Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Cognitive Therapy and Research 5/2006

01-10-2006 | ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Attention to Threat in Anxiety-prone Individuals: Mechanisms Underlying Attentional Bias

Auteurs: Ernst H. W. Koster, Geert Crombez, Bruno Verschuere, Jan De Houwer

Gepubliceerd in: Cognitive Therapy and Research | Uitgave 5/2006

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Cognitive views on anxiety have proposed that attentional biases towards threatening information in high trait anxious individuals play an important role in the maintenance of anxiety and may even cause the development of clinical anxiety disorders. However, the precise nature of these attentional biases is under debate. In a pictorial version of the dot probe task, two accounts of attention to threat were contrasted and the components of attention involved in orienting to threat were assessed. Overall, the results support the view that all individuals orient to highly threatening pictures, with high trait anxious individuals orienting more strongly to moderately threatening pictures than the low trait anxious individuals. Attentional bias to threat in high trait anxious individuals was caused by attentional disengagement from threat. These results are discussed in relation to cognitive models of attention to threat.
Voetnoten
1
See Koster et al. (2004) for more detail on selection of the affective pictures. The exact IAPS pictures can be provided by the authors upon request.
 
2
The congruency effect is determined by the higher-order interaction between picture position and probe position. Analyses incorporating Picture Position × Probe Position instead of congruency revealed the same significant interactions. No main effects of probe location and picture location were found (Fs < 1).
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Beck, A. T., Emery, G., & Greenberg, R. L. (1985). Anxiety disorders and phobias: A cognitive perspective. New York: Basic Books. Beck, A. T., Emery, G., & Greenberg, R. L. (1985). Anxiety disorders and phobias: A cognitive perspective. New York: Basic Books.
go back to reference Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. San Diego, CA: McGraw-Hill. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. San Diego, CA: McGraw-Hill.
go back to reference Derryberry, D., & Reed, M. A. (2002). Anxiety-related attentional biases and their regulation by attentional control. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 225–236.CrossRefPubMed Derryberry, D., & Reed, M. A. (2002). Anxiety-related attentional biases and their regulation by attentional control. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 225–236.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Eysenck, M. W. (1992). Anxiety: The cognitive perspective. Hove: Erlbaum. Eysenck, M. W. (1992). Anxiety: The cognitive perspective. Hove: Erlbaum.
go back to reference Fox, E., Russo, R., Bowles, R., & Dutton, K. (2001). Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 681–700.CrossRef Fox, E., Russo, R., Bowles, R., & Dutton, K. (2001). Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 681–700.CrossRef
go back to reference Fox, E., Russo, R., & Dutton, K. (2002). Attentional bias for threat: Evidence for delayed disengagement from emotional faces. Cognition & Emotion, 16, 355–379.CrossRef Fox, E., Russo, R., & Dutton, K. (2002). Attentional bias for threat: Evidence for delayed disengagement from emotional faces. Cognition & Emotion, 16, 355–379.CrossRef
go back to reference Inquisit 1.32 (2001). Computer Software. Seattle, WA: Millisecond Software. Inquisit 1.32 (2001). Computer Software. Seattle, WA: Millisecond Software.
go back to reference Kindt, M., van den Hout, M., de Jong, P., & Hoekzema, B. (2000). Cognitive bias for pictorial and linguistic threat cues in children. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral assessment, 22, 201–219.CrossRef Kindt, M., van den Hout, M., de Jong, P., & Hoekzema, B. (2000). Cognitive bias for pictorial and linguistic threat cues in children. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral assessment, 22, 201–219.CrossRef
go back to reference Koster, E. H. W., Crombez, G., Verschuere, B., Van Damme, S., Wiersema, J.-R. (in press). Components of attentional bias to threat in high trait anxiety: Facilitated engagement, impaired disengagement, and attentional avoidance. Behaviour Research and Therapy. Koster, E. H. W., Crombez, G., Verschuere, B., Van Damme, S., Wiersema, J.-R. (in press). Components of attentional bias to threat in high trait anxiety: Facilitated engagement, impaired disengagement, and attentional avoidance. Behaviour Research and Therapy.
go back to reference Koster, E. H. W., Crombez, G., Verschuere, B., & De Houwer, J. (2004). Selective attention to threat in the dot probe paradigm: Differentiating vigilance and difficulty to disengage. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 1183–1192.CrossRefPubMed Koster, E. H. W., Crombez, G., Verschuere, B., & De Houwer, J. (2004). Selective attention to threat in the dot probe paradigm: Differentiating vigilance and difficulty to disengage. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 1183–1192.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Lang, P. J. (1980). Behavioural treatment and the bio-behavioural assessment: computer applications. In J. B. Sidowski, J. H. Johnson, & T. A. Williams (Eds.), Technology in mental health care delivery systems (pp. 119–137). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Lang, P. J. (1980). Behavioural treatment and the bio-behavioural assessment: computer applications. In J. B. Sidowski, J. H. Johnson, & T. A. Williams (Eds.), Technology in mental health care delivery systems (pp. 119–137). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
go back to reference Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1999). International pictures system (IAPS): Technical manual and affective ratings. Gainesville, FL: The Center for research in Psychophysiology. Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1999). International pictures system (IAPS): Technical manual and affective ratings. Gainesville, FL: The Center for research in Psychophysiology.
go back to reference MacLeod, C., Campbell, L., Rutherford, E., & Wilson, E. (2004). The causal status of anxiety-linked attentional and interpretive bias. In J. Yiend (Ed.), Cognition, emotion and psychopathology (pp. 172–189). Cambridge: Universities Press. MacLeod, C., Campbell, L., Rutherford, E., & Wilson, E. (2004). The causal status of anxiety-linked attentional and interpretive bias. In J. Yiend (Ed.), Cognition, emotion and psychopathology (pp. 172–189). Cambridge: Universities Press.
go back to reference MacLeod, C., & Hagan, R. (1992). Individual differences in the selective processing of threatening information, and emotional responses to a stressful life event. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 30, 151–161.CrossRefPubMed MacLeod, C., & Hagan, R. (1992). Individual differences in the selective processing of threatening information, and emotional responses to a stressful life event. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 30, 151–161.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (1988). Anxiety and the allocation of attention to threat. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40, 653–670.PubMed MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (1988). Anxiety and the allocation of attention to threat. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40, 653–670.PubMed
go back to reference MacLeod, C., Mathews, A., & Tata, P. (1986). Attentional bias in emotional disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 15–20.CrossRefPubMed MacLeod, C., Mathews, A., & Tata, P. (1986). Attentional bias in emotional disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 15–20.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference MacLeod, C., Rutherford, E., Campbell, L., Ebsworthy, G., & Holker, L. (2002). Selective attention and emotional vulnerability: Assessing the causal basis of their association through the experimental manipulation of attentional bias. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 107–123.CrossRefPubMed MacLeod, C., Rutherford, E., Campbell, L., Ebsworthy, G., & Holker, L. (2002). Selective attention and emotional vulnerability: Assessing the causal basis of their association through the experimental manipulation of attentional bias. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 107–123.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Mathews, A., & Mackintosh, B. (1998). A cognitive model of selective processing in anxiety. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 22, 539–560.CrossRef Mathews, A., & Mackintosh, B. (1998). A cognitive model of selective processing in anxiety. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 22, 539–560.CrossRef
go back to reference Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (1998). A cognitive-motivational analysis of anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 809–848.CrossRefPubMed Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (1998). A cognitive-motivational analysis of anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 809–848.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Mogg, K., McNamara, J., Powys, M., Rawlinson, H., Seiffer, A., & Bradley, B. P. (2000). Selective attention to threat: A test of two cognitive models of anxiety. Cognition & Emotion, 14, 375–399.CrossRef Mogg, K., McNamara, J., Powys, M., Rawlinson, H., Seiffer, A., & Bradley, B. P. (2000). Selective attention to threat: A test of two cognitive models of anxiety. Cognition & Emotion, 14, 375–399.CrossRef
go back to reference Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1983). Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1983). Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
go back to reference Verschuere, B., Crombez, G., & Koster, E. (2001). The international affective picture system: A cross-cultural validation study. Psychologica Belgica, 41, 205–217. Verschuere, B., Crombez, G., & Koster, E. (2001). The international affective picture system: A cross-cultural validation study. Psychologica Belgica, 41, 205–217.
go back to reference Williams, J. M. G., Watts, F. N., MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (1988). Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders. Chichester: Wiley. Williams, J. M. G., Watts, F. N., MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (1988). Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders. Chichester: Wiley.
go back to reference Williams J. M. G., Watts F. N., MacLeod C., & Mathews, A. (1997). Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley. Williams J. M. G., Watts F. N., MacLeod C., & Mathews, A. (1997). Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.
go back to reference Wilson, E., & MacLeod, C. (2003). Contrasting two accounts of anxiety-linked attentional bias: Selective attention to varying levels of stimulus threat intensity. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 212–218.CrossRefPubMed Wilson, E., & MacLeod, C. (2003). Contrasting two accounts of anxiety-linked attentional bias: Selective attention to varying levels of stimulus threat intensity. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 212–218.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Yiend, J., & Mathews, A. (2001). Anxiety and attention to threatening pictures. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 54, 665–681.CrossRef Yiend, J., & Mathews, A. (2001). Anxiety and attention to threatening pictures. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 54, 665–681.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Attention to Threat in Anxiety-prone Individuals: Mechanisms Underlying Attentional Bias
Auteurs
Ernst H. W. Koster
Geert Crombez
Bruno Verschuere
Jan De Houwer
Publicatiedatum
01-10-2006
Gepubliceerd in
Cognitive Therapy and Research / Uitgave 5/2006
Print ISSN: 0147-5916
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2819
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-006-9042-9

Andere artikelen Uitgave 5/2006

Cognitive Therapy and Research 5/2006 Naar de uitgave