(1), 95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koronczai, B., Urbán, R., & Demetrovics, Z. (2020). Parental bonding and problematic internet or social media use among adolescents. Psychiatria Hungarica: A Magyar Pszichiatriai Tarsasag Tudomanyos Folyoirata, 35(1), 73–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ktoridou, D., Eteokleous, N., & Zahariadou, A. (2012). Exploring parents’ and children’s awareness on internet threats in relation to internet safety. Campus-wide Information Systems, 29(3), 133–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. J. (2013). Parental restrictive mediation of children’s internet use: effective for what and for whom? New Media & Society, 15(4), 466–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. J., & Chae, Y. G. (2007). Children’s internet use in a family context: influence on family relationships and parental mediation. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10(5), 640–644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Len-Ríos, M. E., Hughes, H. E., McKee, L. G., & Young, H. N. (2016). Early adolescents as publics: a national survey of teens with social media accounts, their media use preferences, parental mediation, and perceived internet literacy. Public Relations Review, 42(1), 101–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Q. X., Fang, X. Y., Zhou, Z. K., Zhang, J. T., & Deng, L. Y. (2013). Perceived parent-adolescent relationship, perceived parental online behaviors and pathological internet use among adolescents: gender-specific differences. PLoS One, 8(9), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S., & Bober, M. (2013). Regulating the internet at home: Contrasting the perspectives of children and parents. In D. Buckingham & R. Willett (Eds.), Digital generations: Children, Young people, and the new media (pp. 105–126). New-York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2008). Parental mediation of children’s internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(4), 581–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S., Ólafsson, K., Helsper, E. J., Lupiáñez-Villanueva, F., Veltri, G. A., & Folkvord, F. (2017). Maximizing opportunities and minimizing risks for children online: the role of digital skills in emerging strategies of parental mediation. Journal of Communication, 67(1), 82–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marwick, A. E., & Boyd, D. (2014). Networked privacy: how teenagers negotiate context in social media. New Media & Society, 16(7), 1051–1067.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mascheroni, G., & Ólafsson, K. (2016). The mobile internet: access, use, opportunities and divides among European children. New Media & Society, 18(8), 1657–1679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesch, G. S. (2009). Parental mediation, online activities, and cyberbullying. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12(4), 387–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Micheli, M. (2015). What is new in the digital divide? Understanding internet use by teenagers from different social backgrounds. In L. Robinson, S. R. Cotton, J. Schulz, T. M. Hale, & A. Williams (Eds.), Communication and information technologies annual (pp. 55–87). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

  • Moilanen, K. L., Rasmussen, K. E., & Padilla-Walker, L. M. (2015). Bidirectional associations between self-regulation and parenting styles in early adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 25(2), 246–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Notten, N., & Nikken, P. (2016). Boys and girls taking risks online: a gendered perspective on social context and adolescents’ risky online behavior. New Media & Society, 18(6), 966–988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oeldorf-Hirsch, A., & Sundar, S. S. (2015). Posting, commenting, and tagging: effects of sharing news stories on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 240–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Valle, M., De-Frutos-Torres, B., & Vázquez-Barrio, T. (2017). Parent’s influence on acquiring critical internet skills. Comunicar, 25(53), 103–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, W., & Ismail, N. (2014). Exploring the role of parents and peers in young adolescents’ risk taking on social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 17(9), 578–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, W., & Lwin, M. O. (2016). How does “talking about the internet with others” affect teenagers’ experience of online risks? The role of active mediation by parents, peers, and school teachers. New Media & Society, 19(7), 1109–1126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strasburger, V. C., Wilson, B. J., & Jordan, A. B. (2013). Children, adolescents, and the media. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symons, K., Ponnet, K., Emmery, K., Walrave, M., & Heirman, W. (2017). A factorial validation of parental mediation strategies with regard to internet use. Psychologica Belgica, 57(2), 93–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terras, M. M., & Ramsay, J. (2016). Family digital literacy practices and children’s mobile phone use. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzavela, E. C., Karakitsou, C., Dreier, M., Mavromati, F., Wölfling, K., Halapi, E., Macarie, G., Wójcik, S., Veldhuis, L., & Tsitsika, A. K. (2015). Processes discriminating adaptive and maladaptive internet use among European adolescents highly engaged online. Journal of Adolescence, 40, 34–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaala, S. E., & Bleakley, A. (2015). Monitoring, mediating, and modeling: parental influence on adolescent computer and internet use in the United States. Journal of Children and Media, 9(1), 40–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2009). Social consequences of the internet for adolescents: a decade of research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisniewski, P., Ghosh, A. K., Xu, H., Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. M. (2017). Parental control vs. teen self-regulation: Is there a middle ground for mobile online safety?. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (pp. 51-69).

  • Wright, M. F. (2017). Parental mediation, cyberbullying, and cybertrolling: the role of gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 189–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ybarra, M. L., Finkelhor, D., Mitchell, K. J., & Wolak, J. (2009). Associations between blocking, monitoring, and filtering software on the home computer and youth-reported unwanted exposure to sexual material online. Child Abuse & Neglect, 33(12), 857–869.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, R. P., Bai, B. Y., Jiang, S., Yang, S., & Zhou, Q. (2019). Parenting styles and internet addiction in Chinese adolescents: conscientiousness as a mediator and teacher support as a moderator. Computers in Human Behavior, 101, 144–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, J., Zhang, W., Yu, C., & Bao, Z. (2015). Early adolescent internet game addiction in context: how parents, school, and peers impact youth. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 159–168.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks Shiraz Meir, Bat-Sheva Yanir, Rivka Schloss, Itay Karkason and Jordan Zeidenberg for their assistance in conducting the research and preparing the manuscript.

Funding

The study was supported by the Pedagogical Research Fund at Ariel University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ariel University, 40700, Ariel, Israel

    Nili Steinfeld

Authors
  1. Nili Steinfeld
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nili Steinfeld.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Steinfeld, N. Parental mediation of adolescent Internet use: Combining strategies to promote awareness, autonomy and self-regulation in preparing youth for life on the web. Educ Inf Technol 26, 1897–1920 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10342-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10342-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation