Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A randomized phase 2 trial of the efficacy and safety of a novel topical povidone-iodine formulation for Cancer therapy-associated Paronychia

  • PHASE II STUDIES
  • Published:
Investigational New Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Purpose Cancer therapy-associated paronychia (CAP) is a frequent adverse event associated with cytotoxic and targeted therapies that may impact dosing of anticancer therapies and patient quality of life (QoL). There are currently no evidence-based management strategies or approved treatments for CAP. Materials and Methods This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled phase 2 study that evaluated the efficacy and safety of 6 to 8 weeks of 1% or 2% povidone-iodine (PVP-I) topical solution versus vehicle-control in adult patients with CAP. Patients were randomized to one of three treatment arms administered twice daily: 1% PVP-I (Cohort A), 2% PVP-I (Cohort B), or vehicle-control (Cohort C). The primary endpoint was a two-grade reduction (or reduction to grade 0 if involved nails were grade 1) on the six-point Paronychia Severity Grading (PSG) scale. Secondary endpoints included safety and the effect on QoL and microbiota. Results A total of 102 patients with cancer were randomized to the study. In Cohort A, 83 of 205 (40.5%, P = 0.6059) affected nails met the primary endpoint versus Cohort C. In Cohort B, 88 of 167 (52.7%, P = 0.0063) affected nails met the primary endpoint versus 64 of 169 (37.9%) in Cohort C. Nineteen of 29 patients (65.5%) in Cohort B reported moderately or very painful nails at baseline that decreased to 15 patients (51.7%) at visit 2 and five patients (17.2%) at visit 3. Conclusions Treatment with twice-daily topical 2% PVP-I was safe and resulted in improvement in CAP compared with control. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03207906. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03207906

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee SL, Tan BS, Chan LC (2013) Paronychia induced by the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor cetuximab. J Oncol Pharm Pract 19(3):273–278

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rigopoulos D, Gregoriou S, Belyayeva Y et al (2009) Acute paronychia caused by lapatinib therapy. Clin Exp Dermatol 34(1):94–95

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dainichi T, Tanaka M, Tsuruta N et al (2003) Development of multiple paronychia and periungual granulation in patients treated with gefitinib, an inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor. Dermatology (3):324–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boucher KW, Davidson K, Mirakhur B et al (2002) Paronychia induced by cetuximab, an antiepidermal growth factor receptor antibody. J Am Acad Dermatol 47(4):632–633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nakano J, Nakamura M (2003) Paronychia induced by gefitinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor. J Dermatol 30(3):261–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gilbar P, Hain A, Peereboom VM (2009) Nail toxicity induced by cancer chemotherapy. J Oncol Pharm Pract 15(3):143–155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cubiró X, Planas-Ciudad S, Garcia-Murett MP, Puig L (2018) Topical Timolol for Paronychia and Pseudopyogenic Granuloma in Patients Treated With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors and Capecitabine. JAMA Dermatol 154(1):99–100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gutzmer R, Hassel JC, Kähler KC et al (2014) Cutaneous adverse events of anti-tumor therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors. Hautarzt 65(7):582–589

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Garden BC, Wu S, Lacouture ME (2012) The risk of nail changes with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol 67(3):500–508

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Capriotti K, Capriotti J, Lessen S, al e (2015) The risk of nail changes with taxane chemotherapy: a Systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Br J Dermatol 17(3):842–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Balagula Y, Barth Huston K, Busam KJ et al (2011) Dermatologic adverse events associated with MEK 1/2 inhibitor selumetinib (AZD6244, ARRY 142886). Invest New Drugs 29:1114–1121

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schad K, Baumann Conzett K, Zipser MC et al (2010) Mitogen-activated protein/extracellular signal regulated kinase kinase inhibition results in biphasic alteration of epidermal homeostasis with keratinocytic apoptosis and pigmentation disorders. Clin Cancer Res 16:1058–1064

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Raymond E, Alexandre J, Faivre S et al (2004) Safety and pharmocokinetics of escalated weekly intraveneous infusion of CCI-779, a novel mTOR inhibitor, in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:2336–2347

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Raju DL, Bitzan M (2007) Sirolimus-associated chronic pyogenic granuloma periungual infection. Kidney Int 71:476

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rosen AC, Case EC, Dusza SW et al (2013) Impact of dermatologic adverse events on quality of life in 283 cancer patients: a questionnaire study in a dermatology referral clinic. Am J Clin Dermatol 14:327–333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Minisini AM, Tosti A, Sobrero AF et al (2002) Taxane-induced nail changes: incidence, clinical presentation and outcome. Ann Oncol 14:333–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Robert C, Sibaud V, Mateus C et al (2015) Nail toxicities induced by systemic chemotherapy treatments. Lancet Oncol 16(4):e181–e190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Piracccine BM, Alessandrini A (2013) Drug-related nail disease. Clin Dermatol 5:618–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Capriotti K, Capriotti J, Pelletier J, Stewart K (2017) Chemotherapy-associated paronychia treated with 2% povidone-iodine: A series of cases. Cancer Manag Res 26(9):225–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and Common Toxicity Criteria [v4.0]. 15-12-2010.

  21. Sibaud V, Dalenc F, Chevreau C et al (2011) HFS-14, a Specific Quality of Life Scale Developed for Patients Suffering from Hand–Foot Syndrome. Oncologist 16:1469–1478

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Tosti A, Piraccini BM, Ghetti E, Colombo MD (2002) Topical steroids versus systemic antifungals in the treatment of chronic paronychia: an open, randomized double-blind and double dummy study. Jour Am Acad Dermatol 47(1):73–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wollina U (2001) Acute paronychia: comparative treatment with topical antibiotic alone or in combination with corticosteroid. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 15(1):82–84

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rigopoulos D, Gregoriou S, Belyayeva E et al (2009) Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus ointment 0.1% vs. betamethasone 17-valerate 0.1% in the treatment of chronic paronychia: an unblinded randomized study. Br Jour Dermatol 160(4):858–860

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Daniel CR, Daniel MP, Daniel CM et al (1996) Chronic paronychia and onycholysis: a thirteen-Year experience. Cutis 58(6):397–501

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rutala WA, Weber DJ (1997) Uses of inorganic hypochlorite (bleach) in health-care facilities. Clin Microbiol Rev 10(4):597–610

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Rosenbaum D, Merenstein D, Meyer F (2002) Topical steroids more effective than antifungals for chronic paronychia. J Fam Pract 51(10):824

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Suh KY, Kindler HL, Medenica M, Lacouture M (2006) Doxycycline for the treatment of Paronychia induced by the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor cetuximab. Br Jourm Dermatol 154(1):191–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Quitkin HM, Rosenwasser MP, Strauch RJ (2003) The efficacy of silver nitrate cauterization for pyogenic granuloma of the hand. Jour Hand Surg Am 28(3):435–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ghodsi SZ, Raziei M, Taheri A (2006) et ak. Comparison of cryotherapy and curettage for the treatment of pyogenic granuloma: a randomized trial. Br Jour Dermatol 154(4):671–675

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kwon SH, Choi JW, Hong JS et al (2012) Gefitinib-induced paronychia: response to autologous platelet-rich plasma. Arch Dermatol 148(12):1399–1402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hosono Y, Uenami T, Yano Y, Mori M (2018) Febrile neutropenia with bacterial paronychia. Clin Case Rep 6(3):543–544

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Bourgeois GP, Cafardi JA, Sellheyer K, Andea AA (2010) Disseminated Fusarium infection originating from paronychia in a neutropenic patient: a case report and review of the literature. Cutis 85(4):191–194

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Masago K, Irie K, Fujita S et al (2018) Relationship between Paronychia and Drug Concentrations of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors. Oncology 95(4):251–256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Piraccini BM, Tosti A (1999) Drug-induced nail disorders: incidence, management and prognosis. Drug Saf 21:187–201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Saltz LB, Meropol NJ, Loehrer PJ Sr, Needle MN, Kopit J, Mayer RJ (2004) Phase II trial of cetuximab in patients with refractory colorectal cancer that expresses the epidermal growth factor receptor. J Clin Oncol 22:1201–1208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ho PH, Lin IC, Yang X et al (2018 Jun 12) Using a novel scoring system for paronychia related to oncologic treatments (SPOT) for assessing paronychia severity and its correlation with pain index and quality of life. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.15121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by Veloce BioPharma. M. Lacouture is funded, in part, through the NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748. B. Kaffenberger is a recipient of the Dermatology Foundation Career Development Award.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kara D. Capriotti.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

K. Capriotti owns equity and is an employee of Veloce BioPharma. M. Anadkat has received honoraria for consulting and/or speaking engagements in the past from Adgero, Astra Zeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Biogen, Eli Lilly, Genentech, ImClone, Therakos, Xoma, and Eisai and has also served as a Principal Investigator for Biogen, Veloce BioPharma, Xoma, Hana Biosciences, and InflamRx. J. Choi declares that she has no conflict of interest. B. Kaffenberger is an Investigator for Biogen, Celgene, Eli Lilly Co, and Veloce BioPharma. B. McLellan has served as an investigator for Veloce BioPharma. S. Barone owns equity and is an employee of Veloce BioPharma. All other authors have declared no relevant conflicts of interest. O. Kukoyi declares that he has no conflict of interest. S. Goldfarb declares that she has no conflict of interest. M. Lacouture has a consultant/speaking role with Legacy Healthcare Services, Adgero Bio Pharmaceuticals, Amryt Pharmaceuticals, Celldex Therapeutics, Debiopharm, Galderma Research and Development, Johnson and Johnson, Novocure Inc., Lindi, Merck Sharp and Dohme Corporation, Helsinn Healthcare SA, Janssen Research & Development LLC, Menlo Therapeutics, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, AbbVie Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma Gmbh & Co. KG, Allergan Inc., Amgen Inc., E.R. Squibb & Sons LLC, EMD Serono Inc., AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Genentech Inc., Leo Pharma Inc., Seattle Genetics, Bayer, Manner SAS, Lutris, Pierre Fabre, Paxman Coolers, Adjucare, Dignitana, Biotechspert, Teva Mexico, Parexel, OnQuality Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Oncoderm, Apricity, Novartis, and Our Brain Bank. Dr. Lacouture also receives research funding from Berg, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Lutris, Paxman, Novocure, US Biotest, and Veloce BioPharma.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Capriotti, K.D., Anadkat, M., Choi, J. et al. A randomized phase 2 trial of the efficacy and safety of a novel topical povidone-iodine formulation for Cancer therapy-associated Paronychia. Invest New Drugs 37, 1247–1256 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-019-00825-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-019-00825-0

Keywords

Navigation