Abstract
In contemporary society, digital media are fully integrated in our daily lives, indispensable for our routines, always connected and at-hand. Our research thus explores the parental mediation of portable digital devices in families with young children, addressing the following questions: (a) which are the most common parental mediation styles adopted towards young children; and (b) which individual features of the parents or contextual factors influence the parental mediation style adopted. Our methodology is exploratory and qualitative, considering as empirical corpus 14 national reports from the European-scale study “Young Children (0–8) and Digital Technologies” for a comparative thematic analysis. The authoritative style was the most common parental mediation style related to technology use. In general, there are transversal rules to all parental mediation styles (except laissez-faire style), such as withdraw or give devices to children according to their behavior, control (inappropriate) content and control the time of use. Also, parental perceptions and attitudes about the technologies played a heavier weight on the parental mediation style adopted, and consequently influenced the relationship of the children with digital media. Some implications for future studies, preventive actions, and family therapy are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aunola, K., Stattin, H. K., & Nurmi, J. (2000). Parenting styles and adolescents’ achievement strategies. Journal of Adolescence. doi:10.1006/jado.2000.0308.
Bacigalupe, G., Camara, M., & Buffardi, L. E. (2014). Technology in families and the clinical encounter: Results of a cross-national survey. Journal of Family Therapy. doi:10.1111/1467-6427.12042.
Barkin, S., Ip, E., Richardson, I., Klinepeter, S., Finch, S., & Krcmar, M. (2006). Parental media mediation styles for children aged 2 to 11 years. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine. doi:10.1001/archpedi.160.4.395.
Barron, B., Martin, C. K., Takeuchi, L., & Fithian, R. (2009). Parents as learning partners in the development of technological fluency. International Journal of Learning and Media. doi:10.1162/ijlm.2009.0021.
Baumrind, D. (1991). Parenting styles and adolescent development. In J. Brooks-Gunn, R. Lerner & A. C. Petersen (Eds.), The encyclopedia on adolescence (pp. 746–758). New York: Garland.
Beebe, T., Asche, S., Harrison, P., & Quinlan, K. (2004). Heightened vulnerability and increased risk-taking among adolescent chat room users: Results from a statewide school survey. Journal of Adolescent Health. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2003.09.012.
Bittman, M., Rutherford, L., Brown, J., & Unsworth, L. (2011). Digital natives? New and old media and children’s outcomes. Australian Journal of Education. doi:10.1177/000494411105500206.
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Carvalho, J., Francisco, R., & Relvas, A. P. (2015). Family functioning and information and communication technologies: How do they relate? A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.037.
Chaudron, S., Plowman, L., Beutel, M. E., Černikova, M., Navarette, Donoso, Dreier, V., M., & Wölfling, K. (2015). Young children (0–8) and digital technology—EU report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Connell, S. L., Lauricella, A. R., & Wartella, E. (2015). Parental co-use of media technology with their young children in the USA. Journal of Children and Media. doi:10.1080/17482798.2015.997440.
Davies, J., & Gentile, D. (2012). Responses to children’s media use in families with and without siblings: A family development perspective. Family Relations. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00703.x.
Dias, P., & Brito, R. (2016). Crianças (0 a 8 anos) e tecnologias digitais [Children (0 to 8 years-old) and digital technologies]. Lisboa: Centro de Estudos em Comunicação e Cultura, Universidade Católica Portuguesa. Retrieved March 24, 2017, from http://goo.gl/obFv4L.
Dias, P., Brito, R., Ribbens, W., Daniela, L., Rubene, Z., Dreier, M., Gemo, M., Di Gioia, R., & Chaudron, S. (2016). The role of parents in the engagement of young children with digital technologies: Exploring tensions between rights of access and protection, from ‘gatekeepers’ to ‘scaffolders’. Global Studies of Childhood. doi:10.1177/2043610616676024.
Duimel, M., & de Haan, J. (2007). Nieuwe links in het gezin [New links in the family]. Retrieved March 28, 2017, from http://www.scp.nl/publicaties/boeken/9789037702873/Nieuwe_links_in_het_gezin.pdf.
European Commission. (2008). Towards a safer use of the Internet for children in the EU: A parents’ perspective. Retrieved March 28, 2017, from http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/sip/docs/eurobarometer/analyticalreport_2008.pdf.
Goh, W., Bay, S., & Chen, V. (2014). Young school children´s use of digital devices and parental rules. Telematics and Informatics. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2015.04.002.
Hajvard, S. (2008). The mediatization of society: A theory of the media as agents of social and cultural change. Nordicom Review, 29(2), 105–134.
Hollingsworth, S., Mansaray, A., Allen, K., & Rose, A. (2011). Parents’ perspectives on technology and children’s learning in the home: Social class and the role of the habitus. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00431.x.
Johnson, G. M., & Puplampu, K. P. (2008). Internet use during childhood and the ecological techno-subsystem. Canadian Journal of Learning & Technology, 34(1), 19–28.
Kucirnova, N., & Sakr, M. (2015). Child-father creative text-making at home with crayons, iPad collage and PC. Thinking Skills and Creativity. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2015.05.003.
Leathers, H., Summers, S., & Desollar, A. (2013). Toddlers on technology: A parents’ guide. Illinois: AuthorHouse.
Livingstone, S. (2007). Strategies of parental regulation in the media-rich home. Computers in Human Behavior. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2005.08.002.
Livingstone, S., & Bober, M. (2004). UK children go online: Surveying the experiences of young people and their parents. Retrieved April 21, 2017, from http://www.york.ac.uk/res/e-society/projects/1/UKCGOsurveyreport.pdf.
Lwin, M. O., Stanaland, A. J. S., & Miyazaki, A. D. (2008). Protecting children’s privacy online: How parental mediation strategies affect website safeguard effectiveness. Journal of Retailing. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2008.04.004.
Mitchell, K., Finkelhor, D., & Wolak, J. (2005). Protecting youth online: Family use of filtering and blocking software. Child Abuse & Neglect. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2004.05.008.
Nikken, P., & Jansz, J. (2014). Developing scales to measure parental mediation of young children’s internet use. Learning, Media and Technology. doi:10.1080/17439884.2013.782038.
Pauwels, C., Bauwens, J., & Vleugels, C. (2008). Cyberteens: De betekenis van ICT in het dagelijkse leven van Belgische tieners. [Cyberteens: The relevance of ICT in daily life of Belgian teenagers]. Retrieved March 24, 2017, from http://www.eprivacy.be/SID-TIRO-PERSMAP-samenvatting-SMIT-VUB-120208.pdf.
Plowman, L., & McPake, J. (2013). Seven myths about young children and technology. Childhood Education. doi:10.1080/00094056.2013.757490.
Plowman, L., McPake, J., & Stephen, C. (2008). Just picking it up? Young children learning with technology at home. Cambridge Journal of Education. doi:10.1080/03057640802287564.
Plowman, L., McPake, J., & Stephen, C. (2010). The technologisation of childhood? Young children and technology in the home. Children & Society. doi:10.1111/j.1099-0860.2008.00180.x.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. Part 1. On the Horizon. doi:10.1108/10748120110424816.
QSR. (2015). NVivo11 Pro for windows. QSR International Pty Ltd.
Stevenson, O. (2011). From public policy to family practices: Researching the everyday realities of families technology use at home. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00430.x.
Valcke, M., Bonte, S., Wener, B., & Rots, I. (2010). Internet parenting styles and the impact on Internet use of primary school children. Computers & Education, 55(2), 454–464. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.009.
Valkenburg, P. (2002). Beeldschermkinderen: Theorieën over kind en media [Screen-kids: Theories about children and media]. Amsterdam: Boom.
Valkenburg, P., Krcmar, M., Peeters, A., & Marseille, N. (1999). Developing a scale to assess three different styles of television mediation: “Instructive mediation”, “restrictive mediation”, and “social coviewing”. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. doi:10.1080/08838159909364474.
Walrave, M., Lenaerts, S., & De Moor, S. (2008). Cyberteens @ risk: Tieners verknocht aan internet, maar ook waakzaam voor risico’s. [Cyberteens @ risk: Teenagers addicted to the internet but vigilant as to internet risks]. Retrieved March 27, 2017, from http://www.e-privacy.be/SID-TIRO-PERSMAP-samenvatting-survey-UA-OSC120208.pdf.
Wang, R., Bianchi, S. M., & Raley, S. B. (2005). Teenagers’ internet use and family rules: A research note. Journal of Marriage and Family. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00214.x.
Williams, K. C., & Lee, S. L. (2016). Focus on family: Tablets and laptops and Skype, Oh My! How do families and early childhood educators make technology decisions? Childhood Education. doi:10.1080/00094056.2016.1180934.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brito, R., Francisco, R., Dias, P. et al. Family Dynamics in Digital Homes: The Role Played by Parental Mediation in Young Children’s Digital Practices Around 14 European Countries. Contemp Fam Ther 39, 271–280 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-017-9431-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-017-9431-0