Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Utilizing Metaphors in Solution-Focused Therapy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Contemporary Family Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

“The sower soweth the word.” (Bible, Mark 4:14)

Abstract

This article presents possibilities of the utilization of metaphors in solution-focused brief therapy. The first part of the article presents a conceptual background for therapeutic use of metaphors and makes connections with the solution-focused approach. In following parts two ways of working with metaphors are presented—utilization of metaphors offered by client and metaphors offered by therapist. SFBT work with metaphors offered by client consists of four steps: (1) capturing clients’ metaphor, (2) exploration, (3) utilising metaphor for creating new possibilities, and (4) Anchoring metaphors’ contribution in clients‘life. Rarely used stratégy of working with metaphors offered by therapist consists of similar steps: (1) taking client’s experience as our departure point, (2) offering a metaphor to the client, (3) utilising metaphor for creating new possibilities, (4) anchoring metaphor’s contribution in clients’ lives. Guidelines for both types of work are presented and illustrated by case examples from practice of the authors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In his original work, Battino (2005) uses the terms “client-generated metaphor” and “therapist-generated metaphor”. From our point of view however, metaphors as all meanings are “generated” in conversation (Walter and Peller 2000), so we rather use terms “metaphor offered by client” and “metaphor offered by therapist” to point out the fact who brought the metaphor into some particular conversation.

  2. The metaphor of anger as an “inner pressure”, which needs to be released, is very common. At the same time it is only one of the possible scientific metaphors for treating the anger (Kövecses 1986; Harré and Gillett 1994).

  3. Translator’s note: The entire conversation took place using elaborate bodily metaphors, which are, at times, untranslatable to English. The translation strives to imitate the tone and the style of the original conversation. The bodily metaphors serve to express various forms of relating—which are, in the Czech language, expressed by locating the point of relating in different body parts. The intention of this intervention was thus, to allow the client to have the ex-boyfriend travel out from her head and look for a more comfortable point of relating. The last expression—literally—“I’d place him next to my bum”—expresses a relationship of indifference in its original meaning.

References

  • Anderson, H. (1997). Conversation, language, and possibilities: A postmodern approach to therapy. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, H., & Gehart, D. (Eds.). (2012). Collaborative therapy: Relationships and conversations that make a difference. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atwood, J. D., & Donheiser, G. (1997). Me and my shadow: Therapy with sexually abused pre-adolescents. Contemporary Family Therapy, 19(2), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026167118817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atwood, J. D., & Levine, L. B. (1991). AX murderers, dragons, spiders and webs: Therapeutic metaphors in couple therapy. Contemporary Family Therapy, 13(3), 201–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00891801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bannink, F. (2014). Handbook of positive supervision: For supervisors, facilitators, and peer groups. Boston: Hogrefe Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannink, F. P. (2007). Solution-focused brief therapy. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 37(2), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-006-9040-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. New York: Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battino, R. (2005). Metaphoria: Metaphor and guided metaphor for psychotherapy and healing. Wales: Crown House Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, I. K., & de Shazer, S. (1993). Making numbers talk: Language in therapy. In S. Friedman (Ed.), The new language of change: Constructive collaboration in psychotherapy (pp. 5–24). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, I. K., & Steiner, T. (2003). Children’s solution work. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertolino, B., & O’Hanlon, W. H. (2002). Collaborative, competency-based counseling and therapy. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bischof, G. P. (1993). Solution-focused brief therapy and experiential family therapy activities: An integration. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 12(3), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1521/jsyt.1993.12.3.61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cade, B. (1986). The uses of humor in therapy. In S. de Shazer & R. Kral (Eds.), Indirect approaches in therapy (pp. 64–76). Rockville, MA: Aspen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, D. K., Becker, K. W., Vance, K. E., & Forth, N. I. (2003). The role of creativity in marriage and family therapy practice: A national online study. Contemporary Family Therapy, 25(1), 89–109. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022562122420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciuffardi, G., Scavelli, S., & Leonardi, A. (2013). Solution-focused brief therapy in combination with fantasy and creative language in working with children: A brief report. International Journal of Solution-Focused Practices, 1(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.14335/ijsfp.v1i1.14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J. K. (2014). Utilization of clients’ metaphors to punctuate solution-focused brief therapy interventions: A case illustration. Contemporary Family Therapy, 36(3), 426–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-013-9286-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Combs, G., & Freedman, J. (1990). Symbol, story, and ceremony: Using metaphor in individual and family therapy. New York: WW Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, P., & Berg, I. K. (2012). Interviewing for solutions (4th edn.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Shazer, S. (1979). Clues. Investigating Solutions in Brief Therapy. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Shazer, S. (1985). Keys to solution in brief therapy. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Shazer, S. (1991). Putting difference to work. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Shazer, S. (1994). Words were originally magic. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Shazer, S. (1997). Some thoughts on language use in therapy. Contemporary Family Therapy, 19(1), 133. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026170718933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Shazer, S., Dolan, Y., Korman, H., McCollum, E., Trepper, T., & Berg, I. K. (2007). More than miracles: The state of the art of solution-focused brief therapy. New York: Haworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Divinyi, J. (1995). Storytelling: An enjoyable and effective therapeutic tool. Contemporary Family Therapy, 17(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02249302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, Y. (1985). A path with a heart: Ericksonian utilization with chronic and resistant clients. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efran, J. S., Lukens, M. D., & Lukens, R. J. (1990). Language, structure, and change: Frameworks of meaning in psychotherapy. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, M. H., & Rossi, E. L. (1979). Hypnotherapy, an exploratory casebook. New York: Irvington Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furman, B., & Ahola, T. (1992). Solution talk: Hosting therapeutic conversations. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatz, Y. K., & Christie, L. (1991). Marital group metaphors: Significance in the life stages of group development. Contemporary Family Therapy, 13(2), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00890870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K., & McNamee, S. (1992). Therapy as social construction. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, S. (2012). Generative trance: The experience of creative flow. Wales: Crown House Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R., & Gillett, G. (1994). The Discursive Mind. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, B. (2010). The creative therapist: The art of awakening a session. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, H., & Keeney, B. (2012). Circular therapeutics: Giving therapy a healing heart. Phoenix, AZ: Zeig, Tucker & Theisen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopp, R. R. (1995). Metaphor therapy. Using client-generated metaphors in psychotherapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kövecses, Z. (1986). Metaphors of anger, pride and love: A lexical approach to the structure of concepts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. London: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lankton, S. R., & Lankton, C. H. (1983). The answer within: A clinical framework of Ericksonian hypnotherapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankton, S. R., & Lankton, C. H. (1986). Enchantment and intervention in family therapy: Training in ericksonian approaches. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipchik, E. (1993). “Both/and” solutions. In S. Friedman (Ed.), The new language of change: Constructive collaboration in psychotherapy (pp. 25–49). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipchik, E. (2002). Beyond technique in solution-focused therapy: Working with emotions and the therapeutic relationship. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKergow, M., & Korman, H. (2009). Inbetween: Neither inside nor outside: The radical simplicity of solution-focused brief therapy. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 28(2), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1521/jsyt.2009.28.2.34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeilly, R. B. (2000). Healing the whole person: A solution-focused approach to using empowering language, emotions, and actions in therapy. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeilly, R. B. (2016). Learning hypnosis: a common everyday approach after erickson. St.Wallsend: Tandava Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, J. C., & Crowley, R. J. (1986). Therapeutic metaphors for children and the child within. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M. I. & Wampler, K. S. (2003). Fostering client creativity in family therapy: A process research study. Contemporary Family Therapy, 25(2), 207–228. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023624217996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hanlon, B. (1986). The use of metaphor for treating somatic complaints in psychotherapy. Family Therapy Collections, 19, 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hanlon, B., & Martin, M. (1992). Solution-oriented hypnosis: An Ericksonian approach. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hanlon, B., & Weiner-Davis, M. (2003). In search of solutions: A new direction in psychotherapy. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantaleao, L., & Rambo, A. (2014). “Are you a LeBron today?” Playfully expanding scaling questions. International Journal of Solution-Focused Practices, 2(1), 20–23. https://doi.org/10.14335/ijsfp.v2i1.18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prochaska, J. O., & Norcross, J. C. (2010). Systems of psychotherapy: A transtheoretical analysis. Belmont: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratner, H., George, E., & Iveson, C. (2012). Solution focused brief therapy: 100 key points and techniques. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, S. (1982). My voice will go with you: The teaching tales of Milton H. Erickson. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rueveni, U. (1995). Stories and metaphors as interventions with headache sufferers. Contemporary Family Therapy, 17(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02249303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, H. J., & Robbins, M. (1991). Manufacturing multiple meanings of addiction: Time-limited realities. Contemporary Family Therapy, 13(5), 387. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00890494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharf, R. S. (1996). Theories of psychotherapy and counseling: Concepts and cases. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, M. D., Frels, R. K., & Garza, Y. (2011). The use of sandtray in solution-focused supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 30(2), 277–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2011.621869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, I. (1997). Does God play dice? The new mathematics of chaos. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, T. (2002). Poetic possibilities in conversations about suffering. Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal, 24(3), 457–473. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019815300204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, F. (2011). Semaphore, metaphor, … two by four. In T. S. Nelson (Ed.). Doing something different: Solution-focused brief therapy practices (pp. 219–224). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trad, P. V. (1992). A developmental perspective on the use of metaphors in family therapy. Contemporary Family Therapy, 14(6), 481. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00892196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, J. L., & Peller, J. E. (2000). Recreating brief therapy: Preferences and possibilities. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watzlawick, P., Weakland, J., & Fisch, R. (1974). Change: Principles of problem formation and problem resolution. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. (1995). Using story as metaphor, legacy, and therapy. Contemporary Family Therapy, 17(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02249300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winek, J. L., & Craven, P. A. (2003). Healing rituals for couples recovering from adultery. Contemporary Family Therapy, 25(3), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024518719817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1922). Tractatus logico-philosophicus. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zatloukal, L., & Vítek, P. (2016). Koučování zaměřené na řešení: 50 klíčů pro společné otevírání nových možností. Praha: Portál.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeig, J. (1980). A teaching seminar with Milton Erickson. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leoš Zatloukal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zatloukal, L., Žákovský, D. & Bezdíčková, E. Utilizing Metaphors in Solution-Focused Therapy. Contemp Fam Ther 41, 24–36 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-018-9468-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-018-9468-8

Keywords

Navigation