Top

Cognitive Therapy and Research

Gepubliceerd in:

13-11-2020 | Brief Report

Change in Attentional Control Predicts Change in Attentional Bias to Negative Information in Response to Elevated State Anxiety

Auteurs: Julian Basanovic, Isabelle Kaiko, Colin MacLeod

Gepubliceerd in: Cognitive Therapy and Research | Uitgave 1/2021

Abstract

Background

Researchers have demonstrated that elevation in state anxiety leads to elevation in attentional bias favouring the processing of negative information, and that the magnitude of this attentional bias change varies across individuals. However, research has not identified the mechanisms that underpin individual variation in state-anxiety induced attentional bias change. Researchers have also demonstrated that inhibitory control of attention becomes impaired when state anxiety is elevated, and cognitive models propose that impaired inhibitory control of attention may underpin attentional bias to negative information. Thus, the present study investigated whether individual differences in the magnitude of attentional bias elevation elicited by heightened state anxiety is predicted by the degree to which such state anxiety elevation impairs attentional control.

Methods

Eighty participants completed assessments of attentional bias to negative information and inhibitory control of attention prior to, and following, a procedure designed to elevate state anxiety.

Results

It was observed that greater elevation in attentional bias to negative information was predicted by lesser decline in inhibitory control of attention as state anxiety increased.

Conclusions

Findings support proposal of a relationship between attentional control and attentional bias to negative information, though are inconsistent with the proposal that heightened attentional bias to negative information is uniformly underpinned by greater impairment in attentional control. Implications are discussed.

vorige artikel Brief Training to Modify the Breadth of Attention Influences the Generalisation of Fear

volgende artikel Cognitive Predictors of Depressive Symptoms: Cognitive Reactivity, Mood Reactivity, and Dysfunctional Attitudes

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

Word pairs used in this task can be found in the supplementary material associated with this manuscript.

For readers interested in a traditional split-half approach, the correlation between 1^st block and 2^nd block trials for each assessment task was as follows. AB(Pre-Induction) r_SB = -.08, AB(Post-Induction) r_SB = .37, AC(Pre Induction) r_SB = .51, AC(Post Induction) r_SB = .41.

Ansari, T. L., & Derakshan, N. (2010). Anxiety impairs inhibitory control but not volitional action control. Cognition & Emotion, 24(2), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930903381531.CrossRef

Ansari, T. L., & Derakshan, N. (2011). The neural correlates of impaired inhibitory control in anxiety. Neuropsychologia, 49(5), 1146–1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.01.019.CrossRefPubMed

Bar-Haim, Y., Lamy, D., Pergamin, L., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2007). Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.1.CrossRefPubMed

Basanovic, J., Notebaert, L., Clarke, P. J. F., MacLeod, C., Jawinski, P., & Chen, N. T. M. (2018). Inhibitory attentional control in anxiety: Manipulating cognitive load in an antisaccade task. PLoS ONE, 13(10), e0205720. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205720.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Basanovic, J., Notebaert, L., Grafton, B., Hirsch, C. R., & Clarke, P. J. F. (2017). Attentional control predicts change in bias in response to attentional bias modification. Behaviour Research and Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2017.09.002.CrossRefPubMed

Bishop, S., Duncan, J., Brett, M., & Lawrence, A. D. (2004). Prefrontal cortical function and anxiety: Controlling attention to threat-related stimuli. Nature Neuroscience, 7(2), 184–188. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1173.CrossRefPubMed

Bishop, S., & Forster, S. (2013). Trait Anxiety, Neuroticism, and the Brain Basis of Vulnerability to Affective Disorder. The Cambridge Handbook of Human Affective Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511843716.031.CrossRef

Chen, N. T. M., Basanovic, J., Notebaert, L., MacLeod, C., & Clarke, P. J. F. (2017). Attentional bias mediates the effect of neurostimulation on emotional vulnerability. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 93, 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.05.008.CrossRefPubMed

Cisler, J. M., & Koster, E. H. W. (2011). Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorder: An integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(2), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2009.11.003.Mechanisms.CrossRef

Clarke, P. J. F., Marinovic, W., Todd, J., Basanovic, J., Chen, N. T. M., & Notebaert, L. (2020). What is attention bias variability? Examining the potential roles of attention control and response time variability in its relationship with anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2020.103751.CrossRefPubMed

Cornwell, B. R., Mueller, S. C., Kaplan, R., Grillon, C., & Ernst, M. (2012). Anxiety, a benefit and detriment to cognition: Behavioral and magnetoencephalographic evidence from a mixed-saccade task. Brain and Cognition, 78(3), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2012.01.002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Derakshan, N., Ansari, T. L., Hansard, M., Shoker, L., & Eysenck, M. W. (2009). Anxiety, inhibition, efficiency, and effectiveness: An investigation using the Antisaccade task. Experimental Psychology, 56(1), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.56.1.48.CrossRefPubMed

Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion, 7(2), 336–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.336.CrossRefPubMed

Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2004). The Relations Among Inhibition and Interference Control Functions: A Latent-Variable Analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(1), 101–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.1.101.CrossRef

Godara, M., Sanchez-Lopez, A., Liefooghe, B., & De Raedt, R. (2020). Contextual Changes Influence Attention Flexibility Towards New Goals. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 44(2), 327–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-019-10072-5.CrossRef

Joseph, D. L., Chan, M. Y., Heintzelman, S. J., Tay, L., Diener, E., & Scotney, V. S. (2020). The Manipulation of Affect: A Meta-Analysis of Affect Induction Procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 146(4), 355–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000224.CrossRefPubMed

Kruijt, A.-W., Parsons, S., & Fox, E. (2019). A meta-analysis of bias at baseline in RCTs of attention bias modification: No evidence for dot-probe bias towards threat in clinical anxiety and PTSD. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 128(6), 563–573. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000406.CrossRefPubMed

Lavie, N., Hirst, A., de Fockert, J. W., & Viding, E. (2004). Load Theory of Selective Attention and Cognitive Control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(3), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.3.339.CrossRef

Liu, J., Shen, K., & Li, H. (2019). How state anxiety and attentional bias interact with each other: The moderating effect of cognitive appraisal. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 81(3), 694–706. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-01650-y.CrossRef

MacLeod, C., Grafton, B., & Notebaert, L. (2019). Anxiety-Linked Attentional Bias: Is It Reliable? Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 15(1), 529–554. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095505.CrossRefPubMed

MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (1988). Anxiety and the Allocation of Attention to Threat. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 40(4), 653–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748808402292.CrossRef

MacLeod, C., & Rutherford, E. M. (1992). Anxiety and the selective processing of emotional information: Mediating roles of awareness, trait and state variables, and personal relevance of stimu. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 30(5), 479–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(92)90032-C.CrossRefPubMed

Marteau, T. M., & Bekker, H. (1992). The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 31(3), 301–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1992.tb00997.x.CrossRefPubMed

Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions and Their Contributions to Complex “Frontal Lobe” Tasks: A Latent Variable Analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734.CrossRefPubMed

Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (1998). A cognitive-motivational analysis of anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36(9), 809–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(98)00063-1.CrossRefPubMed

Mogg, K., Bradley, B. P., De Bono, J., & Painter, M. (1997). Time course of attentional bias for threat information in non-clinical anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35(4), 297–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(96)00109-X.CrossRefPubMed

Mogg, K., Mathews, A., Bird, C., & Macgregor-Morris, R. (1990). Effects of stress and anxiety on the processing of threat stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1230–1237. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1230.CrossRefPubMed

Murphy, G., Groeger, J. A., & Greene, C. M. (2016). Twenty years of load theory—Where are we now, and where should we go next? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 23(5), 1316–1340. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0982-5.CrossRefPubMed

Pacheco-Unguetti, A. P., Acosta, A., Callejas, A., & Lupiáñez, J. (2010). Attention and Anxiety: Different Attentional Functioning Under State and Trait Anxiety. Psychological Science, 21(2), 298–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797609359624.CrossRefPubMed

Parsons, S. (2020). Splithalf: Robust Estimates of Split Half Reliability. Doi:https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11956746.v4

Parsons, S., Kruijt, A.-W., & Fox, E. (2019). Psychological Science Needs a Standard Practice of Reporting the Reliability of Cognitive-Behavioral Measurements. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(4), 378–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919879695.CrossRef

Rudaizky, D., Basanovic, J., & MacLeod, C. (2014). Biased attentional engagement with, and disengagement from, negative information: Independent cognitive pathways to anxiety vulnerability? Cognition and Emotion, 28(2), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2013.815154.CrossRefPubMed

Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Van Bockstaele, B., Lamens, L., Salemink, E., Wiers, R. W., Bögels, S. M., & Nikolaou, K. (2019). Reliability and validity of measures of attentional bias towards threat in unselected student samples: seek, but will you find? Cognition and Emotion. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2019.1609423.CrossRefPubMed

Vogt, J., De Houwer, J., & Moors, A. (2011). Unintended allocation of spatial attention to goal-relevant but not to goal-related events. Social Psychology, 42(1), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000042.CrossRef

Vogt, J., De Houwer, J., Moors, A., Van Damme, S., & Crombez, G. (2010). The automatic orienting of attention to goal-relevant stimuli. Acta Psychologica, 134(1), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.12.006.CrossRefPubMed

Zvielli, A., Bernstein, A., & Koster, E. H. W. (2015). Temporal Dynamics of Attentional Bias. Clinical Psychological Science, 3(5), 772–788. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702614551572.CrossRef

Titel: Change in Attentional Control Predicts Change in Attentional Bias to Negative Information in Response to Elevated State Anxiety
Auteurs: Julian Basanovic
Isabelle Kaiko
Colin MacLeod
Publicatiedatum: 13-11-2020
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Cognitive Therapy and Research / Uitgave 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0147-5916
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2819
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-020-10176-3

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2021

Development of the A-DISS Rejection Task to Demonstrate the Unique and Overlapping Affective Features of Social Anxiety and Depression

Cognitive Predictors of Depressive Symptoms: Cognitive Reactivity, Mood Reactivity, and Dysfunctional Attitudes

Advancing the Assessment of Mindfulness-Based Meditation Practice: Psychometric Evaluation of the Mindfulness Adherence Questionnaire

Brief Training to Modify the Breadth of Attention Influences the Generalisation of Fear

Emotion-in-Motion: An ABM Approach that Modifies Attentional Disengagement from, Rather than Attentional Engagement with, Negative Information

Emotion-Regulation in Psychosis: Patients with Psychotic Disorders Apply Reappraisal Successfully