Top

Gepubliceerd in:

01-06-2012 | Original Article

Is Timing Everything? Sequential Effects of Rumination and Distraction on Interpersonal Problem Solving

Auteurs: K. Lira Yoon, Jutta Joormann

Gepubliceerd in: Cognitive Therapy and Research | Uitgave 3/2012

Abstract

Rumination has been closely linked to risk for depression, whereas distraction has been hypothesized to decrease sad mood and to promote effective problem solving. This study investigates the hypothesis that it is not the use of specific strategies but rather their timing that is critical. Following a negative mood induction, participants were assigned to either immediately ruminate or distract followed by a second set of instructions to either ruminate or distract. Participants who initially engaged in distraction, compared to rumination, generated more effective solutions to interpersonal problems even when they subsequently engaged in rumination immediately prior to the problem solving task. In contrast, participants who engaged in distraction prior to the problem solving task generated less effective solutions when distraction followed a period of rumination. Importantly this effect was not due to differences in current mood state. The results suggest that the timing of the use of emotion regulation strategies is critical.

volgende artikel Unique and Shared Aspects of Affective Symptomatology: The Role of Parental Bonding in Depression and Anxiety Symptom Profiles

There were no significant differences between male and female participants on any of our variables. Furthermore, when we included sex of the participants as a factor, none of the effects involving sex were significant. The results from the analyses examining the effects of gender are available upon request from the first author.

Although we matched the analyses closely to our a priori hypothesis, we also conducted conventional post-hoc analyses to follow-up on the significant ANOVA results. As expected, post-hoc LSD analyses revealed that the DIS/DIS group provided a higher percentage of model solutions and their solutions were rated as more effective compared to the RUM/RUM group (both ps < .05). More importantly, the DIS/RUM group provided a significantly higher percentage of model solutions and their solutions were rated as more effective compared to the RUM/RUM group (both ps < .05). Furthermore, the solutions generated by the RUM/DIS group were rated as less effective than the ones provided by the DIS/RUM and the DIS/DIS groups (both ps < .05). Thus, more conventional analyses also support our hypotheses despite small sample sizes in each group.

The results did not change, when the mood rating after the second rumination/distraction (i.e., right before completing the MEPS) was entered as a covariate. That is, the solutions generated by the participants who first engaged in distraction (DIS/RUM and DIS/DIS) were still rated as more effective than those who first engaged in rumination (RUM/RUM and RUM/DIS), and the difference between the two groups with regards to the amount of model solutions remained significant after controlling for individual differences in negative mood.

Armey, M. F., Fresco, D. M., Moore, M. T., Mennin, D. S., Turk, C. L., Heimberg, R. G., et al. (2009). Brooding and pondering: Isolating the active ingredients of depressive rumination with exploratory factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Assessment, 16, 315–327.PubMedCrossRef

Ciesla, J., & Robert, J. E. (2007). Rumination, negative cognition, and their interactive effects on depressed mood. Emotion, 7, 555–565.PubMedCrossRef

Davila, J., Hammen, C., Burge, D., Paley, D., & Daley, S. E. (1995). Poor interpersonal problem solving as a mechanism of stress generation in depression among adolescent women. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 592–600.PubMedCrossRef

Joormann, J., & Siemer, M. (2004). Memory accessibility, mood regulation, and dysphoria: Difficulties in repairing sad mood with happy memories? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113, 179–188.PubMedCrossRef

Kross, E., & Ayduk, O. (2008). Facilitating adaptive emotional analysis: Distinguishing distanced-analysis of depressive experiences from immersed-analysis and distraction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 924–938.PubMedCrossRef

Kross, E., Ayduk, O., & Mischel, W. (2005). When asking ‘why’ does not hurt: Distinguishing rumination from reflective processing of negative emotions. Psychological Science, 16, 709–715.PubMedCrossRef

Lyubomirsky, S., Caldwell, N. D., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1998). Effects of ruminative and distracting responses to depressed mood on authobiographical memories and predictions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 166–177.PubMedCrossRef

Lyubomirsky, S., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1993). Self-perpetuating properties of dysphoric rumination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 339–349.PubMedCrossRef

Lyubomirsky, S., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1995). Effects of self-focused rumination on negative thinking and interpersonal problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 176–190.PubMedCrossRef

Lyubomirsky, S., Tucker, K. L., Caldwell, N. D., & Berg, K. (1999). Why ruminators are poor problem solvers: Clues from the phenomenology of dysphoric rumination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1041–1060.PubMedCrossRef

Martin, L. L., & Tesser, A. (1996). Some ruminative thoughts. In R. S. Wyer Jr (Ed.), Ruminative thoughts (pp. 1–47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Mor, N., & Winquist, J. (2002). Self-focused attention and negative affect: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 638–662.PubMedCrossRef

Morrow, J., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1990). Effects of responses to depression on the remediation of depressive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 519–527.PubMedCrossRef

Nezu, A. M. (1986). Efficacy of a social problem-solving therapy for unipolar depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 196–202.PubMedCrossRef

Nezu, A. M. (2004). Problem solving and behavior therapy revisited. Behavior Therapy, 35, 1–33.CrossRef

Nezu, A. M., & Ronan, G. F. (1985). Life stress, current problems, problem-solving, and depressive symptoms: An integrative model. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 693–697.PubMedCrossRef

Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1991). Responses to depression and their effects on the duration of depressive episodes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 569–582.PubMedCrossRef

Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Morrow, J. (1991). A prospective study of depression and posttraumatic stress symptoms after a natural disaster: The 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 115–121.PubMedCrossRef

Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Wisco, B. E., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). Rethinking rumination. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 400–424.CrossRef

Platt, J. J., & Spivack, G. (1972). Problem-solving thinking of psychiatric patients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 39, 148–151.PubMedCrossRef

Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.CrossRef

Trask, P. C., & Sigmon, S. T. (1999). Ruminating and distracting: The effects of sequential tasks on depressed mood. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 23, 231–246.CrossRef

Treynor, W., Gonzalez, R., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2003). Rumination reconsidered: A psychometirc analysis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27, 247–259.CrossRef

Watkins, E. (2004). Appraisals and strategies associated with rumination and worry. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 679–694.CrossRef

Watkins, E., & Baracaia, S. (2002). Rumination and social problem-solving in depression. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40, 1179–1189.PubMedCrossRef

Watkins, E., & Moulds, M. (2005). Distinct modes of ruminative self-focus: Impact of abstract versus concrete rumination on problem solving in depression. Emotion, 5, 319–328.PubMedCrossRef

Watkins, E., & Teasdale, J. D. (2001). Rumination and overgeneral memory in depression: Effects of self-focus and analytic thinking. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 353–357.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Is Timing Everything? Sequential Effects of Rumination and Distraction on Interpersonal Problem Solving
Auteurs: K. Lira Yoon
Jutta Joormann
Publicatiedatum: 01-06-2012
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Cognitive Therapy and Research / Uitgave 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0147-5916
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2819
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-010-9330-2

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2012

Psychological Predictors of Anxiety in Response to the H1N1 (Swine Flu) Pandemic

Disgust Propensity as a Predictor of Intrusive Cognitions Following a Distressing Film

Eating Attitudes, Coping Styles, and Peer Victimization Among Adolescents with Seasonal and Nonseasonal Depression Symptoms

Anxiety Sensitivity, Emotional Avoidance, and PTSD Symptom Severity Among Crack/Cocaine Dependent Patients in Residential Treatment

Erratum to: Repetitive Thought and Emotional Distress: Rumination and Worry as Prospective Predictors of Depressive and Anxious Symptomatology

Unique and Shared Aspects of Affective Symptomatology: The Role of Parental Bonding in Depression and Anxiety Symptom Profiles