Skip to main content
Log in

Children’s Responses to Traditional Versus Hybrid Advertising Formats: The Moderating Role of Persuasion Knowledge

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Consumer Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research on the impact of advertising on children has failed to keep pace with the rapidly changing media environment. Using an experimental approach, children’s responses towards traditional (television advertisement) versus new, hybrid advertising techniques (trailer, advergame, and their combination), and the moderating role of persuasion knowledge, are investigated. Results show that children who played an advergame have more difficulty recalling the advertised brand than children who saw a traditional television advertisement. When confronted with integrated marketing communications (a trailer followed by an advergame), children without knowledge of persuasive intent developed a more positive brand attitude than children with persuasion knowledge. The implications of these results are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ali, M., Blades, M., Oates, C., & Blumberg, F. (2009). Young children’s ability to recognize advertisements in web page designs. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27, 71–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • An, S., & Stern, S. (2011). Mitigating the effects of advergames on children. Journal of Advertising, 40(1), 43–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andronikidis, A. I., & Lambrianidou, M. (2010). Children’s understanding of television advertising: A grounded theory approach. Psychology and Marketing, 27(4), 299–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auty, S. G., & Lewis, C. (2004). Exploring children’s choice: The reminder effect of product placement. Psychology and Marketing, 21(9), 697–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balasubramanian, S. K. (1994). Beyond advertising and publicity: Hybrid messages and public policy issues. Journal of Advertising, 23(Dec), 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biehal, G., Stephens, D., & Curlo, E. (1992). Attitude toward the ad and brand choice. Journal of Advertising, 23(3), 19–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bijmolt, T. H. A., Claassen, W., & Brus, B. (1998). Children’s understanding of tv advertising: Effects of age, gender, and parental influence. Journal of Consumer Policy, 21(2), 171–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boush, D. M., Friestad, M., & Rose, G. M. (1994). Adolescent skepticism toward tv advertising and knowledge of advertiser tactics. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 165–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewaeys, E. (2009). Wetboek media en journalistiek editie 2009: Kluwer.

  • Brucks, M., Armstrong, G. M., & Goldberg, M. E. (1988). Children’s use of cognitive defenses against television advertising: A cognitive response approach. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(4), 471–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, D. (2000). After the death of childhood: Growing up in the age of electronic media. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, D., Banaji, S., Carr, D., Cranmer, S., & Willett, R. (2005). The media literacy of children and young people: A review of the research literature. London: Centre for the Study of Children, Youth and Media Institute of Education: University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, D., Willett, R., Banaji, S., & Cranmer, S. (2007). Media smart be adwise 2: An evaluation. Media Smart.

  • Buijzen, M., & Valkenburg, P. (2000). The impact of television advertising on children’s christmas wishes. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(3), 456–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buijzen, M., & Valkenburg, P. (2003). The effects of television advertising on materialism, parent–child conflict, and unhappiness: A review of research. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 24(4), 437–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1979). Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive responses, recall and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(1), 97–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calder, B. J., Malthouse, E. C., & Schaedel, U. (2009). An experimental study of the relationship between online engagement and advertising effectiveness. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23(4), 321–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvert, S. L. (2008). Children as consumers: Advertising and marketing. The Future of Children, 18(1), 205–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, M. C., & Kirmani, A. (2000). Consumers’ use of persuasion knowledge: The effects of accessibility and cognitive capacity on perceptions of an influence agent. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(1), 69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cauberghe, V., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2010). Advergames: The impact of brand prominence and game repetition on brand responses. Journal of Advertising, 39(1), 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen, J., & Lock, A. (2000). Theoretical concept or management fashion? Examining the significance of imc. Journal of Advertising Research, 40(5), 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, K. S. (1998). The effects of affective responses to media context on advertising evaluations. Journal of Advertising, 41–51.

  • De Pelsmacker, P., Geuens, M., & Van den Bergh, J. (2013). Marketing communications. London: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dens, N., De Pelsmacker, P., Wouters, M., & Purnawirawan, N. (2012). Do you like what you recognize? The effects of brand placement prominence and movie plot connection on brand attitude as mediated by recognition. Journal of Advertising, 41(3), 35–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagle, L. C. (2007). Commercial media literacy: What does it do, to whom - and does it matter? Journal of Advertising, 36(2), 101–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, C. J., Muñoz, M. E., & Medrano, M. R. (2011). Advertising influences on young children’s food choices and parental influence. Journal of Pediatrics, 160(3), 452–455. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.08.023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1974). Attitudes towards objects as predictors of single and multiple behavioral criteria. Psychological Review, 81(1), 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (2005). The next generation: Research for twenty-first-century public policy on children and advertising. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 24(2), 183–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garde, A. (2008). Food advertising and obesity prevention: What role for the european union? Journal of Consumer Policy, 31(1), 25–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigorovici, D. M., & Constantin, C. D. (2004). Experiencing interactive advertising beyond rich media: Impacts of ad type and presence on brand effectiveness in 3d gaming immersive virtual environments. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 5(1), 22–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grodal, T. (2000). Video games and the pleasures of control. In D. Zillmann & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Media entertainment: The psychology of its appeal (pp. 197–213). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hota, M., Chumpitaz, R., & Cousin, A. (2010). Can public-service advertising change children’s nutrition habits? The impact of relevance and familiarity. Journal of Advertising Research, 50(4), 460–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssens, W., De Pelsmacker, P., Wijnen, K., & Van Kenhove, P. (2008). Marketing research with SPSS: Prentice Hall.

  • John, D. R. (1999). Consumer socialization of children: A retrospective look at twenty-five years of research. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(3), 183–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. T., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Effects of involvement on persuasion: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 106(2), 290–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., Lim, J. S., & Bhargava, M. (1998). The role of affect in attitude formation: A classical conditioning approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26(2), 143–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitchen, P. J., & Schultz, D. E. (2009). IMC: New horizon/false dawn for a marketplace in turmoil? International Journal of Advertising, 15(2/3), 197–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunkel, D., Wilcox, B. L., Cantor, J., Palmer, E., Linn, S., & Dowrick, P. (2004). Report of the American Psychological Association task force on advertising and children. Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurie, S., & Mortimer, K. (2011). ‘IMC is dead. Long live IMC’: Academics’ versus practitioners’ views. Journal of Marketing Management, 27(13–14), 1464–1478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M., & Faber, R. J. (2007). Effects of product placement in on-line games on brand memory: A perspective of the limited-capacity model of attention. Journal of Advertising, 36(4), 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., & Shrum, L. (2002). What is interactivity and is it always such a good thing? Implications of definition, person, and situation for the influence of interactivity on advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 31(4), 53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S. (2002). Young people and new media: Childhood and the changing media environment: Sage Publications Limited.

  • Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2006). Does advertising literacy mediate the effects of advertising on children? A critical examination of two linked research literatures in relation to obesity and food choice. Journal of Communication, 56, 560–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macklin, M. C. (1983). Do children understand tv ads? Journal of Advertising Research, 23(1), 63–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macklin, M. C. (1987). Preschoolers’ understanding of the informational function of television advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(2), 229–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madhavaram, S., Badrinarayanan, V., & McDonald, R. E. (2005). Integrated marketing communication (imc) and brand identity as critical components of brand equity strategy: A conceptual framework and research propositions. Journal of Advertising, 34(4), 69–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher, J. K., Hu, M. Y., & Kolbe, R. H. (2006). Children’s recall of television ad elements: An examination of audiovisual effects. Journal of Advertising, 35(1), 23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallinckrodt, V., & Mazerski, D. (2007). The effects of playing an advergame on young children’s perceptions, preferences and requests. Journal of Advertising, 36(2), 87–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAlister, A. R., & Cornwell, T. B. (2009). Preschool children’s persuasion knowledge: The contribution of theory of mind. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 28(2), 175–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, E. S., & Rideout, V. J. (2007). The online marketing of food to children: Is it just fun and games? Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 26(2), 202–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naik, P., & Raman, K. (2003). Understanding the impact of synergy in multimedia communicating. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(4), 375–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nairn, A., & Fine, C. (2008). Who’s messing with my mind? The implications of dual-process models for the ethics of advertising to children. International Journal of Advertising, 27(3), 447–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, M. R. (2002). Recall of brand placements in computer/video games. Journal of Advertising Research, 42(2), 80–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, M. R., Yaros, R. A., & Keum, H. (2006). Examining the influence of telepresence on spectator and player processing of real and fictitious brands in a computer game. Journal of Advertising, 35(4), 87–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordhielm, C. L. (2002). The influence of level of processing on advertising repetition effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(3), 371–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oates, C., Blades, M., & Gunter, B. (2001). Children and television advertising: When do they understand persuasive intent? Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 1(3), 238–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obermiller, C., & Spangenberg, E. R. (1998). Development of a scale to measure consumer skepticism toward advertising. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(2), 159–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ofcom. (2007). Television advertising of food and drink products to children: Final statement. London: Ofcom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlou, P. A., & Stewart, D. W. (2000). Measuring the effects and effectiveness of interactive advertising: A research agenda. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 1(1), 62–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, M. (2005). Performance auditing of integrated marketing communication (imc) actions and outcomes. Journal of Advertising, 34(4), 41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2010). Generation m [superscript 2]: Media in the lives of 8-to 18-year-olds. Menlo Park: CA: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D. F., & Foehr, U. G. (2008). Trends in media use. The Future of Children, 18(1), 11–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roedder, D. L. (1981). Age differences in children’s responses to television advertising: An information-processing approach. Journal of Consumer Research, 8(2), 144–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roozendaal, E., Buijzen, M., & Valkenburg, P. (2008). Reclamewijsheid in ontwikkeling. Een vergelijking van de cognitieve reclamevaardigheden van kinderen en volwassenen. Tijdschrift voor Communicatiewetenschap, 36(4), 270–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter, J. R. (1977). Reliability of a short test measuring children’s attitudes toward tv commercials. Journal of Consumer Research, 3(4), 179–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozendaal, E., Buijzen, M., & Valkenburg, P. (2009). Do children’s cognitive advertising defenses reduce their desire for advertised products. Communications, 34, 287–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozendaal, E., Lapierre, M. A., Van Reijmersdal, E. A., & Buijzen, M. (2011). Reconsidering advertising literacy as a defense against advertising effects. Media Psychology, 14(4), 333–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, L.-P., & Cornwell, B. B. (2005). Cashing in crashes via brand placement in computer games. International Journal of Advertising, 24(3), 321–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, D. E. (1992). Integrated marketing communications. Journal of Promotion Management, 1(1), 99–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, D. E., & Kitchen, P. J. (1997). Integrated marketing communications in us advertising agencies: An exploratory study. Journal of Advertising Research, 37(5), 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta, J., & Johar, G. V. (2002). Effects of inconsistent attribute information on the predictive value of product attitudes: Toward a resolution of opposing perspectives. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(1), 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tutaj, K., & Van Reijmersdal, E. A. (2012). Effects of online advertising format and persuasion knowledge on audience reactions. Journal of Marketing Communications, 18(1), 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Reijmersdal, E. A., Neijens, P., & Smit, E. (2007). Effects of television brand placement on brand image. Psychology and Marketing, 24(5), 403–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Reijmersdal, E. A., Rozendaal, E., & Buijzen, M. (2012). Effects of prominence, involvement, and persuasion knowledge on children’s cognitive and affective responses to advergames. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(1), 33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waiguny, M. K. J., & Terlutter, R. (2011). Differences in children’s processing of advergames and tv commercials. In S. Okazaki (Ed.), Advances in advertising research (Vol. 2, pp. 35–51). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Waiguny, M. K. J., Nelson, M. R., & Terlutter, R. (2012). Entertainment matters! The relationship between challenge and persuasiveness of an advergame for children. Journal of Marketing Communications, 18(1), 69–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, P., Kim, Y., & Ross, S. D. (2008). Brand recall and recognition: A comparison of television and sport video games as presentation modes. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 17(4), 201–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, M.-L., Fischer, E., & Main, K. J. (2008). An examination of the effects of activating persuasion knowledge on consumer response to brands engaging in covert marketing. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 27(1), 34–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, L. (2008). The consumer and advertising regulation in the television without frontiers and audiovisual media services directives. Journal of Consumer Policy, 31(1), 63–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. (2002). Marketplace metacognition and social intelligence. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(4), 677–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P., Friestad, M., & Boush, D. M. (2005). The development of marketplace persuasion knowledge in children, adolescents, and young adults. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 24(2), 222–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, M., Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., Dinu, L., & Arpan, L. M. (2006). The effectiveness of “in-game” advertising: Comparing college students’ explicit and implicit memory for brand names. Journal of Advertising, 35(4), 143–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2, Part 2), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yann Verhellen.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 6 Detailed breakdown of the different levels of persuasion knowledge for each experimental condition

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Verhellen, Y., Oates, C., De Pelsmacker, P. et al. Children’s Responses to Traditional Versus Hybrid Advertising Formats: The Moderating Role of Persuasion Knowledge. J Consum Policy 37, 235–255 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-014-9257-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-014-9257-1

Keywords

Navigation