Skip to main content
Log in

Can a Structured Model for Group Intervention be Responsive to Group Process? A Proposal

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clinical Social Work Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores the common but complex challenge facing many social workers of using structured group intervention models while maintaining sensitivity and responsiveness to the group process. It puts forward guidelines for the development of both structured and responsive group intervention, based on our extensive experience in developing and implementing two such models focusing on the fathering of violent men and the mothering by abused women. First, we suggest incorporating into the development process of such group intervention a reliance on a continuous dialogue with members of the target population, group members and facilitators, while maintaining an evolving and flexible design. Second, we propose three desirable attributes of a model for structured and responsive group intervention: preceding action with understanding; modularity; and offering a choice of options. Finally, we present and demonstrate principles for the facilitation of such groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Addis, M. E., Wade, W. A., & Hatgis, C. (1999). Barriers to dissemination of evidence based practices: Addressing practitioners` concerns about manual-based psychotherapies. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6, 430–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bancroft, L., & Silverman, J. G. (2002). The batterer as parent. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbander, V. (2002). Introduction to group therapy. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, B., Ernst, S., & Hyde, K. (1999). An introduction to group work: A group-analytic perspective. London: Macmillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman-Rossi, T. (1993). The tasks and skills of the social worker across stages of group development. Social Work with Groups, 16(1/2), 69–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bion, W. R. (1961). Experiences in groups. London: Tavistock Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, T., & Thomas, H. (2003). “If this is week three we must be doing ‘Feelings’”: An essay on the importance of client-paced group work. Social Work with Groups, 26(3), 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, M. A. (1992). Empowering and healing the battered woman. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foulkes, S. H. (1975). Group-analytic psychotherapy: Method and principles. London: Gordon and Breach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, G. L., & Benson, M. L. (2004). Violent men, bad dads? Fathering profiles of men involved in intimate partner violence. In R. D. Day & M. E. Lamb (Eds.), Conceptualizing and measuring father involvement (pp. 359–384). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraiberg, S., Adelson, E., & Shapiro, V. (2003). Ghosts in the nursery: A psychoanalytic approach to the problems of impaired infant-mother relationships. In J. Raphael-Leff (Ed.), Parent-infant psychodynamics: Wild things, mirrors and ghosts (pp. 87–117). Philadelphia, PA: Whurr Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furr, S. (2000). Structuring the group experience: A format for designing psychoeducational groups. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 25, 29–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galinsky, M. (2003). Response. Social Work with Groups, 26(3), 15–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galinsky, M., Terzian, M. A., & Fraser, W. F. (2006). The art of group practice with manualized curricula. Social Work with Groups, 29, 11–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gitterman, A. (2005/1989). Building mutual support in groups. Social Work with Groups, 28(3/4), 91–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg-Wood, G., & Roche, S. E. (2000). An emancipatory principle for social work with survivors of male violence. Affilia, 16(1), 66–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greif, G. L., & Ephross, P. H. (Eds.). (2004). Group work with populations at risk (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harne, L., & Radford, J. (1994). Reinstating patriarchy: The politics of the family and the new legislation. In A. Mullender & R. Morley (Eds.), Children living with domestic violence: Putting men’s abuse of women on the child care agenda (pp. 68–85). London: Whiting & Birch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, S. (1992). Group skills in social work: A four-dimensional approach (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, J. (1987). History and issues in the treatment of battering. Men: A case for unstructured group therapy. Journal of Family Violence, 2, 193–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Letendre, J. (2007). Take your time and give it more: Supports and constraints to success in curricular school-based groups. Social Work With Groups, 30(3), 65–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levendosky, A. A., Lynch, M. L., & Gramam-Bermann, S. A. (2000). Mothers’ perceptions of the impact of woman abuse on their parenting. Violence Against Women., 6(3), 247–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, K. R. (1990). Introduction to time-limited group psychotherapy. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, K. R., & Livesley, W. J. (1983). A developmental model for brief group therapy. In R. R. Dies & K. R. MacKenzie (Eds.), Advances in group psychotherapy: Integrating research and practice (pp. 101–116). New York: New York International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martsch, M. D. (2005). A comparison of two group interventions for adolescent aggression: High process versus low process. Research on Social Work Practice, 15(1), 8–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peled, E. & Barak-Gil, I. (in press). The mothering perceptions of women abused by their partner. Violence Against Women.

  • Peled, E., Davidson-Arad, B., & Perel, G. (2010). The mothering of women abused by their partner: An outcome evaluation of a group intervention. Research on Social Work Practice, 20, 391–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peled, E., Eisikovits, Z., Enosh, G., & Winstock, Z. (2000). Choice and empowerment for battered women who stay: Towards a constructivist model. Social Work, 45, 9–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peled, E., & Perel, G. (2006). Mothering in the shadow of violence: A group intervention model for women abused by their partner. Jerusalem: Ashalim. (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peled, E., & Perel, G. (2007). Duality in practice: A conceptual framework for intervening with abusive men as parents. In J. L. Edleson & O. Williams (Eds.), Parenting of men who batter: New directions for assessment and intervention (pp. 85–101). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perel, G. & Peled, E. (2001a). Strengthening the parental functioning of men who are violent to their partner: Group-intervention model1 st Draft. The Bob Shapell School of Social Work, Tel Aviv University, Ashalim, and the Ministry of Labor and Welfare. (Hebrew).

  • Perel, G. & Peled, E. (2001b). Empowerment and individual development of battered women as mothers: Group-intervention model1 st Draft. The Bob Shapell School of Social Work, Tel Aviv University, Ashalim, and the Ministry of Labor and Welfare. (Hebrew).

  • Perel, G. & Peled, E. (2002a). Strengthening the parental functioning of men who are violent to their partner: Group-intervention model2 nd Draft. The Bob Shapell School of Social Work, Tel Aviv University, Ashalim, and the Ministry of Labor and Welfare. (Hebrew).

  • Perel, G. & Peled, E. (2002b). Empowerment and individual development of battered women as mothers: Group-intervention model2 nd Draft. The Bob Shapell School of Social Work, Tel Aviv University, Ashalim, and the Ministry of Labor and Welfare. (In Hebrew).

  • Perel, G., & Peled, E. (2006). Fathering and violence: A group intervention model for men who abuse their partner. Jerusalem: Ashalim. (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Perel, G., & Peled, E. (2008). The fathering of violent men: Constriction and yearning. Violence Against Women, 14, 457–482.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, E. F., Mandel, D. G., & Silverman, J. G. (2007). Abusers’ perceptions of the effects of their intimate partner violence on children. Violence Against Women, 13(11), 1179–1191.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salloum, A., Garside, L. W., Irwin, C. L., Anderson, A. D., & Francois, A. H. (2009). Grief and trauma group therapy for children after hurricane Katrina. Social Work With Groups, 32(1), 64–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, W., & Zalba, S. (1971). The practice of group work. NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1986). The dynamics of mutual aid. Social Work with Groups, 8(4), 51–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, R. L., Beaman, J., Conger, R. D., & Chao, W. (1993). Childhood experience, conceptions of parenting, and attitudes of spouse as determinants of parental behavior. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55(1), 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spira, J.l., & Reed, G. M. (2003). Group psychotherapy for women with breast cancer. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, D. M. (1999). The impact of Time and Place on mutual-aid practice with short-term groups. Social Work with Groups, 22(3/3), 101–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, C. M., Nguyen, H., Allen, N., Bybee, D., & Juras, J. (2000). Beyond searching for deficits: Evidence that physically and emotionally abused women are nurturing parents. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 2(1), 51–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velasquez, M. M., Maurer, G. G., Crouch, C., & DiClemente, C. C. (2001). Group treatment for substance abuse: A stages-of-change therapy manual. NY: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, G. T. (1996). Manual-based treatments: The clinical application of research findings. Behavior Research and Therapy, 34, 295–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalom, I. D. (1975). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The models presented in this article were developed as part of a joint project of the Ashalim Association, the Individual and Family Service of the Israeli Ministry of Welfare, many staff members of the network of Centers for the Treatment and Prevention of Family Violence, and participants in the fathers’ and the mothers’ groups that were run in the centers from 2001 to 2004. We would like to thank everyone for their valuable contribution to this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Einat Peled.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peled, E., Perel, G. Can a Structured Model for Group Intervention be Responsive to Group Process? A Proposal. Clin Soc Work J 40, 391–400 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-010-0285-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-010-0285-2

Keywords

Navigation